• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PP population Table S1.2. Mean reduction f

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "PP population Table S1.2. Mean reduction f"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Supplementary Table 1

Table S1.1. Mean reduction from baseline in SBP at each visit- PP population

SBP (mmHg) DXM 0 mg N=31

DXM 2.5 mg N=16

DXM 7.5 mg N=6

DXM 30 mg

N=25 P-value#

Week 6

Mean ± SD 1.8 ± 7.8 -14.0 ± 8.1 1.3 ± 11.7 0.0 ± 8.2 <0.001*

p-value$ 0.21 <0.001* 0.81 >0.99

Week 10

Mean ± SD 1.5 ± 8.1 -9.4 ± 12.1 -10.8 ± 10.2 -0.6 ± 7.4 <0.001*

p-value$ 0.30 0.007* 0.049* 0.67

Week 14

Mean ± SD 0.5 ± 7.8 -11.9 ± 10.8 -7.7 ± 3.4 -0.7 ± 10.5 0.001*

p-value$ 0.67 0.003* 0.003* 0.75

(0.011*)$ SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; DXM: dextromethorphan

P-value# byone-way ANOVA; p-value$ bypaired t test; *statistical significance

$ For those 4 patients who achieved the BP goal at the end of study, there was a significant reduction of 15.3 ± 5.5 mmHg in SBP from baseline at week 14.

Table S1.2. Mean reduction from baseline in DBP at each visit - PP population

DBP (mmHg) DXM 0 mg N=31

DXM 2.5 mg N=16

DXM 7.5 mg N=6

DXM 30 mg

N=25 P-value#

Week 6

Mean ± SD -0.2 ± 6.4 -7.2 ± 4.1 -1.7 ± 3.6 -0.9 ± 3.9 <0.001*

p-value$ 0.87 <0.001* 0.31 0.27

Week 10

Mean ± SD 0.0 ± 4.7 -5.2 ± 5.9 -4.9 ± 2.9 -2.5 ± 4.6 0.004*

p-value$ 0.99 0.003* 0.009* 0.01*

Week 14

Mean ± SD -1.9 ± 6.2 -6.4 ± 6.7 -4.6 ± 2.1 -1.6 ± 5.2 0.045*

p-value$ 0.10 0.002* 0.003* 0.13

(0.15) $ SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; DXM: dextromethorphan

P-value# by one-way ANOVA; p-value$ by paired t test; *statistical significance

$ For those 4 patients who achieved the BP goal at the end of study, there was no significant reduction in DBP from baseline at week 14.

(2)

Table S1.3. Percentage change from baseline in SBP at each visit - PP population

SBP (%) DXM 0 mg N=31

DXM 2.5 mg N=16

DXM 7.5 mg N=6

DXM 30 mg

N=25 P-value#

Week 6

Mean ± SD 1.5 ± 6.2 -9.3 ± 5.1 0.9 ± 8.3 0.1 ± 5.5 <0.001*

p-value$ 0.19 <0.001* 0.81 0.94

Week 10

Mean ± SD 1.3 ± 6.5 -6.1 ± 8.0 -7.5 ± 7.0 -0.3 ± 4.9 0.003*

p-value$ 0.29 0.008* 0.047* 0.75

Week 14

Mean ± SD 0.5 ± 6.3 -7.9 ± 7.0 -5.4 ± 2.4 -0.5 ± 6.9 <0.001*

p-value$ 0.64 <0.001* 0.003* 0.74

(0.009*) $ SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; DXM: dextromethorphan

P-value# byone-way ANOVA; p-value$ bypaired t test; *statistical significance

$ For those 4 patients who achieved the BP goal at the end of study, there was a significant reduction of 10.2 ± 53.4 % in SBP from baseline at week 14.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Table S1: Studies include in the review Study Number Design Intervention Results Hong et al, 2007 26 Cohort study Plain radiographs versus ultrasound Radiography identified 54%

Supplementary table: Incidence rates for selected cancers in the study population and in the general population according to sex and study

1 Supplementary Table 2: Cumulative number of false-positive test results by age per 100 000 persons neoplasia-free at age 50 for various screening scenarios in the age range 50–74

Supplementary Table 1: Parameters and distributions regarding recurrence and mortality for additional factors Parameter Level Total Recurrence Mortality No... b Region:

Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12101686/s1, Table S1: The dimensions of SnO2nanos-

Supplementary Digital Content Immunosuppression and PTLD relapse 3 Figure S1: Landmark analysis of time to progression in patients without evidence of progression 1 year after

1 Supplementary Digital Content Table 1: This table depicts for participants within Group RT-AS and PREV the self-reported AAS cycles that they have used as noted down during the

Supplementary Table Supplementary Table