• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Techniques of Data Analysis

Dalam dokumen This Thesis, I Dedicate for My Beloved (Halaman 33-40)

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

E. Techniques of Data Analysis

1. Scoring Questionnaire based on Eysenck Personality Inventory Eysenck Personality Inventory includes several instructions in scoring.

 ‘Lie Score’ is out of 9 to determine the subject honesty in answering.

 The ‘E score’ is out of 24 to determine the Extraversion and Introversion level.

 The ‘N score’ is out of 24 and measures neuroticism (Stable- Unstable).

This research only measures Extraversion level, only ‘E Score” of the data will be calculated. The procedures were mentioned below:

a) We need to check through all answers in the questionnaire. For example, the answer of question number 1 is ‘Yes’, gives ‘2’ score beside it. If ‘No’, gives “1” score beside it.

Table 3.1 Example of Question in Questionnaire

No Question Yes No

2 1 Do you often feel the gladness

in a long time?

b) Table ‘E score’

Table 3.2 Extraversion and Introversion Personality Score Question Answer

Question Answer

1 Yes 29 No

3 Yes 32 No

5 No 34 No

8 Yes 37 No

10 Yes 39 Yes

13 Yes 41 No

15 No 44 Yes

17 Yes 46 Yes

20 No 49 Yes

22 Yes 51 No

25 Yes 53 Yes

27 Yes 56 Yes

From the table ‘E score’ above, “Yes” determined the Extraversion personality and “No” determine the Introversion personality.

2. Scoring the Students’ Writing Test

There were two components that concerned of the researcher in this research to measure. Those were content and organization which used criteria as follows:

1. Content Classification

Score Criteria

Excellent 90100 Shows a clear understanding of writing, topic and main idea

Very good 8089 Shows a good understanding of writing, topic, and main idea development

Good 7079 Shows some a good understanding of writing, topic and main idea, less development

Fair 6069 Shows a little evidence of discourse understanding

Poor 059 No evidence of concept of writing

(Jacobs in Herlina, 2011:32)

2. Organization

Classification Score Criteria

Excellent 90-100

Logical sequence clear to reader, varied use of connectives maintain the flow of ideas

Very good 80-89

Logical sequence clear to the reader, connectives lack variety

Good 70-79

Sequence not clear to the reader, disjointed use of connectives

Fair 60-69

Disjointed sequence, disjointed use of connectives

Poor 0-59 No apparent organization

(Harmer in Islamiah, 2012:56)

The ways for writing test 1. Calculating the mean score

=∑ N

Where:

: mean score

∑ : the sum of sub total

N : the total number of respondents.

(Gay 1981:298) 2. Calculating the percentage of the students’ score:

Percentage = X 100 Where:

P : Percentage F : frequency

N : Number of subject

3. Scoring the Correlation between Extraversion Personality and writing skill

Overall the data computing were carried out with the aid of computer facilities (SPSS) version 16.0.

CHAPTER IV

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter concerns with the data analysis of the research and the discussion. The findings of the research cover the data taken from the results of personality test about students’ extraversion personality and the students’ writing scores, and the correlation between them.

A. Findings

The findings cited below are personality test of the students that is divided into questioner, and then writing skill that is divided into two components in argumentative paragraph, namely content and organization.

The personality of the students is classified into moderate, extrovert, and introvert. The scores are divided into personality classification.

1. Number of Students’ ExtraversionPersonality

The data of the students’ extraversion personality were obtained through questionnaire. Through the students answers toward Eysenck Personality Inventory, 25 students were identified extraversion personality.

In this part shown the range score and percentage of students’

extraversion personality

Table 4.1 Range Score of Students’ Extraversion Personality Range

Score

Number of Range Score of

Students’ Extraversion Personality Percentage

Personality Types

35-43 25 41.7% Extrovert

The illustration of Table 4.1 shows clearly that 41.7% students have extraversion personality or 25 students out of 60 students are considered extraversion.

2. Description of Students’ Writing Skill

The data of the students’ writing skill were obtained through content and organization. Content is usually known as unity and completeness. Organization of the writing is how to arrange and organize the ideas logically.

To describe the students’ writing skill, the score of the two components are shown through frequency and percentage. The students score in content and organization are categorized into frequency and percentage.

Table 4.2 Rate Percentage and Frequency of the Students’ Writing Skill In Terms of Content

Classification Score Frequency Percentage

Excellent Very Good

Good Fair Poor

90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 0-59

6 12

6 1 -

24%

48%

24%

4%

-

Total 25 100%

Based on the rate percentage above, it is found that there are 6 (24%) students got excellent, 12 (48%) got very good, 6 (24%) got good and 1 (4%) students got fair, and then there isn’t students got poor.

