# $%
379 - 367
! "
#$
( Canis lupus ) %& ' ! ( ! )&
*+ ,) - . / )
%
* 0
1 ( 2 (0
2 3 %& 5 * +6 2* 3 78
: $; 2
4 6$
1 .
> ) 3 2 )
? 0 % $ 2
"+ &
@
! $;, % + & 2 8 7A B
2 . ) + &
2
2 ? 0 % $
"+ &
@
! $;, % + & 2 8 7A B
3 4 . 2 ? 0 % $ ) &
"+ &
@
! $;, % + & 2 8 7A B
) :
8 / 11 / 1391 - :
13 / 2 / 1393 (
% "C
' ( ) *+
, ) - . /0 /012 32 4 ) 5 ) 3 67 # 7 ) -
1 0 10 5 18
* 9 ) -
: - ;4 .
= 7 10 4 3 = )
/012 = , >8 . , 0 ? /5 0 -
+0 0 9 ) - 5 .
= 6- @;?
10. - A+ ' $ 4
=B 8 ? C ) - 1 5 9 = 9 2 D0 '+ )+
EF - ( G H 1IJ K2 /;0. ) -
; 32
+ - 4 L 2 +
. /> ) 1IJ > M8 18 = N - )+
B>0 O ; 1IJ # ;> / ,% 7
+ ' $ 4 .
/5 B0 P 0 0 4:
O 1IJ 71 / 0 S H$8 T1IJ 0 ' ( T1IJ 7 10 1 0 = F / ;5
U; 8 8 = +;
2649 1I 5 A
5 / 13 / + - 4 XJ4 +%
O*3 7 10 ) /0. , 0 ? /5 L 2 32
+0 + 4 .
= N -
P 0 Y 4 /
4 /$*Z / / 3M8 1 : '+ : ) -
[ $8 ) - \ I%
M 4 O ) 1 - 0 7 1;0 /I;% 9 ] E5 ;8 ;-
/ 01H O*3
, 1^
EF J
= _8 + 5 ,` +7 ) - 0 /0. ' (
+0+ = 8 4 = L 2 32 .
;4 ) -
A+ ^ /
4 a bB8 I ` c * /d '+ : )
1 0 XJ4
825 / 0 ( /> % c * /d )+
)
% I5 h 0
/>
)+
84 / 0 ( 1IJ A+ /5 B0 /
4 6 ? 1i HI ^ '+ : /0. 7 10
32 .
/0.
L 2 32
j 0 1 - 0 k
$8 ) 1870 ; 2405 ( 8 l / S 30 ; B0 01H 7 10 /
/;5 +;- 1; 0 ; 18
/0.
+ - 4 L 2 ) - m
O 0 0 #ni + 8 ) - 1 5 9 G_ A 4
.
3
! D :
' ( L 2 0 # l 8 M 4
O ) 1 - 0 - , /0. ) - 32 0 0 #ni + .
=$I8 A1o '+ 10*
: 02632245908 C5 9
: 02632245908
Email: mkaboli@ut.ac.ir
1 . F
) 5 i L 2 )
Canis lupus
( /; 9 q 2 = ;8
H;;Bi +0 ;; ? )
;;4 ;;4 r;;
s 8 - ( ) - E 0
5 * ;5 '+; 5 ? = ;
4 '+
)
Mech & Boitani, 2003
.(
L 2 /; ;F 8 -
4 H k / ' 1b0
+ 0 8 1%
/;5
>8 0 ,
+ 0 /
/ / 1i 1b$I^ ) -
;;; 5 8 +;;;0 ` + ;;; / ;;; ;;;4 4 ' ( + 8 ) - / 0
+ q 2
)
Mech, 1995; Mladenoff et al., 1999; Treves et al., 2011
.(
1;m ; =;
' ;F ; ; + +; )
U b8 /H8
+ /H8 ' ( ;
) ;- 6- ;5 /;d tH
/ ; 0 ;Iu ) ;- 3; 0 H ) -
L 2 1v7 I 1;^ ' ( ; S; -
;4 /;5
w >0 ) 5
L 2 m + + 6- 5 = -
+0+ Um1 E E- 10 ` )
Salvatori &
Linnell, 2005; Rich et al., 2012
.(
; m 1v7 ;-
,; ` ) ;4 L ;2 /;m18
+ - T1IJ ' 12
;4 =; H x1;*15 1
L 2 1v7 ) -
;4 . ^1; 8 , ; ;4 =;
) 5 s; 8 - y ;i S; x1*19 1zx 6; 1? ) ;-
{ ) B5 l , +; ; 8 ;8 ;-
+; ; 8 U;Iu /;5 ;4 '+; | $7 k 2 I b ) -
# $ + } +- r +0
. /;d 2
s 8 n i 1;IJ ; - ( [1 ) -
L 2 6 5 ? ) ; E- 9 -
: )
Treves et al.,
(2011
'+ N ? / M 1i = 8
+; +
0 /012 = # l 8 1
d
~ - /5 ; /012
O 7 bB ' ( = • ) 5 L 2 ) -
) -
+- 1b0 1m 0 0 .
= L ;2 4 =
/012 ) /Io 4 4 € ; 8 ; 1 ; /;012 =;
/ c * /d + - 4 ] /; /I 7 ) 1i
€ ; 8 ). ; #+; ' 1;2 0 / /I 7 c * /d ; 0 /012 = 9
;>J O /; * J '+;
;4
)
Ahmadi et al., 2012
.(
j ` L 2 = B5 /*18 -
-
/0. U b8 : ) -
) ; />J 1 418 -
4 = 7 10 /
4 '+ q 32 # 5 )
,;5
+;; - ;;4 ;; ;; ;;| $7 q 3;;2
) ;;- B
'+B0 .(
# l 8 = 18
,• + * ;
/ ,; *
;9 )19 ;H8 6 3;9 S; x1*1 3 9 ) - 0 6 39 ;; - +;;0 9 q ;;?
1;; 0 /;;0. T ;;b 0 ) ;;-
' $ 4 '+
) ;B 1 0 - 0 = = _8 w 8
/ 1i 2 )
Linnell et al., 2000
(.
,5 / > = N - O; 7 0
7 1;0 6 5 ;?
' $ 4 '+
/0. ) L 2 418 32 -
; A ;4
' $ 4 '+
) ;B /m18 ;4
/;
10 ;5 ^1;0
L 2 6 5 ? * 9 -
T1 +01
)
Trapp et
al., 2008; Unger et al., 2009
.(
M0:
= ;B /5
h 0 L /*18 L ;2 ) - 6;
O;- ; b0
2+0 : - ‚ $8 + 9 0 ;H T b U;4 ) ;-
/0.
= +* )1? H8 32 +
/0.
