G. Sergi, C. Trevisan, B.M. Zanforlini, N. Veronese, and E. Manzato
3.1 Introduction
In the geriatric population, rehabilitation care is important in preventing or limiting mobility impairment and loss of self-sufficiency, which raise the risk of comorbidities, frailty, and mortality [1]. The exercise workload to adopt in reha- bilitation programs needs to be adapted to each patient’s characteristics and to the physiological, age-related changes in their body composition and energy metabolism, as illustrated in Fig. 3.1. The musculoskeletal changes generally seen in old age concern fat-free mass, fat mass, and bone mass, with a gradual loss of muscle bulk and strength, a gain and redistribution of adipose tissue, and the onset of joint stiffness and declining bone mineral density [2]. Among the multiple factors influencing these changes, endocrine, immunological, and inflammatory mediators have a fundamental role: together with the age-related decline in cardiovascular and pulmonary performance, they give rise to signifi- cant changes in energy metabolism and particularly in resting metabolic rate and maximal aerobic capacity. This chapter briefly describes the main physiological age-related changes in body composition and energy metabolism to consider when dealing with elderly people, with a view to providing physicians with the information needed to adapt the load of any rehabilitation programs to the real functional capacity of geriatric patients.
22
3.2 Body Composition and Aging
Physiological changes in body composition may influence physical performance in older age. Lean mass, and appendicular muscle mass in particular, undergoes quantitative and qualitative changes with aging. The reduction in skeletal muscle mass has been estimated at 8% every 10 years between 40 and 70 years of age, after which this phenomenon seems to speed up, with a loss of 15% or more per decade [2, 3]. This ultimately gives rise to a roughly 40% difference in muscle volume between individuals 20 and 60 years of age [4]. Some of the factors that may influence these changes include an inadequate dietary protein intake, oxida- tive stress, vitamin D deficiency, hormonal dysregulation (with low levels of GH, IGF-1, and androgens), and inflammatory states [5, 6]. The loss of muscle mass particularly concerns the fast-twitch glycolytic muscle fibers (type IIb), which may be lost or partially replaced by slow-twitch muscle fibers (type I). This con- version affects the muscle’s energy metabolism and physical performance because type II fibers are involved in short exercises demanding power and speed, not in long-endurance activities [7]. To describe the age-related reduction in muscle mass and the associated decline in muscle function, Rosenberg coined the term “sarcopenia,” a condition characterized by a progressive mobility impairment and loss of physical performance [8]. Like lean mass, fat also under- goes peculiar physiological changes with aging. The proportion of adipose tissue tends to increase in older people, who reported 10% more body fat than younger people [9]. Older people’s fat mass tends to deposit mainly in the visceral
FAT-FREE MASS
RESTING METABOLIC
RATE
Physical activity Aging
MAXIMAL AEROBIC CAPACITY FAT MASS
Fig. 3.1 Age-related changes in body composition and energy metabolism
G. Sergi et al.
23
compartment, generating hormonal and inflammatory pathways associated with negative metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, and thus limiting their endur- ance and physical performance [10]. In older age, adipose tissue also tends to infiltrate the muscle fibers, thereby accelerating muscle loss through encum- brance and lipotoxicity mechanisms [11]. Estimating changes in fat and lean mass with such noninvasive methods such as dual X-ray absorptiometry and bio- electrical impedance analysis [12, 13] thus represents the first step when plan- ning tailored rehabilitation programs.
3.3 Changes in Resting Energy Rate
The resting metabolic rate (RMR) represents the energy needed to maintain basic body functions in a state of rest. Using a calorimetric method, it has been estimated at around 50–65% of the total daily energy expenditure. The RMR gradually decreases with aging, due mainly to changes in body composition (and especially the reduction in fat-free mass) but also to changes in tissue energy metabolism [14]. Skeletal muscle metabolism, in particular, has been recognized as one of the most relevant factors influencing the RMR [15]. However, regardless of the impact of body composition on the RMR decline over time, the effect of aging per se as a factor capable of influencing the RMR has been confirmed by several studies [14, 16], which identified a 4.6% lower RMR in the middle-aged than in younger adults, irrespective of body size, body composition, and physical activity [16]. Moreover, other factors can contribute to influencing resting energy expenditure in older peo- ple, as well as age and the proportion of lean mass. Patients undergoing rehabilita- tion, in fact, often suffer from various comorbidities and have a history of neurohormonal dysregulation, fasting, mobility problems and body temperature alterations—all variables that may affect their RMR. These factors therefore need to be considered before initiating any rehabilitation programs. The potential effect of physical exercise in increasing an individual’s RMR and daily energy require- ment must be considered too, in order to ensure an adequate energy intake for patients under rehabilitation.
3.4 Maximal Aerobic Capacity and Metabolic Equivalent in Aging
The maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) is the highest rate of oxygen uptake and distribution to the peripheral tissue that a cardiorespiratory system can cope with during exercise, beyond which there is no increase even if more effort is made.
Like the RMR, VO2max values may be influenced by numerous factors, includ- ing age, gender, body composition, and training. Aging has a strong impact on VO2max, which can decline by 10% per decade beyond the age of 50 years [17], depending on cardiopulmonary fitness and exercising behavior but also due to
3 Age-Related Changes in Body Composition and Energy Metabolism
24
age-related changes in skeletal muscle mass, with the related loss of muscle fibers and decline in oxidative function [18]. A more standardized index of car- diopulmonary performance has been introduced to express individual tolerance of physical activity for clinical purposes, namely, metabolic equivalents (METs), defined as the ratio between the work metabolic rate and the RMR. Under maxi- mal workload, this measure expresses how many times an individual’s energy metabolism could be increased to cover the body’s needs in maximal effort.
