• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

BAB V SIMPULAN DAN SARAN

5.2 Saran

1) Dapat dilakukan penelitian pengukuran laju membaca menggunakan HMD berbasis smartphone menggunakan kartu baca standar berbahasa Indonesia 2) Dapat dilakukan penelitian untuk mengukur laju membaca menggunakan HMD berbasis smartphone untuk mengetahui pengaruh adaptasi penggunaan alat.

60

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. World Health Organization. Change the Definition of Blindness. 2015.

2. Harris J, Garratt S. Vision Rehabilitation Preferred Practice Pattern.

American Academy of Ophthalmology. San Fransisco; 2017.hal.1-278.

3. Khorrami-nejad M, Sarabandi A, Akbari M, Askarizadeh F. The Impact of Visual Impairment on Quality of Life. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2016.5(4):1–8.

4. Golesic E, Mao A, Hutnik CML. Clinical effectiveness of currently available low-vision devices in glaucoma patients with moderate-to-severe vision loss. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017.:683–7.

5. Lovie-Kitchin JE. Reading performance in children with low vision. PhD thesis. 1996.

6. Altinbay D, Adibelli FM, Taskin I, Tekin A. The Evaluation of Reading Performance with Minnesota Low Vision Reading Charts in Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol.

2016.23(4):14–8.

7. Mitzner TL, Rogers WA. Reading in the Dark : Effects of Age and Contrast on Reading Speed and Comprehension. Hum Factors. 2006.48(2):229–40.

8. Rubin GS. Measuring reading performance. Vision Res. 2013.90:43–51.

9. Frennesson C, Nilsson UL, Peebo BB, Nilsson SEG. Significant improvements in near vision, reading speed, central visual field and related quality of life after ranibizumab treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010.88(4):420–5.

10. Varma R, Souied EH, Tufail A, Tschosik E, Ferrara D, Silverman D, dkk.

Maximum Reading Speed in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018.7.

11. Jonathan Jackson A, Wolffsohn JS. Low Vision Manual. Low Vision Manual. 2007.

12. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Clinical Optics. Basic and Clinical Science Course. San Fransisco; 2016.hal.237-285.

13. Benjamin WJ. Borish’s Clinical Refraction. Borish’s Clinical Refraction.

2006.

14. Repka MX. Pediatric ophthalmology and childhood reading difficulties. J AAPOS. 2017.21287.

15. Lovie-Kitchin JE, Whittaker SG. Prescribing near magnification for low vision patients. Clin Exp Optom. 1999.82(6):214–24.

16. Ehrlich JR, Ojeda L V., Wicker D, Day S, Howson A, Lakshminarayanan V, dkk. Head-Mounted Display Technology for Low-Vision Rehabilitation and Vision Enhancement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017.176:26–32.

61

17. Deemer AD, Bradley CK, Ross NC, Natale DM, Itthipanichpong R, Werblin FS, dkk. Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems. Optom Vis Sci. 2018.95(9):1.

18. Wittich W, Lorenzini M-C, Markowitz SN, Tolentino M, Gartner SA, Goldstein JE, dkk. The Effect of a Head-mounted Low Vision Device on Visual Function. Optom Vis Sci. 2018.95(9):774–84.

19. Steed A, Julier S. Design and implementation of an immersive virtual reality system based on a smartphone platform. IEEE Symp 3D User Interface.

2013.:43–6.

20. Relumino. Relumino [Internet]. 2018 [dikutip 12 Desember 2018]; Tersedia pada: https://www.samsungrelumino.com/home

21. Menkominfo. Indonesia Raksasa Teknologi Digital Asia [Internet]. 2018;

Tersedia pada: https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/6095/indonesia-raksasa- teknologi-digital-asia/0/sorotan_media

22. Deloitte. Global mobile consumer trends, 2nd edition Mobile continues its global reach into all aspects of consumers’ lives. 2017.

