Alikodra H. 1990. Pengelolaan Satwa Liar Jilid 1. Pusat Antar Universitas. Bogor (ID): Ilmu Hayati, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Ambagau Y. 2010. Analisis kesesuaian habitat burung maleo (Macrocephalon maleo) di Taman Nasional Bogani Nani Wartabone [tesis]. Fakultas Kehutanan. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Argos. 1996. User’s manual. Maryland: CLS/Service Argos.
Ariyanty M. 2011. Monitoring Perubahan Penutupan Lahan dengan Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografi (SIG) dan Penginderaan Jauh (Studi Kasus : Kawasan Puncak, Kabupataen Bogor, Jawa Barat). Fakultas Pertanian. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Aronoff S. 1989. Geographic Information System A Management Persfektive. Ottawa, Kanada (AF): WDL. Publications
ARRCN. 2012. Field Guide to Raptors of Asia Vol. 1 : Migratory Raptors of Oriental Asia.Jepang : Asian Raptors Research and Conservation Network.
Azuma S, Yafuso M, Kinjo M, Hayashi M, Kohama T, Sasaki T, Kimura M, Kawamura F. 2002. Check-list of the insects of the Ryukyu Islands. 2nd ed. The Biological Society of Okinawa, Okinawa.
Bildstein KL. 2006. Migrating Raptor of the World: their Conservation and Ecology. New York (US). Cornell University.
Chang K. 2002. Introduction to Geographic Information Sistems. Ed. ke-1. New York (US) : McGraw-hill Companies, Inc.
Cohn J. 1999. Tracking wildlife: high-tech devices help biologists trace the movement of animals through sky and sea. BioScience 49, 12–17.
Coop N, Catling P. 2002. Prediction of Spatial Distribution and Spatial Pattern of Vegetation Parameters Over A Tallgrass Prairie. Journal of The Atmospheric Science 55: 1225-1238.
Crane E. 1985. Bees and Honey in the Explotation of Arid Land Resources in "Plants for Arid Land" (Wickens, G.E., J .R . Goodin and D .V . Field ) pp. 163 – 175 Darsihardjo. 2004. Model Pemanfaatan Lahan Berkelanjutan di Daerah Hulu Sungai
Studi KasusDaerah Hulu Sungai Cikapundung, Bandung Utara [disertasi]. Bogor (ID) : Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Ferguson J, Christie D. 2005. Raptors of the World. London (GB) : Black Publishers. Forman RT, Gordon M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. Minneapolis (US) : University of
Minnesota
Fujita G, Hong L, Ueta M, O Goroshko, V Krever, K Ozaki, N Mita, H Higuchi. 2004. Comparing Areas of Suitable Habitats Along Travelled and Possible Shortest Routes In Migration of White-naped Cranes Grus Vipio in East Asia. Ibis 146: 461–474.
Gamauf A, Preleuthner M, Winkler H. 1998. Philippine Birds of Prey: Interrelations Among Habitat, Morphology, and Behavior. Auk 115: 713–726.
Hadi S. 2012. Pemodelan Arsitektur Lanskap. Departemen Arsitektur Lanskap. Fakultas Pertanian. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Hake M, Kjellen N, Alerstam T. 2003. Age-dependent Migration Strategy in Honey Buzzards Pernis apivorus Tracked by Satellite. Oikos 103: 385–396.
Hasanah A, Syartinilia, Higuchi H. 2011. Landscape Habitat Characteristics of Oriental Honey Buzzard (Pernis ptylorhynchus) Wintering in South Kalimantan Based on Satellite Tracking. Procedings of The 18 th Tri-University International Joint Seminar and Symposium, Jiangsu University, China, October 26-21, 2012. Higuchi H, J Shiu, H Nakamura, A Uematsu, K Kuno, M Saeki, M Hotta, K Tokita, E
Moriya, E Morishima, M Tamura. 2005. Migration of honeybuzzards Pernis apivorus based on satellite tracking. Ornithol. Sci. 4: 109–115.
Higuchi H, Pierre J. 2005. Satellite tracking and avian conservation in Asia. International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer. Verlag Tokyo. Landscape Ecol Eng (2005) 1 : 33-42.
Hosmer D, Hosmre T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. 1997. A comparison of goodness-of- fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistic in Medicine. Vol. 16 pp. 965- 980.
Iseki F. 2004. Spring migration of Sparrowhawks, Gray-faced Buzzards and Oriental Honey Buzzards in northwestern Kyushu. Strix 22: 81–88.