While younger adults achieve METs of around 11, elderly people generally reach values of 6–8 METs, compatible with a moderate physical activity level [19].
The decrease in METs in maximal effort begins from the age of 40 years and is accelerated by certain subclinical conditions or a sedentary lifestyle [20].
Although measuring METs in older people fails to take age- related changes in body composition and energy metabolism into account [19], their use can facili- tate the estimation of an individual’s tolerance of exercise and cardiorespiratory reserves. A low capacity for exercise, judging from a low METs count in maxi- mal oxygen uptake, is a significant predictor of cardiovascular disease and mor- tality, with each increase of 1 METs corresponding to a 10% lower mortality risk [21]. Aerobic capacity is therefore another factor to consider when planning safe rehabilitation programs for older people.
3.5 Approaches to Rehabilitation for Elderly Patients
Age-related changes in body composition and energy metabolism need to be taken into account when planning rehabilitation programs for older people. Patients needing rehabilitation have often suffered from medical conditions that may have exacerbated the age-related reduction in their metabolic performance and acceler- ated the functional decline of skeletal muscle mass. Such physiological and patho- logical changes mainly affect the individual’s maximal aerobic capacity, giving rise to a lower exercise tolerance. This decline can be countered, however, by reha- bilitation aiming to improve older patient’s physical performance, which often leads to an increase in their energy needs. Estimating body composition and maxi- mal aerobic capacity could therefore represent fundamental steps in the design of rehabilitation programs tailored to each patient’s characteristics.
Key Points
• Rehabilitation programs in advanced age have to consider the physiologi- cal modifications in body composition and energy metabolism.
• Older people tend to present reduced skeletal muscle mass and increased adipose tissue.
• Resting metabolic rate and maximal aerobic capacity gradually decrease with aging.
G. Sergi et al.
25
References
1. Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit R (2002) Skeletal muscle strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:B359–B365
2. Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV et al (2006) The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:1059–1064
3. Grimby G, Saltin B (1983) The ageing muscle. Clin Physiol 3:209–218
4. Porter MM, Vandervoort AA, Lexell J (1995) Aging of human muscle: structure, function and adaptability. Scand J Med Sci Sports 5:129–142
5. Morley JE (2012) Sarcopenia in the elderly. Fam Pract 29(Suppl 1):i44–i48. doi:10.1093/
fampra/cmr063
6. Brüünsgaard H, Pedersen BK (2003) Age-related inflammatory cytokines and disease.
Immunol Allergy Clin N Am 23:15–39
7. Toji H, Kaneko M (2007) Effects of aging on force, velocity, and power in the elbow flexors of males. J Physiol Anthropol 26:587–592
8. Rosenberg IH, Roubenoff R (1995) Stalking sarcopenia. Ann Intern Med 123:727–728 9. Coin A, Sergi G, Minicuci N, Giannini S, Barbiero E, Manzato E et al (2008) Fat-free mass
and fat mass reference values by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a 20–80 year- old Italian population. Clin Nutr 27:87–94. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.008
10. Riechman SE, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Thaete FL, Kriska AM (2002) Association of physi- cal activity and visceral adipose tissue in older women and men. Obes Res 10:1065–1073.
doi:10.1038/oby.2002.144
11. Goodpaster BH, Carlson CL, Visser M, Kelley DE, Scherzinger A, Harris TB et al (2001) Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: the Health ABC Study. J Appl Physiol 90:2157–2165
12. Saragat B, Buffa R, Mereu E, De Rui M, Coin A, Sergi G et al (2014) Specific bioelectrical impedance vector reference values for assessing body composition in the Italian elderly. Exp Gerontol 50:52–56. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2013.11.016
13. Haarbo J, Gotfredsen A, Hassager C, Christiansen C (1991) Validation of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Clin Physiol 11:331–341
14. Fukagawa NK, Bandini LG, Young JB (1990) Effect of age on body composition and resting metabolic rate. Am J Phys 259:E233–E238
15. Zurlo F, Larson K, Bogardus C, Ravussin E (1990) Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major deter- minant of resting energy expenditure. J Clin Invest 86:1423–1427. doi:10.1172/JCI114857 16. Klausen B, Toubro S, Astrup A (1997) Age and sex effects on energy expenditure. Am J Clin
Nutr 65:895–907
17. Pimentel AE, Gentile CL, Tanaka H, Seals DR, Gates PE (2003) Greater rate of decline in maximal aerobic capacity with age in endurance-trained than in sedentary men. J Appl Physiol 94:2406–2413. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00774.2002
18. Jackson AS, Beard EF, Wier LT, Ross RM, Stuteville JE, Blair SN (1995) Changes in aerobic power of men, ages 25–70 yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:113–120
19. Sergi G, Coin A, Sarti S, Perissinotto E, Peloso M, Mulone S et al (2010) Resting VO2, maxi- mal VO2 and metabolic equivalents in free-living healthy elderly women. Clin Nutr 29:84–88.
doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.07.010
20. Morris CK, Myers J, Froelicher VF, Kawaguchi T, Ueshima K, Hideg A (1993) Nomogram based on metabolic equivalents and age for assessing aerobic exercise capacity in men. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:175–182
21. McAuley P, Myers J, Abella J, Froelicher V (2006) Evaluation of a specific activity question- naire to predict mortality in men referred for exercise testing. Am Heart J 151:890.e1–890.e7.
doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.09.017
3 Age-Related Changes in Body Composition and Energy Metabolism
© Springer International Publishing AG 2018 27
S. Masiero, U. Carraro (eds.), Rehabilitation Medicine for Elderly Patients, Practical Issues in Geriatrics, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57406-6_4
M. Invernizzi, MD, PhD • A. Baricich, MD • C. Cisari, MD, PhD (*)
Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, Novara, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]