Based on Table 4.2 the researcher concluded that students’ classification, frequency and percentage of writing skill in terms of content most of them got

“very good” with 12 students(48%).

Table 4.3 Rate Percentage and Frequency of the Students Writing Skill In Terms of Organization

Classification Score Frequency Percentage

Excellent Very Good

Good Fair Poor

90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 0-59

2 13

8 2 -

8%

52%

32%

8%

-

Total 25 100%

Based on the rate percentage above, it is found that there are 2 (8%) students got excellent, 13 (52%) got very good, 8 (32%) got good and 2 (8%) students got fair, and then there isn’t students got poor.

Based on Table 4.3 the researcher concluded that students’ classification, frequency and percentage of writing skill in terms of organization most of them got “very good” with 13 students(52 %).

3. Description of Relationship between Extraversion Personality Students’

and Their Writing Skill

In this part, its shown the relationship between the scores of students’

extraversion personality and the score of students’ writing skill.

Table 4.4 Correlation between Extraversion Personality and Writing Skill EXTRAVERSION

PERSONALITY

WRITING SKILL EXTRAVERSION

PERSONALITY

Pearson Correlation 1 -.400*

Sig. (2-tailed) .047

N 25 25

WRITING SKILL Pearson Correlation -.400* 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .047

N 25 25

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

The result of Pearson correlation shown that there is a significant correlation between students’ extraversion personality and their writing skill as described 0.047<0.05. It was described, If the significant value < 0.05, it means there is a significant correlation, then if the significant value > 0.05, it means there is no significant correlation.

B. Discussion

This section discusses the result of the data analysis. It consists of students’ extraversion personality, students’ writing skill and the correlation between students’ extraversion personality and their writing skill.

1. Students’ Extraversion Personality

Based on the result of the students’ personality test, it was found that the students’ personality dominantly was “extraversion” because most of them active in the class and enjoy participating in groups. It was related to the previous

reseacrh, the results show that extroverts seem to take full advantage of language- use opportunities as they tend to be sociable, and are more likely to join groups, more inclined to engage in conversations both inside and outside the classroom.

However, results have also concluded that a more introverted personality may be better suited to classroom learning, especially reading and writing skills. Risk takers; who are believed to be inherently extroverts, are more likely to take their existing language system to the limit. Such learners are more likely to change and more resistant to fossilization. Language proficiency is influenced directly by classroom participation which reflects, among other things, the contributing influences of risk-taking.

2. Students’ Writing skill

Based on the result of the students’ writing test, it was found that the classification of students’ writing skill was “Very Good”. The mean scores of students’ writing skill in terms of content and organization:

a. The mean score of students’ writing skill in terms of content

The mean score of students’ writing skill in terms of content was 83.68 in Very Good classification. The criteria of content in very good classification is shows a good understanding of writing, topic, and main idea development.

b. The mean score of students’ writing skill in terms of organization

The mean score of students’ writing skill in terms of organization was 79.76 in Good classification. The criteria of organization in good classification is sequence not clear to the reader, disjointed use of connectives.

Based on the result of the writing skill in terms of content and organization above, the researcher concluded that the students who included extraversion personality type have a good capability in writing skill with the mean score of students’ writing skill was 81.72. It was related to the previous research that has been described in previous chapter. The previous researcher described that extraverts and introverts have the capability to be proficient in writing skill. And also told that personality factors significantly influence the degree of success that individuals achieve in learning a second language. Especially, lots of studies have shown that extroverts (or unreserved and outgoing people) acquire a second language better than introverts (or shy people). That indicates a new light on the second language teaching methodology.

3. Correlation between Students’ Extraversion Personality and Their Writing Skill

Based on the Pearson correlation analysis, the correlation between extraversion personality and writing skill as described 0.047<0.05. This data was analyzed through SPSS version 16.0. Based on the correlation analysis above, the researcher concluded that the students’ extraversion personality and writing skill has a significant correlation where significant value<0.05. it means that H0: there was no significant correlation between students’ extraversionpersonality and their writing skill was rejected and H1: there was a significant correlation between students’ extraversion personality and their writing skill was accepted.

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter consists of two parts, the correlation based on the result and discussion and suggestion was made from further study.

