• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

BAB VII SIMPULAN DAN SARAN

7.2. Saran

1. Untuk Tatalaksana Pengobatan Pasien, disarankan dalam melakukan terapi ARV, pasien dapat disarankan oleh petugas kesehatan agar memulai terapi ARV dengan kadar CD4 yang masih tinggi.

2. Untuk Pemegang Kebijakan, hasil penelitian ini dapat dipakai sebagai bukti tambahan untuk memperluas atau meningkatkan inisiasi dini terapi ARV di Indonesia serta meningkatkan perhatian yang lebih mendalam pada pasien IDU saat melakukan terapi ARV.

3. Untuk Penelitian lebih lanjut jika hendak dilakukan studi lebih lanjut, maka sebaiknya melakukan penelitian dengan desain prospektif atau dengan metode fokus group discussion (FGD) maupun survei pada pasien sehingga masalah ketersediaan data dapat diatasi.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abuzaitoun OR, Hanson IC. (2000). Organ-specific manifestations of HIV disease in children. Pediatr Clin North Am, 47:109-24.

Ader, R. (1991). The Influence Of Conditioning On Immune Response. 2th edition. Academic Press Inc. San Diego.

Alvarez, UG. (2012). Factors associated with late presentation of HIV and estimation of antiretroviral treatment need according to CD4 lymphocyte count in a resource-limited setting: data from an HIV cohort study in india.

Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis.

Apasou, S. dan Sitkorsy MV. (1999). T-cell-mediated immunity inprinciples of

immuno pharmacology. Medical-Surgical Nursing. A Psychophysiologic

Approach. 4th edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.

Aruben, R. (2012). Proses stigmatisasi penderita HIV/AIDS: studi eksploratif berbasis narasi partisipan di Semarang tahun 2012. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Badri M, Lawn SD, Wood R. (2008). Utility of CD4 cell counts for early prediction of virological failure during antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited setting. BMC infectious diseases [Internet]. Jan [cited 2014 Mar 14];8(1):89. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/89.

Balperio, PS dan Rhew DC. (2004). Prevalence and outcome of anemia in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus: a systematic review of literature. Am J Med 116: 27S-43S.

Bonnet, F, Thiebaut R, Chene G, Neau D, Pellegrin JL, dan Mercie P. (2005). Determinants of clinical progression in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy. Aquitaine Cohort, France. 1996-2002. HIV Med. 6(3):198-205.

Boris, J, Danielle P, Musie G, Carmen C, Marcus A, Henry S, Richard AM, and Bruce DW. (2012). Factors predicting discordant virological and immunological responses to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 clade C infected Zulu/Xhosa in South Africa. PLOS ONE 7:31161.

Braitstein P, Asselin JJ, Montessori V, Wood E, Yip B, Chan K, et al., (2006). The impact of the hepatitis c virus on CD4 response post initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy among a population based hiv cohort.

Clancy, J. (1998). Basic Concept In Immunology: Student’s Survival Guide. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Departemen Kesehatan RI. (2007a). Data HIV/AIDS Indonesia. Dirjen P2PL. Jakarta.

Departemen Kesehatan RI. (2007b). Pharmaceutical care untuk penyakit hati. Direktorat Bina Farmasi Komunitas Dan Klinik. Ditjen Bina Kefarmasian Dan Alat Kesehatan. Jakarta.

Diego, LC, Kristien V, Larissa O, David I, Juan E, Lynen L, Eduardo G, dan Carlos S. (2008). Predictors of CD4+ cell count response and of adverse outcome among HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in a public hospital in Peru. International Journal of

Infectious Diseases 12: 325-331.

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Bali. (2013). Laporan Tahunan Dinas Kesehatan

Provinsi Bali Tahun 2013. Denpasar.

Elinore, F. (2007). Interaction between buprenoprine and atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir. Drug alcohol depend. Available from : http://lib.bioinfo.pl/auth:Difrancesco,R.

Evan W, Robert SH, Benita Y, Richard H,Michael VOS. (2004). The impact of adherence on CD4 cell count responses among HIV-infected patients.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes [Internet]. [cited 2014

Mar 16];35:261–8. Available from:

http://journals.lww.com/jaids/Abstract/2004/03010/The_Impact_of_Adher ence_on_CD4_Cell_Count.6.aspx.

Fithria, Risha Fillah, Ahmad Purnomo, Zullies Ikawati. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat kepatuhan pengobatan ARV (antiretroviral) pada odha (orang dengan HIV/AIDS) Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Tugurejo dan Rumah Sakit Umum Panti Wilasa Citarum Semarang. Jurnal

Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi. 1(2): 126-137.

