February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 1 of 8 PURDUE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Faculty Senate Minutes February 14, 2006
Representatives in Attendance: Hasan Akay (alternate), Jim Brown, Sally Catlin, Jie Chen, Stanley Chien, Barbara Christe, Gabe Chu, Connie Justice, Brian King, Daphene Koch, Nancy Lamm, Tim Price, Paul Salama, John Schild, Bill Watson, Wanda Worley, Jack Zecher
Guests: Doug Acheson, Ed Berbari, Ken Rennels, Jan Stevens, Dean Yurtseven Meeting began at 11:00 a.m.
The November and December 2005 minutes were approved by all in attendance. Copies of the minutes are not distributed at the meeting, but can be found at G\COMMON\Senate documents.
Administration Report
Dean Yurtseven presented the Administration Report (Attachment 1).
Academic Programs:
Purdue University Board of Trustees approved the new degree program proposal, Biomedical
Engineering Technology-BS and a name change for BMET-AS from Biomedical Electronics Technology Biomedical Engineering Technology. The Indiana Commission for Higher Education approved the AS program name change and the BS program approval will be on the March or April 2006 agenda.
The Motorsports Certificate program with MET Minor was approved by IUPUI.
The Interior Design program went through IUPUI review on January 22-23, 2006. The three member team interviewed faculty, staff, students and administrators regarding the future of this program. The program recently separated from Construction Technology administration and the team confirmed this decision.
Dr. Yurtseven gave a presentation at the Planning and Budgeting hearing for the school on February 1, 2006. This is an off year in terms of budgeting; the state does budgeting every two years. The school is still down from the past year and enrollment is down also. The school is starting with a negative balance for years 2006-2007. Dr. Yurtseven will give more details in the near future.
The College of North Atlantic in NewFoundland, Canada faculty and administrators visited the school on February 9, 2006 for potential collaboration in our technology programs. The school is looking at the Masters in Technology for their graduates. They currently have 200+ faculty in their school. Jan Cowan was the primary contact and host.
Faculty and Staff News:
Hiroki Yokota, with BME, received $1,264,019 from NIH. This is a five year prestigious RO1 grant.
Connie Justice, with CIT, received $50,000 from Microsoft Corporation.
Andrew Hsu, with ME, received $8,000 from IUPUI International Development Fund.
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 2 of 8 Wei Wang, with ECE, received $14,850 from IUPUI International Development Fund.
Ali Jafari and CIT student, Jeremy Reed, submitted Software Disclosure “Epsilen Environment” to the IU Research and Technology Corporation Office of Technology Transfer.
Barbara Christe was on the cover of the magazine 24X7 for Technical Service and Support Professionals in Health Care. The article highlighted the BMET program as a highly innovative online degree program.
Faculty members Ed Berbari, Janet Meyer, Patrick Gee, Mark Bannatyne, Rob Wolter, Darrel Nickolson, Brian Teeters, John Toksoy and Adam Siurek were selected as the “Favorite Professors” from our school by the student athletes. These faculty members along with others from IUPUI were recognized at the IUPUI men’s basketball gave on February 9, 2006.
Karen Siurek and Jessica Shipp recently resigned due to family relocation. The search is on for Jessica’s position; however, the school will replace Karen Siurek with part time staff.
Kyle Randall will replace Leila Lynch as the technical support staff for the CIT Department.
Events:
The IUPUI Alumni Night was held at the Children’s Museum on December 14, 2005. Several alumni attended this event.
First Robotics Competition had its kick-off session on January 7, 2006 at IUPUI. Several high schools participated in this event. Peter Orono along with several of our students provided technical expertise to the high school teams.
The First Annual Career Connection Job Fair was organized by EGTC Student Council with assistance from the Internship Office on January 19, 2006. More than 20 companies participated and interviewed several of our students for job placement or internship positions.
John Schild asked if some of the information will be highlighted somewhere. Dr. Yurtseven advised it is in a press release sometimes. The school does forward the information but is not always sure what will be highlighted.
For further details of the Dean’s Report see Attachment 1.
Administration Report from Dean Rennels
Ken distributed an update on the statistics for the fall 2005 evaluations. Some faculty had expressed concerns previously about the validity of the information. Ken advised there was a mistake in the original data, and the information rate did drop in the overall school evaluation.
The spring enrollment numbers are not real good. The school is down 8.75%, and 1,955 credit hours below last spring semester. The school did not make their budgeted numbers since we were almost 2,000 credit hours down in budget.