Kerlinger P. 1985. Water-crossing behavior of raptors during migration. Wilson Bull 97: 109–113.
Korman J, Perrin C, Lekstrum T. 1994. A Guide fot The Selection of Standard Method for Quantifying Sportfish Habitat Capability and Sustainability in Streams and Lakes of British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada (AF) : Limnotek Research and Development Inc.
Koutsias N. 2003. An Autologistic regression model for increasing the accuracy of burned surface mapping using landsat Thematic Mapper data. Int. J. Remote Sensing Vol 24. No. 10, pp. 2199-2204.
Kusmana C. 1997. Metode Survey Vegetasi. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor. Lang L. 2003. Managing Natural Resources with GIS. New York (US) : Published by
ESRI.
Meyburg B, E Lobkow. 1994. Satellite tracking of a juvenile Steller’s sea eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus. Ibis, 136: 105-106.
Mitchel K. 2007. Quantitative analysis by the point-centered quarter method. Htttp://people.hws.edu/mitchell/PCQM.pdf [07 Oktober 2012].
Miyamoto K, Suzuki E, Kohyama T, Seino T, Mirmanto E, Simbolon, H. 2003. Habitat differentiation among tree species with small-scale variation of humus depth and topography In a tropical heath forest of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 43-54.
Moore FR, Aborn DA. 2000. Mechanisms of en route habitat selection: How do migrants make habitat decisions during stopover. Studies in Avian Biology 20. Muhammad, Aminullah E, Susilo B. 2001. Analisis Sistem Dinamis: Lingkungan
Hidup, Sosial, Ekonomi, Manajemen. Jakarta (ID) : UMJ Press.
N Yamaguchi, K Tokita, A Uematsu, K Kuno, M Saeki, E Hiraoka, K Uchida, M Hotta, F Nakayama, M Takahashi, H Nakamura, H Higuchi. 2008. The large-scale detoured migration route and the shifting pattern of migration in Oriental honey- buzzards breeding in Japan. Journal of Zoology.
Orians G. 1969. The Number of Birds Species in Some Tropical Forest. Japan (JP). Saunders College Pub.
Ornithological Society of Japan. 2000. Check-list of Japanese birds, 6th edn. Obihiro (JP) : The Ornithological Society of Japan.
Panuccio M. 2011. Across and around barrier: migration 501 ecology of raptors in the Mediteranean basin. Scientifica Acta 5, No. 1, EEG 27-36.
Peet K. 1989. Forest of Rocky Mountains in North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Edit by Barbour, M.G. and Billings, W.D. Cambridge, New York (US) : Cambridge University Press.
Peterson R. 1980. Pustaka Life. Jakarta (ID). Tiara Pustaka.
Petit DR. 2000. Habitat use by landbirds along Nearctic-Neotropical migration routes: Implications for conservation of stopover habitats. Studies in Avian Biology 20. Piorecky M, Prescott D. 2006. Multiple spatial scale logistic and autologistic habitat
selection models for northern pygmy owls, along the eastern slopes of Alberta’s Rocky Mountains. Biological Conservation 129, pp. 360-371.
Richard PW. 1964. The Tropical rain Forest. An Ecological Study. Cambridge (GB) : Cambrifge University Press.
Semlitsch R, Jensen J. 2001. Core habitat, Not Buffer Zones. National Wetlands Newsletter Vol.23 no.4. United States (US) : Washington DC.
Soerianegara, Indrawan A. 1998. Ekologi Hutan Indonesia. Jurusan Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan. Bogor (ID) : IPB.
Supranto J. 2000. Statistik : Terapan dan Aplikasi. Jilid 1. Edisi ke-6. Jakarta (ID) : Penerbit Erlangga.
Supriatna A. 2010. Diurnal raptor (burung pemangsa) di Indonesia; Status dan konservasi. Seminar tentang penelitian dan konservasi raptor di Indonesia, 6 Maret 2010. Bogor.
Syartinilia, Afra DN, Yeni AM, Hiroyoshi H. 2013. Landscape characteristics of Wintering Habitats Used by Oriental Honey-buzzards in Borneo Derived from Satellite Tracking Data. Landscape and Ecological Engineering. DOI 10.1007/s11355-013-0237-4
Syartinilia, Yamaguchi N, Higuchi H. 2008. Spatial Distribution and Habitat of Oriental Honey-Buzzards Wintering in Borneo Based on Satellite Tracking. Int. J. 10
Syartinilia, Tsuyuki S. 2008. GIS-based modeling of Javan Hawk-Eagle Distribution Using Logistic and Autologistic Regression Models. Biological Conservation 141, pp. 756-769.
