• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Grazing, Army Training, and the Carrying Capacity of Military Lands? (A02-guretzky243797-poster)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Grazing, Army Training, and the Carrying Capacity of Military Lands? (A02-guretzky243797-poster)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Grazing, Army Training, and the Carrying Capacity of Military Lands? (A02-guretzky243797-poster)

Authors:

J.A. Guretzky* - US Army ERDC-CERL J.S. Fehmi - US Army ERDC-CERL A.B. Anderson - US Army ERDC-CERL

Abstract:

Several Army installations support both military training and cattle grazing. Army training, consisting of light-infantry to heavy-mechanized maneuvers, can severely disturb soils and vegetation. Concerns have arisen about how much disturbance Army installations can sustain. Our objective was to discuss the impacts of military training and cattle grazing on western US rangelands. We reviewed literature discussing how these activities affected soils and vegetation. Responses to training generally included increased soil compaction, reduced cover and density of vegetation, shifted dominance from perennial to annual species, disturbance of soil biological crusts, altered hydrologic conditions, and susceptibility to wind and water erosion. Cattle grazing effects were similar when stocking rates were high and

livestock management practices were poor. We concluded that little was known about the interaction of cattle grazing and military training on the soils and vegetation of Army installations. How much these activities overlap and affect the carrying capacity of these lands and recovery from past disturbances remains unknown. Knowledge of their interaction could improve the Army Testing and Training Area Carrying Capacity (ATTACC) model and Land Rehabilitation and Maintenance (LRAM) procedures and ultimately management and sustainability of Army training lands.

Speaker Information: John Guretzky, US Army ERDC-CERL, 2902 Newmark Drive, Champaign, IL 61822; Phone: (217) 352-6511; E-mail: [email protected]

Session Information: Wednesday, November 5, 2003, 8:55 AM-11:45 AM Presentation Start: 9:55 AM

Keywords: rangeland health; ecological indicators; disturbance; community ecology

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation against quality of life alteration and functional capacity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient assessed using St G

then it is required some efforts to be able to support the growth of the extensive of land use for building longer in accordance with the carrying capacity,.

Carrying Capacity lahan pasang surut di Kabupaten Banyuasin dan Kecamatan Muara Telang adalah Defisit karena CCR < 1, dimana CCR Kabupaten sebesar 0,4 dan CCR

Data analysis carried out is descriptive analysis, location quotient, livestock density, feed concentration index, carrying capacity of agricultural and plantation waste,

of catch fisheries management based on the carrying capacity of aquatic ecosystems; (2) eradication of IUU fishing activities; (3) improve the institutional capacity of fish

This study aims to assess the production and carrying capacity of raw materials derived from mangrove vegetation to make processed food products using a case study from mangrove

GHRM incorporates elements of green management into job design, staffing, training and development, motivation, and maintenance functions of human resource management HR to improve

6.3 GENERAL CONLUSIONS The feasibility of including K reserves and fixation capacity in soil K testing and the development of fertilizer requirements was investigated and it is