• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Change Requests | OGC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Change Requests | OGC"

Copied!
180
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Figure 5.1 — UML notation
Figure 7.1.   Relationship of sensor frame (pink) to the moving platform frame (black)
Table 7.1.  Relationships between in-situ and remote sensors on mobile and fixed platforms
Figure 8.1. Simple Data Types Conceptual Model
+7

Referensi

Garis besar

Dokumen terkait

* The code list encoding in CityGML provides no mechanism to point to the dictionary with the used code list values (and it does not use the GML mechanism) → noone can interpret

Provision of another - optional - section of the Capabilities document that can be queried by clients for WSDL description of a service. within the XML Schema from OWS Common for

(Association from image sensor that uses this group of sensor parameter values) Public attributes: Two attributes inherited from GF_FeatureType, No attributes inherited

When time zone offsets are used in a temporal element of a client request, the server processing the request shall interpret temporal information with respect to the client’s

The response to an UpdateSensor request is the fixed string “sensorUpdated” which indicates that the sensor submitted sensor properties were successfully updated. Otherwise

Reason for change:  The GetResult operation allows a client to repeatedly obtain sensor data from the same set of sensors3. But there is no corresponding InsertResult operation

WSDL does not support the definition of dynamic parameter names, all parameters have to be defined at interface description stage.. 3.1.4 Specific

Reason for change:  The WPS 1.0.0 specification does not provide any mechanism for querying the status of an asynchronous process, though the specification does require an