A. Research Design
This research used a descriptive quantitative research in this study. It is with the objective study that would like to indentify students‟ perceptions about english outdoor learning to enhance their speaking skill.
B. Research Variable and indicator
The indicator of this research was the students perceptions toward the effectiveness of English outdoor learning techniques in enhancing students speaking skill
C. Research Subject
The subject of this research were 21 students from the seventh semester at English Education Departement from Makassar Muhammadiyah of University in academic 2019/2020.
D. Research instrument
The instrument of this study, the researcher used questionnaire to collect the data. The questionnaire consisted of 15 number related to know the students‟ perceptions toward the effectiveness of English outdoor learning in enhancing students speaking skill.
25
E. Data collection
For data collection, the researcher used questionnaire in this study. The researcher gave the questionnaire to the students consisting of 15 open-ended questions, then the researcher gave 35 minutes to the students to answer the questions based on their own thinking.
F. Techniques of data analysis
There were some procedures to gather the data analysis that used questionnaire
The researcher collected the data to be analyzed then classify the answer by the questionnaire. The researcher used some formulates arrange the study in questionnaire.instrument research was used likert scale to make in the form of checklist. The checklist was gave on the available column and the statement is in accordance with the alternative subject state the answer use is strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Undecided (U), Disagree (D), and Strongly Disagree (SD)
Table 3.1 Total the score base on the response category : Response Category Score
Strongly Agree 5
Agree 4
Undecided 3
Disagree 2
Strongly Disagree 1 (Sugiyono, 2012)
After the researcher administrated the fulfillment the questionnaire, the researcher counted the total answer for each answer category which existed in each aspect. Then, the data obtain from the questionnaires analysis by using the percentage technique.
Explanation : P = Percentage
F= The frequency of items N= Total respondent
(Sugiyono, 2012)
P = x 100%
27 CHAPTER IV
FINDING AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presents the findings of the research and discussion about the findings. They are follows :
A. Findings
In this chapter, the results of the study are presented. The chapter was divided into two main sections. The first section presents the data of followed by findings on each statement aspects to answer research questions about the students‟ perceptions toward the effectiveness of English outdoor learning in enhancing students speaking skill, focusing on the techniques used by the lecturers.
Table 4.1 My Lecturer used English outdoor learning that supporting in teaching process
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 7 33,3
2. Agree 12 57,1
3. Undecided 2 9,5
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The table represents that there were 21 students responds, there were 7 students or 33,3 % from the total number of the students whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 12 students or 57,1 % from the total number of the
students agree with the statement. And non there were 2 or 9,5 % from the total number whose undecided with the statement and none of the student‟s whose answered disagree and strongly disagree with the statement. In brief, The students‟ perceived that English outdoor learning succeeded to support teaching process
Table 4.2 Base on outdoor English learning I get new knowledge to eksplore my speaking skill
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 11 52,3
2. Agree 10 47,6
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The given table showed that there were 21student‟s responds, there were 11 students or 52,3 % from the total number of the student‟s whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 10 students or 47,6 % from the total number of the students agree with the statement. Meanwhile, there were None of the student‟s whose answered undecided, disagree and strongly disagree with the statement.
The result show that mostly students‟ perceived that the applied of English outdoor learning that gave a new knowledge to students.
29
Table 4.3 Techniques used by my lecturers interesting and motivate us to speak
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 16 76,1
2. Agree 5 23,8
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The presented table shows that there were 21 students responds, there were 16 students or 76,1% from the total number of the students whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 5 students or 23,8 % from the total number of the students agree with the statement. None student‟s answered undecided, disagree and strongly disagree with the statement. In brief, the used of this techniques was interesting and motivating.
Table 4.4English outdoor learning make us to be more active in learning
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 10 47,6
2. Agree 11 52,3
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The table represents that there were 21 students responds, there were 10 students or 47,6 % from the total number of the students whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 11 students or 52,3 % from the total number of the students agree with the statement. None of the student‟s whose answered Undicated, disagree and strongly disagree with the statement. Overall English outdoor learning made the students to be active.
