Overview
Introduction
This means that the BPS state vector space provides a natural categorization of the homology block of 3-manifoldness. In other words, the homology block Ėšš¤is a searchable, categorizable invariant of 3-dimensional manifolds.
This thesis
The second identity is the inverse of the first identity and can be verified with qZeil. Similarly, two of the main features of Bš¤(š) are that it is affine isomorphic to š»2(š;š) and that it allows an action of the Weyl group š (and thus an action of š»2(š;š) āš performs).
Background
Chern-Simons theory
It can be shown that this is independent of the choice of a braid representing the bond. Homology blocks, which we introduce in the next section, can be thought of as a generalization of these analytically continued WRT invariants.
Homological blocks
Setting š = šā, its ā expansion corresponds to the Melin-Morton-Rozansky expansion of the colored Jones polynomials. In the classical limit, the š matrices Ėš (š„)and Ėš ā1(š„) can be obtained by specializing the parameters of the parametrized š matrix.
Large-color š -matrix
The large-color š -matrix
It is easy to see that all arcs of the open thread must carry š£. 2 are (the squares of) the eigengenes of the holonomy around the meridians of the two strings, in š šæ.
Inverted state sum
If exactly two of the four arcs are in š for each intersection, connect the ends of the two arcs. When all four bows are in š, connect the ends of the bows of the same strand (i.e. the same as in the link).
Proof of Theorem 3.2.2
The significance of the parameterized š matrix arises from the fact that they induce an algebra morphism in the following way. It follows that the result of the state sum of this new model is of random walk of free bosons. The effect of the sign factor on the positive and negative stabilization movements can be summarized as in Figure 3.18.
In a similar way, we get candidates of the inverted Habiro coefficients for all mirror twirls. The š holonomicity of these cyclotomic coefficients follows from the š holonomicity of the colored HOMFLY-PT polynomials. At the end of the previous chapter, we presented a conjecture about the existence of a three-variable sequenceš¹š¾(š„, š, š) āāāāwhich interpolates the foreš°š©šš¹š¾.
The existence of the quantum š“ polynomial was independently conjectured in the context of the quantization of the Chern-Simons theory [Guk05]. For example, the š degree of the šµ polynomial is equal to the š¦ degree of the š“ polynomial (since there is a one-to-one correlation between the branches). The universal š matrix, Burau representation and the Melvin-Morton expansion of the colored Jones polynomialā.
Dehn surgery
Inverted Habiro series
The series on the right is what we will call an inverted Habiro series. A priori, the "reverse Habiro series" is a completely different object compared to the original Habiro series. For another thing, the inverse Habiro series can be extended to a power series inš„orš„ā1, which is not possible for the regular Habiro series.
The distinction is clearer in the classical limitš ā 1, where the usual Habiro sequences take values āāin Z[[š„+š„ā1ā2]] (a completion in a finite placeš„+š„ā1 = 2), while the converse Habiro series take values āāin Q[[š„+š„1ā. For every node š¾ with Īš¾(š„) ā 1, it has an inverted Habiro sequence, and corresponds to the š¹š¾ in the sense that . With the following identity we can transform a power series in š„ into an inverted Habiro series and vice versa.
It follows from this proposition and Theorem 3.3.1 that for every nice knot š¾ (such as every homogeneous braid knot) that is not a non-knot, š¹š¾ can be expressed as an inverted Habiro series. Proposition 4.1.3 states that the inverted Habir series and the vš„ power series contain the same amount of information. Nevertheless, the inverted Habiro series is a particularly nice way to represent š¹š¾, since it is clearly Weyl symmetric.
Connection to indefinite theta functions
This three-variable series has a natural interpretation in terms of topological strings, which is the subject of the next chapter. The contribution of the vectorā = ( Ā®āš,0,āĀ®š) for the upper graph to the theta function is the same as the contribution of the vectorāā²=( Ā®āš,āĀ®š) for the lower graph. 5.8) Therefore, Ėšš¤ is invariant under the Type A Neumann shift. This is due to the reduction of the Weyl symmetry to Z2, as we specialize to symmetric representations.
According to the volume conjecture, it also captures the asymptotics of the colored Jones polynomials š½š¾ ,š(š) for large colorsš. The vacuum modulus space in 4dN =4 SYM is Symš(C3).) The gauge symmetry šš(š) of this theory appears as a global symmetry of the 3d limit theoryš[šš¾]. This brane configuration is essentially a variant of (6.2) with conormal Lagrangian notation).
For the SFT-stretch to work well, we should be able to move the Lagrangian completely off the zero sectionš3. The variables š„ and š¦ of the š“-polynomial correspond to the eigenvalues āāof the meridian holonomy and the knot length. Therefore, it is natural to expect that there are invariants analogous to š¹š¾(š„ , š, š) āāassociated with the other branches of the š“-polynomial.
We have seen that in the Abelian branch, the expectation value of the Ėš operator gives a š deformation of the inverse Alexander polynomial. On other branches š¦(š¼)(š„ , š), the expectation value of the Ėš operator will be some other function; let's define.