- +;0 18
+;; *18 ;; >91 / ;;4 ;;I•
L ;;2 : ) ;;-
8 +- ` G_8 )
Harrington & Mech, 1982
.(
;
/;0. /;H / /m18 ;-
;4 8 4 /;m18 1; A ;4
L 2 T b 0 3 0 ' 1 - H
) - /0.
8 ; 32 ;41
G_ /012 = 1 0
- ( ; ) ;- \ 18
n;5 XJ;4 ;4
)
Norris et al., 2002; Person &
Russell, 2009
(
= 7 10
/0.
32 +0 18
1*
k )+
)
* 9 A ^ +; ) ;-
+;; + 1;;4 | ;;$7 } +;;- ;;
.
= ;;
= ;; 8
) ;;- \ T ;;b 0 ;; K;;2 G ;;J
;;H ) ;;-
/0.
4 32
7 10 , 0 ? )
/0.
; 32
# 7 67 ;% 9 =; 67 # 7 + )
E- ;;9
;;
€ ;; 7 1;;0 ;;4 /;; ;;8 :
€ 8 ) - '1>*
A 0 / ; 0 # ;Ji 6- 5 :
+;0 t # ;l 8 =;
)
Podruzny et al., 2002;
Baldwin & Bender, 2007; Northrop et al.,
(2012
. ' ;F ) # * J 1D = + ) ; 2
q + 0 ) *+ ) - ; = ;B
; D0 A+; 1
OI% 9 C 10. ;- 1 ;4 2 2
;>J /; 3
1;D
K;;2 G_8 ,;; 1^ ;;4 )
Norris et al., 2002;
Theuerkauf et al., 2003; Trapp et al., 2008;
Person & Russell 2009
( ) ; *+
k ; )
/0. , 0 ? ; 32
)
Clark et al., 1993; Ciarniello
et al., 2005; Libal et al., 2011
( 7 1;0 = 8
1 . Maximum Entropy 2 . Mahalanobis distance 3. Logistic Regression
/0. 0 # l 8 € /;012 ; 32
# ; 7 ) ;-
* 9 67 0 0 ) -
)
Podruzny et al., 2002;
Baldwin & Bender, 2007
( 4 / 9 2 ] M0 .
' F / * J = ) 2
;2@ ;i ) ;-
3;; 0 = ;4 ) ;;4 ; 0 ;; 0 ) ;- 1 5 9
An ;;;i C 10. ;;;- q ' $ ;;;4 ;;;
=B 8 ?
1)+
/0. 7 10 '+
4 L 2 32
+ - +
. * J =;
}+;- ; /;
1 . = ; 8
/0. 7 10 - ( # m 7 ,` +7 L ;2 32
ƒ
2 .
;;z O /;;0. , ;; 0 ? ) 7 1;;0 /;;B>0 ;; 32
9 2 ] M0 + - 4 L 2 418 .
2 .
&
/ )
1.2 . F G 8
%
+ - 4
7 19546 1I 5 ;
T ;u
,% 9 +7 59'
33˚
8 48' 35˚
€ ^ * ;
34' 47˚
;;8 36' 49˚
` ;; A1;;
;;`
+;;
'
;;4
) ,H 1 .(
T: 4 =
) 1- / 0 = (0 ; S;Bi
O0 * ;;4 q ;;
325
;;I ;;
= (0 ;;
) ;;
/0 * ;;4 11 O;;m 0 ;;4 ;;2
;;4 . ;; I` ;;
U4 ,% 7 ) -
'+ U 4 3 i 4
U;Iu 8
;4 =; ; l ) ;
#.1;• ;B5
' $ 4 ^ 1
. ; = ;
U; b8 U ;4 1;4 S
' ( ; ) ; + + # ; 7 ) ;-
=; 6;7
( )14 '+ 4 U 4
- ;4 + 8 6 39
'+; 0 0 m E5 8 6 39 = N - />J 4 . / ) 1 + - 4 /5 E5 8 = (0
88 ;$0
1;;I 5 ;;
) /;; S;; 30 E5 ;;8 = (0 ;; ;;
1B5 ,5 0 0 (
7 1;0 H E5 ;
1;B5 ;4
)
Reyahi-Khoram & Fotros, 2011
.(
+ - 4
6
| $7 O>J +
| $7 4 + 8
;4 [1 M /5 1m 60
3;-
F 8 H- /4
y ;• i 1;i / 4 XJ4 +%
' +0 . 1b$I^
EF 3; ;4 =;
-1;5 )
Capra
aegagrus
( ;B7 + $412 )
Ovis orientalis
( ;2
)
Sus scrofa
(
+ -
m /5 /* 3 ) -
: ) ;-
k i / F 8 ;| $7
+;
+; ;4 =;
'+
+0 .
- 0 1 . 89%
: 9) :
$ + )
;, 1'
$%&
.
* 3
;, 6 5
1. Partitioned Mahalanobis
2.2 . B(H
%& & ) I
9 5 + 8 / 4 / * J = O0.
' $ 4 '+
Y ? k F 8 L 2 418 /;>J ; 1 1m
j %1•i ' F 0 ?1d ; # ;^n ) ; 2
;0
| $7 # 4 F
] ;M0 3; 0 -
B2 0 + IH 4 181 418 0 + ) - .
M0:
/0. /5 /*18 + 32
- Y ; 7
Oi d L 2 # 7 -
;4 ; / /; /; m ] 3;* ,; *
/0. `1 3; 0 H x1;*15 # ^n G -
) ;
: „$7
;4 [ - 0 +; ) ;-
0 ;
/;*18 … ;i /5 9 2 ] M0 /;0. ;-
; ;-
+ ,% 7 )
BF i
.(
/;0. = 9 ; C?
) ;-
1v7 L 2
= ; +0 /;*18 L ;2
;-
:
`1 - /0.
- 418 + GGPS
.
3.2 . 0 $ J
%
% $
0 0 ) - \ B
_ ) ; # G_;8 ;
6 5 ;?
: ' ( 1IJ L 2 4
)
Cayuela, 2004;
Mech & Boitani, 2003
( l 6 1? s 8 /d 2
K;2 G /012 = 1v7 3 0 ;4
)
Norris et al.,
2002; Theuerkauf et al., 2003
.(
; Y ;4 =;
; /;012 ; † ;8 / w1 # ^n / /m18 2@ m i
8 ; ) -
GZ; 0 ; 0 ) - 1 5 9 = 4 ) 4 /0.
' $ 4 ) *+ L 2 32 +
)
Norris
et al., 2002; Trapp et al., 2008; Person &
Russell, 2009; Unger et al., 2009
) ( A +;m 1 .(
[ ;$8 1` A+ 1D = + ; /;>J 1
+;0
A1I4 100 )
F8 O Fd , ; K;2 G \
U [ $8 T ; 9: B B8 ai
) ; ; 2
) 1 - 0
3- + ' $ 4 .
