• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

On behalf of the respondents on or before Friday 9 December 2005.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "On behalf of the respondents on or before Friday 9 December 2005."

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CASE NO: CCT 57/05

SOUTH AFRICAN LIQUR TRADERS ASSOCIATION First Applicant

VIRGINIA MKIZE Second Applicant

MINKI MARYSTELLA NETSHADAMA Third Applicant

MOLEFI JACOB MOGODIRI Fourth Applicant

BLANCHE MARGARET MARIA ALLIES Fifth Applicant

DGB (PTY) LIMITED Sixth Applicant

KWV SA (PTY) LIMITED Seventh Applicant

JONKHEER BOEREWYNMAKERY (PTY) LIMITED Eighth Applicant

PERNOD RICARD SOUTH AFRICAN (PTY) LIMITED Ninth Applicant

OMNIA WINES LIMITED Tenth Applicant

DISTELL LIMITED Eleventh Applicant

MOOIUITSIG WYNELDERS (PTY) LIMITED Twelfth Applicant

WINECORP (PTY) LIMITED Thirteenth Applicant

EDWARD SNELL & CO LIMITED Fourteenth Applicant

BRANDHOUSE BEVERAGES (PTY) LIMITED t/a

BRANDHOUSE Fifteenth Applicant

1

(2)

and

THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE GAUTENG

LIQUOR BOARD First Respondent

THE GAUTENG LIQUOR BOARD Second Respondent

THE MEC FOR FINANCE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS,

GAUTENG Third Respondent

________________________________________________________________________

DIRECTIONS DATED 09 NOVEMBER 2005

________________________________________________________________________

The Chief Justice has given the following directions in this matter.

1. The application for condonation and the application for confirmation of the order of constitutional invalidity made by the High Court are set down for hearing on Thursday 2 March 2006 at 10:00.

2. The record consists of the application papers that have been filed in this Court.

3. The applicants must file an index of the record on or before 18 November 2005.

4. Written argument must be lodged:

a) On behalf of the applicants on or before Friday 25 November 2005; and b) On behalf of the respondents on or before Friday 9 December 2005.

5. Written argument must, in addition to addressing fully the issue of the constitutionality of the legislative provision to be considered by this Court address the following issues:

a) Whether it was appropriate for the High Court to grant an order of constitutional invalidity without furnishing any reason for that order;

b) Whether it is appropriate, in the circumstances of this case, for this Court to adjudicate the issue of constitutionality in the absence of the reasons of the High Court; if not

c) The way in which this Court should approach this application in the absence of reasons; and

d) If the section is unconstitutional is the relief granted by the High Court appropriate.

2

(3)

MS STANDER

SNR REGISTRAR: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

TO: SONNENBERG HOFFMANN GALOMBIK Attorneys for Applicants

Ground Floor, ABN Amro House 85 Maude Street

Sandown

JOHANNESBURG

Ref: A C Hoeben/J Engelbrect Tel: (011) 669 8000

Fax: (011) 669 8111

AND TO: THE STATE ATTORNEY Attorneys for the Respondents

8th Floor, Old Mutual Building 167 Andries Street

PRETORIA

Ref: NV/zh/897/2005/02244/212 Tel: (012) 309 1500

Fax: (012) 328 2662/3

3

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

/ Futao Huang 167 세션 3-5 Designing the Innovative Practices of General Education on the bases of Historical Heritage in China-Top Research Universities as a Case / SHI Jinghuan 180