Table 4.5 I don’t like outdoor learning is wasting time
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 0 0
2. Agree 0 0
3. Undecided 4 19,0
4. Disagree 17 80,9
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The table presented show that there were 21 students‟ responds, and there were none students answered strongly agree and agree with the statement.
Meanwhile, there were 4 students or 19,0% from the total number of the students answered undecided with the statement.17 students or 80,9 % answered disagree with the statement. And none students whose answered strongly disagree with the statement. The result showed of student‟s perceived that the applied of English outdoor learning was great.
31
Table 4.6 English outdoor learning never gave us a nice experience in innovating in learning proccess
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 0 0
2. Agree 0 0
3. Undecided 2 9,52
4. Disagree 17 80,9
5. Strongly Disagree 2 9,52
Total 21 100
The given table showed that there were 21 students‟ responds, and there were none students answered strongly agree, agree and undecided with the statement. Meanwhile, there were 17 students or 80,9% from the total number of the students answered disagree with the statement. 2 students or 9,52% answered strongly disagree with the statement. The student‟s perceived that outomatically English outdoor learning gave a nice experience to students.
Table 4.7 I felt more confidence to be a good public speaker especially in out class by outdoor learning techniques
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 15 71,42
2. Agree 6 28,57
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The table represents that there were 21 students responds, there were 15 students or 71,42% from the total number of the students whose strongly agree
with the statement. The other 6 students or 28,57 % from the total number of the students agree with the statement. None of the student‟s whose answered undecided, disagree and strongly disagree with the statement. In brief the students‟ perceived that they were more confidence to be a good public speaker.
Table 4.8 Since I study by outdoor learning techniques I felt encourangment in learning
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 4 19,0
2. Agree 17 80,9
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The presented table shows that there were 21 students‟ responds, and there were 4 students or 19,0% answered strongly agree, and there were 17 or 80,9%
students agree with this statements. and none students answered undecided,disagree and strongly disagree with the statements. The student‟s perceived that this techniques was make to encourangment in speaking.
33
Table 4.9 I felt this techniques was very easy to make us communicative in learning proccess
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 11 52,3
2. Agree 10 47,6
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The given table shows given table showed that there were 21 students‟
responds, and there were 11 or 52,3% students answered strongly agree with the statement. Then, there were 10 or 47,6% students agree with this statements. And none students whose answered undecided, disagree and strongly disagree with the statement. In brief, The students‟ perceived that this techniques was easy to students to communicative.
Table 4.10 Outdoor Learning help my activities learning in improving speaking skill
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 12 57,1
2. Agree 9 42,8
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The table represents that there were 21 students‟ responds, and there were 12 or 57,1% students answered strongly agree with the statement. Then, there
were 9 or 42,8 % students agree with this statements. And none students whose answered undecided, disagree and strongly disagree with the statement. In brief, The students‟ perceived that this techniques can help the students improving their speaking.
Table 4.11 Study outdoor learning techniques not effective for the students
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 0 0
2. Agree 0 0
3. Undecided 4 19,04
4. Disagree 10 47,6
5. Strongly Disagree 7 33,3
Total 21 100
The presented table shows that there were 21 students responds, there were none students answered strong agree, agree with this statements. Meanwhile, there were 4 students or 19.04 % from the total number of the students answered undecided with the statement. There were 10 or 47,6 % students‟s answered disagree and there were 7 or 33,3 students answered strongly disagree with the statement. It means that students‟ perceived that English outdoor learning was effective for the students.
35
Table 4.12 By outdoor learning techniques was difficult to open up our horizons in learning proccess
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 0 0
2. Agree 0 0
3. Undecided 4 19,04
4. Disagree 9 42,8
5. Strongly Disagree 8 38,09
Total 21 100
The given table shows that there were 21 students responds, none students answered strong agree, agree with the statement. And there were 4 students or 19,04% from the total number of the students whose undecided with the statement. The other 9 students or 42,8% from the total number of the students disagree with the statement. Meanwhile, there were 8 students or 38,9% from the total number of the students answered strong disagree with the statement. In brief, outdoor learning techniques was easy to students opened up their horizons in the learning.