) / * J =
0 ) 1 - ƒ - [ + 418 '+
Sappington
H -
) (2007
/ O*3
‡ 5 ) ) K;? \8 3;
) 1 - 0 + ' $ 4 -
. 3; k; $I8 ai =
/ 7 0 S Fm U [1 8 /;0
r ;%18 ) ; ;F 8
) 1 - 0 / /HI I ) -
O*3 /;$*Z H ) ;-
EF X B8 + 5 2 ' 23 67 # 7 ) - +;0 18
' $ 4 1
)
Sappington et al., 2008
.(
) - 1 5 9
+;7 ; 0 E5 ;8 , ; 0 1v7 8 XJ;4 +;7 ] E5 ;8 XJ4 7 1;0 ;8 /I;% 9
01H ' ;m ;8 /I% 9 I;% ) ;-
/; 3; 0 O;*3
/ 0 /;>J ; 0 1v7 ) - ,; I 8
;-
+ . - \ 8
ArcGIS 9.3
' +0
A1I4 100 +0+ / F8
.
= ,>
1 .
?!
.
*
; @!3
;,
=, A8 B C D '%& .
;, *, ' %
EB : F .
\ 1 0
/ F8
[ $8 [ $8 1` A+ Y 4
) (DEM
/ F8 418 '+
SRTM
U / 4
+ 8 418 '
SLOPE
] 0 39
ArcGIS
XJ4+7 0 E5 8
418 / 4
: 35 : Y 4 / F8
L 2 + ˆ '+
+ - 4
XJ4+7 ] E5 8
418 / 4
) +Bb : Y 4 4 ) -
/ F8 + ˆ '+
L 2 + - 4
l 8 8 /I% 9
8 A ^
DISTANCE
OB>0 4 l ) 5 / F8
L 2 + ˆ '+
+ - 4
' m 8 /I% 9
8 A ^
DISTANCE
OB>0 ' m 8n%1 ) - / F8
/B>0 4 '+
)
/0 i 8 /I% 9
8 A ^
DISTANCE
/ F8 OB>0 3 418 '+
HYDROLOGY
Y 4 DEM
01H 710 8 /I% 9
8 A ^
DISTANCE
OB>0 4 l ) 5 / F8
L 2 + ˆ '+
+ - 4
8 7 B B8 ai
/ 4 8 418 '+
Area Solar Radiation
Y 4 ] 0 DEM
39
ArcGIS
/M 4 ) 1 - 0
- / F8
'+
Y 4 ) ( 2007 Sappington et al. [ $8 1` A+ ' $ 4
+ - 4
1. DEM
2. Solar Radiation Index 3. Vector Ruggedness Measure
4.2 .
%& & 0, K,
=B 8 ? C 10. - q / * J = '+ )+
/0. 7 10 ) *+ ) + ' $ 4 L 2 32
. =
q ˆn%
'+
q OI% 9 C 10. - 4
/;5
= (0 ; ;- \ > = 9 2 D0 : : C0 15 F B 3 -
S;8 A1I;4 S;8 ) ;-
'+ M 4 1v7 w >0 />J 1;
)
Clark et al.,
1993; Podruzny et al., 2002; Jenness et al.,
(2011
. ;;> # 1;;% =;;
OI;;% 9
;;- C 10.
/ ;;4 '+;;
w ;;>0 /;; F ;;B 3;; ;;•i
'+;;
A:
) 1;;v7 w ;;>0 (
1;; +;;- 1i .
q OI;;% 9
/ 9 2 D0 € 9 = C 10. - w ;>0 /;5 1
1v7 B0 + - 1 0 ' ( 18 O; F
/;012
EBd ,5 4 +0
'+
4 . EF = /M 0
; D0 ;5 ; 2 /
1; 0 T ;b 0 /;012 ;HI ^
jn 5 - ( /Fm 1
= (0 ; Y ;4
; X ;B8 1;v7 w ;>0 ;- \ C0 15 1;
)
Rotenberry et al., 2006
.(
) ; *+ ;( )14
/ F B 3 Y 4 O F
- ( ;
'+ /012 1v7 w >0 0 A:
/ = , *
1 0 1m J`
O F '
) -
18 4 . /^1 M 4 €1^
,` +;7 )
;; /;;012 S;; ) ;; - ( ;; # ;;m 7
+;;0 18
6 ;;?
;; 18 ;;
: j ;;%1•i /;;012
;;
) ;;-
/ ; ) ;4 ;HI ^ ; \8 A 7 S +;
)
Dunn & Duncan, 2000; Rotenberry et al.,
.(2006
;;HI ^ ;;* 7 =;;
;; : C 10. ;;-
/ 4 '+
k
=B 8 ? )+
= +; d /;
O;$*Z
: ] +5 - /5 /0 2 +m (0 0 -
O^1 M I> ;
1 0 - ( ; ) - \ /012 18
1 F + +;
)
Duncan 2000; Rotenberry et
al., 2002
.(
+>
OI% 9 =;B 8 ? C 10. ;- )+;
/;>J /;J>0 ;- ) ; '+
; Y ;4 O;J
;
/ 4 + :
) 1 (
( )
p j jj
D y d
=
=
∑
λ2 2
1
=
/J λj
'@; +;> # ^ ,;% 71
/$*Z / / 3M8 1 : I% ) -
;- \ +; 8p
dj
3 0 A1 9 Y 4 /
4 + : :
) 2 ( ( )
j j
d = y− µ α
= /J 3 0 ,; H ? - - \ q y
/>J 1;v7 w ;>0 - \ q = (0 µ
αj
'@ +>
'@ > | 2
;4 . ; }n;i
q /; /; 3M8 1; : P ; 0 ,; I 8 ]1;4 ) -
*Z /$
I% ) - =;B 8 ? C 10. - q
)+;
'+
) K2 G_8 /;H ) ;m /
;418
/;;$*Z ) ;;- = ;; 8 '@ +;;> = ;;B ;;
1;;
/;;
/$*Z 5 ) - '@ +;> =
; ' ; 0 1;
.
}+- ) *+ /5 4 EF = / /m18 =
+ ? 4
1 0 /;012 S; 18 ;4
.
