• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Motivation and Rehabilitation in Older Patients

Dalam dokumen Stefano Masiero Ugo Carraro Editors (Halaman 70-73)

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018 53

S. Masiero, U. Carraro (eds.), Rehabilitation Medicine for Elderly Patients, Practical Issues in Geriatrics, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57406-6_7

C. Federspiel, MD • J.-P. Steinmetz, PhD (*)

Centre for Memory and Mobility - ZithaSenior, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

7

Motivation and Rehabilitation in Older

54

[6], is a person’s belief in his or her capabilities to have control over or to influence a (personal) situation or an event. Previous research found that sense of control in people and their age is negatively related, with older persons experiencing generally less control [7, 8]. Beliefs in one’s own capabilities (i.e., self-efficacy) are thought to govern cognition, emotions, and behavior and are crucial to determine to what extent a patient feels motivated. In PRM it is thus important to identify potential sources of self-efficacy enhancing information to help strengthen those beliefs [9].

To enhance motivation and corresponding behaviors (i.e., participation in rehabili- tation activities), several factors are relevant: the patient’s personality, patient’s active participation in the development of the interdisciplinary rehabilitation pro- gram, definition of relevant goals to be achieved during rehabilitation, encourage- ment and support from the therapists, empowerment of the patient, and the rehabilitation environment in general [1, 10, 11]. Moreover, providing information about the necessity of certain exercises or therapies (i.e., patient education) may furthermore be beneficial in generating patient motivation to engage in rehabilita- tion [11]. Detrimental effects of lack of motivation have been discussed in the litera- ture. Findings suggest that if patients are perceived as unmotivated by the therapist, the clinician is less likely to support and encourage him/her. Thus, motivated patients are differently treated than unmotivated ones, especially if the unmotivated patient is old [11]. Therapists play a vital role in positively influencing their patients to actively participate in therapy. An interpersonal relationship characterized by respect and trust may easily be established between the therapist and the motivated patient but takes time and effort to be established with patients lacking motivation.

That is, therapists must develop an important amount of sensitivity toward their patients enabling the therapist to recognize cognitive and mood disorders threaten- ing positive rehabilitation outcomes in their patient [4]. As a positive consequence, rehabilitation interventions can promptly be adapted according to the mental and physical state of the patient.

After more than a decade of clinical practice in geriatric rehabilitation, our gen- eral experience is that the acquisition of knowledge of the patient’s preferences prior the critical health event and the patient’s personality (e.g., through contacts with the family) is beneficial in determining a tailored intervention program.

Tailored intervention programs are ideally developed by an interdisciplinary team composed of various healthcare professionals. A multidisciplinary team can be composed of a geriatrician and/or a specialist in rehabilitation medicine, an occupa- tional therapist, a physiotherapist, a psychologist, a speech therapist, a social worker, and a nursing staff. This interdisciplinary composition is an important key toward a better understanding, evaluation, adaptation, and scheduling of individualized reha- bilitation interventions. Monitoring physical and mental capacities and the social condition of the old patients helps us in approaching the very personal interests of each patient on different levels. Thus and, for example, assessing (e.g., through semi-structured interviews) and integrating systematically individual biographic elements in the development of tailored interventions is useful in enhancing compli- ance among patients as interventions may be better focused and adapted to the indi- vidual patient. Furthermore, spending time with the patient and trying to build up an

C. Federspiel and J.-P. Steinmetz

55

empathetic relationship to make the patient feel comfortable and welcome may fur- thermore positively affect compliance and consequently, rehabilitation outcomes [12]. We conclude that exploring the construct of motivation is fundamental in the work with older adults and should hence be systematically considered in geriatric rehabilitation units as it figures as a key mediator of the success or the failure of a rehabilitation program.

References

1. Resnick B (2002) Geriatric rehabilitation: the influence of efficacy beliefs and motivation.

Rehabil Nurs 27:152–159

2. Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, Samsa GP, Hoenig H, Hamilton B, LaClair BJ, Dudley TK (2002) Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 33:167–178. doi:10.1161/hs0102.101014

3. Kerr T (2000) Depression in the elderly. Adv Phys Ther Phys Ther Assist 11:38–39

4. Givens JL, Sanft TB, Marcantonio ER (2008) Functional recovery after hip fracture: the com- bined effects of depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment, and delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1075–1079. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01711.x

5. So C, Pierluissi E (2012) Attitudes and expectations regarding exercise in the hos- pital of hospitalized older adults: a qualitative study. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:713–718.

doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03900.x

6. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215

7. Wolinsky FD, Wyrwich KW, Babu AN, Kroenke K, Tierney WM (2003) Age, aging, and the sense of control among older adults: a longitudinal reconsideration. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 58:S212–S220. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.4.S212

8. Wolinsky FD, Stump TE (1996) Age and the sense of control among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 51:S217–S220

9. Buckman M (2016) A systemic literature review exploring the effects of occupational therapy rehabilitation and motivation on geriatric patients. Honors Major Theses Pap. 7

10. Resnick B (1996) Motivation in geriatric rehabilitation. ResearchGate 28:41–45

11. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A (2002) The concept of patient motivation a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals’ attitudes. Stroke 33:444–448. doi:10.1161/hs0202.102367 12. Maclean N, Pound P (2000) A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the litera-

ture on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 50:495–506. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00334-2 7 Motivation and Rehabilitation in Older Patients

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018 57

S. Masiero, U. Carraro (eds.), Rehabilitation Medicine for Elderly Patients, Practical Issues in Geriatrics, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57406-6_8

F. Scarponi

Neurorehabilitation Unit, USL Umbria 2, Foligno Hospital, Via. M. Arcamone, Foligno, Perugia 06034, Italy

M. Zampolini (*)

Department of Rehabilitation, USL UMBRIA 2, Foligno Hospital, Via M. Arcamone, Foligno, Perugia 006034, Italy

e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

8

Dalam dokumen Stefano Masiero Ugo Carraro Editors (Halaman 70-73)