23. World Health Organization. The Management of Low Vision in Children:

Report of a WHO Consultation: Bangkok. 1992.

24. Colenbrander A. Visual Standards: Aspects and Ranges of Visual Loss.

Sidney; 2002.

25. Manuscript A. NIH Public Access. 2010.5(1):59–74.

26. Coco-martín MB, López-miguel A, Cuadrado R, Herrero AJ, Pastor JC, Maldonado MJ. Reading Performance Improvements in Patients with Central Vision Loss without Age-Related Macular Degeneration after Undergoing Personalized Rehabilitation Training Reading Performance Improvements in Patients with Central Vision Loss without Age-Related . Curr Eye Res. 2017.00(00):1–9.

27. Shah P, Schwartz SG, Gartner S, Scott IU, Flynn HW. Low vision services:

a practical guide for the clinician. Ther Adv Ophthalmol.

2018.10:251584141877626.

28. Park Y, Shin JA, Yang SW, Yim HW, Kim HS. The Relationship between Visual Impairment and Health-Related Quality of Life in Korean Adults : The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2008 – 2012). PLoS One. 2015.:1–14.

29. Hassell JB, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE. Impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006.90(5):593–6.

30. Evans K, Law SK, Walt J, Buchholz P, Hansen J. The quality of life impact of peripheral versus central vision loss with a focus on glaucoma versus age- related macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009.3(1):433–45.

31. Keane PA, Patel PJ, Ouyang Y, Chen FK, Ikeji F, Walsh AC, dkk. Effects of retinal morphology on contrast sensitivity and reading ability in neovascular

63 age-related macular degeneration. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci.

2010.51(11):5431–7.

32. Scheiman M, Scheiman M, Whittaker S. Low Vision Rehabilitation: A Practical Guide for Occupational Therapists. SLACK Incorporated; 2007.

33. Bansback N, Czoski-Murray C, Carlton J, Lewis G, Hughes L, Espallargues M, dkk. Determinants of health related quality of life and health state utility in patients with age related macular degeneration: The association of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity. Qual Life Res. 2007.16(3):533–43.

34. Faria BM, Duman F, Zheng CX, Waisbourd M, Gupta L, Ali M, dkk.

Evaluating contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration using a novel computer-based test, the spaeth/richman contrast sensitivity test.

Retina. 2015.35(7):1465–73.

35. Radner W. Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017.255(8):1465–82.

36. Brown B. The Low Vision Handbook for Eyecare Professionals. Slack;

2007.

37. Dougherty BE, Flom RE, Bullimore MA. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test. Optom Vis Sci. 2005.82(11):970–5.

38. Chen A, Mohamed D. New paediatric contrast test : Hiding Heidi low- contrast ‘face’ test. Clin Exp Optom Exp Ophthalmol. 2003.31:430–4.

39. Calabrese A, Gamam S, Mansfield J, Legge G. MNREAD App User Guide.

Woodstock: University of Minnesota; 2014.

40. Calabrèse A, Owsley C, McGwin G, Legge G. Development of a Reading Accessibility Index Using the MNREAD Acuity Chart. JAMA Ophthalmol.

2016.55455(4):398–405.

41. Calabrèse A, To L, He Y, Berkholtz E, Rafian P, Legge GE. Comparing performance on the MNREAD iPad application with the MNREAD acuity chart. J Vis. 2018.18(1):11.

42. Agency S, No R, Date PUB, Type PUB, Price E. National Reading.

43. Rodríguez-aranda C, Rodrı C. Reduced Writing and Reading Speed and Age- related Changes in Verbal Fluency Tasks Reduced Writing and Reading Speed and Age-related Changes in Verbal Fluency Tasks. 2010.

(December 2014):37–41.

44. Liu R, Patel BN, Kwon M. Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed. Sci Rep. 2017.(March):1–10.

45. Valsecchi M, Gegenfurtner KR, Sch AC, Psychologie AA, Liebig J.

Saccadic and smooth-pursuit eye movements during reading of drifting texts. 2013.13:1–20.