+ ? = +; ? > /5 - \ Y 4
/012 1v7 w >0 G +;0
) C0 ; /;M 0
+0 /012 1v7 w >0 5 (
; r; 8
1;
= : - ) - 1 5 9 18 + EF
'+; 5
;;9 2 ;;D0 )
Rotenberry et al., 2006
( . ;;`
q 4 / 1v7 w >0 /5 - \ ;-
/ ; y ;• i 1i +; -
) ; 8 ; /;M 0
/$*Z = B ) - +>
'@;
+ ; - ( ;M0:
/;5
+ 5 + ) ; 5 # ;^n + ; 0 /012 18
1;; 0
;; /;;012 ;; 18 /
;; ;;4 +;; -
)
Dunn &
Duncan, 2000; Rotenberry et al., 2006
.(
;
] +5 /H 1;v7 A 7 J ) - \ S
8 /012 +0
; 1; : ,;% 7 '@; Y ;4
/$*Z / / 3M8 ] M0 I% ) -
2 . - \ /5
kIJ +>
@;
; 2 3 ) +;0 ; - )
) B + - )
Dunn & Duncan, 2000
( EF;4
+ - 1i 5 B ) *+ ) B .
,;; I 8 /;; 3M8 ] ;;M0 6 ;;? 6- @;;? =;;
/ . : ' $ 4 J ) - ) ; *+ +;0 -
: ( -
1 : - ' + /;5 ;- \ ;
6 ( -
8 / 0 +; }K;7 \ S +
)
Treves et al., 2011
.(
/;
] ;M0 1;D ,; I 8
) ;-
1. Eigenvalue 2. Eigenvector
/;0. 1;v7 w >0 - \ > + / 1 ) ;-
… b ;;;4 L ;;;2 +;;;
. /;;; * J =;;;
/;;;
PRINCOMP
] ;;0 3;;9 ) ;; SAS
1;; : ] ;;M0
/$*Z / / 3M8 I% ) -
; / ;> : ;4
+ ' $ 4 '@ ) - )
Dunn & Duncan et al.,
2000; Rotenberry et al., 2006; Hollenbeck et al.,
.(2011
P 0 / ;4 =; '+; : ,; I 8
, ; 10
O$*Z ;- \ +; 8 / I%
'@; '@ +;>
: | - 4 . ' ( ; # ;m 7 ,` +7 = 8
/0.
3 0 L 2 32 OB>0 O F8
, ; 0 ? ) 7 10
. /0 32 Sd15 Y 4
> = 8 '@
/;$*Z ;-
+> = B '@
;J ) - \ S -
/$*Z ;9 2 ] M0 D0 1 ) - .
U; 8 8 = +;
= B /5 - \ @;
= ; 5 ; | ;
'@;; ;;>
+ ;;
/;;
,` +;;7 1;; ^ ) ;;- 0
/0. ) - ( +0+; /; 9 2 D0 L 2 32
.
C?
O 4 ] ;0 '@; ) ;- ;>
3;9
OB>0 O F8 ) /0. , 0 ? ) 7 10
418 32
L 2 O
] 0 # 4 3;9
ArcGIS 9.3
] ;M0
9 2 . ] 0 = /5 U 8 8 = + 9 2 D0 39
=
>
) - @ / 4 ] 0 '+ : 3;9
SAS
;;;8 ' $ ;;;4 ;;;
Raster Calculator
O;;;*
=B 8 ? C 10. - ;J ) - \ '+ )+
+ A ^ .
5.2 . M ) 7 5 )$
) A+; ^ 4
+;
100 ]+;^ / ; /;J>0
I` … i />J 1v7 )
/0.
- / # 1%
9 •8 + r 8 .
= 5
OI% 9 8 w >0 = /0.
) -
L 2 1;I 5 $- +; /; 9 2 ;D0
. +;> =;
Y 4 I` [ = (0
) L 2 € ;^ ) ;- ) ;-
+; / 9 2 D0 = ? 9 \m )
Jędrzejewski et
al., 2008
.(
/;;;; * J =;;;;
+;;;;>
1AUC
/ 4 '+
; ; Y ;4
2ROC
) ; O; >
6 ? > q ;> ; 1;v7 w ;>0 '+;
6 ? +; ' $ ;4 1;v7 ]+;^ w ;>0 ) '+
.
/ = 1 0 XJ4 O*3
# +;` ) ;
1. Area Under the Curve
2. Receiver Operating Characteristic
A+; ;418 1v7 ]+^ w >0 1v7 w >0 a bB8 , ^ ' 5 /0 ;4: r; 8 ,>
; 1IJ ) ;-
4 )
Boyce et al., 2002; Elith et al., 2011; Libal et al., 2012
.(
a b;;B8 # +;;` +;;` 9 /;;5 *+;;
6 ? +> +
AUC
5 / 0 *+; /
6 ? # +` , 5 ) ;
; AUC
1; +;- 1i S )
Boyce et al., 2002
.(
/;5 ;M0:
1 0 XJ4 / ROC
;5 F 8 ; ^ I
A+;; S;; ;;%
;; 0 )
Lobo et al., 2008;
Jimenez-Valverde, 2012
( ) ;;;- ;;;i
/;;> ;;% ;;4 ]1;;4 ) ;; 3;; 0 )+;;
E- ;;9
;;5 ;; I ` ;; . ;; XJ;;4
6 ? ' $ 4 A+
'+
9 2 ` .
/5 - =
/ 4 Ji C 8 ' $ 4 +0+
;% ,
/> I5
3)+
/> h 0 1;v7 w >0 ' )+
1v7 ]+^ / )
) - Ji
omission commission
(
5 ) ? 5 -1
4= 4 )
Fielding & Bell, 1997;
Lobo et al., 2008; Romero et al., 2012
.(
6.2 . 7 0 G I G
%
= 8 ) O0 4:
1IJ A+; S; +; ' (
/ * 1 0 =;B 8 ? C 10. - > 18 )+;
,5 '+
O>J / * J '+
+ / F8 . 1;D = +;
O;J>0 3- ;> r; 8 /;>J ,;5 9 ;•8
=B 8 ? C 10. - … b ;4 w >0 = '+ )+
+ . OI7
= M8 18 +
; >
/0. / w1 >
/ > L 2 ) - '+
9 2 ` .
; 18 1; 0 =; ; /I;% 9 = B F0 /;; ;; M8 O;;*3
) ;; ' ( ;; ;; 1IJ /0 ;;4:
/>
)+
OB>0 /;0. 1IJ ' $ ;4 L ;2 ; 32
+;
)
Browning et al., 2005; Hollenbeck et al.,
.(2011
A+
, H ? F0 8. ; q /;5 -
/0 4: +> = +
/ O;*3 T1;IJ ' ( ;
, H ? + ; /0 4: +7 = 5 q /5 -
/ /0. ) T1IJ 0 7 10 1 ^ ;D0 L ;2 32
+ / 9 2 )
Hollenbeck et al., 2011
.(
3. Correct Classification Rate: CCR 4. Cohen’s Kappa
3 . O
4 ] M0 C?
+ ) - + 8 0
35 ;0.
O L ;2
;; =;; /;;5 +;; ;;4 17
/;;0.
;;
Y ;;4
;;I ;;9 # ;;^n 14
/;;0.
