• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

isprsarchives XL 1 W1 23 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "isprsarchives XL 1 W1 23 2013"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Figure 2. Difference between SAR and GNSS coordinate
Figure 3. Standard deviation of the geodynamic and signal
Figure 5. Intersection of the circles (red) described by the azimuth and range equations for two orbits (blue) in the ITRF2008 reference frame at a point in the SAR image (center of green ellipse)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Network_1, which is approximately 230 km distance from the base station to the flight area and the farthest network, solution accuracy is worse especially in Z-direction than

Such opposite- side configurations enable to obtain information of both building sides (Liu et al. 2011), which is very helpful in case of neighbouring effects. TerraSAR-X

To test if affine RPC correction results to improved absolute accuracy, we additionally performed a block adjustment where all survey points were used as GCPs.. When using

The line coordinate is utilized with line period and reference time to calculate the time of acquisition of the point, using this time we can obtain the corrections

Some specific method and techniques are particularly introduced for pixel scale and whole product validation, including the ground observation field selection criteria,

This research focused on the latter part by analysing the impact of uncertainty on land-use maps, obtained through a remote sensing interpretation chain involving

The radar incidence angle could be adjusted from 37degree to 45 degree and the resolution are 0.1m, 0.4m respectively (azimuth resolution and slant resolution)[1]. Fully

Data fusion of high-resolution satellite imagery and GIS data for automatic building extraction.. GUO Zhou a, * , LUO Liqun a, b , WANG Wanyi a , DU Shihong a a Institute