46. Tarita-Nistor L, Brent MH, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ, González EG.

Maximum reading speed and binocular summation in patients with central vision loss. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013.48(5):443–9.

47. Bambo MP, Ferrandez B, Güerri N, Fuertes I, Cameo B, Polo V, dkk.

Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity, Chromatic Vision, and Reading Ability in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. J Ophthalmololgy.

2016.2016:6.

48. Cheong AMY, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Bowers AR. Determining magnification for reading with low vision. Clin Exp Optom. 2002.85(4):229–37.

49. Lovie-Kitchin JE. Reading with low vision: the impact of research on clinical management. Clin Exp Optom. 2011.94(2):121–32.

50. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Visual Requirements for Reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993.70(1):54–65.

51. Leduc-mills B, Profita H, Cromer P, Bharadwaj S, Han R. ioCane : A Smart- Phone and Sensor-Augmented Mobility Aid for the Blind Mobility Aid for the Blind. Computer Science Techincal Reports. 2013.

52. Tapu R, Mocanu B, Bursuc A, Zaharia T. A Smartphone-Based Obstacle Detection and Classification System for Assisting Visually Impaired People.

2013 IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis Work. 2013.:444–51.

53. Peterson RC, Wolffsohn JS, Rubinstein M, Lowe J. Benefits of electronic vision enhancement systems (EVES) for the visually impaired. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003.136(6):1129–35.

54. Chaudhry M. Low Vision AIDS. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2006.

55. Monira S, Rao A, Chowdhury M. Preference pattern of low vision aids in glaucoma-redefining guidelines. J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2016.4(1):31.

56. Nguyen NX, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Effectiveness of magnifying low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Neuro- Ophthalmology. 2009.33(3):115–9.

57. Nguyen NX, Weismann M, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Improvement of reading speed after providing of low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009.87(8):849–53.

58. Watanabe T, Yamaguchi T, Minatani K. Advantages and drawbacks of smartphones and tablets for visually impaired people-analysis of ict user survey results-. IEICE Trans Inf Syst. 2015.E98D(4):922–9.

59. Morrice E, Johnson AP, Marinier JA, Wittich W. Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid. Eye. 2017.31(6):865–71.

60. Mednick Z, Jaidka A, Nesdole R, Bona M. Assessing the iPad as a tool for low-vision rehabilitation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017.52(1):13–9.

61. Feng HL, Roth DB, Fine HF, Prenner JL, Modi KK, Feuer WJ. The Impact of Electronic Reading Devices on Reading Speed and Comfort in Patients with Decreased Vision. J Ophthalmol. 2017.2017.

62. Lavalle SM. Virtual Reality. University of Illinois. Cambridge University Press; 2017.

63. Zhang H. Head-mounted display-based intuitive virtual reality training system for the mining industry. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2017.27(4):717–22.

65 64. Kramida G. Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-

mounted displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016.22(7):1912–31.

65. Samsung Electronics. Samsung Gear VR User Manual.

66. Terven JR, Salas J, Raducanu B. New Opportunities for computer vision- based assistive technology systems for the visually impaired. Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2014.47(4):52–8.

67. Koulieris G-A, Bui B, Banks MS, Drettakis G. Accommodation and comfort in head-mounted displays. ACM Trans Graph. 2017.36(4):1–11.

68. Banks MS, Kim J, Shibata T. Insight into vergence/accommodation mismatch. Proc SPIE. 2013.:873509.

69. Massof RW, Rickman DL, Lalle PA. Low vision enhancement system.

Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig (Applied Phys Lab. 1994.

70. ESight. eSight [Internet]. 2018 [dikutip 12 Desember 2018]; Tersedia pada:

https://www.esighteyewear.com/homex

71. Virgili G, Acosta R, Grover LL, Bentley SA, Giacomelli G. Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.2013(10).