;;
# ;;^n Y ;;4
0 4 03 ;B2 = ;l 3 0 /0.
0 +; ) ;-
+; ;4 IH 4 181 418 .
,;% 7 P ; 0
3;; /;;5 ;;B0 ;;- \ ( ;; - ;;4 ) - \ = ( - 5 J
8 / 0 1
= - \ S ~ - ,; I 8
;B0 }K;7 ;- +
.
/$*Z / / 3M8 1 : P 0 I;% ) -
/;5 ;B0
Fd ;$*Z O '@; ;> = ; 5 ;i:
+ ; .
= ; '@; ;> ; \8 +0 /5 M0: = N -
$*Z O ; ) ; }n ;i ;$- 6 T ;b 0
d15 S /$*Z = 8 -
) ) *+
$*Z O 6 /;
1% + 9 2 # .
/$*Z = - 1 / 10 C0 ; +;%
= 8 / * ) - \ # \8 ;
5 +;0 . C;?
4 O '@ ) - >
;B>0 O ) 7 1;0
/0. , 0 ? L 2 32
Y 4
* O C 10. -
=B 8 ? '+ )+
' $ 4 O
/;B>0 m
;-
+ / F8 )
,H 2 .(
/$*Z / / 3M8 1 : ,% 7 P 0 Y 4 ) -
; ; \ = + d I%
,` +;7 A1;•7 1;8
/;0. ) U4 - ( L ;2 ; 32
9 2 D0 .
4 ) - \ = 9 2 D0 '+;
/$*Z = 5 /5 - = 8 C0
5 +0
M ;4 XJ;4 +;7 ] E5 8 [ $8 \ Fd O
) 1 - 0 ; 01H 7 10 /I% 9 -
/ O;*3
, 1^
EF + ? L ;2 /;0. 1v7 w >0 8
+ 4 .
4 O 0 4:
O /0. 7 10 1IJ L ;2 ; 32
; M8 ; 18 1 0 ' $ 4 '+;0 w ;>0
/0.
/ 9 •8 w >0 - O*3
; •i O
,;5
>J O 4 '+;
/;5 ;B0
P-value
; ;
71 / 0 ' ( ; ,;5 T1;IJ ' ( ; S H$8 +7
4 '+
4 ) ,H 3 .(
;> ; 7 10
P-value
/ /0 4: = 8.
O*3 ;4 T1;IJ ' ( ;
;;5 ;;l /
P-value
+ ;; +;;> =;; ;; 5
/;;
O;;*3 /;;0. ) ;; T1IJ ;;0 7 1;;0 L ;;2 ;; 32
/>
+0+ )+
. U; 8 8 = + 2649
1;I 5 ;
A 5 / 13 /; +; - ;4 XJ;4 +%
O;*3
/0. , 0 ? ) l 1; L ;2 ;418 32
9 2 ` /m18 )
A +m 2 .(
0- 2 . 89%
: 9
$%& '() H 9 $!3' C 6 5 45
$ 3 ;,
'() 9 IB J 3
= ,>
2 . 2 ,K L 'C H 9
'()
/>
+>
P-value
7 )
Km2
( 6 1? +%
/0. ) T1IJ 7 10 L 2 32
–1
71 / 0 2649
55
/ 13
/0. ) T1IJ 0 7 10 L 2 32
71
/ 0 - 0 16897
45
/ 86
0- 3 . 9 IB % M P-value
; @!3
;,
$9 *
$%& ; /! *,
6 5 45
P 0 / ;4 ; '+; : ) ; ROC
;
A+ HI ^
1;v7 ]+;^ 1;v7 w ;>0 a bB8
1; 0 ; XJ;4 +;> /5 B0 825
/ 0 ) ' ;
= 047 / 0 ( (0 ; ; I ` a b;B8 T1;i ;
A+
4 . /> % 4 )+
/;5 ;B0 3; 0
A+
/ i 4 1;v7 w >0 S H$8 . % '+
1v7 ]+^
. /5 ? 5 +0 18
+ $;%
; 2 ;;` S; ;8 63
/ 0 /;;5 +; / ;;4 ;
Y ;;4
Romero
;;;H - )
(2012
A1;;; ` ,;;; ` ) +;;;>
+ . /;> ;I5 ;% ;>
)+;
Specificity
) /;;;>
1;;;v7 w ;;;>0 X ;;;% )+;;;
(
Sensitivity
) />
1;v7 ]+^ w >0 X % )+
( : /;5 3; 0 ;-
+;;
;; ;;` S;; ;;8 $;;%
;;B +;;0 2 8
/ 0
j ` + / 4 ) Ji
omission commission
3 0 2 / 0 15 / 0 / + : 4 ) A +m 3 (.
= ,>
3 . * . )N D B 3
$9 K
=, *, $% !3F A!M 5 O%
71 / 0
ai
` w >0
% +%
1v7 ]+^ 1v7
w >0 A+
1v7
28 15
1v7 ]+^
7 100
/> I5 % )+
84
Sensitivity
80
Specificity
85
Omission error
20
Commission error
15
15 ) ? 5 -
=
63
4 . K P0
$
EF = 9 2 D0 / * J = ) ;- ? = ;8
=;;B 8 ? C 10. ;- A+;; ;J '+;; )+;
/ O*3 ;‡ 5 ;•i ) ; ' ( ; ; 1IJ
/B>0 4 /0. 7 10 ) ' $ ;4 L ;2 32
+ . /;0. * 7 = L ;2 ) ;-
r;B5 ; '+;
4 /; 0 +; ) - O;*3
'+; w ;>0 A:
;D0
,` +;;7 = 9 ;;2 ;;D0 ;; '+;; /;; 9 2 ) ;;- 0
E- ;;9 - ( ;;
) ;; T1;;IJ ;; :
/0.
32 )
Rotenberry et al., 2006; Hollenbeck
et al., 2011
( 0 ;;4 , ;; 0 ? ) ;; /;;>J w ;;>
/0.
L 2 32 /
‡ 5 # 1%
4 +
. = ; N -
) ;; ;; M8 ;;0 9 ;; 18 1;; 0
;;4 O
U4 = 8 0 4:
O /;> 1IJ )+;
;>J O
4 '+
+ ' $ 4 T1IJ 0 T1IJ # > / .
E- ;9 ' n^ / = ;5
0 ;4:
O J ; 1I
; A 8 M
Specificity Sensitivity
A+;
) ; 5
. 0 ;4:
O ; ; ; 1IJ
71 / 0 / 4 6 ;? 18 q = 418 '+ : ;
/0 ;4: = d '+0 4 •5 +7 / A+ X % )
/> I5 % A+
A )+
83 +%
/ 1
m18 , ` /0. 7 10 S H$8 / ` F
L 2 32
k 4
u ;4 ' 1; L ;2 ) ' $ 4 , ` .
