• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:M:Mathematical Social Sciences:Vol40.Issue2.Sep2000:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:M:Mathematical Social Sciences:Vol40.Issue2.Sep2000:"

Copied!
25
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Fig. 1. Hydraulic metaphor. Note: a problem (t , t , t , t ; g) is solved by assigning to types t , t , t ,1234123 tappropriate vessels and pouring4 g water into the main reservoir.
Table 1Solutions to three claims problems recommended by the Talmud (Aumann and Maschler, 1985)
Fig. 2. A hydraulic CG solution to the three claims problems from the Talmud. Note: the size of a claim isequal to the area of the corresponding vessel.
Fig. 4. A hydraulic solution to a bankruptcy problem according to American bankruptcy law

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

(2) Theorem 7(b) for Banach spaces and Γ = X ′ is proved in [9]; the case of complete separable metrizable topological vector spaces and arbitrary Γ is considered in [10] (see also

If ‘H1’ and ‘Bush Dawn’ cut flower hybrids need to be stored for protracted periods of time, in the order of weeks, then 2 – 5°C is a relatively safe storage temperature

application of Glicksburg’s Theorem (Glicksburg, 1952) that the game form g exhibits a (mixed strategy) Nash equilibrium. We contend that local pure strategy Nash equilibria can

However, they prove the existence of stable outcomes and the lattice property of the core for a particular case of this model, which does not include the continuous market as it

Keywords: Social choice; Social decision rules; Normative constraints; Rationality conditions; Aggregation operator; Arrow theorem; Ordinal relation..

The first assertion of Theorem 5.C corresponds to the undecidability result presented in Kaneko-Nagashima (1996) that there is a specific three-person game with a unique

The next step is to prove that the first-player consistent rule s assigns to each airport problem the modified nucleolus of the associated airport game2. First we

Hollard and Le Breton (1996) have shown that if we restrict ourselves to separable complete relations then McGarvey’s result remains true, that is, every separable complete relation