Of white respondents, 2.9 percent (one respondent) strongly agreed, 0 percent agreed, 0 percent disagreed somewhat, 14.3 percent disagreed slightly, 22.9 percent disagreed and 60 percent strongly disagreed. Of white respondents, 42.9 percent strongly agreed, 37.1 percent agreed, 17.1 percent somewhat agreed, and 2.9 percent (one respondent) strongly disagreed . Of white respondents, 17.1 percent strongly agreed, 37.1 percent agreed, 31.4 percent somewhat agreed, 8.6 percent disagreed slightly, 5.7 percent disagreed and 0 percent strongly disagreed.
Of white respondents, 48.6 percent strongly agreed, 40 percent agreed, 11.4 percent somewhat agreed, 0 percent somewhat disagreed, 0 percent disagreed, and 0 percent strongly disagreed. Of the white respondents, 8.6 percent strongly agreed, 17.1 percent agreed, 31.4 percent somewhat agreed, 20 percent somewhat disagreed, 20 percent disagreed, and 2.9 percent strongly disagreed. Of the white respondents, 2.9 percent strongly agreed, 37.1 percent agreed, 28.6 percent somewhat agreed, 14.3 percent somewhat disagreed, 8.6 percent disagreed, and 8.6 percent strongly disagreed.
Of the white respondents, 5.7 percent strongly agreed, 28.6 percent agreed, 25.7 percent somewhat agreed, 20 percent somewhat disagreed, 14.3 percent disagreed, and 5.7 percent did not agree at all. Of white respondents, 0 percent strongly agree, 22.9 percent agree, 42.9 percent somewhat agree, 22.9 percent somewhat disagree, 2.9 percent disagree, and 8.6 percent strongly disagree . Of the white respondents, 2.9 percent strongly agreed, 57.1 percent agreed, 28.6 percent somewhat agreed, 5.7 percent somewhat disagreed, 2.9 percent disagreed, 2 and 9 percent did not agree at all.
Of white respondents, 2.9 percent strongly agreed, 20 percent agreed, 34.3 percent somewhat agreed, 20 percent disagreed slightly, 17.1 percent strongly agreed disagree and 5.7 percent strongly disagreed. Of white respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 11.4 percent agreed, 40 percent agreed somewhat, 31.4 percent disagreed slightly, 17.1 percent disagreed, and 0 percent strongly disagreed. Of white respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 22.9 percent agreed, 28.6 percent agreed somewhat, 17.1 percent disagreed slightly, 28.6 percent disagreed disagree and 2.9 percent strongly disagreed.
Of the white respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 2.9 percent agreed, 0 percent somewhat agreed, 0 percent somewhat disagreed, 42.9 percent disagreed, and 54.3 percent strongly disagreed. Of white respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 11.4 percent agreed, 31.4 percent somewhat agreed, 8.6 percent somewhat disagreed, 40 percent disagreed, and 8.6 percent strongly disagreed. Of minority respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 39.5 percent agreed, 31.6 percent somewhat agreed, 7.9 percent somewhat disagreed, 2.6 percent disagreed, and 0 percent strongly disagreed.
Of white respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 54.3 percent agreed, 37.1 percent somewhat agreed, 2.9 percent disagreed slightly, 0 percent disagreed, and 2.9 percent strongly disagreed. Of white respondents, 0 percent strongly agreed, 34.3 percent agreed, 25.7 percent somewhat agreed, 17.1 percent disagreed slightly, 20 percent strongly agreed disagree and 2.9 percent strongly disagreed. Of white respondents, 5.7 percent strongly agreed, 20 percent agreed, 40 percent somewhat agreed, 22.9 percent disagreed slightly, 11.4 percent disagreed, and 0 percent strongly disagreed.
Of white respondents, 5.7 percent strongly agreed, 20 percent agreed, 25.7 percent somewhat agreed, 31.4 percent somewhat disagreed, 11.4 percent disagreed, and 5.7 percent strongly disagreed.
Would Do Differently
The research you will participate in is designed to broadly evaluate the current understanding of The Village Church's Race Positive Impact Initiative. The survey you will participate in is designed to broadly assess the current understanding of The Village Church's vision for local mission through home groups and the initiative to positively impact racial reconciliation in Dallas. The Village Church membership will invite a family from another culture that is not yet part of the Village Church to their home for a meal.
Village Church leadership will seek to establish true diversity of staff and congregation to lead in public settings. The Village Church will incorporate songs, rituals and clothing from different cultures into public church gatherings. The Village Church leadership will publicly discuss what has been done to perpetuate prejudice in the name of Christ and as a representative of the true Christian church, will apologize and speak the truth in love.
The membership of the Village Church will access, read and follow the local news so that they are better informed of the events and struggles of the communities around them. The leadership of the village church will publicly and privately support and follow the life-changing power of the Holy Spirit by praying for the good of the nation and the local community. The leadership of the village church will beg the Lord to turn hearts of prejudice into hearts of peace.
The Village Church membership will seek public office (or support someone in public office) when appropriate to become part of a governing body that can influence schools, gentrification, neighborhoods. Village church membership will add racial reconciliation to family discipleship times and moments as they reflect and teach about the ramifications of the gospel into interpersonal relationships. The village church leadership will organize a coalition of like-minded churches of various backgrounds to plant churches together - the DFW Church Planting Network.
The membership of the Village Church will be organized into small groups that share a passion for the same geographic area of the city and are willing to address the racial barriers therein. The Village Church membership will strive to partner or volunteer with other local missions organizations and partnerships whose strategies address the root causes of issues within them. An American Tragedy: The Legacy of Slavery Lives in the Ghettos of Our Cities.” The Brookings Review 16, no.
Pharisee and Samaritan in John: Polar or Parallel?” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 1, no. Addressing the issue of racial reconciliation according to the principles of Ephesians 2:11–22.” Evangelical Theological Society Bulletin 38, no.
