BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BCA already has policy regarding performance assessment of the Board of Commissioners and the Board of Directors through the self-assessment method. The self-assessment policy serves as a form of accountability for the Board of Commissioners and the Board of Directors in carrying out their duties and responsibilities.
Performance assessments of the Board of Commissioners and the Board of Directors are carried out annually in the form of:
• Collegial assessment of the performance of the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors;
• Assessment of individual performance of each member of the Board of Commissioners and members of the Board of Directors; and
• Performance assessment of the President Director.
1. Performance Assessment Procedure of the Board of Commissioners
The performance assessment procedure of the Board of Commissioners of BCA includes the following:
a. Assessment Method and Instrument
Assessment is carried out through self- assessment method that performed by members of the Board of Commissioners by using the Self-Assessment Form.
b. Frequency
The Board of Commissioners is obliged to perform self-assessment collegially and individually at least once per year
c. Criteria or Benchmark
The criteria used to assess the Board of Commissioners individually and collegially are include:
1) Supervision and providing advice to the Board of Directors on:
a. BCA’s key strategy and plan;
b. Integrity of BCA’s financial statement;
c. Internal control system and risk management; and
d. Good Corporate Governance.
2) Providing approval for Board of Directors decisions in accordance with the BCA’s Articles of Association or applicable laws and regulations. The Board of Commissioners’ work can be seen in the Board of Commissioners’ Supervisory report pages 36-45, which includes the Board of Commissioners’ oversight and advisory functions to the Board of Directors, strategy evaluation, governance implementation, as well as internal control and risk management.
d. Parties who Perform the Assessment and Evaluation
The following mechanisms are used to assess collegial and individual performance:
• Collegial performance assessment of members of the Board of Commissioners.
The Board of Commissioners performs a joint self-assessment, which is then evaluated at the Board of Commissioners’
meeting based on the Remuneration and Nomination Committee’s recommendation (RNC).
• Individual performance assessment of members of the Board of Commissioners. Each member of the Board of Commissioners performs a self- assessment, which is then evaluated at the Board of Commissioners’ Meeting based on the Remuneration and Nomination Committee’s recommendation (RNC).
e. Assessment Process Flow
Each Member of the Board of Commissioners fills out the
Self-Assessment Form
The results of the board of commissioners’ self- assessment both collegial and
individual are evaluated by the board of commissioners
through meetings based on the recommendations of the remuneration and nomination
committee
Evaluation Results of:
- Collegial Performance Assessment
- Individual Performance Assessment
f. 2022 Assessment Results
In 2022, the Board of Commissioners performed its duties and functions with the title “Very Good,” ensuring that bank performance meets the expectations of shareholders and all stakeholders. The following is a detailed description of the results of the Board of Commissioners’ collegial and individual performance assessments:
• The results of the collegial performance assessment of the Board of Commissioners are “Very Good” and the average performance assessment result for individual members of the Board of Commissioners is “Very Good”.
2. Performance Assessment Procedure of the Board of Directors
The performance assessment procedure of the Board of Directors of BCA includes the following:
a. Assessment Method and Instrument
Assessment is carried out through self- assessment method that performed by members of the Board of Directors by using the Self-Assessment Form
b. Frequency
The Board of Directors is obliged to perform self-assessment collegially and individually at least once per year
c. Criteria or Benchmark
The criteria used to assess the Board of Directors individually and collegially refer to the Bank’s Business Plan which has been approved by the Board of Commissioners. Performance indicators for each member of the Board of Directors are determined using the Balanced Scorecard approach which consists of 4 (four) perspectives, namely financial, customer, internal business processes and learning &
growth perspectives.
The Balanced Scorecard is derived from the bank’s Business Plan (RBB), which is the result
of an annual process that involves the Board of Directors, heads of work units, and the Board of Commissioners in reviewing and determining business strategies and targets. During the process, BCA examines and investigates various external factors that affect BCA’s performance, such as banking industry trends, emerging threats and opportunities, changes in customer behavior, changes in regulations, process efficiency, and the adequacy of human resource needs. The study’s findings will determine key strategic objectives such as digital initiatives, technology development and cybersecurity, process improvement, regulatory compliance, Good Corporate Governance supervision, ESG implementation, and prudent business expansion.
Furthermore, these strategic goals are translated into Key Performance Indicators (KPI) in accordance with each member of the Board of Directors’ duties and responsibilities, with due regard for collegial and individual responsibilities, both financially and non- financially. The Board of Directors then mutually agrees on the KPIs that have been established.
d. Parties Who Perform the Assessment
The following mechanisms are used to assess collegial and individual performance:
• Collegial performance assessment of members of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors performs a joint self-assessment, which is then evaluated at the Board of Commissioners’ meeting based on the Remuneration and Nomination Committee’s recommendation (KRN).
• Individual performance assessment of members of the Board of Directors.
Each member of the Board of Directors performs a self-assessment, which is then evaluated at the Board of Commissioners’
Meeting based on the Remuneration and Nomination Committee’s recommendation (RNC).
e. Assessment Process Flow
Each Member of the Board of Directors fills out the Self-
Assessment Form
The results of the board of Directors’ self-assessment both collegial and individual
are evaluated by the board of commissioners through meetings based on the recommendations of the remuneration and nomination
committee
Evaluation Results of:
- Collegial Performance Assessment
- Individual Performance Assessment
f. 2022 Assessment Results
In 2022, the Board of Directors performed its duties and functions with the title “Very Good,” ensuring that bank performance meets the expectations of shareholders and all stakeholders. The following is a detailed description of the results of the Board of Directors’ collegial and individual performance assessments:
• The results of the collegial performance assessment of the Board of Directors are
“Very Good” and the average performance assessment result for individual members of the Board of Directors is “Very Good”.
3. Performance Assessment Procedure of the President Director
The performance assessment procedure of the President Director of BCA includes the following:
a. Assessment Method
Assessment is carried out through self- assessment method by using the Self- Assessment Form
b. Frequency
The President Director is obliged to perform self-assessment individually at least once per year
c. Criteria or Benchmark
The criteria or benchmark used to assess the President Director individually refer to the Bank’s Business Plan which has been approved by the Board of Commissioners. BCA has prepared assessment components based on the President Director’s duties and responsibilities, which include financial, customer, business process, learning, and development components.
d. Parties Who Perform the Assessment
The President Director performs a self- assessment, which is then evaluated at the Board of Commissioners’ meeting based on the Remuneration and Nomination Committee’s recommendation (RNC).
e. Assessment Process Flow
President Director fills out the Self-Assessment Form
The results of the President Director’s self-assessment are evaluated by the board of commissioners through meetings based on the recommendations of the remuneration and nomination
committee
Evaluation Results of:
President Director Performance Assessment
f. 2022 Assessment Results
In 2022, the President Director performed its duties and functions with the title “Very Good,” ensuring that bank performance meets the expectations of shareholders and all stakeholders. The following is a detailed description of the results of the President Directors’ performance assessments: The 2022 performance assessment results of the President Directors were “Very Good.”