Higher rank
Higher rank Ė š
Higher rank š¹ š¾
Moreover, this series should be annihilated by (higher rank) quantum š“- polynomial:. 5.23) Our main result in this section is an explicit expression for š¹š¤. This can be derived either directly from (5.2) using plumbing description or by reverse construction using the higher-order operational formula that we discuss below. To calculate the integral (5.2) with š„āš š” left unintegrated, we just replace the theta functionĪāšµ(š„ā1, š) with.
Since 2ādegreeš£ is non-zero for only 3 vertices (central vertexš£ā . 1 and 2 terminal vertices) it is very easy to calculate. This is a theorem for knots and 3-manifolds represented by negative-definite hydraulics, as a direct generalization of Theorem 1.2 of [GM21].
Symmetric representations and large š
The š“-polynomial š“š¾(š„ , š¦) is an invariant of the polynomial knot defining the algebraic curve {(š„ , š¦) ā (Cā)2 | š“š¾(š„ , š¦) = 0}, which is the projection of the characteristic variety of the complement of the knot onto the boundary torus [Coo+94]. Indeed, near the limit š2= Īš¾ =š šš¾ compactification of š of five branes produces a 4dN =4 theory which has the space of vacuum modules Symš(C2ĆCā) [Chu+20]. If š¦(š¼)(š„) ā¼š„šis asymptotically close toš„ = 0, for some š āQ, then we can use this as an initial condition and find a solution of the form.
Since there appears to be some correlation between the window of good surgery coefficients (Remark 4.0.2) and the boundary slope of the š“ polynomial Newton polygon, it is not too far-fetched to speculate that this non-abelian branch š¹š¾'s may play a role in gaining a full understanding of Ėš. The DT invariants have two geometric interpretations, either as the intersection homology Betti numbers of the moduli space of all semisimple representations of š of dimension vector, or as the Chow-Betti numbers of the moduli space of all simple representations ofšof dimension vectorized; see [MR19;FR18]. It is an interesting problem to understand, given a socket for one branch, how to get a socket for another branch of the same node.
Topological strings
Topological strings and š¹ š¾
More generally, the colored HOMFLY-PT polynomialsšš¾ , š (š, š) āāare polynomial knot invariants that generalize the HOMFLY-PT polynomial, which also depends on a representation (a Young diagram)š . We will be mainly interested in the HOMFLY-PT polynomials colored by the totally symmetric representations. To simplify the notation, we will denote them by šš¾ ,š(š, š) āāāāand simply call them the HOMFLY-PT polynomials.
The š“ polynomial can be further generalized for the colored HOMFLY-PT polynomials [AV12] and colored superpolynomials [Awa+12;FGS13], which we briefly introduced in (6.1). Equivalently, one can use the topological invariance along š3 to move the tubular neighborhood from š¾ ā š3 to "infinity". This creates a long neck isomorphic to RĆš2, as in the discussion above. Anyway, we end up with a system of š five branes on the node complement and no extra branes on šæš¾, so that the choice of šŗ šæ(š,C) flat connection onšæš¾ is now encoded in the boundary condition for š šæ(š , C)connection2onš2 =š šš¾.
To summarize, a system of š pentabrane in a node complement (6.2) is equivalent to a brane configuration (6.4), with a suitable map connecting the boundary conditions in both cases. Both of these systems on the solved side compute HOMFLY-PT polynomials ofš¾ colored by Young diagrams with at most rowsš. Mathematically, what the physical picture above shows us is that š¹š¾(š„ , š, š) āāis the count of open topological sequences in the resolved conifold š, with the completion of the Lagrangian nodešš¾ ā ā .
Branches
As mentioned briefly in the previous section, a branch choice corresponds to a vacuum choice in 3D theoryš[šš¾]. The abelian branch always corresponds to the slopeā(or equivalentlyš =0), which is why the two-variable seriesš¹š¾(š„ , š) we discussed in previous chapters do not have the exponential prefactoršš. One is the abelian branch, and there are two non-abelian branches with boundary slope ±1.
The abelian branch š¹š¾(š„ , š), as we have considered at length in previous chapters, was part of a larger story involving closed 3-manifolds. On the other hand, it is currently not clear whether the non-abelian branchš¹(š¼).
Holomorphic Lagrangian subvarieties
Physically, this holomorphic Lagrangian corresponds to the Coulomb branch of a 3d-5d coupled system, which should have a quantization. This conjecture can be generalized even more by introducing the š” variable and its conjugate, which we denote by š¢.
Knots-quivers correspondence
The similarity between knots and quivers can be generalized to knot complements, as proposed in [Kuc20] and extensively studied in [Ekh+22]. Then it is an assignment of a symmetric quiverš, an integer šš, and half integers,šš,šš,š ā š. 0 to a given node complementšš¾ =š3\š¾ in such a way that. 6.11). Ekh+] Tobias Ekholm, Angus Gruen, Sergei Gukov, Piotr Kucharski, Sunghyuk Park, and Piotr Sulkowski.šbat largeš: From curve counts to quantum modularity.
Ekh+22] Tobias Ekholm, Angus Gruen, Sergej Gukov, Piotr Kucharski, Sunghyuk Park, Marko StoÅ”iÄ in Piotr SuÅkowski.