Adi P, 2008, Relevansi Transfer Pemerintah Pusat Terhadap Upaya Pajak, The 2nd National Conference UKWMS, Surabaya
Agustina N 2010, Desentralisasi Fiskal, Tax Effort, dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah: Studi Empirik Kabupaten/Kota Se-Indonesia 2001-2008 [Tesis]. Bogor Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Aritenang A F , 2009, “The Impact of Government Budget shifts to Regional
Disparities in Indonesia: Before and After Decentralisation”.Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Akai N, Sakata M 2005 Decentralization, Commitment and Regional Inequality: Evience From State-level Cross-sectional Data for the US. CIRJE
Badan Pusat Statistik, Statistik Indonesia, berbagai edisi
Bappenas, 2011, Analisis Perspektif, Permasalahan dan Dampak Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK), White Paper
Barro, J, R Sala i Martin X, 1995, Economic Growth, Singapore, Mcgraw Hill Book Co.
Bouton, Gassner dan Verrardi, 2008, “Redistributing Income under Fiscal
Vertical Imbalance”, European Journal of Political Economy 24 (2008) Bird, R. M., J. Martinez-Vasquez dan Torgler B, 2006. “Societal Institutions and
Tax Effort in Developing Countries”: J. Alm and J. Martinez-Vazquez (eds.), The Challenge of Tax Reform in the GlobalEconomy. Springer- Verlag.
Bird R M, Martinez-Vaguez dan Torgler B, 2008,”Tax Effort in Develooping
Countries and High Income Countries”, Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol 38 No.1, March 2008
Bland, Robert dan Nunn, 199β. “ The Impact of Capital Spending on
Municipal Operating Budget”. Public Budgeting & Finance (Summer): 32-47
Brojonegoro B, Pakpahan A T, β00β, “Evaluasi atas Alokasi DAU β001 dan Permasalahannya; Dana Alokasi Umum, Konsep, Hambatan, dan Prospek di Era Otonomi Daerah”, LPEM-UI, Jakarta.
Brodjonegoro B. 2005, “Three years of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: its impacts on regional economic development and fiscal sustainability”, Department of Economics, University of Indonesia Canning, D. (1999), “Infrastructure’s Contribution to Aggregate Output”, Policy
Calderón, C., Servén L β005. “The effects of infrastructure development on growth and income distribution”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3643. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Canning, Pedroni 2004, “The Effect of Infrastructure on Long Run Economic
Growth”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank, Washington D.C.
Dahan M, 1998, “Demographic Transition, Income Distribution, and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 3: 29–52 (March 1998) Dahlby B, Warren N, 2003,”Fiscal Incentive Effects of the Australian
Equalisation System” The Economic Record, Vol. 79, No. 247, December.
Dalhby, Wilson, 1994, “Fiscal Capacity, Tax Effort and Equalization Grant”, The Canadian Journal Economies, Vol 27, No 3, August 1994 Davoodi H R, Grigorian D A, 2006, “ Tax Potensial Versus Tax Effort, A Cross
Country Analysis of Armenia’s Stubbornly Low Tax Collection”
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Davoodi, Hamid dan Heng fu Zhu, 1998. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth” : A Cross Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics 43:244- 257
Devkota. K L. 2010, ”Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth of
Nepal”.
Devarajaan, Swaroop, Zou, 1996, “The Composition of Public Expenditure and
Economic Growth” Journal of Monetary Economics,313-344
Fedderke, J. W., Perkins P, Luiz J. M., 2006. “Infrastructural investment in long- run economic growth: South Africa 1875-2001”, World Development, vol. 34, No. 6; pp. 1037-1059.
Gallo, Sagales, 2011, “Economic Growth and Inequality : The Role of Fiscal
Policies,” Australian Economic Papers (2011)
Gujarati, D N, 2009. Basic Econometrics 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill.
Grand Design Desentralisasi Fiskal Indonesia 2030, TADF, Kementerian Keuangan R I, 2010
Holzner M, 2010 ,“ Inequality, Growth and Public Spending in Central, East dan
Southeast Europe”The Wiiw Balkan Observatory, Working Paper Series 087, October 2010
Jin, Jing, dan Zou, 2005. “Fiscal Decentralization, Revenue and Expenditure Assignments, and Growth in China”. Journal of Asian Economics 16 : 1047-1064
Josaphat, Morrissey, 2000, “Government spending and Economic Growth in Tanzania 1965 – 1996”, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham.
Juanda, 2009, Ekonometrika, Permodelan dan Pendugaan, IPB Press, 2009
Juanda, Sidik dan Qibthiyyah, 2013, Kajian Akademis : Reformulasi DAU Untuk Memperkuat Peran Sebagai Equalization Grant, Tim Asistensi Kementerian Keuangan RI, Bidang Desentralisasi Fiskal, 2013
Kementrian Keuangan, 2013, DJPK Direktorat Dana Perimbangan, Pemyusunan Mekanismen Dana Alokasi Khusus untuk Pembiayaan Standar Pelayanan Minimum
Kothenburger. 2002, “Tax Competition and Fiscal Equalization”, International Tax and Public Finance 2002
Laporan Grand Design DesentralisasiFiskal, 2011, Tim Asistensi Desentralisasi Fiskal, Kementerian Keuangan R I, 2011
Lessmann C. 2006. “Fiscal decentralization and regional disparity”: a panel data approach OECD countries. Working Paper. Ifo Institute for Economic Reseach, Germany
Lledo, V. A. Schneider dan Moore M. 2003. “Pro-poor Tax Reform in Latin America”: A Critical Survey and Policy Recommendations, IDS, Sussex, March.
