• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

constitutional court of south africa

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "constitutional court of south africa"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case CCT 48/17

In the application of:

FREEDOM UNDER LAW Intervening Party

to intervene as an applicant in the matter between:

BLACK SASH TRUST Applicant

and

MINISTER OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT First Respondent

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE

SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY Second Respondent SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY Third Respondent MINISTER OF FINANCE Fourth Respondent

NATIONAL TREASURY Fifth Respondent

CASH PAYMASTER SERVICES (PTY) LIMITED Sixth Respondent INFORMATION REGULATOR Seventh Respondent

_____________________________________________________________________

DIRECTIONS DATED 8 MARCH 2017

_____________________________________________________________________

(2)

The Chief Justice has issued the following directions:

1. The application for leave to intervene is set down for hearing together with the main application at 10h00 on Wednesday 15 March 2017.

2. Those parties wishing to oppose the application must file their opposing papers by 16h00 on Friday 10 March 2017.

3. Written submissions of no longer than ten pages on this application may be filed by all parties by 16h00 on Monday 13 March 2017.

4. Further directions may be issued.

MR KGWADI MAKGAKGA REGISTRAR

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

TO: NORTONS INC Intervening party’s attorneys 135 Daisy Street

JOHANNESBURG Tel: 011 666 7560 Fax: 086 600 5529

Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Ref: A Norton / A Roets

AND TO: CENTRE FOR APPLIED LEGAL STUDIES Attorneys for the Applicant

First Floor

DJ du Plessis Building

West Campus, University of the Witwatersrand 1 Jan Smuts Avenue

JOHANNESBURG Tel: 011 717 8606 Fax: 011 717 1702

Email: [email protected] Ref: BHR/0062/NN

AND TO: STATE ATTORNEY, JOHANNESBURG First Respondent

12th Floor

North State Building

(3)

95 Market Street JOHANNESBURG Tel: 073 407 5793

Email: [email protected] /

Ref: Vijay Dhulam / Sipho Molope / 1 007/20 12/Z 1

AND TO: STATE ATTORNEY, JOHANNESBURG Second and Third Respondents

12th Floor

North State Building 95 Market Street JOHANNESBURG Tel: 076 061 6695

Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Ref: Vijay Dhulam / Mpho Ratshisusu

AND TO: STATE ATTORNEY, JOHANNESBURG Fourth and Fifth Respondents

95 Market Street JOHANNESBURG Tel: 083 564 8539

Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Ref: Vijay Dhulam / Rebecca Tee

AND TO: SMIT SEWGOOLAM INC.

Attorneys for the Sixth Respondent 12 Avonwold Road

Saxonwold

JOHANNESBURG Tel: 011 646 0006 Fax: 011 646 0016

Email: [email protected] Ref: T Jonker

AND TO: THE INFORMATION REGULATOR Seventh Respondent

21st Floor SALU Builiding

316 Thabo Sehume Street PRETORIA

Tel: 012 406 4818 Fax: 086 500 3351

Email: [email protected]

Ref: Mmamoroke Mphelo

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE No: SCA CASE No.: 419/09 In the matter between: NAIDOO, RAJAN First Applicant NAIDOO, DOLLY Second Applicant TWOLINE TRADING 87

In its application for leave to appeal, Afrocentrics argued that the order of the High Court on the rule 30 interlocutory application had a final and definitive effect on the main

It is declared that: 1.1 the Advertising Standards Authority of South Africa the ASA has no jurisdiction over any person or entity who is not a member of the ASA and that the ASA may

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT the Respondents may within ten 10 days from the date on which this application is lodged, respond thereto in writing, indicating in his /their response: a

That the Applicants be granted leave to file their heads of argument by 27 September 2013 and the Respondent to file theirs by 4 October 2013... Further and / or alternative

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CCT CASE NO.: 14/2019 In the application of: PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SOUTH AFRICA Applicant for admission as an amicus curiae In the

Today the Constitutional Court handed down its judgment concerning an order of the Full Court of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria which restrained the Tshwane

Second Respondent SORAYA DANIELS Third Respondent ADELAH JAKOET Fourth Respondent SHAHIEDA MANUEL Fifth Respondent MOGAMAT SHARIEF MANUEL Sixth Respondent SARAH DANIELS