• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Table S1: According to the ipsilateral and contralateral

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Table S1: According to the ipsilateral and contralateral"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Table S1: According to the ipsilateral and contralateral; and deviation side measurement results

Ipsilateral and contralateral measurement results

Ipsilateral

(n=300) Contralateral

(n=300)

Mean Std.dev. Mean Std.Dev. P*

OFdepth 5.94 1.99 5.85 2.02 0.311

OFwidth 3.58 0.92 3.76 0.89 0.000

LLCPA 100.64 14.84 100.63 15.78 0.990

OPCP 15.06 2.08 15.27 2.34 0.098

Measurement results according to the deviation side (right or left)

Deviation to the right

(n=159) Deviation to the left (n=141)

P**

Mean Std.dev. Mean Std.Dev.

OFdepth Ipsilateral 6.13 2.05 5.74 1.89 0.090

Contralateral 5.75 2.12 5.96 1.89 0.352

OFwidth Ipsilateral 3.59 0.94 3.57 0.91 0.842

Contralateral 3.76 0.92 3.76 0.85 0.980

LLCPA Ipsilateral 99.61 13.87 101.80 15.83 0.202

Contralateral 100.78 16.45 100.47 15.05 0.867

OPCP Ipsilateral 15.33 1.83 14.76 2.30 0.018

Contralateral 15.03 2.40 15.54 2.25 0.061

SDA Ipsilateral 10.13 3.54 10.83 4.66 0.146

*p value show the results of Paired samples t test

**p value show the results of Independant samples t test

(2)

Table S2: Measurement results according to the Ipsilateral Keros Classification

Ipsilateral Keros-Type I

(n=48)

Ipsilateral Keros-Type II

(n=203)

Ipsilateral Keros-Type III

(n=49) P*

n % n % n %

Gender Male 14 12.6 75 67.6 22 19.8 P=0.276

χ2=2.575

Female 34 18.0 128 67.7 27 14.3

Mean Std.dev. Mean Std.Dev. Mean Std.Dev. P**

Pairwise comparisons Ipsilateral

Keros I- İpsilateral Keros II

Ipsilateral Keros I- İpsilateral

Keros III

Ipsilateral Keros II-İpsilateral

Keros III padjusted padjusted padjusted

OFdepth Ipsilateral 3.12 0.66 5.84 1.05 9.15 1.04 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Contralateral 3.81 1.30 5.82 1.63 7.95 1.96 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

OFwidth Ipsilateral 3.99 1.02 3.55 0.90 3.31 0.79 0.001 0.004 0.000 0.087

Contralateral 3.85 0.96 3.78 0.88 3.62 0.85 0.401

LLCPA Ipsilateral 109.50 15.19 100.88 12.98 90.97 16.20 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Contralateral 108.15 15.03 100.74 15.43 92.84 14.49 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.001

OPCP Ipsilateral 13.64 1.85 15.13 2.06 16.19 1.56 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001

Contralateral 13.86 2.35 15.46 2.21 15.86 2.36 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.258

SDA Ipsilateral 11.69 5.18 10.30 4.02 9.92 3.03 0.065

*p value shows the results of Chi-Square test

**p value shows the results of One-way ANOVA test

*** padjusted shows the results of Independent samples t-test with Bonferroni adjustment. padjusted<0.0175 is considered as statistically significant

(3)

Table S3. Pearson correlation test results

Age Gender OF depth OF width LLCPA OPCP

Ipsilateral Contralat SDA

eral Ipsilateral Contralate

ral Ipsilater

al Contralat

eral Ipsilateral Contralatera

Age r -0.057 -0.058 -0.099 -0.137 -0.060 0.044 0.178 0.045 0.020 l -0.083

p 0.329 0.315 0.087 0.017 0.299 0.444 0.002 0.437 0.727 0.152

Gender r -0.057 -0.046 -0.012 -0.093 -0.204 0.127 -0.026 -0.012 -0.013 -0.020

p 0.329 0.431 0.840 0.109 0.000 0.028 0.655 0.841 0.824 0.731

OF depth Ipsilateral r -0.058 -0.046 0.675 -0.200 -0.115 -0.404 -0.315 0.379 0.242 -0.114

p 0.315 0.431 0.000 0.001 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.048

Contralateral r -0.099 -0.012 0.675 -0.110 -0.269 -0.327 -0.473 0.270 0.230 -0.066

p 0.087 0.840 0.000 0.057 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.257

OFwidth Ipsilateral r -0.137 -0.093 -0.200 -0.110 0.509 0.364 0.199 0.013 -0.107 0.026

p 0.017 0.109 0.001 0.057 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.821 0.063 0.648

Contralateral r -0.060 -0.204 -0.115 -0.269 0.509 0.152 0.286 0.039 -0.041 -0.005

p 0.299 0.000 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.496 0.479 0.938

LLCPA Ipsilateral r 0.044 0.127 -0.404 -0.327 0.364 0.152 0.556 -0.087 -0.049 0.072

p 0.444 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.132 0.401 0.214

Contralateral r 0.178 -0.026 -0.315 -0.473 0.199 0.286 0.556 -0.010 -0.014 -0.079

p 0.002 0.655 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.860 0.806 0.174

OPCP Ipsilateral r 0.045 -0.012 0.379 0.270 0.013 0.039 -0.087 -0.010 0.539 -0.128

p 0.437 0.841 0.000 0.000 0.821 0.496 0.132 0.860 0.000 0.026

Contralateral r 0.020 -0.013 0.242 0.230 -0.107 -0.041 -0.049 -0.014 0.539 0.100

p 0.727 0.824 0.000 0.000 0.063 0.479 0.401 0.806 0.000 0.085

SDA r -0.083 -0.020 -0.114 -0.066 0.026 -0.005 0.072 -0.079 -0.128 0.100

p 0.152 0.731 0.048 0.257 0.648 0.938 0.214 0.174 0.026 0.085

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Thirdly, to do weighting the unit of analysis and categorization using online calculation results of the link popularity and the categorization of content management according

List of test cases consists of (the right side of) an oracle truth table and the desired results one wants to measure. Qubits number specifies the number of qubits, final

The results of the study show that there are no significant differences in the social functioning of child sexual assault survivors according to the duration and frequency of sexual

CONCLUSION The Saadat NIBP device fulfilled the AAMI validation requirements of automated oscillometric devices according to the analyzed results of the measurements and it is

Table 2 shows the energy and exergy results for a Rankine cycle with a constant heat input 𝑄𝑖𝑛 in the saturated state 300 °C for water, toluene, and n-nonane organic fluids.. The

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 STUDENTS PERCEPTION TOWARDS ACADEMIC POSTER COMPETITION Table 1: Perception Towards Academic Poster Competition Items Mean Standard Deviation

61 Table 4.3.2 Criterion for Acceptability 61 Table 4.4 a Score Range and Level of Emotional Intelligence 63 Table 4.4 b Results of the Mean Emotional Intelligence Score 63 64

Discriminatory Values of Biomarkers for infection-induced organ dysfunction among all patients n=524 The whole cohort group I-V, n=524 was included in this analysis, thus including