Name: Rika Pratiwi NIM: 20400121090 Class: PBIC
Judul Artikel: Word Meaning and Lexical Pragmatics
Latar Belakang: The paper explores the relationship between word meanings and concepts in the context of lexical pragmatics. It discusses the representation of underspecified lexical meanings and the role of contexts in the construction of full-fledged utterance meanings. The paper also compares and contrasts different linguistic theories such as Generative Lexicon Theory (GLT), Theory of Conceptual Spaces (TCS), and Relevance Theory, proposing a lexical pragmatic conception that integrates the views of these theories. Additionally, it delves into the challenges of representing polysemy and the mechanisms of type coercion and co-composition in linguistic analysis. The text also discusses the interaction between word meanings and context in language interpretation, exploring how meanings of words can be inferred from context and how the Cognitive Principle of Relevance regulates the construction of utterance meaning.
Hasil: The paper aims to explore the relationship between word meanings and concepts in the context of lexical pragmatics, drawing from theories such as Generative Lexicon Theory (GLT), Theory of Conceptual Spaces (TCS), and Relevance Theory (RT). It discusses the representation of underspecified lexical meanings and the role of contexts in the construction of full-fledged utterance meanings. The paper also compares and contrasts different linguistic theories, proposing a lexical pragmatic conception that integrates the views of these theories.
Additionally, it delves into the challenges of representing polysemy and the mechanisms of type coercion and co-composition in linguistic analysis. The text also discusses the interaction between word meanings and context in language interpretation, exploring how meanings of words can be inferred from context and how the Cognitive Principle of Relevance regulates the construction of utterance meaning.
The paper provides a detailed analysis of the lexical-semantic representation and generative procedures in the context of Generative Lexicon Theory (GLT). It discusses the representation of polysemic words and the mechanisms of type coercion and co-composition in GLT. The text also explores the similarities and differences between Two-level Conceptual Semantics, Generative Lexicon Theory, and Relevance Theory, proposing a lexical pragmatic conception that amalgamates the views of these theories. It concludes by outlining the structure of the paper and its approach to lexical pragmatics.
The paper also addresses the challenges of treating the various meanings of words such as
"book," "sonata," and "newspaper" within the framework of GLT, emphasizing the necessity of distinguishing between primary and non-primary literal meanings and the derivation of non- primary meanings from primary ones.
Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive exploration of lexical pragmatics and semantic representation in linguistics, drawing from various linguistic theories and proposing a novel lexical pragmatic conception that integrates their views.
Kelebihan: The passage discusses the underspecific character of word meanings and the challenges of representing polysemy in terms of meaning postulates. It also explores the role of immediate and extended contexts in lexical pragmatics, and how they contribute to the interpretation of utterances. The passage also discusses how under-specified predicates are influenced by lexically encoded meanings of arguments and how immediate contexts provide relevant information to infer meanings of verb phrases.
The paper discusses the relationship between word meanings and concepts in the context of lexical pragmatics. It explores the similarities and differences between Two-level Conceptual Semantics, Generative Lexicon Theory, and Relevance Theory, and proposes a lexical pragmatic conception that amalgamates the views of these theories.
This text discusses the concept of lexical pragmatics, which involves the interaction between word meanings and context in language interpretation. It explores how meanings of words can be inferred from context and how the Cognitive Principle of Relevance regulates the construction of utterance meaning. The text also compares lexical pragmatics with other models and discusses its potential application to empirical data.
Kekurangan: The passage lacks a clear explanation of the practical implications of the proposed lexical pragmatic conception and how it can be applied to empirical data. While it discusses the theoretical aspects of lexical pragmatics and semantic representation, it could benefit from providing examples or case studies to illustrate how the proposed conception can be utilized in linguistic analysis. Additionally, the passage does not address potential criticisms or limitations of the proposed lexical pragmatic conception, which could provide a more balanced and comprehensive analysis of the topic. Furthermore, the passage could benefit from a more detailed discussion of the specific challenges and complexities involved in representing polysemy and underspecified lexical meanings, as well as the potential implications for language processing and understanding. Lastly, the passage does not explicitly address the potential impact of the proposed lexical pragmatic conception on the broader field of linguistics and its relevance to current linguistic research and discourse.