Marchionni, Gasparini, 2003, “ Tracing Out the Effects of Demographic Changes on the Income Distribution: The Case of Greater Buenos Aires 1980- 2000 “,CEDLAS - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Marko K, 2002, “Tax Competition and Fiscal Equalization” International Tax and Public Finance
Martinez, Vazquez, dan Mc Nab R M 2003,“Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth”’ (Vol. 31, pp. 1597-1616). Great Britain: World Development.
Martinez-Vazquez. 2001, “Mexico: An Evaluation of the Main Features of the
Tax System”, International Studies Program Working Paper 01-12,
Atlanta, Georgia, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, November. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, dan Boex, β005, “ Designing Intergovernmental
Equalization Transfer with Imperfect Data” ISP, Working Paper, Georgia State University
Mello, L. Barenstein M 2001, “Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis”,IMF Working Paper WP/01/71.
Nazara S. 2010. Pemerataan Antardaerah sebagai Tantangan Utama Transformasi Struktural Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia Masa Depan. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi. Universitas Indonesia.
N. Gregory Mankiw,2003, Macroeconomics, Fifth Edition, Pearson Addision Wesley Boston
Nurudeen, Usma dan Abdullahl. (2010). Government Expenditure And Economic Growth In Nigeria.Aston Journal, Business and Economic journal Volume 2010, BEJ-4.
Norris D, Era, 2006. “The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralization in Transition
Countries”,Comparative Economic Studies 48 : 100-131
Oyakale A, Adeoti A dan Ogunnupe O.T . 2004. “Sources of Income Inequality
and Poverty in Rural and Urban Nigeria”. Department of Agricultural Economic. University of Ibadan(ABSTRAK gabisadicopy)
Panggabean A, Mahi, Panggabean M, Brodjonegoro, Lap. Akhir Distribusi Dana Alokasi Umum : Konsep dan Formula DAU, Jakarta Oktober 1999
PDRB Jawa Barat Menurut Penggunaan Tahun 2003-2005
PP No. 55/2005 Tentang Dana Perimbangan Kementerian Keuangan R I
Qiao, Martinez, Vaquex dan Xu, 2007, “ The Trade off between Growth and Equity in Decentralization Policy : China Experience” : Journal of Development Economic (2007)
Raychaudhuri A, Prabir De. 2010, “Trade, Infrastructure and Income Inequality
in Selected Asian Countries: An Empirical Analysis”, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, No 82, August 2010
Rayp, Sijpe, 2007, “Measuring and Explaining Government Eficiency in
Developing Countries”, Journal of Development Studies (2007)
Riyanto, Siregar, β005, “Dampak Dana Perimbangan Terhadap Perekonomian Daerah dan Pemerataan Antar Wilayah” Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi Vo.1 No.1
Rodriguez A, Ezcurra R, 2009, “Does Decentralization Matter for Regional
Disparities?” ESRC, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Rodriguez dan Kroijer R β009. “Fiscal Decentralization and economic growth in central dan eastern Europe”. LSE’ Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper
Series. The London School of Economic and Political Science
Sacchi, Salloti, 2011, “Income inequality, regional disparities,and fiscal
decentralization in industrialized countries” Workshop on Regional and Urban Economics: Inequality and Regional Growth and Cohesion, 2011 Sasana H β008, “Peran Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Kinerja Ekonomi di
Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Jawa Tengah”, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
Seetanah, Ramessur, Rojid, (2009), “ Does Infrastructure Alleviates Poverty in
Developing Countries” International journal of applied econometrics and quantitative studies.
Shah A, 2007, “Local Governance in Developing Countries”, World Bank Shah A, Boadway R, 2007. “Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers”, World Bank Shah A, 2012, “Public Services and Expenditure Need Equalization: Reflections
on the Principles and the Indonesian and Worldwide Comparative
Practices”August 31, 2012
Simanjuntak R A, β00β, ” Transfer Pusat Ke Daerah: Konsep dan Praktik di Beberapa Negara ; Dana Alokasi Umum, Konsep, Hambatan, dan Prospek di Era Otonomi Daerah”, LPEM-UI, Jakarta.
Simanjuntak R A, Hidayanto D, β00β, “ Dana Alokasi Umum di Masa Depan ; Dana Alokasi Umum, Konsep, Hambatan, dan Prospek di Era Otonomi Daerah”, LPEM-UI, Jakarta.