Tangenjaya B. 1992. Kaliandra dan Manfaatnya. Balai Penelitian Ternak dan The Australian Cebtre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
Thomas. 1979. Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington, United States (US) : Department of Agriculture.
Tietje W. 2000. Land-Use Planning in Oak Woodland: Applying the Concepts of Landscape Ecology Using GIS Technology and the CDF Oak Woodland Maps. Berkeley (US) : University of California.
Tomitaka M, Yamamoto C. 2002. Migration of Oriental Honey Buzzards in northeastern Kyushu, Japan. Strix 20: 107–115.
Ueta M, Higuchi H. 2002. Difference in migration pattern between adult and immature birds using satellites. Auk 119: 832–835.
Ueta M, Sato F, Nakagawa H, Mita N. 2000. Migration routes and differences of migration schedule between adult and young Steller’s Sea Eagles Haliaeetus pelagicus. Ibis 142: 35–39.
Van Steenis C, 1972. The Mountain Flora of Java. E.J. Brill, The Netherlands (NL) : Leiden.
Webster M, Marra P, Haig S, Bensch S, Holmes R. 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 76–83.
Wiharto M, Cecep K, Lilik B P, Tukrin P. Klasifikasi Vegetasi Gunung Salak, Bogor, Jawa Barat. Volume 31 nomor 1 januari 2008. Journal IPB. Hal 13-23
Yamaguchi N, Tokita K, Uematsu A, Kuno K, Saeki M, Hiraoka E, Uchida K, Hotta M, Nakayama F, Takahashi M, Nakamura H, Higuchi H. 2008. The large-scale detoured migration route and the shifting pattern of migration in Oriental honey buzzards breeding in Japan. J. of Zoology 276: 54-62.
Yamazaki T, Yasunori N. 2012. Field Guide To Raptors of Asia, Vol 1, Migratory Raptors of Oriental Asia, Asian Raptor Research and Conservation Network. Zalles J, Bildstein K. 2000. Raptor watch: a global directory of raptor migration sites.
Cambridge, U.K. and Kempton (US) : BirdLife International and Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Lampiran 1. Nilai Akurasi Umum dan Akurasi Kappa
Kelas Data Acuan Total Baris UA (100%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Hutan 36 0 0 0 8 0 0 44 81,82 Kebun 0 15 0 0 4 0 0 17 88,23 Semak 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 21 100 Lahan Kering 0 0 3 23 2 0 0 28 82,14 Sawah 2 0 0 0 103 9 0 114 89,57 Permukiman 3 0 0 0 10 52 0 65 78,46 Badan Air 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 100 Total Kolom 18 PA (100%) 94, Overall accuracy = 88,60% Kappa accuracy = 85,62%
Lampiran 2. Penampakan Training Area pada ALOS AVNIR2 tahun 2009
No Kelas Penampakan pada Citra Keterangan
1 Badan Air Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
2 Sawah Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
3 Permukiman Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
4 Semak/Belukar Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
5 Kebun/Perkebunan Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
6 Tegalan/Ladang Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
7 Hutan Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
8 Awan Band combination :
Red : Layer 4 Green : Layer 3 Blue : Layer 2
Lampiran 21
.