The school is creating an initiative with University College to discuss and promote our new plans of study. The previous plans of study from the School of ET were hard to read and decipher in part because all the departments had a different form. Advisors in University College did not like advising students for
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 3 of 8 our school because the plans were hard to read. The school is in process of drafting a uniform plan of study. There will be a University College Advisor Orientation on March 10th, and the school will
distribute these updated plans of study at that time. Ken advised there is a large turnover of advisors on an annual basis and we need to keep the advisors updated.
The following items from Ken Rennels are attached to the end of this report:
• Spring 2006 Enrollment Document
• Plans of Study Examples
• Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evaluation Response Rates Constitution and Bylaws Committee – No Report
Graduate Education Committee – No Report Student Affairs Committee – No Report Budgetary Affairs Committee – No Report Nominations Committee
Doug Acheson advised Faculty Senate of the following items:
CNT committee representatives have been re-aligned to reflect the recent creation of the Design
Technology (DT) program. This program will be represented as are the TCM and FE programs with their own Faculty Senate representative and shared (w/other programs) committee representation.
The committee elections are coming up.
1. Nominations for elected positions are to be made by Nominations Committee members from each department from Monday, February 27 thru Wednesday, March 7 at midnight.
2. Appointed committee members from each department are to be reported to the Nomination Committee Chair Doug Acheson by Wednesday, March 7 at midnight.
3. The 2006 voting will take place Monday, March 27 thru Wednesday, April 5 at midnight. There is a proposed improvement to the voting web page which will supply accompanying pictures for each candidate.
In previous nominations some people were nominated and not aware of this. With an improvement to the nominations database it will automatically email each nominee for confirmation on willingness to serve.
Someone asked if anyone can nominate a person or nominate only department per department. Faculty Senate advised if it is for department representation the nomination should be done by the department themselves. Hasan Akay advised elected offices can be nominated by anyone. Once a person is notified the have been nominated they can respond as to whether they will serve on committee (or any committee) they are nominated for.
Doug reminded everyone each department needs to make a decision on who their representatives will be.
He advised Faculty Senate members to remind their departments of the nomination process and committees.
Resources Policy Committee – No Report
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 4 of 8 Undergraduate Education Committee
Connie Justice advised the Undergraduate Education Committee met on January 6 and Jan 25, 2006.
Members in attendance were Barb Christe, Karen Alfrey, Nancy Lamm, Connie Justice, Liz Coles, and Stanley Chen. Guests included Betty Klein and Jan Stevens.
New Courses
CIT 327, Wireless Networking
This course was tabled in the December meeting. Barb discussed the course with ECET faculty and they had no issues. The committee approved this course.
ECE 421, Advanced Digital Systems Design
This course was tabled in the December meeting. The description was re-written and the pre-reqs changed to ECE 266 and ECE 270. The committee approved this course.
The Computer Application Certificate (CAC) was discussed. Jan Stevens presented the certificate proposal at the January 6th meeting and returned to the January 25th meeting with recommended changes to the certificate. The committee approved the certificate.
The motion was made and Faculty Senate voted and approved the courses and certificate above.
Computer Resources Committee
Hasan Akay reported that this committee has met twice since the last Faculty Senate meeting. The committee is looking at developments within CNC and also the Oncourse CL situation. The original (old) Oncourse will still be in place till June 2007, and Oncourse CL problems should be resolved by the start up begins in one year. Hasan advised the File Manager will, however, go away in June 2006 so the original Oncourse users should be prepared to deal with this in some way.
According to the UITS statistics, this year, 70% of courses have chosen Oncourse CL version to use. This has been a major change since last year. Barb Christe questioned if this percentage is of current users.
Hasan feels that most faculty are basically satisfied with the changeover. Faculty should realize there are a lot of services available for using Oncourse CL and Hasan advised there is a practice site option available on Oncourse CL now.
Rob Meagher, CNC Manager of Research Computing, gave the committee a presentation on the research computing activities and status within the school. They have emphasized that they are equipped to serve the school and departments if necessary. CNC is interested in increasing the usage of Unix and Linux operating systems in the school. It appears like graduates are expected to know more about Unix/Linux usage. CNC is interested in making Linux more widely accessible in CNC labs. CNC is asking if Faculty Senate will endorse the use of Linux and Unix. Hasan asked if the Senate agrees that Linux endorsement should be more emphasized in the school. Bill Watson mentioned that he has had a number of students asking about Linux availability. CNC is making plans to install more computers with dual operating system (Linux and Windows) features; this will get installed faster if there is a strong interest in the area.
CNC can provide double booting options in the CNC lab computers. CNC is also willing to give training or short courses to students. Hasan feels the same is also happening in the campus. Connie advised that CIT is in favor of this idea.
The committee is continuing to look at some models for student laptop program in the school. They are planning to speak with some vendors and campus experts.