Skira M. 2006,“Fiscal Decentralization and Poverty”.Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Georgia State University
Steiner. S 2005. “Decentralization and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual
Framework for the Economic Impact”. Working Paper Global and Area Studies. German Overseas Institute
Straub, 2008, “Infrastructure and Development: A Critical Appraisal of the Macro Level Literature “,Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank in East Asia and Pacific Sustainable Department, April 2008
Straub, Vellutini dan Walters, 2008, “Infrastructure and Economic Growth in
East Asia”, Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank in East Asia and Pacific Sustainable Department, April 2008
Sutarsono, β01β. “Hubungan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan, Infrastruktur dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia”, Thesis, IPB, β01β
Swastyardi D, 2008, “Regional Inequality Indonesia : Is the General Allocation
Fund likely to have an impact?”, Graduate School of Development Studies, Institute of Social Studies, Netherland
Tannewald R, 1999 ”Fiscal Disparity Among the State Revisited”, New England Economic Review, July 1999
Tannewald R, Cowan J (1997), ”Fiscal Capacity, Fiscal Needs and Fiscal
Comfort among U.S. State: New Evidence”, Oxford Journal Sept. 1997. Thorbecke, Charumilind, β00β, “Economic Inequality and Sosioeconomic
Impact” World Development Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1477–1495, 2002
Todaro M P, 2010, Economic Development, 11 th eds, Pearson Addision Wesley Boston
Trang, Hieu, 2011, “Effects of Population growth on Economic Growth in Asian Developing countries, Thesis Bachelors Economic”, Malarden University, February 2011
UU No. 33/2004 Tentang Hubungan Keuangan antara Pusat dan Daerah, Kementerian Keuangan R I
Widhiyanto I, 2008, “Fiscal Desentralization and Indonesia Regional Income
Disparity” Jurnal Keuangan Publik
Wibowo P, 2008,“Mencermati Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Pertumbuhan ekonomi Daerah”, Jurnal Keuangan Publik
Wibowo, Muljarijadi, Rinaldi, 2011, “Allocation Mechanism Of Equalization Fund In Indonesia: Current Condition And Alternative Proposals Of Specific Grant In Sub National Level”, Working Paper in Economic and Development Studies, 2011
Vehorn, 2008, “ Fiscal adjustment in Developing Countries Through Tax
Administration Reform”, JEL Clasification H36 (2008)
Zhang T, Zou H, 1998, "Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China," Journal of Public Economics 67(2),
Zhang T, Heng-fu, 2001, “The Growth impact of Intersectoral and intergovernmental Allocation of Public Expenditure: with Application to
LAMPIRAN
1. Melakukan berbagai percobaan untuk mengestimasi persamaan Belanja Modal
Pooled OLS, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Dependent variable: lnbm Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 2.62276 0.826016 3.1752 0.00165 *** Lndau 0.136145 0.0752585 1.8090 0.07140 * Dkaya 0.253163 0.196591 1.2878 0.19878 Dkaya*lndau -0.0238733 0.0104768 -2.2787 0.02336 ** Dhh 0.0606307 0.0211629 2.8650 0.00445 *** Lnpad 0.650339 0.0677001 9.6062 <0.00001 *** lndak_jln 0.00419464 0.0166423 0.2520 0.80117
Mean dependent var 12.23626 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 Sum squared resid 639.4074 S.E. of regression 1.429278 R-squared 0.738961 Adjusted R-squared 0.733957
F(6, 313) 147.6754 P-value(F) 3.55e-88
Log-likelihood -564.8157 Akaike criterion 1143.631 Schwarz criterion 1170.010 Hannan-Quinn 1154.165
Rho 0.039411 Durbin-Watson 1.764068
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 0 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Dependent variable: lnbm Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 7.02578 1.56819 4.4802 0.00001 *** Lnpad 0.629041 0.105225 5.9781 <0.00001 *** Dkaya -0.0185294 0.360006 -0.0515 0.95899 Dkaya*lnpad 0.00358561 0.00799689 0.4484 0.65423 Lndau 0.236631 0.123912 1.9097 0.05719 * Dhh -5.95181 1.72917 -3.4420 0.00067 *** Dhh*lndau -0.379298 0.130905 -2.8975 0.00406 *** lndak_jln 0.0734158 0.0216785 3.3866 0.00081 *** Mean dependent var 12.23626 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 Sum squared resid 439.0423 S.E. of regression 1.249971 R-squared 0.820760 Adjusted R-squared 0.796521
F(38, 281) 33.86134 P-value(F) 8.60e-84
Log-likelihood -504.6643 Akaike criterion 1087.329 Schwarz criterion 1234.293 Hannan-Quinn 1146.014
Rho -0.187714 Durbin-Watson 2.108830
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Dependent variable: lnbm