72. Pundlik S, Yi H, Liu R, Peli E, Luo G. Magnifying smartphone screen using google glass for low vision users. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.

2017.25(1):49–58.

73. Stearns L, DeSouza V, Yin J, Findlater L, Froehlich JE. Augmented Reality Magnification for Low Vision Users with the Microsoft Hololens and a Finger-Worn Camera. ASSETS’17. 2017.:361–2.

74. Cheong AMY, Cheung S, He Y, Kwon M, Mansfield JS, Subramanian A, dkk. Baseline MNREAD Measures for Normally Sighted Subjects From Childhood to Old Age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016.57:3836–43.

75. Gilbert C, Foster A, Negrel A, Thylefors B. Childhood blindness : a new form for recording causes of visual loss in children. Bull World Health Organ. 1993.71(5):485–9.

76. Mansfield JS, Atilgan N, Lewis AM, Legge GE. Extending the MNREAD sentence corpus: Computer-generated sentences for measuring visual performance in reading. Vision Res. 2019.158(February):11–8.

77. Culham LE, Chabra A, Rubin GS. Clinical performance of electronic, head- mounted, low-vision devices. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2004.24:281–90.

78. Ortiz A, Chung S, Legge G, Jobling J. Reading with a Head-Mounted Video Magnifier. Optom Vis Sci. 1999.76(11):755–63.

79. Taylor JJ, Bambrick R, Brand A, Bray N, Dutton M, Harper RA, dkk.

Effectiveness of portable electronic and optical magnifiers for near vision activities in low vision: a randomised crossover trial. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017.37(4):370–84.

80. Harper R, Culham L, Dickinson C. Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation : a comparison with existing technology Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation : a

comparison with existing technology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999.(November 2007):495–500.

81. Crossland MD, Rubin GS. Text Accesibility by People with Reduced Contrast Sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 2012.89(9):1276–81.

82. Lovie-Kitchin JE, Woo GC. Effect of magnification and field of view on reading speed using a CCTV. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1988.8:139–45.

83. Ergun E, Maar N, Radner W, Barbazetto I, Scmidt-Erfurth U, Stur M.

Scotoma Size and Reading Speed in Patients with Subfoveal Occult Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-related Macular. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2003.6420(02):65–9.

84. Rubin GS. Vision rehabilitation for patients with agerelated macular degeneration. Eye. 2001.15:430–5.

85. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Neuro-ophthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course. 2018.hal.106-7.

86. Altpeter EK, Blanke BR, Leo-kottler B, Nguyen XN, Trauzettel-klosinski S.

Evaluation of Fixation Pattern and Reading Ability in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. J Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2013.33:344–8.

87. Nilsson UL, Frennesson C, Nilsson SEG. Patients with AMD and a large absolute central scotoma can be trained successfully to use eccentric viewing , as demonstrated in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Vision Res.

2003.43:1777–87.

88. Tarita-Nistor L, Brent MH, Steinbach MJ, Markowitz SN, González EG.

Reading training with threshold stimuli in people with central vision loss: A feasibility study. Optom Vis Sci. 2014.91(1):86–96.

89. Pabon S, Sunness JS, Kaleem MA. Low Vision Therapy for Glaucoma Patients. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2017.5:85–92.

90. Virgili G, Pierrottet C, Parmeggiani F, Pennino M, Giacomelli G, Steindler P, dkk. Reading Performance in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa : A Study Using the MNREAD Charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004.45(10):3418–

24.

91. Han Q-M, Cong L-J, Yu C, Liu L. Developing a Logarithmic Chinese Reading. Optom Vis Sci. 2017.94(6):714–24.

92. Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Dietz K, IREST Study Group. Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance : The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012.53(9):5452–61.

93. Haegerstrom-portnoy G, Schneck ME, Brabyn JA. Seeing into Old Age:

Visual Function Beyond Acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1999.76(3):141–58.