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 5 of 8 E-Portfolio is an ongoing campus activity where we might be impacted. This is going to be part of
Oncourse eventually. Students will be able to post their work, for assessment purposes of PULs. E- Portfolio will be available in June or July for faculty access. Hasan advised Faculty Senate to contact Jay Fern if you are interested in this area. There is also a group of faculty who are providing support for Oncourse CL. Barb Christe and Wanda Worley are with some of these groups. UITS has advised they will also provide a service named Tech Rangers to help faculty with the transition to Oncourse CL.
Faculty Affairs Committee – No Report IUPUI Faculty Council
Ed Berbari reported the following items were discussed at the February 7, 2006, IUPUI Faculty Council meeting.
Karen Whitney, Vice Chancellor for Student Life and Diversity, gave a presentation on IUPUI’s student demographics. Some statistics noted include:
16% of IUPUI undergraduate students represent ethnic or racial minorities;
37% of IUPUI undergraduates are age 25 or older;
70% of IUPUI undergraduates work an average of 29 hours per week;
61% of IUPUI undergraduate students are first-generation college students; and 27% of IUPUI undergraduates have children
Ed advised “apartments” is the correct term for the new student housing on campus. The goal is to have 3,000 beds on campus. The school is currently planning for the next round of construction. The campus housing is about 93% full right now.
Trustee issues include the new Life Science plan which if fully implemented would cost the state about
$1.2 billion.
President Bart Ng addressed his concerns about the new responsibilities assigned Charles Bantz office.
Our Chancellor has increased responsibilities. There is concern about how he can manage the academic processes on all regional campuses.
There is a proposal to make IUPUI campus smoke free effective August 15, 2006.
Dr. Yurtseven advised the IUPUI Faculty Council did not discuss PUL issues during the February meeting since the meeting was running too long, should be discussed at the next meeting.
Grievance Board – No Report PWL Faculty Senate
Sivakumar Krishnan attended the Purdue WL Faculty Senate meeting on January 23, 2006. The following is his report from this meeting.
Two items were discussed:
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 6 of 8 A. The Educational Policy Committee report discussed an Alternative to ‘Redlining’. In particular, the creation of a Graduation Index (for internal purposes only) apart from the Semester Index and the Cumulative Index is being considered. This is aimed at addressing two deep-felt positions:
1. All grades need to be included in the calculation of the GPA until or unless a grade was replaced by a new grade for the same course.
2. A Freshman forgiveness policy should exist that enables students to overcome poor grades they might receive while adjusting to the University.
Comments were solicited from the members of the Senate on the draft version before the policy will be discussed in its final form.
B. It was felt that the Grade Appeals process could be modified to make it move forward more smoothly.
With this in mind, changes to the policy were discussed along the following themes:
1. Fewer members of faculty and students on the Grade Appeals Committee, 2. Informal Resolution encouraged wherever possible, and
3. Fixed timelines for tasks.
Ken advised IUPUI has never accepted the IU forgiveness policy. West Lafayette is essentially a forgiveness policy. The school is reconsidering the policy since students might be abusing it.
Purdue Intercampus Faculty – No Report Purdue Technology Senate – No Report Old Business – No Report
New Business
The current March meeting is scheduled for March 14th, which is during spring break. Faculty Senate agreed to schedule the March meeting for Tuesday, March 21, 11:00-12:30 p.m. in SL 165.
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 7 of 8 Attachment 1
Dean’s Report for February 14, 2006 Faculty Senate Meeting
Academic Programs
• Our new degree program proposal, Biomedical Engineering Technology–BS, and a name change for BMET-AS from Biomedical Electronics Technology to Biomedical Engineering Technology have been approved by the Purdue University Board of Trustees on December 16, 2005. Indiana Commission for Higher Education approved the name change for AS program and the BS program approval will be on the agenda in March or April 2006.
• Motorsports Certificate program with MET Minor has been approved by IUPUI.
• Interior Design Program wet through IUPUI Review on January 22-23, 2006. A three- member team interviewed faculty, staff, students, and administrators about the future home for the Interior Design program. The team confirmed the initial decision taken to separate the program from the Construction Technology administration.
• Planning and Budgeting hearing for the school took place on February 1, 2006. A copy of the presentation will be attached to the minutes of this Senate meeting.
• College of North Atlantic in Newfoundland, CA faculty and administrators visited our school on February 9, 2006 for potential collaboration and 3 plus 1 and 3 plus 2 programs in technology programs. Jan Cowan was the primary contact and host.