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 2.4186 0.801824 3.0164 0.00279 *** Lnpad 0.720288 0.0380116 18.9491 <0.00001 *** Dkaya 0.0162069 0.660838 0.0245 0.98045 Dkaya*lnpad 0.00466787 0.0129904 0.3593 0.71962 Lndau 0.100628 0.0290994 3.4581 0.00063 *** Dhh -0.89741 0.889343 -1.0091 0.31381 lndak_jln 0.0955932 0.0236357 4.0444 0.00007 *** Mean dependent var 12.23626 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 Sum squared resid 514.0165 S.E. of regression 1.350094 R-squared 0.790152 Adjusted R-squared 0.762618
F(37, 282) 28.69804 P-value(F) 3.37e-75
Log-likelihood -529.8898 Akaike criterion 1135.780 Schwarz criterion 1278.976 Hannan-Quinn 1192.961
Rho -0.171739 Durbin-Watson 2.144622
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Dependent variable: lnbm
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 2.27319 0.786754 2.8893 0.00416 *** Lnpad 0.660641 0.0408357 16.1780 <0.00001 *** Dkaya 0.00571817 0.647552 0.0088 0.99296 Dkaya*lnpad -0.00120571 0.0128354 -0.0939 0.92523 Lndau 0.0669464 0.03004 2.2286 0.02663 ** Dhh -0.708853 0.87306 -0.8119 0.41753 lndak_jln 0.0950994 0.0231607 4.1061 0.00005 *** Lndbh 0.108731 0.0305149 3.5632 0.00043 ***
Mean dependent var 12.23626 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 Sum squared resid 491.7955 S.E. of regression 1.322937 R-squared 0.799223 Adjusted R-squared 0.772072
F(38, 281) 29.43594 P-value(F) 4.49e-77
Log-likelihood -522.8190 Akaike criterion 1123.638 Schwarz criterion 1270.603 Hannan-Quinn 1182.324
Rho -0.194531 Durbin-Watson 2.200592
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl)DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Dependent variable: lnbm Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 6.5799 1.64408 4.0022 0.00008 *** Lnpad 0.605624 0.100054 6.0530 <0.00001 *** Dwil -0.0211426 0.344742 -0.0613 0.95114 dwil_lnpad 0.000643463 0.0086407 0.0745 0.94069 Lndau 0.208311 0.133294 1.5628 0.11923 dhh1 -5.44767 1.8232 -2.9880 0.00306 *** dhh1_lndau -0.348764 0.136153 -2.5616 0.01094 ** lndak_jln 0.0749465 0.0215614 3.4760 0.00059 *** Lndbh 0.0560778 0.0437777 1.2810 0.20127
Mean dependent var 12.23626 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 Sum squared resid 433.6175 S.E. of regression 1.244441 R-squared 0.822975 Adjusted R-squared 0.798318
F(39, 280) 33.37680 P-value(F) 9.30e-84
Log-likelihood -502.6750 Akaike criterion 1085.350 Schwarz criterion 1236.083 Hannan-Quinn 1145.541
Rho -0.196270 Durbin-Watson 2.140711
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Dependent variable: lnbm
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 2.53584 0.487486 5.2019 <0.00001 *** Lnpad 0.57538 0.0375586 15.3195 <0.00001 *** Dkaya -0.961808 0.84082 -1.1439 0.25364 Dkaya*lnpad 0.0791061 0.0485923 1.6280 0.10465 Lndau 0.198862 0.0275238 7.2251 <0.00001 *** Dhh 0.0868469 0.0461238 1.8829 0.06075 * lndak_jln 0.0559263 0.0258611 2.1626 0.03142 ** Lndbh 0.00789469 0.0301392 0.2619 0.79356
Mean dependent var 11.69909 S.D. dependent var 3.738887 Sum squared resid 649.2844 S.E. of regression 1.520073 R-squared 0.854401 Adjusted R-squared 0.834711
F(38, 281) 43.39351 P-value(F) 3.65e-96
Log-likelihood -567.2683 Akaike criterion 1212.537 Schwarz criterion 1359.501 Hannan-Quinn 1271.222
Rho 0.099878 Durbin-Watson 1.691222
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 0 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Dependent Variable: LNBM
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 5.204240 0.529199 9.834183 0.0000
LNPAD 0.193986 0.064752 2.995853 0.0032
DUM 0.172739 0.086072 2.006920 0.0466
DKAYA_LNPAD 2.57E-09 1.55E-09 1.662480 0.0985
LNDBH 0.507038 0.033179 15.28174 0.0000
LNDAU 2.97E-07 1.64E-07 1.813846 0.0717
R-squared 0.770654 Mean dependent var 12.77554 Adjusted R-squared 0.762905 S.D. dependent var 0.947147 S.E. of regression 0.461188 Akaike info criterion 1.328161 Sum squared resid 31.47880 Schwarz criterion 1.446484 Log likelihood -96.26840 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.376223 F-statistic 99.46236 Durbin-Watson stat 1.779333 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: LNBM
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 16.55743 2.870635 5.767865 0.0000 LNDAU 0.098196 0.277351 0.354051 0.7238 DUMMY 0.781996 0.131455 5.948768 0.0000 DKAYA_LNDAU -2.043795 0.766900 -2.665009 0.0086 LNPAD 1.733895 0.818734 2.117776 0.0360 LNDBH -0.569531 0.511924 -1.112531 0.2678
R-squared 0.256300 Mean dependent var 12.72216
Adjusted R-squared 0.229740 S.D. dependent var 0.886678 S.E. of regression 0.778188 Akaike info criterion 2.376530 Sum squared resid 84.78069 Schwarz criterion 2.499144 Log likelihood -167.4867 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.426351 F-statistic 9.649613 Durbin-Watson stat 1.894611 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: LNBM