=; ' $ ;4 +; /5 4 ) l / H0 = 5Š ' $ ;;4 # 1;;% q 0 ;;4:
O ;; ;;
5 / 0
/ S 1 ^ 0 ;4:
O ) ; *+ A1; ; 1IJ 6;7 # 7
)
Kuemmerle et al., 2011
( ;4
/
= d /;>
* ; )+;
; u =;H ; +;
/;;0. ) ;; T1;;IJ 7 1;;0 ) ;;
L ;;2 ;; 32
/ O*3 /> T1IJ 0 ' (
)+
+ j `
) Ji
Omission
6 39 A+
9 .
/ T1;i ) : h ;0 . ; ‹ ; 8 # +;` , *
(
= +0
;i - ( /
L ;2 y ;-
H x1;*15 ) 2 4 # +` 1b 12 4 / 0 ) 8.
+0 )
Mech & Boitani, 2003
.(
=;
* i 1m ' ;F k 0 0 ) -
; ;B5
' ( ; U b8 L ;
L ;2 H; ; 0 ;
# + +F8 EF
) > ) j;%1•i /;012 =; #+
10 ;4 0 ; 0 # ;l 8 /m 1 7 )
Smith et
al., 2010; Rich et al., 2012
.(
=;
; 18 '1; 0
= 9 ;;2 ;;D0 ;; ;;>9 /;;0 ' ( ;; /;;012 =;;
c ; * /HI ) - 1 5 9 ;5
,; 1^
; 2 ;` /;m18 1; + 0 0 #ni + 8 )
Mech & Boitani, 2003; Cayuela, 2004
.(
;D0 /;
/0. 3 0 / * J = +4 ;4 L ;2 ; 32
+;; -
;; 8 ;; 0 1;;v7 ,;; ^ ;;- G_;;8
2@
` = 4 ) 4 ) -
. Y ;4
) ;- >
@;
/; /; 3M8 1; : ,;% 7
/$*Z ) - \ I% ) - = _;8 EF
+; 5 ,` +;7
- 0 - ( ) H
/0. ) - [ ;$8 L 2 32
XJ;4 +;7 ] E5 ;8 ; XJ4 OM ;4
;
) 1 - 0 01H 7 10 /I% 9 -
4 ) A +m 4 .(
= ,>
4 . 01 ,2 9
* . %
$%& . /!
$%& 6 5 45 .
\
= (0 } 0
> ' +
[ $8 2119
128
± 2405
- 1870
XJ4 +7 ] E5 8
113 16
± 140
- 85
OM 4 ) 1 - 0
- 003
/ 0 003
/ 0 ± 022 / 0 - 0005 / 0
01H 7 10 /I% 9
3939 1011
± 4669
- 500
[ $8 ) - \ - / /m18 Y 4 = ; XJ4 M ;4
O ) 1 - ;0 ; ; ;-
1;8
L 2 /5 9 /;0. /; ,; 8 -
7 1;0 ; 32 j 0
+0 1 - 0 $8 .
M 4 O ) 1 - 0 ;-
# \8 U 5 8 /5 4 •i
$*Z O Fm
;‡ 5 /; U ; ; 2 # ;$8 ) ;4
;I ) ;-
) 1 - ;;0
;; ;;-
= ;; 8 ;;?
+;; 5 ;; `1
' 2 K2 m ) - / J m H 1I
K;2 ) -
r ;;%18 +;; 5
= ;;B /;;5 ;;4 > ;;
+;;7
F ? m ) - /012 ) 2+
/ /012 m
E- 9 + 5
)
Sappington et al., 2007
.(
; =
P ;; 0
Salvatori Linnell
) (2005
/ ;;B ;;?
/5 4 i
; ;B0 L ;2 +; 5
7 1;0 /; ;-
0 -15 /5
;418 O '+;0 0 ; 0 ,; 8 +;0
'+ + 7 10 = + UIu / ) B +0
.
=;; P ;; 0 ;;( )1;;4 6- @;;?
P ;; 0 ;;
Matteson
) (1992
;;;H : ) ;;;0 01
Norris
;;;H - )
(2002
;;;0 5 1 ;;; 0
Person
Russell
) (2009
T1 m # $ H4.: ‚
4 .
/;5 +0+ ;4 /;M 0 = / 1i P 0 0: /5 d L 2 /0. - k 1i ) - E;5
; [ ;$8
T b 0 E n U
$8 1 - 0 k 8 + 5 .
j. 7 P 0 v8 = , * # ; * J /;5 ;4 =
: = ; 5 ; ;| $7 ; 8 ;I( m k -
0 0 #ni + /; U4 I( m 6 1?
O;*3
4 / 9 2 # 1% ' ? .
* 7 +; - 4 /5
E;;Bd ;;
;;4 ) - 3 ;;B5 ;; * u ;; ) - +;;0
~ - - 2 6 1? /012
; Y ;4 4 I( m
L 2 ' 1 0 - 4
: /;0. /; ;d 0 ;- ; 32
'+ $8 1 - 0 ˆ1J4 +0
. U 8 8 = + ˆ1J4 =
3 = B F ?
/ 4 ) 2+
: ) ;-
E- 9 L 2 +0 5
/ ;4 4 ,; * ; 5 ) K;?
0 418 ; * 9 #ni + 3 = 5
) ;-
'+ ˆ1J4 = 0 0 1
.
= N - /; / 3M8 1 : ,% 7 P 0 Y 4
/$*Z +7 ] E5 8 I% ) - /I;% 9 XJ;4
) - ? ( 01H 7 10
= _8 ,` +;7 '+ 5
) - 0 /0. ' (
+; - ;4 L ;2 32
1 +0 6 ? ) - \ ;
+; 5 ; ) K;2 G_8
/B>0 +0 /0. 1IJ 7 10 ) 4 ; 32
+ ; .
B0 =
L ;2 +; - ;4 /;5+- ;-
/;; ,;; 8 /;;0.
/;; ;; 7 1;;0 ;; 32
' ( 01H4
* 9 - ; +0 0 0 ) -
/ ) 1;
/;5
= (0 I% 9 O /0.
' ( 01H4 L 2 ) - 0 ; 0 ) -
4 = 3939
1 1I 5 )
A +m 4 .(
; /;m18
+;; - ;;4 ;; 0 ;; m ). ;; E5 ;;8 /;;
) / = (0 ; 1;
88 ;- ;$0 1;I 5
; (
' ( ;; ;; /;; >
;; ;;? L ;;2 / ;;B ) ;;-
0 0 E5 8 = (0 20
8 30 1;I 5 ;- ;$0
; * 0 t;4 4 5 )
Cayuela, 2004;
Theuerkauf et al., 2007
( = ;;; d ;;; -
abB 6 ? 6 - 1 5 9 1
. 1;(*
P 0 / B =
6- @?
Unger
H - )
(2009
3 0 i B0 L 2 6 5 ? /5 + 5
k -
Um1 0 0 1m * u 1
/I;% 9 „;$7
) ;;- ? 0 ;; 0 #ni +;; ;; 1m E;;F
K2 G 1 0
4 T b 0 /0. ) -
L 2 32
;-
+ .
* 9 0 0 ) - +;0 18
; \8 /; ;M
' ( U 5 8 $ # G : -
- 1;
)1 0 / ) /5 (B- @?
/;5 +;0 =
* i 8 ) - 1 5 9 E;F 0 ; 0 ) ;-
= ;8
K2 G 1 5 9 1 0
S; L ;2 ' $ 4 18
' ( ; ; - + )
Corsi et al., 1998; Cayuela,
2004; Mech & Boitani, 2003
.(
L 2 T m ) ;-
418 I 1m 0 1v7 :
Kusak
;;;H - )
(2005
;;;>J O
1+;;;
;;;4 5
= N -
Theuerkauf
H - )
(2003
,;( m
23 1*
4 '+ q 32 3 0 F* ‚ .
0 ' ( /5 /;012 ) ; T1;IJ ) ;-
) ;-
# ;;l 8 ;; . ;; S;; ;; 6;;7 # ;; 7 /m 1 1; +;- 1i +; +; ) ;- H- +0
)
Treves et al., 2011; Northrop et al., 2012
.(
m }K7 /
;m /;012 € ; ) ;- /;
# +;0
; >91 # l 8 Œ14 # G 6- 5 ;4 ' 1; 3; :
)
Linnell et al., 1997
.(
=;;
;;4 ;;4 ] .
)@8 4 ; 3 - ) ;>8 ;H /5 + ) -
E- 9 67 # 7 0 /;m18 1; +;0 :
2 ` .
). - / /m18 1(* - ;2:
;v8 ) ;-
6;;7 # ;; 7 ;; 0 ;; # ;;l 8 9 ;;
1. Dinarid 2. Bialowieza
/;012 ;| $7 ' ( + ;-
)
Smith et al.,
2010; Treves et al., 2011; Rich et al., 2012
(
A+ 8 # * J ] M0 ' ( 1IJ ) -
c * 5 : ˆ - / 0 )3
= ;4 )3
- = + , 0 ) }+
T1 ) 5 ) 3
1
)
Corsi et al., 1998; Cayuela, 2004;
Jędrzejewski et al., 2008
.(
A+; =; ` ;-
# ;l 8 ; , 0 ? /5 7 10 4 k : E- 9 H = 4. - - 2: 8 +0 :
6 ? 1m1 '+ : l
/ 0
;| $7 - +;B- /0 (;B ? # +;` ] M0 /; k = + 1 0 ] +` E 415 0 E- , F 8 )
* L ;2 0 3 :
: 9 , >8 ) 21Im : E- ;9 ;-
. =;
B>0 O = ,% 7 6- @?
/; 18 O;*3
S;
+ 3 + 5
) /0. 7 10 4 ; 32
; . ; , ; 0 ? /;5 > = 8 L 2 +; ; 8 7 1;0 … ;i +;0 # l 8 ;` /;m18 1; ; | $7 4 .
, /5 M0: = N - /0. ) -
10 ;5 L 2 32
* 9 L 2 /0. 4 ) - 1 A 4 A1 -
' )
Trapp
et al., 2008
( /0. UIu 3 0 A 4 -
* 1; ) ;-
1
$ 4 L 2 +M
` -
+;0 2 )
Ballard
& Dau, 1983; Trapp et al., 2008
( 8 +;` ] M0
[n /I m
• - 9 0 4 - ;2: 6 3;9 ) ;4
I 1m )
/0. U b8 ) 21Im L 2 ) -
M ;4 ) l ) B5 l .
=; ; ' n;^
B>0 O / 4 E- ;9 ;H =; / * J = '+ :
€ ; ; Y ; 7 k ; - 2: 8 : ; #ni +; ] ;M0 /; 0 '+ : Ji /
# 1;%
] +` b 0 + 9+- 5
. .1o; U 8 8 = +
7 10 =5 4 I 9 ;` . Ji €
6 ;? ; - ;2: ; 1 + - 1i ˆn;% ;
* 9 S; - ( ; , + 8 1i ) -
U ;4: 14 ' 6- ;5 ;I ; 1m ) K;?
E- ;9 ; [1; 8 „;$7 ) / ( )14 +0 : .
F,
$"+, $
= / * J
? / 9 2 0
O 5 ; + 4
;4 '+ ;4 ] ;M0 /; ;F8 ' (B0 * 7 .
; - /I 4 = + ;-
' 2+;
) ;- + ;
? ) `: T m 1 9
John T. Rotenberry
1; F
1 0 , I 8 '
- F8 O B>0 O ) 3(4 t4 1IJ
1 . ' ;F +; / * J = #+^ ; ) ; 2
5 ) H - ; ; 5
;0 ;| $7 ,;5
+; - ;4 ; /;
) ;`: T ; m '@;
: +; Y ; 5 ; : S ) 10 + 7 Y+ F ) 10 I 0 ^ ) `: T m ' qn;8 ?
1;; 0 =;;H ;;4 .
) ;;H - /I ;;4 = +;;
) ;;-
5 5 4 B + H;B8 15K;
+`
0 1 .
REFERENCES
1. Ahmadi, M., Kaboli, M., Imani Harsini, J., Khosravi Sharifabadi, R., Almasi, M., 2012.
Strategic Management Plan for Wolf (Canis lupus) in Hamedan Province: An Approach to Reducing Human-Wolf Conflicts. Journal of Natural Environment, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources. 65, 271–281.
2. Ballard, W.B., Dau, J.R., 1983. Characteristics of gray wolf, Canis lupus, den and rendezvous sites in Southcentral Alaska. Canadian Field- Naturalist 97, 299–302.
3. Baldwin, A.R., Bender, L.C., 2008. Den-Site Characteristics of Black Bears in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 1717–1724.
4. Boyce, M.S., Vernier, P.R., Nielsen, S.E., Schmiegelow, F.K.A., 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157, 281–300.
5. Browning, D.M., Beaupres, S.J., Duncan, L., 2005. Using Partitioned Mahalanobis D2 (K) To Formulate a GIS based Model of Timber
Rattelsnake Hibernacula. Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 33–44.
6. Cayuela, L., 2004. Habitat evaluation for the Iberian wolf (Canis lupus) in Picos de Europa National Park, Spain. Applied Geography 24, 199–215.