A. Conclusion

Based on the data analysis and discussion, the researcher draws conclusion as follows: The personality of the students was dominantly as Extraversion category. The writing skill of the students’ extraversion personality was dominantly got very good classification with the mean score 81.72. There was a significant correlation betweenstudents’extraversion personality and their writing skill at the Second Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Bontonompo class IPA 1 and IPA 2. (0.047 < 0.05)

B. Suggestion

Based on the result of the research above, the researcher offers some suggestions for students of second grade of SMA Negeri 1 Bontonompo as follows:

1. The students join an English meeting or practice their English writing skill 2. The students should be active in learning process and must be recognize their

personalities.

3. The students’ extraversion personality should be fluent not only in speaking but also in writing skill.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adelstein, M.M.E.Pival J.G. 1980. The Writing Commitment. New York. Doc.

Retrieved from (http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Writing).

Barkaoui, K. 2007. Teaching Writing to Second Language Learners: Insights from Theory and Research. TESL Reporter 40, 35-48.

Brown, H.D. 2000. Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practice. New York: Longman.

Creswell, J. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall

Davies, A. 2004. The Handbook of Applied Linguistics Edited.

Eysenck, H.J. 1952. The Scientific Study of Personality. London, : Routledge and K. Paul.

Eysenck, H.J. 1967. The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield. IL; Thomas.

Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, M.W. 1985. Personality and Individual Differences:

A Natural Science Approach (Plenum Press, NY).

Eysenck, H.J.,and Wilson, G.D. 1991. The Eysenk Personality profiler.

AustraliaCymeon.

Eysenck, S.B., and Eysenck, H.J. 1975. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Quistionnaire. London: Houghter and Soughton.

Fachrurrazy. 2014.Teaching English as a Foreign Language for Teachers in Indonesia. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Gay. L, R. 1981. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applicant, Churles E. Marril publishing Company, Colombus.

Heaton. 2001. Education Research:Competencies For Analysis and Application.

Second Edition. Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Co.

Herlina, E. 2011. Improving the Students’ Descriptive Writing Skill through Quick-Writing Method. Thesis of FKIP Unismuh Makassar.

Islamiah. 2012. The Correlation Between Students Extraversion Personality and Their Writing Skill. Thesis of FKIP Unismuh Makassar.

Jung. 1936. Personality Types: Jung’s Model of Typology. Canada

Lawrence, G. 1997. Looking at Type and Learning Styles. Gainesville, Fla.:

Center for Applications of Psychological Type.

Lestari. 2008. Studi Deskriptif Mengenai Tipe Kepribadian Ditinjau Dari Teori Eysenck pada Mantan Junkies Wanita Usia 15-18 Tahun di Inabah Xvii Pondok Pesantren Suryalaya. Universitas Islam Bandung

Meyer. 1999. Developing Competent Readers and Writers in the Primary Grades.

Colombus, Ohio: Merril, an Imprint of Prentice hall.

Myers, I., M. McCaulley, N. Quenk, and A. Hammer. 1998. Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, Cal.: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Na’im, F. 2006. Increasing the Second Year Students’ Writing Ability By Using Picture Technique At The SMP Negeri 1 Bontolempangan Kab. Gowa.

Makassar: Thesis Unismuh.

Nejad, A.M., Bijami, M. & Ahmadi, M.R. 2012. Do Personality Traits Predict Academic Writing Ability?. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Nezhad, S.H., Jahandar, S. & Khodabandehlou, M. 2014. The Impact of Extraversion Vs. Introversion on Iranian Efl Learners’ Writing Ability.

Islamic Azad University.

Qomarudin. 2010. Correlation between Estraversion Personality and English Writing skill. Semarang: Thesis of Faculty of Humanities Diponegoro University Semarang.

Rasfatih. 2011. The Application of Sensations and Feelings Technique to Improve the Second Year Students’ Writing Ability of SMA Neg. 1 Bontonompo Kabupaten Gowa. The Thesis of Universitas Islam Negeri Makassar.

Yumiko. 2012. Improving The Student’s Writing Skill in Descriptive Paragraph Through Suggestion Imagination Method at Smk Muhammadiyah 3 Makassar. The Thesis of Unismuh Makassar.

Zafar, S. & Meenakshi, K. 2011. A Study on the Relationship Between Extroversion-Introversion and Risk-Taking in the Context of Second Language Acquisition. India. VIT University

Zhang, Y. 2008. The Role of Personality in Second Language Acquisition.