94. Paterson KB, Mcgowan VA, Jordan TR. Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text : evidence from eye movements. PeerJ. 2013.:1–16.

95. Seferlis F, Chimona TS, Papadakis CE, Bizakis J. Age related changes in ocular motor testing in healthy subjects. J Vestib Res. 2015.25:57–66.

67 96. Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West SK, Bandeen-roche K, Fried LP, dkk. Characteristics of Discrepancies between Self-reported Visual Function and Measured Reading Speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999.40(5):858–

64.

97. Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and Reading Speed. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009.127(1):82–7.

LAMPIRAN 1

PERSETUJUAN ETIK

69 LAMPIRAN 2

LAPORAN KEGIATAN PENELITIAN

A. Pemeriksaan dasar low vision dan penentuan power alat optik

C. Fitting HMD berbasis smartphone

D. Pemeriksaan Laju Membaca

71 E. Fitur HMD berbasis Smartphone dengan Aplikasi Relumino

1. Pengaturan magnifikasi

2. Autifocus

3. Pengaturan kecerahan dan kontras menggunakan HMD

73 LAMPIRAN 3

DATA PENELITIAN

A. Tabel Demografis, Diagnosis, Gangguan Penglihatan, Gangguan Lapang Pandang, dan Jenis Alat Optik

No. Grup JK Usia (tahun)

TP Etiologi Gangguan Penglihatan

Kelompok Etiologi

Gangguan Penglihatan

Gangguan Lapang Pandang

Jenis Alat Optik

1 A L 45 SMAStargardt's disease Retina Sedang sentral SpM 16 D

2 B L 39 SMP Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Sedang perifer SpM 6 D 3 A L 61 SMA Retinitis pigmentosa,

glaukoma sudut tertutup primer

Retina Sedang perifer SpM 5 D

4 B L 18 SMP hipoplasia diskus

optikus Retina Sedang tidak

spesifik SpM 16 D

5 B P 44 SMP Koloboma koroid Retina Berat tidak

spesifik

SpM 16 D 6 B P 18 SMP Atrofi diskus optikus Nervus optikus Berat tidak

spesifik SpM 8 D 7 A P 41 SMA Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Sedang perifer SpM 6 D 8 B L 18 SMA Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Sedang perifer SpM 5 D

9 B L 19 SMA Atrofi makula Retina Sedang sentral SpM 10 D

10 A P 52 SMAMacular hole Retina Berat sentral SpM 10 D

11 B L 42 SMP Sikatriks makula Retina Sedang sentral SpM 10 D 12 A L 19 SMP Glaukoma kongenital Bola Mata Sedang perifer SpM 6 D 13 A P 57 PT Atrofi diskus optikus Nervus optikus Sedang tidak

spesifik SpM 10 D 14 A L 19 SMA Ambliopia, afakia Lensa Sedang tidak

spesifik

SpM 6 D

15 B L 42 SMP Miopia patologis Retina Berat sentral StM 28 D

16 A L 20 SMP Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Sedang perifer SpM 10 D 17 A P 18 SMP Aniridia, glaukoma

sekunder, afakia

Bola Mata Sedang tidak spesifik

StM 12 D

18 A P 45 SMP Atrofi makula Retina Sedang sentral SpM 16 D

19 B L 51 SMP Ablasio retina

rhegmatogen, glaukoma sekunder

Retina Sedang tidak

spesifik SpM 8 D 20 B L 56 PT Atrofi diskus optikus Nervus optikus Berat tidak

spesifik

StM 28 D 21 A P 46 PT Glaukoma tekanan

normal Bola Mata Berat perifer StM 28 D

22 A L 35 SMP Atrofi makula Retina Sedang sentral SpM 5 D

23 B L 23 SMP Atrofi makula Retina Sedang sentral SpM 5 D

24 A P 55 SMA Ablasio retina traksional

Retina Sedang sentral SpM 20 D

25 B P 58 SMP Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Sedang perifer SpM 10 D 26 B L 60 PT Glaukoma sudut

terbuka primer Bola Mata Sedang perifer SpM 8 D 27 A L 18 SMP Ambliopia deprivatif,