Fredy, Felix C, Frans Liwang, Rudy Kurniawan, Anna Uyainah ZN. (2012). The corelation between CD4+ t-lymphocyte count and tuberculosis form in TB-HIV coinfected patients in Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of

Internal Medicine. 44: 122-127.

Gayle, HD and GL Hill. (2001). Global Impact Of Human Immunodeficiency Virus And AIDS. Clinical Epidemiology Reviews. 14 (2): 327-335.

Gandhi, RT, John S, Ellen C, David MA, Benigno R, Thomas C.M, Martin SH, Robert WS, Gregory KR, Richard BP, and the ACTG 384 Team. (2006).

Effect of baseline and treatment-related factors on immunologic recovery after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive subjects: results from ACTG 384. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 42: 426-434.

Garcia, F, Elisa D Lazzari, Montserrat P, Pedro C, Gabriel M, Meritxell N, Emilio F, Esteban M, Josep M, Jose L Blanco, Jose M Miro, Tomas P, Teresa G, dan Jose M Gatell. (2004). Long-term CD4+ t-cell response to highly active antiretroviral therapy according to baseline CD4+ t-cell count.

Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 36(2) :702-713.

Ghate, MV. (2000). Relationship between clinical conditions and cd4 counts in hiv-infected persons in Pune, Maharashtra, India. Natl Med J India. Jul-Aug;13(4):183-7.

Greub G, Ledergerber B, battegay M. (2000). Clinical progression, survival, and immune recovery during antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 and HCV co infection. Lancet 356: 1800-5.

Handayani, Fitria. (2008). Studi fenomenologi tentang pengalaman ILWHA (Injecting Drug Users Living with HIV/AIDS) dalam menjalani terapi antiretroviral saat terapi rumatan metadon di RS Ketergantungan Obat

Jakarta. Universitas Indonesia. Available from:

http://lontar.ui.ac.id/opac/themes/libri2/detail.jsp?id=127169&lokasi=lokal Helleberg M, Kronborg G, Larsen CS, Pedersen G, Pedersen C, Obel N, et al. (2013). CD4 decline is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and death in virally suppressed patients with HIV. Clinical

Infectious Diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases

Society of America [Internet].[cited 2014 Apr 4];57(2):314–21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23575194.

Hoy, Jenifer, Sharon Lewin, Jeffrey JP, Alan Street. (2009). Managing The

Patient On Antiretroviral Therapy. In: Vujovic, O. and Anna P HIV Management in Australia a Guide For Clinical Care. ed. Australia:

Australasian Society for HIV Medicine Inc, pp. 93-101.

Hutton B, Mills E, Angel J, Cooper C. Angel J. (2006). CD4 T lymphocyte recovery with antiretroviral therapy in HIV-HCV coinfection. JAC 62:732-9.

Idoko J, Meloni S, Muazu M, Nimzing L, Badung B, Hawkins C, et al. (2009). Impact of hepatitis B virus infection on human immunodeficiency virus response to antiretroviral therapy in Nigeria. Clinical Infectious Diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

[Internet]. [cited 2014 Mar 16];49(8):1268–73. Available from: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/8/1268.full.

Kassa, Desta, Leonie Ran, Wudneh Weldemeskel, Mekashaw Tebeje, Amelewerk Alemu, Yodit Alemayehu, et al. (2012). Clinical, hemato-immunological characteristics of mycobacterium tuberculosis patients with and without HIV-1 infection: responses to six month tuberculosis treatment.

Biomedicine International 3: 22-33.

Kaufmann, GR, Hansjakob F, Bruno L, Luc P, Milos O, Pietro V, et al. (2005). Characteristics, determinants, and clinical relevance of CD4 t cell recovery to >500 cells/ml in HIV type 1-infected individuals receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) 41: 361–372. Kementrian Kesehatan RI. (2011). Pedoman Nasional Tatalaksana Klinis dan

Infeksi HIV dan Terapi Antiretoviral Pada Orang Dewasa. Direktorat

Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit Dan Penyehatan Lingkungan. Jakarta. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2012). Petunjuk teknis tata laksana klinis ko-infeksi

TB-HIV. Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit Dan Penyehatan

Lingkungan. Jakarta.

Kementrian Kesehatan RI. (2013). Statistik Kasus HIV/AIDS di Indonesia Dilapor

s/d Desember2013. Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit Dan

Penyehatan Lingkungan. