KAZGUU University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Methods of compensation for damage caused by a criminal offence under the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Annotation. The effective fight against crime was possible not only through the imposition of penalties, but also by encouraging positive action after criminal conduct. The application of measures of encouragement to the perpe- trator of the criminal offence to the person after the fact by studying the content and classification of the methods of smoothing of harm caused a criminal offence, the history of their development, as the circumstances mitigating criminal liability, in any circumstances, allowing not to bring the guilty person to criminal responsibility, the crimi- nal and criminal-procedural legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Analyzing various points of view, the author comes to the conclusion: surrender and the provision of medical and other assistance to the victim immediately after the Commission of the offense, can be aimed at identifying, eliminating or preventing the consequences of such an offense, depending on how timely they were taken by the person who committed it.
Keywords. Сompensation of harm; harmful consequences; prevention of harm; rendering medical care to the vic- tim; elimination of damage; voluntary compensation of property harm; appearance with duty; assistance to disclosure and investigation of a criminal offense; restoration of health to the victim.
References
1 Golik Yu. Institut primireniya s poterpevshim nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii // Ugolov- noe pravo. – 2003. – (3). – С. 20-21. [Golik Yu. Institute of reconciliation with the victim needs improvement / / Criminal law. - 2003. – No. 3. – Р. 20-21].
2 Voskobitova L.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie protseduryi primireniya v ugolovnom sudoproiz- vodstve // Gosudarstvo i pravo na rubezhe vekov: materlyi Vserossiyskoy konferentsii): Krimi- nologiya, ugolovnoe pravo, sudebnoe pravo. – M., 2001. – С. 198-203. [Voskobitova L. A. Legal regulation of the procedure of reconciliation in criminal proceedings / / State and law at the turn of the century: materials of the all-Russian conference): Criminology, criminal law, judicial law.
- M., 2001. – Р. 198-203.].
3 Otechestvennoe zakonodatelstvo 11-20 vekov: posobie dlya seminarov. Chast 2. (20 v.) / pod red. prof. O.I. Chistyakova. – M.: Yurist’, – 2002. – 352 с.[Domestic legislation 11-20 centuries:
a Handbook for workshops. Part 2. (20th century) / edited by Professor O. I. Chistyakov. - M.:
Jurist, - 2002. – 352 с.].
4 Zhizhilenko A.A. Ocherki po obschemu ucheniyu o nakazanii. – Petrograd: Academia, 1923.
– 110 с. [Zhizhilenko A. A. Essays on the General doctrine of punishment. - Petrograd: Academia, 1923. – 110 Р.].
5 Fink D.A. Teoreticheskie, istoricheskie osnovyi i mehanizm zaglazhivaniya vreda, prich- inennogo prestupleniem, v ugolovnom protsesse Respubliki Kazahstan. Monografiya. Astana, 2011. – 222 s. [Fink D. A. Theoretical, historical bases and the mechanism of smoothing of the harm caused by a crime in criminal process of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Monograph. Astana, 2011. - 222 p.].
6 Kim K.V. Predmet dokazyivaniya pri rassledovanii nenadlezhaschego vyipolneniya profes- sionalnyih obyazannostey meditsinskim rabotnikom // Pravo i gosudarstvo. – 2014. - # 2 (63). – S.
92-95. [Kim K. The subject of proof in the investigation of improper performance of professional duties by a medical professional / / Law and the state. - 2014. - № 2 (63). - P. 92-95.].
7 Safronov A.D. Dobrovolnyiy otkaz ot soversheniya prestupleniya i deyatelnoe raskayanie prestupnika: avtoref. ...kand. yurid. nauk. 12.00.08. – M., 1977. – 22 с.[Safronov A. D. Voluntary renunciation of the crime and the active repentance of the offender: author. ...candidate’s the fac- ulty of law. sciences’. 12.00.08. - M., 1977. – 22 р.].
8 Rahmetov S.M., Moldabaev S.S. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v svyazi s deyatelnyim raskayaniem // Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Respubliki Kazahstan / pod.
red. I.I. Rogova, S.M. Rahmetova. – Almatyi: Baspa, 2000. – С. 149-151. [Rakhmetov S. M., Moldabaev S. S. Exemption from criminal liability in connection with active repentance // Com- mentary to the Criminal code of the Republic of Kazakhstan / pod. edited by I. I. Rogov, S. M.
Rakhmetova. - Almaty: BASPA, 2000. – Р. 149-151.].
9 Biryukov A.V. Suschnost, protsessualnyie formyi i pravovyie posledstviya yavki s povinnoy:
diss. …kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. – M., 2000. – 192 с. [Biryukov A.V. the Essence, procedural forms and legal consequences of a surrender: Diss. …candidate’s. the faculty of law. Sciences:
12.00.09. - M., 2000. – 192 р.].
10 Zhilkubaev A.Zh. Deyatelnoe raskayanie po ugolovnomu pravu Respubliki Kazahstan. – Astana, 2004. – 244 с. [Zhilkibaev A. J. Active repentance in criminal law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. - Astana, 2004. – 244 р.].
11 Chernova M.B. Deyatelnoe raskayanie kak institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvet- stvennosti: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. – SPb, 2006. – 234 с. [Chernova M. B. Active repentance as the Institute of exemption from criminal liability: Diss. … candidate’s. the faculty of law. Sciences: 12.00.08. St. Petersburg, 2006. – 234 р.].
12 Ugolovnyiy kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan, ot 3 iyulya 2014 goda # 226-V (s izmeneniya- mi i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 11.07.2017 g.) // https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_
id=31575252. [The criminal code of the Republic of Kazakhstan from July 3, 2014 № 226-IV (with changes and additions as 11.07.2017 g) // URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_
id=31575252.].
13 Ugolovno-protsessualnyiy kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda # 231-V (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 11.07.2017 g.) // https://online.zakon.kz/
Document/?doc_id=31575852. [Criminal procedure code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated July 4, 2014 № 231-V (with amendments as of July 11, 2017) // URL:https://online.zakon.kz/
Document/?doc_id=31575852.].
14 Ozhegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazyika: Okolo 57000 slov / pod red. N.Yu. Shvedovoy. 18- e izd. – M.: Russkiy yazyik, 1986. – 795 с. [Ozhegov S. I. Dictionary of Russian language: Approx 57000 words / under the editorship of N. Yu. Shvedova. 18th ed. - Moscow: Russian, 1986. – 795 р.].15 Dal V. Tolkovyiy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyika: v 4-h t. – M.: Russkiy yazyik, 1989. – T. 1. – 699 s. [Dal V. Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language: in 4 t. – M.: Russian language, 1989. – Vol.1. - 699 p.].
16 Syisalov M.P. Teoriya operativno-rozyisknoy deyatelnosti v Respublike Kazahstan. Mono- grafiya. – Almatyi: «Daneker», 2003. – 326 с. [Syslov M. P. the Theory of operational-investiga- tive activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Monograph. - Almaty: Daneker, 2003. – 326 р.]
17 Scherba S.P., Savkin A.V. Deyatelnoe raskayanie v sovershYonnom prestuplenii: praktich- eskoe posobie. – M.: Yurist, 1997. – 56 с. [Scherba SP, Savkin AV active repentance in the crime:
a practical guide. – M.: Yurist, 1997. – 56 р.].
18 Nikulin S.I. Deyatelnoe raskayanie i ego znachenie dlya organov vnutrennih del v borbe s prestupnostyu: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Moskovskaya VShM MVD SSSR, 1985. – 64 с. [Nikulin S. I. active repentance and its value for law-enforcement bodies in fight against crime: the text- book. – M.: Moscow graduate school of management of MIA of the USSR, 1985. – 64 р.].
19 Zhuravleva E. Yavka s povinnoy v sudebnoy praktike // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2007. – # 5. – С. 33-37. [Zhuravleva E. Surrender in court practice / / Criminal law. - 2007. – No. 5. – Р. 33-37.].
20 Arhiv suda goroda Kostanaya za 2007 g.g. [The archives of the court of Kostanay city in 2007].
21 Endoltseva A.V. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstven-nosti: problemyi i puti resheniya: Monografiya.– M.: YuNITI–DANA, Zakon i pravo. 2004. – 231 с. [Endol’tseva A.V.
Institute of exemption from criminal liability: problems and solutions: Monograph. - M.: UNI- TY-DANA, Law and the right. 2004. – 231 р.].
22 Normativnoe postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda Respubliki Kazahstan. O sudebnoy praktike po primeneniyu stati 67 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazahstan: utv. 21 iyunya 2001 g. # 4 // Informatsionno-pravovaya sistema normativnyih pravovyih aktov Respubliki Kazahstan [Normative resolution of Plenum of Supreme court of the Republic of Kazakhstan. About judicial practice on application of article 67 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: app. June 21, 2001 № 4 / / Information and legal system of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakh- stan “Adilet” / / http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P01000004S_].
23 Hanov T.A. O neobhodimosti priznaniya ne vozmescheniya obvinyaemyim vreda, prich- inennogo prestupleniem, obstoyatelstvom otyagchayuschim ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost i nakaza- nie // Ekonomika i pravo. – 2005. – # 23 // http://niiep.keu.kz/publications_and_writings/article/
article ha 18.php. [Hanov T. A. On the necessity of recognition, not compensation to the accused for the harm caused by the crime, the circumstance aggravating criminal responsibility and pun- ishment//law and Economics. - 2005. – No. 23 // http://niiep.keu.kz/publications_and_writings/
article/article%20ha%2018.php.].
Сведения об авторе:
Финк Д.А. - доцент кафедры уголовно-процессуального права и криминалистики Университета КАЗГЮУ имени М.С. Нарикбаева, кандидат юридических наук, Коргалжинское шоссе 8, Астана, Казахстан.
Fink D.A. - associate Professor of the chair of criminal procedure law and criminology of M. S. Narikbayev KA- ZGUU University, candidate of law, Korgalzhinskoye shosse 8, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Қылмыстық-процессуалдық құқық Уголовно-процессуальное право
Сriminal procedural law