Faculty and Staff News
• Hiroki Yokota received a five-year prestigious RO1 grant from NIH with his proposal,
“Strengthening Bone Using a Novel Mechanical Loading Model”. The total grant amount is $1,264,019.
• Connie Justice received $50,000 grant from Microsoft Corporation for their "Trustworthy Computing Curriculum 2006 Request for Proposals."
• Andrew Hsu received $8,000 from IUPUI International Development Fund with his proposal, “IUPUI Rolls-Royce Collaboration on Sustainability Training”.
• Wei Wang received $14,850 from IUPUI International Development Fund with his proposal, “Nanotechnology research and Education Collaboration”.
• Ali Jafari and one of his CIT students, Jeremy Reed submitted Software Disclosure
“Epsilen Environment” to the Indiana University Research and Technology Corporation Office of Technology Transfer.
• Barbara Christe was on the cover of the magazine 24X7 For Technical Service and Support Professionals in Health Care. Long article in the magazine and interview with Barbara highlighted our BMET program as highly innovative online degree program.
• Our faculty members, Ed Berbari, Janet Meyer, Patrick Gee, Mark Bannatyne, Rob Wolter, Darrell Nickolson, Brian Teeters, John Toksoy, and Adam Siurek were selected as the “Favorite Professors” in our school by our student athletes. These faculty
members and others from IUPUI schools were recognized at half-time of the IUPUI Men’s Basketball game against Valparaiso University on February 9, 2006.
• Karen Siurek and Jessica Shipp left our school due to families moving out of
Indianapolis. Search is on for Jessica’s position but we plan to replace Karen Siurek with PT workers.
• Kyle Randall will replace Leila Lynch as technical support staff for the Department of Computer and Information Technology.
February 2006 Faculty Senate Minutes Page 8 of 8 Events
• IUPUI Alumni Night was held again at the Children’s Museum on December 14, 2005.
Number of our school alumni and their families joined our faculty and staff.
• First Robotics Competition had its kick-off session on January 7, 2006 at IUPUI. Several high school teams merged on IUPUI to receive the specially televised instructions for the competition. Peter Orono and number of our students support the event and provide technical expertise to high school teams.
• First Annual Career Connection Job Fair was organized by EGTC Student Council with the support and assistance of our Internship Office on January 19, 2006. More than 20 companies participated and interviewed number of our students for job placement and internship positions.
Spring 2006 Enrollments
01/30/06
1 2
DEPT/PROGRAM 05 Cr Hrs 06 Cr Hrs Net Chg. % Chg.
1. Biomedical Engineering 144 162 +18 +12.50%
2. Computer and Information
Technology 6,107 5,107 -1,000 -16.37%
3. Construction Technology
ART 1,165 993
CET 529 660
CNT 871 914
INTR 1,057 957
Sub-Total: 3,622 3,524 -98 -2.71%
4. Electrical and Computer 1,751 1,713 -38 -2.17%
Engineering
5. Electrical and Computer Engr. Tech.
BMET 243 125
ECET 1,733 1,336
Sub-Total: 1,976 1,461 -515 -26.06%
6. Freshman Engineering 509 466 -43 -8.45%
7. Mechanical Engineering 1,466 1,573 +107 +7.30%
8. Mechanical Engr. Tech.
CGT 1,366 1,165
CIMT 6 27
IET 438 423
MET 1,028 1,162
Sub-Total: 2,838 2,777 -61 -2.15%
9. Organizational Leadership 2,638 2,432 -206 -7.81%
and Supervision
10. Tech. Communication (TCM) 1,267 1,111 -156 -12.31%
11. TECH 33 70 +37 +112.12%
SCHOOL TOTAL 22,351 20,396 -1,955 -8.75%
IUPUI TOTAL 282,725.0 285,166.0 2,441.0 +.86%
1 1/24/2005 - five days after census (note: due to SIS issues, program level data was not available at census)
2 1/23/2006 - five days after census (same point in semester as 2005 data)
Student ID: Degree/Program Plan:
Student Name: Program/Plan Code:
Program Entry Date: Requirement Term:
Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite
0 0
Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite
0 0
Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite
0 0
Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite Course# Cr Hr Title Pre- or Co-requisite
0 0
3rd Semester
School of Engineering and Technology
5th Semester 1st Semester
2nd Semester
7th Semester 6th Semester
4th Semester 8th Semester
*Check with department of list of approved electives or selectives.
Additional Information: Degree/Program Plan:
Program/Plan Code:
Requirement Term:
Course# Cr Hr Sem/Yr Grade Course# Cr Hr Sem/Yr Grade
total: 0 total: 0
Course# Cr Hr Sem/Yr Grade Course# Cr Hr Sem/Yr Grade
total: 0
Department of :
total: 0 Offices:
Comments General Education Requirements
Comments
School of Engineering and Technology
Comments Comments
Core Requirements
*Technical Electives or Selectives Math and Science Requirements
*Check with department of list of approved electives or selectives.