Qingdao University of Science and Technology.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A

DAFTAR HADIR SISWA KELAS XI IPA 1 DAN XI IPA 2 SMA NEGERI 1 BONTONOMPO

No Name Saturday, 17th,

September 2016

Saturday, 24th, September 2016

1 NURZAMZANI ARIF IRSYAD  

2 REZKY ENDRIYANI  

3 RIDHA RAMDHANI. K  

4 ANNISA NURFADILLAH  

5 ADINDA WARDHATUN QALBI  

6 RISMAYANTI  

7 NURUL SAFITRI  

8 SUMARNI SALEH  

9 SURYANI  

10 FITRIAH  

11 SAHRUL SANI SAPARUDDIN  

12 INDAR CHAIR ILHAM  

13 MUHAMMAD RIFAI  

14 IRWAN  

15 NUR ALAMSYAH  

16 NUR INDAH SARI  

17 NURUL RAHMADANI  

18 RAJAMUDDIN  

19 SETIAWAN RAMLI  

20 SRI WAHYUNI PERMATA SARI  

21 UMRAH LAULIA  

22 RAHMAT NURUL HIDAYAT. J  

23 MUH. NUR IKHSAN  

24 HENDRA SETIAWAN  

25 AGUS  

APPENDIX B

XI IPA 1 AND XI IPA 2 SMA NEGERI 1 BONTONOMPO WHO INCLUDED EXTRAVERSION PERSONALITY

No Name Score Categories

1 NURZAMZANI ARIF IRSYAD 36 Extraversion

2 REZKY ENDRIYANI 41 Extraversion

3 RIDHA RAMDHANI. K 37 Extraversion

4 ANNISA NURFADILLAH 37 Extraversion

5 ADINDA WARDHATUN QALBI 39 Extraversion

6 RISMAYANTI 38 Extraversion

7 NURUL SAFITRI 38 Extraversion

8 SUMARNI SALEH 40 Extraversion

9 SURYANI 37 Extraversion

10 FITRIAH 39 Extraversion

11 SAHRUL SANI SAPARUDDIN 35 Extraversion

12 INDAR CHAIR ILHAM 38 Extraversion

13 MUHAMMAD RIFAI 43 Extraversion

14 IRWAN 42 Extraversion

15 NUR ALAMSYAH 42 Extraversion

16 NUR INDAH SARI 40 Extraversion

17 NURUL RAHMADANI 41 Extraversion

18 RAJAMUDDIN 38 Extraversion

19 SETIAWAN RAMLI 39 Extraversion

20 SRI WAHYUNI PERMATA SARI 40 Extraversion

21 UMRAH LAULIA 35 Extraversion

22 RAHMAT NURUL HIDAYAT. J 35 Extraversion

23 MUH. NUR IKHSAN 38 Extraversion

24 HENDRA SETIAWAN 42 Extraversion

25 AGUS 38 Extraversion

APPENDIX C

NILAI SISWA KELAS XI IPA 1 DAN XI IPA 2 SMA NEGERI 1 BONTONOMPO YANG MENGIKUTI WRITING TEST

No Subject Content Organization Score Categories

1 NURZAMZANI ARIF IRSYAD 85 82 83.5 Very Good

2 REZKY ENDRIYANI 95 92 93.5 Excellent

3 RIDHA RAMDHANI. K 88 80 84 Very Good

4 ANNISA NURFADILLAH 92 90 91 Excellent

5 ADINDA WARDHATUN QALBI 89 83 86 Very Good

6 RISMAYANTI 79 75 77 Good

7 NURUL SAFITRI 92 89 90.5 Excellent

8 SUMARNI SALEH 94 88 91 Excellent

9 SURYANI 84 80 82 Very Good

10 FITRIAH 85 79 82 Very Good

11 SAHRUL SANI SAPARUDDIN 89 80 84.5 Very Good

12 INDAR CHAIR ILHAM 78 75 76.5 Good

13 MUHAMMAD RIFAI 74 72 73 Good

14 IRWAN 82 78 80 Very Good

15 NUR ALAMSYAH 70 68 69 Fair

16 NUR INDAH SARI 80 79 79.5 Good

17 NURUL RAHMADANI 82 80 81 Very Good

18 RAJAMUDDIN 83 80 81.5 Very Good

19 SETIAWAN RAMLI 84 82 83 Very Good

20 SRI WAHYUNI PERMATA SARI 69 68 68.5 Fair

21 UMRAH LAULIA 82 82 82 Very Good

22 RAHMAT NURUL HIDAYAT. J 90 84 87 Very Good

23 MUH. NUR IKHSAN 78 76 77 Good

24 HENDRA SETIAWAN 78 70 74 Good

25 AGUS 90 82 86 Very Good

Total 2092 1994 2043

APPENDIX D

THESTUDENTS’ MEAN SCORE OF WRITING SKILL A. The Students’ Mean Score of Writing Skill in Terms of Content