Uji t-test
Parameter
Levene's Test for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means Keterangan
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Air Equal variances assumed 3.987 584.0 7.53554E-05
Significant
Equal variances not assumed 3.987 434.4 7.84456E-05
Hutan Equal variances assumed -3.344 584.0 0.000879826
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -3.344 317.5 0.000925828
Kebun Equal variances assumed -3.880 584.0 0.000116137
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -3.880 431.7 0.000120542
Lahan Kering Equal variances assumed -3.709 584.0 0.000227577
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -3.709 491.0 0.000231472
Permukiman Equal variances assumed -0.105 584.0 0.916090105 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -0.105 333.9 0.916117211
Sawah Equal variances assumed 2.548 584.0 0.011092561
Significant
Equal variances not assumed 2.548 576.8 0.01109574
Semak Equal variances assumed -0.452 584.0 0.651396395 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -0.452 541.5 0.651409565
s0-3 Equal variances assumed 0.870 584.0 0.384907105 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed 0.870 582.1 0.384908252
s3-8 Equal variances assumed 0.525 584.0 0.599594975 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed 0.525 578.6 0.599596839
s8-15 Equal variances assumed 0.921 584.0 0.357628495 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed 0.921 581.7 0.357629987
s15-25 Equal variances assumed -1.211 584.0 0.226325962 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -1.211 574.9 0.226333727
s25-40 Equal variances assumed -3.323 584.0 0.000945702
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -3.323 569.6 0.000947134
s>40 Equal variances assumed 1.637 584.0 0.102146573 Tidak
Significant
Equal variances not assumed 1.637 560.3 0.102169321
e0-300 Equal variances assumed -2.004 584.0 0.045481798
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -2.004 328.7 0.045840604
e300-500 Equal variances assumed -9.469 584.0 6.88141E-20
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -9.469 335.1 5.22048E-19
e500-700 Equal variances assumed -5.310 584.0 1.55713E-07
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -5.310 396.9 1.82569E-07
e700-1000 Equal variances assumed -5.917 584.0 5.57876E-09
Significant
Equal variances not assumed -5.917 442.6 6.56056E-09
e > 1000 Equal variances assumed -6.758 584.0 3.39277E-11
Significant
Lampiran 22. Prosedur Stepwise Forward Metode Step Hosmer &
Lemeshow R2 Varible Nilai Koefisien Nilai Sign (P-Value) Sign Forward Stepwise 1 66,3% 92,5% JTK5 3,366 0,000 Constant -0,333 0,123 2 70,2% 91,5% JTK5 3,366 0,000 JTE1 4,304 0,000 Constant -0,689 0,005 3 72,2% 88,5% JTK5 3,366 0,000 JTE1 4,304 0,000 JTE2 -5,752 0,000 Constant -0,863 0,002 4 81% 92,5% JTK5 3,366 0,000 JTE1 4,304 0,000 JTE2 -5,752 0,000 JTE5 -2,811 0,002 Constant -0,814 0,008 5 82,7% 92,5% JTK5 3,366 0,000 JTE1 4,304 0,000 JTE2 -5,752 0,000 JTE5 -2,811 0,002 JTHT -2,467 0,013 Constant -1,230 0,001 6 85% 94% JTK5 3,366 0,000 JTE1 4,304 0,000 JTE2 -5,752 0,000 JTE5 -2,811 0,002 JTHT -2,467 0,013 JTSH -0,914 0,011 Constant -1,309 0,002 7 86,2% 94% JTK5 3,366 0,000 JTE1 4,304 0,000 JTE2 -5,752 0,000 JTE5 -2,811 0,002 JTHT -2,467 0,013 JTSH -0,914 0,011 JTBA 1,259 0,034 Constant -1,610 0,001
Lampiran 23. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Pohon di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 20 m x 20 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Tinggi Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2)
Petak 1 Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh.) 36 24 0,1017
Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh.) 34 21 0,0907
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 25 15 0,0490
Karet (Hopea mengarawan) 21 14 0,0346
Sengon (Alibizia falcata) 23 10 0,0415
Petak 2 Cemara (Camara sp) 35 21 0,0961
Meranti (Shorea laevifolia) 30 19 0,0706
Bambu (Babusa indica) 22 8 0,0379
Mahoni (Mahogani swietania) 22 13 0,0379
Mahoni (Mahogani swietania) 22 13 0,0379
Petak 3 Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) 20 7 0,0314
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 22 11 0,0379
Sengon (Alibizia falcata) 21 9 0,0346
Petak 4 Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh.) 29 20 0,0660
Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh.) 29 20 0,0660
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 23 15 0,0415
Karet (Hopea mengarawan) 25 13 0,0490
Karet (Hopea mengarawan) 25 13 0,0490
Mahoni (Mahogani swietania) 25 10 0,0490
Petak 5 Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh.) 31 21 0,0754
Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh.) 31 21 0,0754
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 21 14 0,0346
Lampiran 24. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Tiang di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 10 m x 10 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Jumlah Tinggi
Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2) Petak 1 Kaliandra (Calliandra
callothyrsus)
11 1 4 0,0094
Ubar (Eugenia spp) 13 1 7 0,0132
Pinus (Pinus merkusii
Jungh.)
16 1 6 0,0200
Petak 2 Meranti merah (Shorea spp.) 10 1 4 0,0078 Medang (Litsea spp) 12 1 7 0,0113 Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus) 10 1 5 0,0078
Petak 3 Banitan (Polyalthia sp) 16 1 13 0,0200
Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus) 11 1 7 0,0094 Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus) 10 1 4 0,0078
Petak 4 Karet (Hopea mengarawan)
10 1 6 0,0078
Lampiran 25. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Pancang di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 5 m x 5 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Jumlah Tinggi
Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2) Petak 1 Kaliandra (Calliandra
callothyrsus)
5 1 2 0,0019
Ubar (Eugenia spp) 4 1 2 0,0012
Petak 2 Meranti merah (Shorea spp.)