Table 4.13
Material in this techniques make us to development of something the area of study
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 12 57,1
2. Agree 8 38,0
3. Undecided 1 4,7
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The table represents that there were 21student‟s responds, there were 12 students or 57,1% from the total number of the student‟s whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 8 students or 38,0 % from the total number of the students agree with the statement. Meanwhile, there were 1 students or 4,7% from the total number of the students answered undecided with the statement. None of the student‟s whose answered disagree and strongly disagree with the statement.
The students‟ perceived that outdoor learning make their idea to easy developed in learning process.
Table 4.14 By outdoor learning was enjoy because we felt to adventure in study
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 12 57,1
2. Agree 6 28,5
3. Undecided 1 4,7
4. Disagree 2 9,5
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
37
Based on the table showed that there were 21 students responds, there were 12 students or 57,1% from the total number of the students whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 6 students or 28,5% from the total number of the students agree with the statement. Meanwhile, there were 1 students or 4,7%
from the total number of the students answered undecided with the statement.
There were 2 students or 9,5% answered disagree with the statement and none student‟s answered strongly disagree with the statement. The students‟ perceived that English outdoor learning was make enjoy the students to study.
Table 4.15 Outdoor learning making us easy to adapt in learning
No Opinion Frequency Percentage (%)
1. Strongly Agree 13 61,9
2. Agree 8 38,0
3. Undecided 0 0
4. Disagree 0 0
5. Strongly Disagree 0 0
Total 21 100
The given table shows that there were 21 students responds, there were 13students or 61,9% from the total number of the students whose strongly agree with the statement. The other 8 students or 38, 0% from the total number of the students agree with the statement. And None of the student‟s whose answered undicated, disagree, and strongly disagree with the statement. So the result showed that the students‟ perceived that English outdoor learning make them to easy adapt in learning.
B. Discussion
The discussion of the research detects to give the questionnaire the researcher collected the data to be analyed then classified the answer by the questionnaire. The scale used in this research is Likert scale. Likert Scale use to measure attitudes, opinions, and perceptions of a person or group of people about social phenomena. Likert scale a graduation from very positive to very negative (Sugiono, 012)
The data from questionnaire showed that mostly students‟ perceived that the applied of English outdoor learning make the students enjoy to learn because they are felt an adventure in study.The previous finding research showed that, Tony Rea (2008) his journal Alternative visions of learning: children‟s learning experiences in the outdoors authority states that based on research undertaken in a locally owned residential outdoor education centre, which combines outdoor adventure education with field study. And the students more felt to enjoyed learn in outdoor because their knowledge can be improved in terms of speech.
Furthermore, The students argued that English outdoor learning was effective for the students to increase their vocabulary. In line with Indra Munawar (2009) his journal about title “Outdoor Activites” :his states that outdoor activities is the outclass activities or free nature that has exited and learn about god‟s creation that served on game, e-p-observation, simulation, discussion, and adventure as learning method”states that by using outdoor learning technique the students can see lot of things around them. It is effective and help the students get easier in learning vocabulary mastery. So learning using by outdoor technique
39
is expected to increase student‟s vocabulary mastery. With a direct view the situation or direct view of things in outside.
In summary, the applied English outdoor learning to enhance students speaking skill at Seventh Semester Students of English Departement Makassar Muhammadiyah of University that success to support their speaking skill and make the students more chritism and confidence in the class and also improving their their communicating in speaking class. And it is important that the applied of English outdoor learning would make their idea to be developed to improve their speaking skill. And the applied of English outdoor learning can be a source study that effective to students‟ motivation in speaking skill.
40 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
This chapter consists of two parts. The first presents some conclusions based on the data analysis. The second part present some suggestions based on the findings and conclusion of this research.