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
BME 2089 8 6 75.0%
BME 2090 10 8 80.0%
BME 2091 16 11 68.8%
BME 25696 5 3 60.0%
BME 27509 16 13 81.3%
CIT 6059 23 9 39.1%
CIT 6060 23 18 78.3%
CIT 6061 27 22 81.5%
CIT 6063 30 22 73.3%
CIT 6064 20 7 35.0%
CIT 6065 24 6 25.0%
CIT 6068 24 18 75.0%
CIT 6069 24 8 33.3%
CIT 6071 13 5 38.5%
CIT 6078 25 15 60.0%
CIT 6080 27 16 59.3%
CIT 6082 23 13 56.5%
CIT 6083 14 11 78.6%
CIT 6084 17 15 88.2%
CIT 6085 18 3 16.7%
CIT 6086 11 1 9.1%
CIT 6087 22 5 22.7%
CIT 6088 20 11 55.0%
CIT 6090 27 12 44.4%
CIT 6092 21 9 42.9%
CIT 6094 18 11 61.1%
CIT 6095 1 0 0.0%
CIT 6096 21 14 66.7%
CIT 6097 17 9 52.9%
CIT 6098 9 6 66.7%
CIT 6099 19 12 63.2%
CIT 6101 11 6 54.5%
CIT 6102 11 5 45.5%
CIT 6103 20 8 40.0%
CIT 6104 24 20 83.3%
CIT 6105 17 13 76.5%
CIT 6106 13 7 53.8%
CIT 6107 14 7 50.0%
CIT 6109 25 15 60.0%
CIT 6110 19 10 52.6%
CIT 6112 22 21 95.5%
CIT 6113 22 12 54.5%
CIT 6114 24 16 66.7%
CIT 6115 16 11 68.8%
CIT 6116 1 0 0.0%
CIT 6119 29 17 58.6%
CIT 6120 26 16 61.5%
CIT 6121 26 13 50.0%
CIT 6122 28 24 85.7%
CIT 6123 20 11 55.0%
CIT 6127 27 15 55.6%
CIT 6128 22 11 50.0%
CIT 6129 16 11 68.8%
CIT 6130 13 6 46.2%
1
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
CIT 6131 28 22 78.6%
CIT 6132 20 18 90.0%
CIT 6133 8 4 50.0%
CIT 6134 19 11 57.9%
CIT 6135 13 7 53.8%
CIT 6136 6 4 66.7%
CIT 6138 23 12 52.2%
CIT 6139 22 10 45.5%
CIT 6140 21 8 38.1%
CIT 6141 12 7 58.3%
CIT 6142 29 14 48.3%
CIT 6143 8 3 37.5%
CIT 6147 6 3 50.0%
CIT 6148 28 17 60.7%
CIT 6441 9 2 22.2%
CIT 6442 67 18 26.9%
CIT 6486 20 6 30.0%
CIT 6510 22 11 50.0%
CIT 6597 14 10 71.4%
CIT 6676 8 5 62.5%
CIT 6677 2 2 100.0%
CIT 6678 4 2 50.0%
CIT 6679 1 1 100.0%
CIT 6702 2 1 50.0%
CIT 6703 3 2 66.7%
CIT 6861 10 6 60.0%
CIT 6904 27 13 48.1%
CIT 6944 26 16 61.5%
CIT 7040 21 14 66.7%
CIT 7187 1 0 0.0%
CIT 24456 30 11 36.7%
CIT 24457 19 8 42.1%
CIT 24458 20 9 45.0%
CIT 24459 11 4 36.4%
CIT 24460 10 6 60.0%
CIT 24461 14 11 78.6%
CIT 24462 23 15 65.2%
CIT 24463 24 4 16.7%
CIT 24464 13 11 84.6%
CIT 24466 6 6 100.0%
CIT 24467 13 6 46.2%
CIT 24469 9 6 66.7%
CIT 25698 19 8 42.1%
CIT 25819 14 10 71.4%
CIT 26847 12 6 50.0%
CIT 27827 3 1 33.3%
CIT 28375 1 1 100.0%
CIT 28937 3 0 0.0%
CIT 29059 2 0 0.0%
CIT 29307 10 1 10.0%
CIT 29494 13 7 53.8%
ART 1840 29 13 44.8%
ART 1842 20 8 40.0%
ART 1844 27 11 40.7%
2
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
ART 1846 21 8 38.1%
ART 1848 17 14 82.4%
ART 1850 19 12 63.2%
ART 1852 17 6 35.3%
ART 1854 18 16 88.9%
ART 1856 30 14 46.7%
ART 1860 28 13 46.4%
ART 1862 24 15 62.5%
ART 1863 25 10 40.0%
ART 1866 27 20 74.1%
ART 1867 27 16 59.3%
ART 6234 19 16 84.2%
ART 6662 22 11 50.0%
ART 25607 14 3 21.4%
ART 25609 14 4 28.6%
ART 25610 10 10 100.0%