=

=

= 83.68

B. The Students’ Mean Score of Writing Skill in Terms ofOrganization

=

=

= 79.76

C. The Students’ Mean Scoreof Writing Skill

=

=

= 81.72

APPENDIX E

THE EXTRAVERSION PERSONALITY VARIABLE (X) AND WRITING SKILL VARIABLE (Y) OF SMA NEGERI 1 BONTONOMPO CLASS XI

IPA 1 AND XI IPA 2

NO X Y

1 36 83.5

2 41 93.5

3 37 84

4 37 91

5 39 86

6 38 77

7 38 90.5

8 40 91

9 37 82

10 39 82

11 35 84.5

12 38 76.5

13 43 73

14 42 80

15 42 69

16 40 79.5

17 41 81

18 38 81.5

19 39 83

20 40 68.5

21 35 82

22 35 87

23 38 77

24 42 74

25 38 86

Total 968 2043

APPENDIX F

CORRELATIONS BETWEEN STUDENTS EXTRAVERSION PERSONALITY AND THEIR WRITING SKILL

EXTRAVERSION

PERSONALITY WRITING SKILL EXTRAVERSION

PERSONALITY

Pearson Correlation 1 -.400*

Sig. (2-tailed) .047

N 25 25

WRITING SKILL Pearson Correlation -.400* 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .047

N 25 25

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

The data computing were carried out with the aid of computer facilities (SPSS) version 16.0.

APPENDIX G

QUESTIONNAIRE OF PERSONALITY TEST

Name :

Class :

No Questions Yes No

1 Do you often feel the gladness in a long time?

2 Do you often need friends that understanding to make you happy?

3 Do you usually apathetic?

4 Are you very difficult to refuse something?

5 Do you think first before do something?

6 If you promise to do something, do you always keep your promises however difficult it is to do that?

7 Is your mood often fickle?

8 In general, do you say and do something quickly without thinking first?

9 Have you ever felt bad mood for no apparent reason?

10 Does every challenge will always be you face?

11 Do you suddenly feel awkward if you want to talk to someone interesting and haven’t you known?

12 At a time, are you difficult to control emotions and anger?

13 Do you often do things all of a sudden?

14 Do you often worry about things that you should not do or say?

15 In general, do you prefer to read rather than meeting with people?

16 Are your feelings easily hurt?

17 Do you love travelling?

18 Do you sometimes have thoughts and ideas that do not want to be known by others?

19 Do you sometimes so eager and sometimes very lethargic?

20 Do you prefer to have fewer friends but really familiar?

21 Do you often daydream?

22 When someone snapped you, whether you snapped back?

23 Do you often plagued by feelings of guilt?

24 Did all your habits good and interesting?

25 Do you normally feel free and enjoy a wonderful party?

26 Do you consider that yourself are tense or rigid person?

27 Do other people think that your life is happy?

28 After you've done something important, do you often feel you have done very well?

29 Do you more oftensilencewhen you with someone else?

30 Do you sometimes talk about other people?

31 Do your ideas come into your head until you cannot sleep?

32 When there's something that you want to know, whether you prefer to look at a book than ask it to others?

33 Is your heart often thump?

34 Do you like the kind of work that requires precision?

35 Do you often tremble or tremors for some reason?

36 Do you always tell everything to others, even though you know in fact if it is hidden will not be caught by someone else?

37 Do you not like hanging out with people who prankster each other?

38 Are you easily offended?

39 Do you like to do things that require quick action?

40 Are you worried about something bad happening to you?

41 Do you slowand not quick in movement?

42 Have you ever late in an appointment or a job?

43 Do you often have nightmares?

44 Do you like to talk with anyone, even with new people?

45 Do you get annoyed with the aches and pains that you experienced?

46 Do you feel very unhappy when you are not able to meet so many people?

47 Do you consider that yourself is a nervous person?

48 From all of people that you know, are there some people who do not you like?

49 Do you think that you have the confidence that big enough?

50 Do you easily hurt when people know the faults in yourself or your work?

51 Are you very difficult to enjoy the atmosphere when gathered in a party?

52 Do you feel disturbed by feelings of inferiority?

53 Can you create a quiet atmosphere at the party to be fun?

54 Do you sometimes talk aboutthings that you don’t know?

55 Are you worried about your health?

56 Do you like ignoring other people?

57 Do you suffer from sleeplessness?

(Eysenck in Lestari (2008:119)

Questionnaire of Personality in Indonesia Nama :

Kelas :

No Pertanyaan Jawaban

Ya Tdk

Dalam dokumen This Thesis, I Dedicate for My Beloved (Halaman 33-40)

Dokumen terkait