8 1 2 0,0050
Petak 3 Medang (Litsea spp) 4 1 1,5 0,0012
Petak 4 Karet (Hopea mengarawan)
5 1 2 0,0019
Petak 5 Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)
4 1 2 0,0012
Lampiran 26. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Semai di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 2 m x 2 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Jumlah Tinggi
Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2) Petak 1 Kaliandra (Calliandra
callothyrsus)
2 1 1 0,0003
Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)
2 1 1 0,0003
Salak (Salacca zalacca) 3 1 1,5 0,0007
Petak 2 Lengkuas Merah (Alpinia purpurata K)
3 2 1,5 0,0007
Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)
2 1 1 0,0003
Jahe Merah (Zingiber officinale Linn Var. rubrum)
4 3 1 0,0012
Petak 3 Jagung (Zea mays) 2 2 1 0,0003
Terentang (Compnospera spp),
4 1 1 0,0012
Petak 4 Mayau (Shorea palembanicca Mig),
3 1 1 0,0003
Petak 5 Putri malu (Mimosa pudica, Linn)
2 3 1 0,0003
Lampiran 27. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Pohon di Edge Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 20 m x 20 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Tinggi Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2)
Petak 1 Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 24 21 0,0452
Aren (Arenga pinnata) 21 20 0,0346
Jambu mete (Anacardium occidentale L)
23 12 0,0415
Pinang (Areca catechu) 21 13 0,0346
Petak 2 Cengkeh (Syzygium aromaticum)
27 12 0,0572
Cengkeh (Syzygium aromaticum)
31 20 0,0754
Meranti (Shorea laevifolia) 30 18 0,0706
Petak 3 Mahoni (Mahogani swietania)
32 11 0,0803
Aren (Arenga pinnata) 22 13 0,0379
Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum)
24 8 0,0452
Petak 4 Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 22 10 0,0379
Sengon (Alibizia falcata) 21 9 0,0346
Pala (Myristica fragrans) 25 10 0,0490
Manga (Mango sp) 24 10 0,0452
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 23 15 0,0415
Pala (Myristica fragrans) 25 13 0,0490
Petak 5 Karet (Hopea mengarawan) 29 13 0,0660
Mahoni (Mahogani swietania)
27 14 0,0572
Manga (Mango sp) 31 11 0,0754
Pinang (Areca catechu) 21 11 0,0346
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 21 14 0,0346
Lampiran 28. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Tiang di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 10 m x 10 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Jumlah Tinggi
Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2)
Petak 1 Cassia (Cassia sp) 11 1 4 0,0094
Mayau (Shorea palembanicca)
11 1 5 0,0094
Petak 2 Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)
10 1 4 0,0078
Terentang (Compnospera spp)
12 1 4 0,0113
Petak 3 Lengkuas Merah (Alpinia purpurata)
10 1 5 0,0078
Cassia (Cassia sp) 10 1 5 0,0078
Jahe Merah (Zingiber officinale)
11 1 7 0,0094
Petak 4 Jahe Merah (Zingiber officinale)
11 1 7 0,0094
Cassia (Cassia sp) 10 1 4 0,0078
Petak 5 Terentang (Compnospera spp)
10 1 6 0,0078
Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)
11 1 5 0,0094
Lampiran 29. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Pancang di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 5 m x 5 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Jumlah Tinggi
Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2)
Petak 1 Kopi (Coffea arabica L) 4 1 2 0,0012
Aren (Arenga pinnata) 4 1 2 0,0012
Petak 2 Cengkeh (Syzygium aromaticum)
5 1 2 0,0019
Rambutan
(Nephelium lappaceum)
5 1 2 0,0019
Petak 3 Sengon (Alibizia falcata) 4 1 1,5 0,0012
Petak 4 Pala (Myristica fragrans) 5 1 2 0,0019
Lampiran 30. Data Hasil Pengamatan Fase Semai di Core Habitat SMA dengan metode petak contoh yang luasannya 2 m x 2 m
Jenis Spesies Diameter
Batang (cm)
Jumlah Tinggi
Pohon (m)
Luas Bidang Dasar (m2) Petak 1 Sonokeling (Dalbergia
latifolia)
3 1 1 0,0007
Petak 2 Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 2 2 1,5 0,0003
Petak 3 Kopi (Coffea arabica L) 3 2 1 0,0007
Petak 4 Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)
2 1 1 0,0003
Kelapa (Cocos nucifera) 2 1 1 0,0003
Petak 5 Kaliandra (Calliandra callothyrsus)