CET 2369 29 14 48.3%
CET 2371 27 21 77.8%
CET 2373 31 12 38.7%
CET 2374 29 10 34.5%
CET 2376 14 13 92.9%
CET 2380 34 19 55.9%
CET 2382 27 19 70.4%
CET 2383 29 17 58.6%
CET 25826 14 10 71.4%
CNT 2596 90 67 74.4%
CNT 2597 31 25 80.6%
CNT 2599 24 23 95.8%
CNT 2601 25 13 52.0%
CNT 2602 24 18 75.0%
CNT 2604 31 22 71.0%
CNT 7169 1 0 0.0%
CNT 25806 21 13 61.9%
CNT 25807 20 11 55.0%
CNT 27599 16 10 62.5%
CNT 28461 1 0 0.0%
CNT 29086 1 1 100.0%
INTR 4077 19 14 73.7%
INTR 4078 14 4 28.6%
INTR 4080 13 2 15.4%
INTR 4082 16 7 43.8%
INTR 4084 15 5 33.3%
INTR 4087 12 0 0.0%
INTR 4090 14 7 50.0%
INTR 4092 22 9 40.9%
INTR 4093 19 12 63.2%
INTR 4095 19 15 78.9%
INTR 6327 18 18 100.0%
INTR 6473 16 9 56.3%
INTR 6616 19 13 68.4%
INTR 7080 3 3 100.0%
INTR 25830 10 3 30.0%
INTR 25831 12 4 33.3%
INTR 28269 6 2 33.3%
3
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
INTR 28271 10 4 40.0%
INTR 28272 11 11 100.0%
INTR 28274 6 5 83.3%
ECE 2985 29 16 55.2%
ECE 2986 10 8 80.0%
ECE 2987 22 13 59.1%
ECE 2992 28 16 57.1%
ECE 2993 41 23 56.1%
ECE 2999 17 6 35.3%
ECE 3000 18 12 66.7%
ECE 3001 19 13 68.4%
ECE 3002 39 22 56.4%
ECE 3003 22 11 50.0%
ECE 3006 23 12 52.2%
ECE 3009 15 10 66.7%
ECE 3010 21 10 47.6%
ECE 3011 22 16 72.7%
ECE 3012 25 15 60.0%
ECE 3013 16 12 75.0%
ECE 3015 41 28 68.3%
ECE 3022 16 9 56.3%
ECE 3028 5 4 80.0%
ECE 3030 14 6 42.9%
ECE 3034 6 1 16.7%
ECE 3036 8 5 62.5%
ECE 3037 20 15 75.0%
ECE 6313 18 11 61.1%
ECE 6315 17 9 52.9%
ECE 6318 5 5 100.0%
ECE 6319 11 6 54.5%
ECE 6604 22 21 95.5%
ECE 6607 11 7 63.6%
ECE 6624 10 10 100.0%
ECE 25691 2 2 100.0%
ECE 25692 9 7 77.8%
ECE 25828 11 7 63.6%
ECE 25934 6 4 66.7%
ECE 28591 2 2 100.0%
ECE 29337 7 5 71.4%
ECE 29445 1 0 0.0%
BMET 2095 6 2 33.3%
BMET 2096 16 4 25.0%
BMET 2097 15 8 53.3%
BMET 2098 9 4 44.4%
BMET 6330 4 3 75.0%
BMET 28620 1 0 0.0%
BMET 28622 2 1 50.0%
BMET 28623 3 3 100.0%
BMET 28650 1 1 100.0%
BMET 29320 1 0 0.0%
ECET 3050 22 17 77.3%
ECET 3053 21 11 52.4%
ECET 3055 36 19 52.8%
ECET 3063 14 10 71.4%
4
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
ECET 3065 10 10 100.0%
ECET 3067 28 16 57.1%
ECET 3069 14 13 92.9%
ECET 3071 18 13 72.2%
ECET 3074 20 15 75.0%
ECET 3077 20 15 75.0%
ECET 3080 32 23 71.9%
ECET 3083 22 14 63.6%
ECET 3085 24 15 62.5%
ECET 3086 13 8 61.5%
ECET 6332 21 10 47.6%
ECET 6338 15 10 66.7%
ECET 6699 26 17 65.4%
ECET 24400 22 14 63.6%
ECET 24403 23 16 69.6%
ECET 24405 18 11 61.1%
ECET 24407 25 16 64.0%
ECET 24409 26 17 65.4%
ECET 27772 3 2 66.7%
ECET 30379 1 0 0.0%
ENGR 3525 26 22 84.6%
ENGR 3526 23 11 47.8%
ENGR 3527 19 12 63.2%
ENGR 3528 24 15 62.5%
ENGR 3529 26 16 61.5%
ENGR 3531 31 27 87.1%
ENGR 3532 30 25 83.3%
ENGR 3533 32 19 59.4%
ENGR 3534 21 14 66.7%
ENGR 3537 26 16 61.5%
ENGR 3538 19 8 42.1%