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 3.222744 1.128670 2.855346 0.0050
LNDBH 0.509898 0.051863 9.831641 0.0000
DUMMY 0.179052 0.090493 1.978631 0.0498
DKAYA_LNDBH 1.02E-08 5.09E-09 2.008965 0.0465
LNPAD -0.033325 0.047885 -0.695929 0.4876
LNDAU 0.276845 0.091912 3.012069 0.0031
R-squared 0.718113 Mean dependent var 12.71585
Adjusted R-squared 0.707973 S.D. dependent var 0.886449 S.E. of regression 0.479033 Akaike info criterion 1.406405 Sum squared resid 31.89671 Schwarz criterion 1.529580 Log likelihood -95.96435 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.456455 F-statistic 70.82100 Durbin-Watson stat 1.679228 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 11,50011 1,507712 7,627523 0
LOG(DAU?) 0,243444 0,094104 2,586962 0,0107
LOG(APDAU?) 0,175378 0,064358 2,725024 0,0073
LOG(TE?) 0,410779 0,163589 2,511043 0,0132
R-squared 0,156511 Mean dependent var 2,328247 Adjusted R-squared 0,13804 S.D. dependent var 0,373745 S.E. of regression 0,334126 Sum squared resid 15,29471 F-statistic 8,473536 Durbin-Watson stat 1,279232 Prob(F-statistic) 0,000033
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -13,6944 22,83483 -0,59972 0,5503
LOG(DAU?) 0,303215 0,16181 1,873898 0,0645
LOG(TE?) 0,304438 0,23547 1,292892 0,1996
LOG( P_DAU?) 0,199235 0,086384 2,306381 0,0236
LOG( JP?) 1,570862 1,462298 1,074242 0,2858
R-squared 0,889281 Mean dependent var 13,04824 Adjusted R-squared 0,846594 S.D. dependent var 0,90737 S.E. of regression 0,35539 Akaike info criterion 1,003014 Sum squared resid 10,48307 Schwarz criterion 1,786363 Log likelihood -25,1748 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1,321009 F-statistic 20,83271 Durbin-Watson stat 1,842785
Prob(F-statistic) 0
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -1,74129 2,624662 -0,66343 0,5084
LOG(PAD?) 0,373641 0,102793 3,634907 0,0004
DBH?(-1) 0,293851 0,109917 2,6734 0,0086
LOG(DAU?) 0,451781 0,207917 2,172888 0,0319
R-squared 0,778785 Mean dependent var 12,8423 Adjusted R-squared 0,717556 S.D. dependent var 0,978468 S.E. of regression 0,520011 Akaike info criterion 1,723196 Sum squared resid 30,28606 Schwarz criterion 2,383154 Log likelihood -92,0701 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1,991366 F-statistic 12,71921 Durbin-Watson stat 1,776137
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -1,51581 2,573153 -0,58909 0,557
LOG(PAD?) 0,320669 0,101915 3,146439 0,0021
DBH?(-1) 0,256662 0,106204 2,416691 0,0173
LOG(DAU?) 0,360324 0,207154 1,7394 0,0847
DENS? 0,008239 0,002231 3,693433 0,0003
R-squared 0,791595 Mean dependent var 12,8423 Adjusted R-squared 0,731514 S.D. dependent var 0,978468 S.E. of regression 0,506999 Akaike info criterion 1,677436 Sum squared resid 28,53236 Schwarz criterion 2,358018 Log likelihood -87,7754 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1,953986 F-statistic 13,1755 Durbin-Watson stat 1,843172
Prob(F-statistic) 0
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 6,351574 4,630984 1,371539 0,1744 LOG(PAD?) 0,059404 0,087484 0,679023 0,4992 LOG(DBH?(-1)) 0,830927 1,705051 0,487333 0,6275 LOG(DAU?) 0,125057 0,113685 1,10003 0,2749 LOG(DAK?) 0,040908 0,118444 0,345381 0,7308 DENS? 0,005352 0,002358 2,269435 0,0262
R-squared 0,878315 Mean dependent var 13,06372 Adjusted R-squared 0,825695 S.D. dependent var 0,879742 S.E. of regression 0,367291 Akaike info criterion 1,082734 Sum squared resid 9,982794 Schwarz criterion 1,907064 Log likelihood -24,9263 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1,416906 F-statistic 16,69156 Durbin-Watson stat 2,10543
Prob(F-statistic) 0
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 6,396442 0,970823 6,58868 0
LOG(PAD?) 0,159615 0,034159 4,672777 0
DBH?(-1) 0,165004 0,060074 2,746678 0,0071
LOG(DAU?) 0,108128 0,042107 2,567949 0,0116
DENS? 0,003651 0,000853 4,279339 0
R-squared 0,95423 Mean dependent var 22,52732 Adjusted R-squared 0,940542 S.D. dependent var 15,11137 S.E. of regression 0,376978 Sum squared resid 15,20605 F-statistic 69,71155 Durbin-Watson stat 1,946239
Dependent Variable: BM?
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -20,5892 3,976423 -5,17782 0
PAD? -0,15825 0,420496 -0,37633 0,7074
DBH? 2,722652 0,306872 8,872286 0
DAU? 1,937709 0,348028 5,567678 0
DENS? -0,04618 0,006407 -7,20796 0
R-squared 0,652499 Mean dependent var 1,376215 Adjusted R-squared 0,552319 S.D. dependent var 2,836364 S.E. of regression 1,864034 Sum squared resid 385,6829 F-statistic 6,513247 Durbin-Watson stat 1,598596
Prob(F-statistic) 0
Dependent Variable: BM?
