• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

links.lww.com/JCN/A46

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "links.lww.com/JCN/A46"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

REPORTING CRITERIA No(%) (n=12)

References of Studies Reporting Each Criterion Characteristics of Research Team

Interviewer Identified 5 (42) 7 22 23 24 27

Credentials 12 (100) 7 9 12 22 23 25 27 28 29 30

Occupation 4 (33) 7 23 24 28

Gender 8 (67) 7 22 23 24 26 27 28 30

Experience and Training 5 (42) 7 9 12 22 27

Relationship with participants

Established relationship prior to study 0 Participant knowledge of researcher 0 Interviewer Characteristics (bias, interest,

etc.)

1 (8) 9

Study Design

Methodology/Theory Identified 11 (92) 7 9 12 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30

Sampling Described 11 (92) 7 9 12 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30

Method of Approach Described 5 (42) 7 24 25 27 29

Sample Size 12 (100) 7 9 12 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Refusals/Drop-outs and Reasons Stated 5 (42) 22 23 24 25 26 Setting of Data Collection 7 (58) 7 22 23 24 25 27 30

Presence of Non-participants 1 (8) 23

Description of Sample 12 (100) 7 9 12 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Data Collection

Interview Guide Provided 8 (67) 7 9 24 25 26 27 28 30

Repeat Interviews Conducted 0

Audio/Visual Recording 11 (92) 7 9 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Field Notes Recorded 2 (17) 9 27

Duration of Interviews 8 (67) 9 22 23 24 25 27 28 29

Data Saturation Discussed 8 (67) 7 9 22 24 25 27 28 30

Transcripts returned to participants 0 Data Analysis

Number of coders identified 7 (58) 7 9 12 22 24 25 28

Coding Tree Described 3 (25) 24 29 30

Derivation of themes 11 (92) 7 9 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Software identified 7 (58) 7 24 25 26 27 29 30

Participants provided feedback 2 (17) 7 9

Reporting

Quotations presented and participants identified

7 (58) 22 23 25 26 27 29 30

Consistency between data and findings 12 (100) 7 9 12 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Major themes clear 12 (100) 7 9 12 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Minor themes clear 4 (33) 23 24 25 29

Table 1. Assessment of study quality by consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research

checklist

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

By realizing the importance of integrated assessment instrument, the goal of this research study was to validate an integrated assessment instrument for

The results of the assessment of the level of conformity of the criteria for bioclimatic architecture in the case study Criteria Bioclimatic sub criteria Jida House Lammada House

Supplemental Digital Table 1 Quality Reporting of the 42 Quantitative Studies According to the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument MERSQIᵃ Study authors and date

401 © 2020 Indian Journal of Medical Research, published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow for Director-General, Indian Council of Medical Research Assessment of quality of minor millets

As a result of the study, the elements of the experimental research methodology for the overall satisfaction coefficient of machines and the quality assessment of technological

Inclusion criteria for this review were quantitative and qualitative studies which focus on perceived social support or preoperative program on quality of life in patients awaiting for

Checklist of recommendations for reporting of observational studies using the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data RECORD Statement 1

Sustainability Reporting by Local Councils in Coastal Regions: An Australian Study Nick Sciulli Associate for the Centre for Tourism and Services Research CTSR School of