ENGR 6665 22 4 18.2%
ENGR 24373 9 8 88.9%
ENGR 24374 15 14 93.3%
ENGR 24375 11 11 100.0%
ENGR 28899 4 3 75.0%
ENGR 28900 1 1 100.0%
ENGR 29030 23 14 60.9%
ME 4398 11 5 45.5%
ME 4399 16 10 62.5%
ME 4400 26 11 42.3%
ME 4402 30 17 56.7%
ME 4403 24 11 45.8%
ME 4406 20 8 40.0%
ME 4407 24 11 45.8%
ME 4410 17 10 58.8%
ME 4413 37 14 37.8%
ME 4414 10 6 60.0%
ME 4417 28 11 39.3%
ME 4418 19 10 52.6%
ME 4420 19 11 57.9%
ME 4421 28 15 53.6%
ME 4422 11 5 45.5%
ME 4423 12 6 50.0%
5
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
ME 4425 13 9 69.2%
ME 4430 11 9 81.8%
ME 6475 7 4 57.1%
ME 24316 1 0 0.0%
ME 24330 9 2 22.2%
ME 24331 8 3 37.5%
ME 24332 4 4 100.0%
ME 24333 15 7 46.7%
ME 24334 7 2 28.6%
ME 24336 3 3 100.0%
ME 24337 7 3 42.9%
ME 28212 6 5 83.3%
ME 28630 2 1 50.0%
ME 28691 5 3 60.0%
ME 28693 6 2 33.3%
CGT 2384 30 9 30.0%
CGT 2385 19 6 31.6%
CGT 2387 11 2 18.2%
CGT 2389 44 11 25.0%
CGT 2392 26 7 26.9%
CGT 2395 15 4 26.7%
CGT 2397 12 10 83.3%
CGT 2399 13 5 38.5%
CGT 2401 29 19 65.5%
CGT 2404 12 2 16.7%
CGT 2408 12 4 33.3%
CGT 2409 14 7 50.0%
CGT 2411 25 9 36.0%
CGT 2418 14 4 28.6%
CGT 2420 17 5 29.4%
CGT 2422 21 7 33.3%
CGT 2424 33 11 33.3%
CGT 2426 30 11 36.7%
CGT 2427 12 6 50.0%
CGT 6500 15 9 60.0%
CGT 28104 11 7 63.6%
CGT 31445 2 0 0.0%
CIMT 2575 10 5 50.0%
CIMT 2580 2 1 50.0%
IET 4030 21 7 33.3%
IET 4031 28 11 39.3%
IET 4032 26 18 69.2%
IET 4034 30 10 33.3%
IET 4035 29 15 51.7%
IET 4039 9 4 44.4%
IET 6288 1 0 0.0%
MET 4438 14 6 42.9%
MET 4439 10 5 50.0%
MET 4441 16 7 43.8%
MET 4443 13 3 23.1%
MET 4445 28 8 28.6%
MET 4447 24 10 41.7%
MET 4449 11 6 54.5%
MET 4451 15 7 46.7%
6
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
MET 4453 17 8 47.1%
MET 4456 20 18 90.0%
MET 4458 16 9 56.3%
MET 4459 18 12 66.7%
MET 4461 12 4 33.3%
MET 4463 21 9 42.9%
MET 4470 20 13 65.0%
MET 4472 22 13 59.1%
MET 4473 17 10 58.8%
MET 4475 15 11 73.3%
MET 4476 13 12 92.3%
MET 6608 15 10 66.7%
MET 25723 12 9 75.0%
MET 25729 8 2 25.0%
OLS 4964 27 11 40.7%
OLS 4965 28 16 57.1%
OLS 4966 26 17 65.4%
OLS 4967 31 13 41.9%
OLS 4968 19 12 63.2%
OLS 4969 15 5 33.3%
OLS 4970 30 21 70.0%
OLS 4971 30 23 76.7%
OLS 4972 24 23 95.8%
OLS 4973 13 6 46.2%
OLS 4974 18 4 22.2%
OLS 4975 17 3 17.6%
OLS 4976 23 11 47.8%
OLS 4977 17 10 58.8%
OLS 4978 16 3 18.8%
OLS 4979 20 2 10.0%
OLS 4980 17 4 23.5%
OLS 4981 19 4 21.1%
OLS 4982 24 5 20.8%
OLS 4983 15 5 33.3%
OLS 4985 28 7 25.0%
OLS 4986 29 5 17.2%
OLS 4987 10 4 40.0%
OLS 4988 18 2 11.1%
OLS 4990 22 19 86.4%
OLS 4991 1 0 0.0%
OLS 4992 8 0 0.0%
OLS 4993 29 12 41.4%
OLS 4994 27 3 11.1%
OLS 4995 9 0 0.0%
OLS 4996 27 5 18.5%
OLS 5990 17 3 17.6%
OLS 5991 23 9 39.1%
OLS 6411 12 0 0.0%
OLS 6412 22 3 13.6%
OLS 24826 25 17 68.0%
OLS 24828 18 14 77.8%
OLS 24829 28 5 17.9%