pseudofakia

Lensa Berat tidak

spesifik

SpM 20 D

28 A P 18 SMP Distrofi makula Retina Sedang sentral SpM 8 D

29 B L 23 PT Korioretinopati serosa sentral kronis

Retina Sedang sentral SpM 10 D 30 A L 30 SMA Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Berat perifer SpM 20 D 31 A L 22 SMP Ablasio retina

rhegmatogen Retina Sedang tidak

spesifik SpM 20 D 32 B L 58 SMP Glaukoma sudut

terbuka primer

Bola Mata Sedang perifer SpM 5 D 33 B P 43 SMP Glaukoma sudut

tertutup kronis Bola Mata Sedang perifer SpM 5 D 34 A L 62 SMP Atrofi geografikan Retina Sedang sentral SpM 10 D 35 A P 68 SMP Atrofi diskus optikus Nervus optikus Sedang tidak

spesifik SpM 10 D 36 A L 29 SMP Ablasio retina

rhegmatogen, glaukoma sekunder

Retina Sedang tidak spesifik

StM 36 D

37 A P 24 SMA Glaukoma sudut terbuka juvenil

Bola Mata Sedang perifer SpM 5 D 38 B P 65 SMP Atrofi diskus optikus Nervus optikus Berat tidak

spesifik StM 36 D 39 B P 49 SMA Ablasio retina

rhegmatogen Retina Berat tidak

spesifik StM 36 D 40 A P 29 SMP Amblopia deprivatif,

afakia

Lensa Sedang tidak

spesifik

SpM 20 D

41 B P 37 SMP Atrofi makula Retina Berat sentral StM 28 D

42 B L 48 SMA Albinisme

okulokutaneus Retina Sedang tidak

spesifik SpM 12 D 43 A P 24 SMP Ablasio retina

rhegmatogen

Retina Sedang tidak spesifik

StM 28 D 44 A L 30 PT Ambliopia deprivatif,

afakia

Lensa Sedang tidak

spesifik

SpM 12 D 45 B L 70 PT Glaukoma sudut

terbuka primer Bola Mata Sedang perifer SpM 20 D 46 B P 35 SMP Ablasio retina

rhegmatogen, glaukoma sekunder

Retina Sedang tidak spesifik

SpM 10 D

47 B L 46 SMA Glaukoma sudut terbuka primer

Bola Mata Berat perifer StM 36 D 48 B P 35 SMP Retinitis pigmentosa Retina Sedang perifer SpM 20 D

49 A L 31 PT Stargardt's disease Retina Sedang sentral SpM 10 D

Keterangan: JK: jenis kelamin; L: laki-laki; P: perempuan; TP: tingkat pendidikan; SMP: sekolah menengah pertama; SMA: sekolah menengah atas; PT: perguruan tinggi; SpM: spectacle magnifier; StM: stand magnifier; D: dioptri;

B. Tabel Fungsi Penglihatan dan Laju Membaca

75

No. Grup BCVA (logMAR)

Visus Dekat (logMAR)

Sensitivitas Kontras (%)

Laju Membaca Tanpa Alat

(kpm) HMD (kpm) Optik (kpm)