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -44,8076 5,330212 -8,40634 0 PAD? 0,525173 0,343129 1,530543 0,1288 DBH? 4,057761 0,386247 10,50561 0 DAU? 0,547506 0,355195 1,541426 0,1261 DENS? -0,00897 0,008307 -1,07988 0,2826 D? -2,91127 0,263262 -11,0585 0
R-squared 0,748795 Mean dependent var 1,29268 Adjusted R-squared 0,673433 S.D. dependent var 2,516033 S.E. of regression 1,42652 Sum squared resid 223,8454 F-statistic 9,936031 Durbin-Watson stat 2,547687
Prob(F-statistic) 0
Dependent Variable: LOG(BM?)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 8,651177 2,300467 3,760619 0,0003 LOG(DBH?) 1,359908 0,776725 1,750824 0,0839 LOG(PAD?) -0,02413 0,052522 -0,45935 0,6472 DAU? 0,071202 0,042573 1,672476 0,0984 DENS? 0,004892 0,002778 1,760968 0,0821 D? 0,070513 0,091082 0,774172 0,4411 AR(1) 0,140799 0,113249 1,243272 0,2174
R-squared 0,981133 Mean dependent var 18,71004 Adjusted R-squared 0,973013 S.D. dependent var 13,93426 S.E. of regression 0,280515 Sum squared resid 6,21639 F-statistic 120,8274 Durbin-Watson stat 2,254663
Dependent Variable: LNBM Method: Least Squares Sample: 1 320
Included observations: 320
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 2.671420 0.518105 5.156138 0.0000 LNDAU 0.083090 0.042162 1.970713 0.0496 DDaerah -0.198204 0.574378 -0.345075 0.7303 DKaya*LNDAU -0.013044 0.047083 -0.277044 0.7819 Dholdharmless -0.659499 0.197871 -3.332976 0.0010 LNPAD 0.602668 0.035279 17.08300 0.0000 LNDBH 0.137111 0.029710 4.614915 0.0000 LNDAKT 0.026005 0.015003 1.733282 0.0840
R-squared 0.760168 Mean dependent var 12.23626
Adjusted R-squared 0.754787 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 S.E. of regression 1.372184 Akaike info criterion 3.495367 Sum squared resid 587.4616 Schwarz criterion 3.589575 Log likelihood -551.2587 Hannan-Quinn criter. 3.532986 F-statistic 141.2726 Durbin-Watson stat 1.963117 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: LNBM Method: Least Squares Date: 05/03/13 Time: 23:55 Sample: 1 320
Included observations: 320
Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=5)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 2.344431 1.195527 1.961002 0.0508 LNDAU 0.088654 0.070694 1.254046 0.2108 DDaerah -0.169142 0.972477 -0.173929 0.8620 DKaya*LNDAU -0.016025 0.078793 -0.203379 0.8390 Dholdharmless 0.533613 0.190753 2.797408 0.0055 DHH_LNDAKT 0.000144 0.001459 0.098858 0.9213 LNPAD 0.611642 0.079504 7.693212 0.0000 LNDBH 0.127160 0.048028 2.647621 0.0085
R-squared 0.758379 Mean dependent var 12.23626
Adjusted R-squared 0.752958 S.D. dependent var 2.771025 S.E. of regression 1.377292 Akaike info criterion 3.502797 Sum squared resid 591.8429 Schwarz criterion 3.597005 Log likelihood -552.4476 Hannan-Quinn criter. 3.540416 F-statistic 139.8968 Durbin-Watson stat 1.960720 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: LNBM Method: Least Squares Date: 05/04/13 Time: 00:23 Sample (adjusted): 3 320
Included observations: 318 after adjustments
Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=5)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 5.076736 1.793354 2.830861 0.0049 LNDAU 0.304984 0.170663 1.787055 0.0749 DDaerah -1.383768 2.020018 -0.685028 0.4938 DKaya*LNDAU 0.127680 0.161042 0.792841 0.4285 Dholdharmless 0.068687 0.264438 0.259748 0.7952 DHH_LNDAKT(-2) 0.000166 0.003761 0.044228 0.9648 LNPAD(-1) 0.263320 0.060139 4.378483 0.0000 LNDAKT1(-2) 0.004908 0.020542 0.238918 0.8113 LNDBH(-1) 0.027017 0.025555 1.057214 0.2912
R-squared 0.484523 Mean dependent var 12.23053
Adjusted R-squared 0.471177 S.D. dependent var 2.778728 S.E. of regression 2.020697 Akaike info criterion 4.272656 Sum squared resid 1261.714 Schwarz criterion 4.379129 Log likelihood -670.3523 Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.315182 F-statistic 36.30557 Durbin-Watson stat 1.960337 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
2. Melakukan berbagai percobaan untuk mengestimasi persamaan PDRB Perkapita
Pooled OLS, using 224 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 13.0456 0.635075 20.5419 <0.00001 *** lnbmit-1 0.0462394 0.0156523 2.9542 0.00344 *** Dkayait -0.549221 0.175575 -3.1281 0.00197 *** Dkaya*lnbmit-1 0.102782 0.0363156 2.8302 0.00503 *** Dhhit -1.08481 0.407599 -2.6615 0.00829 *** lninvit-1 0.0470383 0.00815903 5.7652 <0.00001 *** lnjlnit 0.0416365 0.0272309 1.5290 0.12753 lnpopit 0.14862 0.0372824 3.9863 0.00009 ***
Mean dependent var 15.59783 S.D. dependent var 0.705115 Sum squared resid 113.6889 S.E. of regression 0.677070 R-squared 0.200475 Adjusted R-squared 0.077968
F(38, 248) 1.636429 P-value(F) 0.014773
Log-likelihood -274.3520 Akaike criterion 626.7041 Schwarz criterion 769.4239 Hannan-Quinn 683.9040
Rho -0.279296 Durbin-Watson 2.280926
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 0 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Pooled OLS, using 256 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units
Time-series length = 8 Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 17.4101 0.381183 45.6739 <0.00001 *** Lninv(t-1) 0.06986 0.00906437 7.7071 <0.00001 *** Dkaya -0.206438 0.0660043 -3.1276 0.00197 *** Dkaya*lninv(t-1) 0.00636755 0.00504733 1.2616 0.20829 Lnbm(t-2) -0.00816202 0.0122727 -0.6651 0.50664 Dhh 0.01942 0.0105525 1.8403 0.06692 * Dhh*lnbm(t-2) 0.00012317 0.00110167 0.1118 0.91107 Lnjln(t-1) -0.0505453 0.0350798 -1.4409 0.15089 Lnpop(t-1) -0.157476 0.0254605 -6.1851 <0.00001 *** Mean dependent var 15.58728 S.D. dependent var 0.703311 Sum squared resid 105.1537 S.E. of regression 0.652475 R-squared 0.166338 Adjusted R-squared 0.139337
F(8, 247) 6.160407 P-value(F) 2.99e-07
Log-likelihood -249.3596 Akaike criterion 516.7193 Schwarz criterion 548.6259 Hannan-Quinn 529.5520
Rho -0.247870 Durbin-Watson 2.214196
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 0 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 256 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 15.465 0.5836 26.4993 <0.00001 *** Lnbm 0.0115984 0.0283749 0.4088 0.68312 Dkaya*lnbm 0.04254 0.00771462 5.5142 <0.00001 *** Lninv(t-2) 0.0382506 0.00848258 4.5093 0.00001 *** Dhh*lninv(t-2) -0.041102 0.00998587 -4.1160 0.00005 *** Lnjln 0.0780427 0.0387112 2.0160 0.04502 ** Lnpop(t-1) -0.0626022 0.0475481 -1.3166 0.18935
Mean dependent var 15.58728 S.D. dependent var 0.703311 Sum squared resid 90.40432 S.E. of regression 0.643971 R-squared 0.283272 Adjusted R-squared 0.161625
F(37, 218) 2.328643 P-value(F) 0.000089
Log-likelihood -230.0149 Akaike criterion 536.0299 Schwarz criterion 670.7466 Hannan-Quinn 590.2125
Rho -0.342188 Durbin-Watson 2.426416
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 256 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 16.6402 0.526498 31.6053 <0.00001 *** Lninv 0.0188939 0.00933296 2.0244 0.04415 ** Dkaya*lninv 0.0253129 0.00376172 6.7291 <0.00001 *** Dhh -0.647889 0.13454 -4.8156 <0.00001 *** Lnbm(t-2) 0.00495344 0.00824168 0.6010 0.54845 Lnjln 0.0627865 0.0315597 1.9895 0.04790 ** Lnpop(t-1) -0.101953 0.0405404 -2.5148 0.01263 ** Mean dependent var 15.58728 S.D. dependent var 0.703311 Sum squared resid 94.70201 S.E. of regression 0.659100 R-squared 0.249199 Adjusted R-squared 0.121770
F(37, 218) 1.955586 P-value(F) 0.001687
Log-likelihood -235.9597 Akaike criterion 547.9193 Schwarz criterion 682.6361 Hannan-Quinn 602.1019
Rho -0.395746 Durbin-Watson 2.513272
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 256 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Robust (HAC) standard errors
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 16.0456 0.602148 26.6473 <0.00001 *** Lnbm 0.0137822 0.0289465 0.4761 0.63446 Dkaya*lnbm 0.0423865 0.00764542 5.5440 <0.00001 *** Lninv(t-2) 0.031139 0.0109833 2.8351 0.00501 *** Dhh -0.650138 0.269793 -2.4098 0.01680 ** Dhh*lninv_2 -0.0314921 0.0111549 -2.8232 0.00520 *** Lnjln 0.0671623 0.0445028 1.5092 0.13271 Lnpop(t-1) -0.0677267 0.0463863 -1.4601 0.14572
Mean dependent var 15.58728 S.D. dependent var 0.703311 Sum squared resid 89.92235 S.E. of regression 0.643730 R-squared 0.287093 Adjusted R-squared 0.162252