OLS 24830 12 4 33.3%
OLS 25761 13 7 53.8%
7
Fall 2005 Course/Instructor Evalulation Response Rates Section Data
Department Section Number Number of Students Number of Evaluations Response Rates
OLS 25938 11 10 90.9%
OLS 28133 22 13 59.1%
TCM 5788 25 12 48.0%
TCM 5789 20 9 45.0%
TCM 5790 21 11 52.4%
TCM 5791 24 10 41.7%
TCM 5792 22 9 40.9%
TCM 5793 22 18 81.8%
TCM 5794 21 17 81.0%
TCM 5795 16 8 50.0%
TCM 5796 15 9 60.0%
TCM 5797 20 17 85.0%
TCM 5798 15 6 40.0%
TCM 5799 24 16 66.7%
TCM 5800 9 2 22.2%
TCM 5801 10 5 50.0%
TCM 5802 20 11 55.0%
TCM 5803 17 9 52.9%
TCM 5804 15 8 53.3%
TCM 6916 14 5 35.7%
TCM 6917 15 12 80.0%
TCM 6918 16 8 50.0%
TCM 25171 17 9 52.9%
TCM 29291 13 5 38.5%
TECH 6477 2 0 0.0%
TECH 28465 9 3 33.3%
TECH 31489 1 0 0.0%
Total 7081 3831 54.1%
8
1
Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI
Planning/Budgeting Presentation
February 1, 2006
2
Faculty Involvement in Planning and Budgeting
• Three-year Strategic Plan
– Discussions at department/program meetings and at Faculty Senate
– Input from students, alumni, staff, and industry partners
• Budgetary Affairs Committee of the Faculty Senate
– Two to three meetings per year
• Faculty and Staff Convocation
– Fall and Spring semesters
• Chairs/Directors/Deans (CDD)
– Monthly meetings
3
Doubling Teaching and Learning in the School
• Issues to address
– Number of BS graduates
• New graduates from BME and INTR
• Pending approval for BMET-BS degree program
– Retention rates for
• Directly admitted students
• Students coming from UCOL (no data available)
– Six year graduation rate
4
EGTC B.S. Graduates
August, December, May Graduation Year
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
1997/
1998 1998/
1999 1999/
2000 2000/
2001 2001/
2002 2002/
2003 2003/
2004 2004/
2005 2005/
2006 2006/
2007 2007/
2008 2008/
2009 2009/
2010 2010/
2011 2011/
2012 2012/
1013
EGTC BS Graduates Doubling Goal
5
Freshm an to Sophom ore Retention
School of Engineering and Technology Directly Admitted Students
73%
70%
73%
71%
74%
Doubling Goal 75%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
EGTC Fall to Fall Data IUPUI Doubling Goal Linear Retention Trendline
6
6-Year Graduation Rate
School of Engineering and Technology Beginners Receiving Degree from Entry Department
25%
20% 22%
25%
16%
20% 20% 21% 22%
40%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Entry Year (Fall)
IUPUI Doubling Goal
Linear Graduation Rate Trendline
7
6-Year Graduation Rate
School of Engineering and Technology Beginners Receiving a degree from the IU System
37%
28%
34% 34%
27% 28% 29%
37%
29%
40%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Entry Year (Fall)
IUPUI Doubling Goal
Linear Graduation Rate Trendline