A. Conclusion
Based on the findings and discussion, it can be concluded that the respondents of this research gave their positive perception toward the effectiveness of English outdoor learning in enhancing students speaking skill.
Furthermore, the showed from the finding of English outdoor learning were succeded to support their speaking skill, made the students to be motivate, gave a nice experience, more help them confidence and understand, gave a new knowledge, opened up horisons and solved problem for students and enrich their vocabulary.
B. Suggestion
Based on the result of the data analysis and conclusion, the researcher suggests as follows:
1. For the Lecturer
The lecturers should decrease problem appears in implementing of English outdoor learning in order to improve its benefits to improve students‟ language skill in term of practicing speaking and their performances in speaking skill.
41
2. For the Students
The implementation of English outdoor learning can be useful for the students to improve their speaking skill.
3. For the researcher
The application of English outdoor learning should not only be used in speaking subject, but also be implemented toward others subjects of English Education Department to improve their English competence.
Therefore, this research can be a reference for the next researcher to develop this method later.
42
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brunderett (2009) Outdoor learning pupils’ exprencies and teacher’s interaction in one outdoor residential centre
Cruttenden. (2018). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English Seventh Edition. New York: Routledge.
Dariyo, A. (2013). Dasar-DasarPedagogi Modern. Jakarta Barat: Indeks
Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2004).Can teacher quality beeffectively assessed?
Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.Vol.89, Issue 1 Pages 134-150.
Hamidi, M. (2012). Influence Analysis of Competence, Educational Background on Performance Politeknik Bengkalish Lecturer of Leadership Perspective.
Proceeding of the National Seminar on Industry and Technology.December 26, 2012.
Harmer, Jereemy.2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longmand : England.Vol.62, Issue 3, July 2008 Pages 313-316.
Harris, David.P.1974. Testing English as a second Language.New Delhi : Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.
Ho, Pham. (2018). Fluencyof successful comminication. Van Hien University:
Research Gate. (Access 27th March 2019)
Jacobs Gloria E (2010) Models of power and the delation of participation in a classromm literacy event,1-19, St John Collage, New York, USA
Lado, Robbert (1961) Language Testing: The Constructions and Use of Foreign Language Tests. A Teacher’s Book. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 330 west 42nd St., New York, NY,1961.
Lonn, Steven, Stephen J. Aguilar, & Stephanie D. Teasley. (2015). Investigating Student Motivation in the Context of a Learning Analytics Intervention During a Summer Bridge Program. Elsevier Journal
Lodico, Marguirite G, Dean T, Apaulding& Katherine H. Voegetle.(2010).
Method Educational Research. San Fransisco: Jose Bass.
Markham, T. (2011).Project Based Learning. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38- 42.Media Activities on Audience Perceptions of Journalist and Their News Product
Mayer (2001) The Implementation of mobile learning in outdoor education : Application of QR codes.
43
Munawar Indra (2009) Outdoor Activities. Malang University
Musdariah.(2018). Students Perception in Lecturers Characteristic on Teaching English. Makassar: Unismuh Makassar.
Nunan, David. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York:
McGraw.
Rivkin & Bliton (1995) Learning in outdoor environments .
Samian, Yahya. (2012). Students’ Perception on Good Lecturer Based on LecturerPerformance Assessment.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2012) 783 – 790.
Saragih, A.H.(2008). Competencies Minimum of a Masters in Teaching. Journal Tabularasaunimed PPS. Vol. No. 5. June 1, 2008.
Suciu, A. I. (2011). Pedagogical Competences – The Key to Efficient Education, 3(2), 411–423.
Talis, Sri Shelri Novianti. (2018). The Students Perception Toward Implementing Blended Learning Method In English Language Teaching. Makassar Unismuh Makassar.
Tichenor, M.4 S., Tichenor, J. M. (2005). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on professionalism. ER. Vol 27 n1-2 Pages 89-95.Fall September 2004- 2005.