7. Ciarniello, L.M., Boyce, M.S., Heard, D.C., Seip, D.R., 2005. Denning behavior and den site selection of grizzly bears along the Parsnip River, British Columbia, Canada. Ursus 16, 47–
58.
8. Clark, J.D., Dunn, J.E., Smith, K.G., 1993. A multivariate model of female black bear habitat use for a geographic information system.
Journal of Wildlife Management 57, 519–526.
9. Corsi, F., Dupre, E., Boitani, L., 1998. A Large- Scale Model of Wolf Distribution in Italy for Conservation Planning. Conservation Biology 13, 150–159.
10. Dunn, J.E., Duncan, L., 2000. Partitioning Mahalanobis D2 to sharpen GIS classification.
In: Brebbia, C.A., Pascolo, P. (Eds.), Management information systems: GIS and remote sensing. WIT Press, Southampton, UK, pp 195–204
11. Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., Dudik, M., Chee, Y.E., et al., 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distribution 17, 43–57.
12. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F., 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models.
Environment Conservation 24, 38–49.
13. Harrington, F.H., Mech, L.D., 1982. Patterns of homesite attendance in two Minnesota wolf packs. In: Harrington, F.H., Paquet, P.C. (Eds.), Wolves of the world: perspectives of behavior, ecology, and conservation. Noyes Publications, New Jersey, USA, pp. 81–104.
14. Hollenbeck, J.P., Saab, V.A., Frenzel, R.W., 2011. Habitat Suitability and Nest Survival of White-Headed Woodpeckers in Unburned Forests of Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1061–1071.
15. Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., Zawadzka, B., Borowik, T., Nowak, S., Myszajek, R.W., 2008. Habitat suitability model for Polish wolves based on long term national census.
Animal Conservation 11, 377–390.
16. Jenness, J., Brost, B., Beier, P., 2011. Land Facet Corridor Designer. Available in:
http://www.corridordesign.org.
17. Jiménez-Valverde, A., 2012. Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21, 498–507.
18. Kuemmerle, T., et al., 2011. Predicting potential European bison habitat across its former range.
Ecological Application 21, 830–843.
19. Kusak, J., Skrbinsek, A.M., Huber, D., 2005.
Home ranges movements, and activity of wolves (Canis lupus) in the Dalmatian part of Dinarids, Croatia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 51, 254–262.
20. Libal, N.S., Belant, J.L., Leopold, B.D., Wang, G., Owen, P.A., 2011. Despotism and Risk of Infanticide Influence Grizzly Bear Den-Site Selection. PLoS ONE 6, e24133.
21. Linnell, J.D.C., 2000. The Fear of Wolves: A Review of Wolf Attacks on Humans, Norsk Institutt for Nature forskning.
22. Linnell, J.D.C., Aanes, R., Swenson, J.E., Odden, J., Smith, M.E., 1997. Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review. Biodiversity Conservation 6, 1245–1257.
23. Lobo, J., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Real, R., 2008.
AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17, 145–151.
24. Matteson, M.Y., 1992. Denning ecology of wolves in Northwest Montana and southern Canadian Rockies. Dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula.
25. Mech, L.D., 1995. The challenge and opportunity of recovering wolf populations.
Conservation Biology 9, 270–278.
26. Mech, L.D., Boitani, L., 2003. Wolves:
Behavior, Ecology and Conservation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
27. Mladenoff, D.J., Sickley, T.A., Wydeven, A., 1999. Predicting Gray Wolf Landscape Recolonization: Logistic regression models vs.
new field data. Ecological Application 9, 37–44.
28. Norris, D.F., Theberge, M.T., Theberge, J.B., 2002. Forest composition around wolf (Canis lupus) dens in eastern Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 866–872.
29. Northrup, J.M., Stenhouse, G.B., Boyce, M.S., 2012. Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears. Animal Conservation 15, 369–
377.
30. Person, D.K., Russell, A.L., 2009. Reproduction and Den Site Selection by Wolves in a Disturbed Landscape. Northwest Sciences 83, 211–224.
31. Podruzny, S.R., Cherry, S., Schwartz, C.C., Landenburger, L.A., 2002. Grizzly bear denning and potential conflict areas in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Ursus 13, 19–28.
32. Reyahi-Khoram, M., Fotros, M.H., 2011. Land use planning of Hamadan province by means of GIS. International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environment Sciences (ICCEBS'2011) Bangkok.
33. Rich, L.N., Mitchell, M.S., Gude, J.A., Sime, C.A., 2012. Anthropogenic mortality, intraspecific competition, and prey availability influence territory sizes of wolves in Montana.
Journal of Mammalogy 93, 722–731.
34. Romero, D., Olivero, J., Real, R., 2012.
Comparative assessment of different methods for using landcover variables for distribution modelling of Salamandra salamandra longirotris. Environment Conservation 53, 1–12.
35. Rotenberry, J.T., Preston, K.L., Knick, S.T., 2006. GIS-Based Niche Modelling For Mapping Spcies’ Habitat. Ecology 87, 1458–1464.
36. Salvatori, V., Linnell, J., 2005. Report on the conservation status and threats for wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe. T-PVS/Inf. Report 16.
Strasbourg, Council of Europe. 1–24.
37. Sappington, M., Longshore, K.M., Thompson, D.B., 2007. Quantifying Landscape Ruggedness for Animal Habitat Analysis: A Case Study
Using Bighorn Sheep in the Mojave Desert.
Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1419–
1426.
38. Smith, D.W., et al., 2010. Survival of colonizing wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States, 1982–2004. Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 620–634.
39. Theuerkauf, J.J., drzejewski, W., Schmidt, K., Okarma, H., Ruczynski, I., Sniezko, S., Gula R., 2003. Daily patterns and duration of wolf activity in the Białowieza forest, Poland. Journal of Mammalogy 84, 243– 253.
40. Theuerkauf, J., Gula, R., Pirga, B., Tsunoda, H., Eggermann, J., Brzezowska, B., Rouys, S., Radler, S., 2007. Human impact on wolf activity in the Bieszczady Mountains, SE Poland.
Annual Zoology Fennecci. 44, 225–231.
41. Trapp, J.R., Beier, P., Mack, C., Parsons, D.R., Paquet, P.C., 2008. Wolf, Canis lupus, den site selection in the Rocky Mountains. Canadian Field-Naturalist 122, 49–56.
42. Treves, A., Martin, K.A., Wydeven, A.P., Wiedenhoeft, J.E., 2011. Forecasting Environmental Hazards and the Application of Risk Maps to Predator Attacks on Livestock.
BioScience 61, 451–458.
43. Unger, D.E., Keenlance, P.W., Kohn, B.E., Anderson, E.M., 2009. Factors Influencing Homesite Selection by Gray Wolves in Northwestern Wisconsinand East-Central Minnesota. In: Wydeven. A.P., et al. (Eds.), Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States. Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 175–189.
