CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
B. Suggestion
Based on the result of the data analysis and conclusion, the researcher suggests as follows:
1. For the Lecturer
The lecturers should decrease problem appears in implementing of English outdoor learning in order to improve its benefits to improve students‟ language skill in term of practicing speaking and their performances in speaking skill.
41
2. For the Students
The implementation of English outdoor learning can be useful for the students to improve their speaking skill.
3. For the researcher
The application of English outdoor learning should not only be used in speaking subject, but also be implemented toward others subjects of English Education Department to improve their English competence.
Therefore, this research can be a reference for the next researcher to develop this method later.
42
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brunderett (2009) Outdoor learning pupils’ exprencies and teacher’s interaction in one outdoor residential centre
Cruttenden. (2018). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English Seventh Edition. New York: Routledge.
Dariyo, A. (2013). Dasar-DasarPedagogi Modern. Jakarta Barat: Indeks
Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2004).Can teacher quality beeffectively assessed?
Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.Vol.89, Issue 1 Pages 134-150.
Hamidi, M. (2012). Influence Analysis of Competence, Educational Background on Performance Politeknik Bengkalish Lecturer of Leadership Perspective.
Proceeding of the National Seminar on Industry and Technology.December 26, 2012.
Harmer, Jereemy.2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longmand : England.Vol.62, Issue 3, July 2008 Pages 313-316.
Harris, David.P.1974. Testing English as a second Language.New Delhi : Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.
Ho, Pham. (2018). Fluencyof successful comminication. Van Hien University:
Research Gate. (Access 27th March 2019)
Jacobs Gloria E (2010) Models of power and the delation of participation in a classromm literacy event,1-19, St John Collage, New York, USA
Lado, Robbert (1961) Language Testing: The Constructions and Use of Foreign Language Tests. A Teacher’s Book. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 330 west 42nd St., New York, NY,1961.
Lonn, Steven, Stephen J. Aguilar, & Stephanie D. Teasley. (2015). Investigating Student Motivation in the Context of a Learning Analytics Intervention During a Summer Bridge Program. Elsevier Journal
Lodico, Marguirite G, Dean T, Apaulding& Katherine H. Voegetle.(2010).
Method Educational Research. San Fransisco: Jose Bass.
Markham, T. (2011).Project Based Learning. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38- 42.Media Activities on Audience Perceptions of Journalist and Their News Product
Mayer (2001) The Implementation of mobile learning in outdoor education : Application of QR codes.
43
Munawar Indra (2009) Outdoor Activities. Malang University
Musdariah.(2018). Students Perception in Lecturers Characteristic on Teaching English. Makassar: Unismuh Makassar.
Nunan, David. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York:
McGraw.
Rivkin & Bliton (1995) Learning in outdoor environments .
Samian, Yahya. (2012). Students’ Perception on Good Lecturer Based on LecturerPerformance Assessment.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2012) 783 – 790.
Saragih, A.H.(2008). Competencies Minimum of a Masters in Teaching. Journal Tabularasaunimed PPS. Vol. No. 5. June 1, 2008.
Suciu, A. I. (2011). Pedagogical Competences – The Key to Efficient Education, 3(2), 411–423.
Talis, Sri Shelri Novianti. (2018). The Students Perception Toward Implementing Blended Learning Method In English Language Teaching. Makassar Unismuh Makassar.
Tichenor, M.4 S., Tichenor, J. M. (2005). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on professionalism. ER. Vol 27 n1-2 Pages 89-95.Fall September 2004- 2005.
Rea Tony (2008) Alternative visions of learning childrens’ learning experiences in the outdoors authority. Vol 1 (2) Desember 2008.
Walgito, B. (2010). Pengantar Psikology Umum (5th Edition).Yogyakarta:
Penerbit andi.
Yorulmas Yilmas Liker. The effect of power used by lecturers in class management on the pre-servise teacher’s perceptions of fairness regarding their learning environment. 375-404. Turkey/ Mugli Sitki Kocman University.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 : PSCAS Questionnaire
NO ITEM SA A U D SD
1. My Lecturer english outdoor learning that supporting in teaching process
14 7 0 0 0
2. Base on English outdoor learning I get new knowledge to eksplore my speaking skill.
8 10 0 0 0
3. Techniques used by my lecturers interesting and motivate us to speak
11 9 1 0 0
4. English outdoor learning make us to be more active in learning
9 12 0 0 0
5. I don‟t like outdoor learning is wasting time
0 0 3 14 4
6. English outdoor learning gave us a nice experience in innovating in learning process
0 0 0 6 15
7. I felt more confidence to be a good public speaker
15 6 0 0 0
8. Since I study by outdoor learning
techniques I felt encourangment in learning
0 0 0 10 11
9. I felt this techniques was very easy to make us communicative in learning proccess
0 0 1 6 14
10. Outdoor learning help my activities learning in improving speaking skill
5 14 2 0 0
11. Study outdoor learning techniques not effective for the students
8 8 5 0 0
12. By outdoor learning techniques was
difficult to open up our horizons in learning process
0 6 6 9 0
13. Material in this techniques make us to development of something the area of study
12 8 1 0 0
14. By outdoor learning was enjoy because we felt to adventure in study
12 6 1 2 0
15. Outdoor learning making us easy to adapt in learning
13 8 0 0 0
(Developed from Material of Chapter II)
APPENDIX 2 : PSCAS Questionnaire Translate
NO ITEM SS S RR T ST
1.
Dosen saya menggunakan pembelajaran outdoor yang dapat mendukung proses pembelajaran
14 7 0 0 0
2.
Berdasarkan pembelajaran outdoor saya memperoleh pengetahuan baru untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berbicara saya.
8 10 3 0 0
3. Teknik yang digunakan dosen menarik dan memtivasi kami dalam berbicara
11 9 1 0 0
4. Pembelajaran outdoor membuat kami lebih aktif dalam pembelajaran
9 12 0 0 0
5. Saya tidak suka pembelajaran utdor yang hanya membuang buang waktu
0 0 3 14 4
6.
Pembelajaran outdoor tidak pernah
memberi pengalaman yang menyenangkan dalam menginovasi prosese pembelajaran
0 0 0 6 15
7.
Saya merasa lebih percaya diri menjadi pembicara di depan umum khususnya di luar kelas melalui teknik pembelajaran outdoor.
15 6 0 0 0
8.
Semenjak saya belajar melalui
pembelajaran outdoor teknik ini membuat saya terdorong dalam pembelajaran
0 0 0 10 11
9.
Saya merasa teknik ini sangat mudah membuat kami dalam berkmunikasi di proses pembelajaran
0 0 1 6 14
10.
Pembelajaran outdoor membantu saya dalam aktivitas pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara saya
5 14 2 0 0
11. Teknik pembelajaran outdoor tidak efektif untuk kami mahasiswa
8 8 5 0 0
12.
Melalui pembelajaran teknik outdoor sangat susah membuka wawasan kami dalam proses pembelajaran
0 6 6 9 0
13.
Materi dalam teknik ini membuat kami dapat mengembangkan ide dalam
mendeskripsikan sesuatu dalam area belajar
12 8 1 0 0
14.
Melalui pembelajaran outdoor sangat menyenamgkan karena kami merasa dalam petualangan belajar
12 6 1 2 0
15.
Pembelajaran outdoor membuat kami mudah dalam beradaptasi dalam pembelajaran.
13 8 0 0 0
( Pengembangan dari Materi Bab II)
APPENDIX 3: DOKUMENTATION