Rea Tony (2008) Alternative visions of learning childrens’ learning experiences in the outdoors authority. Vol 1 (2) Desember 2008.
Walgito, B. (2010). Pengantar Psikology Umum (5th Edition).Yogyakarta:
Penerbit andi.
Yorulmas Yilmas Liker. The effect of power used by lecturers in class management on the pre-servise teacher’s perceptions of fairness regarding their learning environment. 375-404. Turkey/ Mugli Sitki Kocman University.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 : PSCAS Questionnaire
NO ITEM SA A U D SD
1. My Lecturer english outdoor learning that supporting in teaching process
14 7 0 0 0
2. Base on English outdoor learning I get new knowledge to eksplore my speaking skill.
8 10 0 0 0
3. Techniques used by my lecturers interesting and motivate us to speak
11 9 1 0 0
4. English outdoor learning make us to be more active in learning
9 12 0 0 0
5. I don‟t like outdoor learning is wasting time
0 0 3 14 4
6. English outdoor learning gave us a nice experience in innovating in learning process
0 0 0 6 15
7. I felt more confidence to be a good public speaker
15 6 0 0 0
8. Since I study by outdoor learning
techniques I felt encourangment in learning
0 0 0 10 11
9. I felt this techniques was very easy to make us communicative in learning proccess
0 0 1 6 14
10. Outdoor learning help my activities learning in improving speaking skill
5 14 2 0 0
11. Study outdoor learning techniques not effective for the students
8 8 5 0 0
12. By outdoor learning techniques was
difficult to open up our horizons in learning process
0 6 6 9 0
13. Material in this techniques make us to development of something the area of study
12 8 1 0 0
14. By outdoor learning was enjoy because we felt to adventure in study
12 6 1 2 0
15. Outdoor learning making us easy to adapt in learning
13 8 0 0 0
(Developed from Material of Chapter II)
APPENDIX 2 : PSCAS Questionnaire Translate
NO ITEM SS S RR T ST
1.
Dosen saya menggunakan pembelajaran outdoor yang dapat mendukung proses pembelajaran
14 7 0 0 0
2.
Berdasarkan pembelajaran outdoor saya memperoleh pengetahuan baru untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berbicara saya.
8 10 3 0 0
3. Teknik yang digunakan dosen menarik dan memtivasi kami dalam berbicara
11 9 1 0 0
4. Pembelajaran outdoor membuat kami lebih aktif dalam pembelajaran
9 12 0 0 0
5. Saya tidak suka pembelajaran utdor yang hanya membuang buang waktu
0 0 3 14 4
6.
Pembelajaran outdoor tidak pernah
memberi pengalaman yang menyenangkan dalam menginovasi prosese pembelajaran
0 0 0 6 15
7.
Saya merasa lebih percaya diri menjadi pembicara di depan umum khususnya di luar kelas melalui teknik pembelajaran outdoor.
15 6 0 0 0
8.
Semenjak saya belajar melalui
pembelajaran outdoor teknik ini membuat saya terdorong dalam pembelajaran
0 0 0 10 11
9.
Saya merasa teknik ini sangat mudah membuat kami dalam berkmunikasi di proses pembelajaran
0 0 1 6 14
10.
Pembelajaran outdoor membantu saya dalam aktivitas pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara saya
5 14 2 0 0
11. Teknik pembelajaran outdoor tidak efektif untuk kami mahasiswa
8 8 5 0 0
12.
Melalui pembelajaran teknik outdoor sangat susah membuka wawasan kami dalam proses pembelajaran
0 6 6 9 0
13.
Materi dalam teknik ini membuat kami dapat mengembangkan ide dalam
mendeskripsikan sesuatu dalam area belajar
12 8 1 0 0
14.
Melalui pembelajaran outdoor sangat menyenamgkan karena kami merasa dalam petualangan belajar
12 6 1 2 0
15.
Pembelajaran outdoor membuat kami mudah dalam beradaptasi dalam pembelajaran.
13 8 0 0 0
( Pengembangan dari Materi Bab II)