F(38, 217) 2.299667 P-value(F) 0.000099
Log-likelihood -229.3307 Akaike criterion 536.6614 Schwarz criterion 674.9233 Hannan-Quinn 592.2698
Rho -0.350223 Durbin-Watson 2.443289
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 320 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 13.7306 0.757464 18.1271 <0.00001 *** Lnbm -0.0212579 0.0199907 -1.0634 0.28852 Dkaya 0.241625 0.311774 0.7750 0.43899 Dkaya*lnbm 0.0416017 0.00639776 6.5025 <0.00001 *** Dhh -0.0622756 0.434385 -0.1434 0.88610 Lninv 0.0199514 0.0118886 1.6782 0.09442 * Lnjln 0.0576101 0.0258218 2.2311 0.02647 ** Lnpop 0.0735414 0.0463939 1.5852 0.11406
Mean dependent var 15.58645 S.D. dependent var 0.703015 Sum squared resid 114.1048 S.E. of regression 0.637234 R-squared 0.276258 Adjusted R-squared 0.178386
F(38, 281) 2.822631 P-value(F) 5.54e-07
Log-likelihood -289.0677 Akaike criterion 656.1354 Schwarz criterion 803.0999 Hannan-Quinn 714.8211
Rho -0.291955 Durbin-Watson 2.387584
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 288 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 16.2027 0.821049 19.7341 <0.00001 *** Lnbm -0.0200473 0.0214143 -0.9362 0.35010 Dkaya -0.17162 0.485075 -0.3538 0.72379 Dkaya*lnbm 0.0429733 0.0069615 6.1730 <0.00001 *** Dhh 0.00156778 0.496021 0.0032 0.99748 Lninv 0.0280941 0.0126683 2.2177 0.02748 ** Lnjln 0.05465 0.0271404 2.0136 0.04513 ** Lnpop(t-1) -0.0876048 0.0474072 -1.8479 0.06580 * Mean dependent var 15.59704 S.D. dependent var 0.704013 Sum squared resid 102.7185 S.E. of regression 0.642281 R-squared 0.277886 Adjusted R-squared 0.167684
F(38, 249) 2.521609 P-value(F) 0.000011
Log-likelihood -260.1949 Akaike criterion 598.3899 Schwarz criterion 741.2453 Hannan-Quinn 655.6377
Rho -0.344406 Durbin-Watson 2.443289
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 288 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 16.8885 0.885661 19.0688 <0.00001 *** Lnbm(t-1) 0.00159316 0.0198302 0.0803 0.93603 Dkaya -0.437497 0.519396 -0.8423 0.40042 Dkaya*lnbm(t-1) -0.00240408 0.0072678 -0.3308 0.74108 Dhh -0.0259639 0.521391 -0.0498 0.96032 Lninv 0.0286658 0.0114489 2.5038 0.01293 ** Lnjln 0.0940559 0.0283938 3.3125 0.00106 *** Lnpop(t-1) -0.138028 0.0526101 -2.6236 0.00924 *** Mean dependent var 15.59704 S.D. dependent var 0.704013 Sum squared resid 118.4050 S.E. of regression 0.689581 R-squared 0.167611 Adjusted R-squared 0.040579
F(38, 249) 1.319444 P-value(F) 0.110951
Log-likelihood -280.6599 Akaike criterion 639.3198 Schwarz criterion 782.1753 Hannan-Quinn 696.5677
Rho -0.330859 Durbin-Watson 2.353665
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Fixed-effects, using 288 observations Included 32 cross-sectional units Dependent variable: lnpdrbkapita
Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value
Const 17.959 0.846953 21.2042 <0.00001 *** Lnbm(t-1) -0.064786 0.0215758 -3.0027 0.00295 *** Dwil -0.520766 0.48653 -1.0704 0.28549 dwil_lnbm(t-1) 0.00223793 0.00681954 0.3282 0.74306 Dhh 0.0857499 0.476676 0.1799 0.85738 Lninv(t-1) 0.0813289 0.0125302 6.4906 <0.00001 *** Lnjln 0.100286 0.0255679 3.9224 0.00011 *** Lnpop(t-1) -0.213234 0.0505691 -4.2167 0.00003 *** Mean dependent var 15.59704 S.D. dependent var 0.704013 Sum squared resid 103.8207 S.E. of regression 0.645717 R-squared 0.270138 Adjusted R-squared 0.158754
F(38, 249) 2.425278 P-value(F) 0.000026
Log-likelihood -261.7318 Akaike criterion 601.4636 Schwarz criterion 744.3190 Hannan-Quinn 658.7114
Rho -0.314343 Durbin-Watson 2.349824
Dummy Hold Harmless sebelum tahun 2009 = 1 (Software : Gretl) DHH = Dummy Hold Harmless
Dependent Variable: LNPDRBKAP
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -4.118395 0.595518 -6.915647 0.0000
LNINV(-1) 0.093526 0.020977 4.458522 0.0000
DUMMY 0.423365 0.062985 6.721650 0.0000
DKAYA_LNINV(-1) 1.32E-10 3.50E-11 3.780745 0.0002
LNBM 0.316744 0.042206 7.504735 0.0000
LNJL 0.100331 0.226925 0.442130 0.6592
R-squared 0.784914 Mean dependent var 1.925388 Adjusted R-squared 0.776379 S.D. dependent var 0.615379 S.E. of regression 0.291004 Akaike info criterion 0.413430