1 A 0,90 0,92 25% 0 52,10 46,04

2 B 0,49 0,62 25% 18,67 17,36 25,71

3 A 0,49 0,82 25% 21,17 33,21 24,44

4 B 0,90 0,82 5% 0 66,42 44,21

5 B 1,10 1,02 10% 0 22,78 42,12

6 B 1,03 0,82 10% 0 50,76 35,82

7 A 0,49 0,70 5% 39,57 45,97 61,93

8 B 0,60 0,62 25% 18,28 11,64 25,26

9 B 0,90 0,92 1,25% 0 70,71 86,08

10 A 1,03 1,22 25% 0 24,75 49,5

11 B 0,60 0,92 5% 0 6 5

12 A 0,80 0,70 5% 62,30 58,23 70,43

13 A 0,60 0,82 25% 31,07 44,65 32,22

14 A 0,80 0,62 1,25% 60 47,14 66

15 B 1,30 1,32 25% 0 28,61 30,47

16 A 0,80 0,82 25% 0 22,32 11,62

17 A 0,90 1,02 2,5% 0 38,4 32,72

18 A 0,90 1,02 25% 0 17,14 21,81

19 B 0,70 0,82 25% 46,15 50,27 58,06

20 B 1,20 1,22 25% 0 24,87 20,43

21 A 1,20 1,22 25% 0 36,22 12,46

22 A 0,60 0,62 2,5% 51,89 61,87 104,21

23 B 0,60 0,52 2,5% 40,5 68,27 80

24 A 0,82 1,12 10% 0 45,40 42,66

25 B 0,80 0,92 10% 0 32,45 56,57

26 B 0,80 0,92 10% 0 23,02 20,45

27 A 1,03 1,12 10% 0 26,75 20,42

28 A 0,90 0,70 1,25% 0 70,71 123,75

29 B 0,60 0,62 1,25% 64,61 105,88 68,88

30 A 1,03 1,22 25% 0 14,74 12,72

31 A 0,70 0,82 10% 0 26,4 9,23

32 B 0,49 0,70 10% 47,69 61,87 56,57

33 B 0,49 0,70 5% 56,47 73,04 82,5

34 A 0,60 1,02 10% 0 6,26 5,64

35 A 0,80 0,92 5% 0 21,75 18,67

36 A 0,70 1,22 10% 0 16,36 13,33

37 A 0,49 0,52 25% 18,46 16,51

38 B 1,20 1,42 25% 0 9,23 4,28

39 B 1,12 1,32 25% 0 15,18 11,83

40 A 0,70 0,82 1,25% 46,82 94,28 58,18

41 B 1,30 1,42 10% 0 62,87 45,71

42 B 0,70 1,02 10% 0 72 64,28

43 A 1,00 1,12 25% 0 58,23 11,62

44 A 0,80 0,82 10% 0 22,22 16,17

45 B 0,90 1,22 25% 0 4,54 6,75

46 B 0,49 0,70 2,5% 43,04 48,29 86,08

47 B 1,10 1,32 25% 0 8,91 7,5

48 B 1,00 1,02 25% 0 14,14 14,11

49 A 0,90 0,92 5% 0 116,47 90

Keterangan: BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity

77 LAMPIRAN 4

ANALISIS STATISTIK

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Laju membaca alat bantu low vision optik

49 100.0% 0 0.0% 49 100.0%

Laju membaca alat HMD berbasis smartphone

49 100.0% 0 0.0% 49 100.0%

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

Laju membaca alat bantu low vision optik

Mean 39.8153 4.23619

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound 31.2979

Upper Bound 48.3327

5% Trimmed Mean 37.8837

Median 32.2200

Variance 879.322

Std. Deviation 29.65336

Minimum 4.28

Maximum 123.75

Range 119.47

Interquartile Range 46.34

Skewness .835 .340

Kurtosis -.012 .668

Laju membaca alat HMD berbasis smartphone

Mean 40.1865 3.81426

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound 32.5175

Upper Bound 47.8556

5% Trimmed Mean 38.3448

Median 33.2100

Variance 712.879

Std. Deviation 26.69979

Minimum 4.54

Maximum 116.47

Range 111.93

Interquartile Range 42.14

Skewness .857 .340

Kurtosis .378 .668

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Laju membaca alat bantu low vision optik

.152 49 .006 .913 49 .002

Laju membaca alat HMD berbasis smartphone

.142 49 .015 .927 49 .005

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Dokumen terkait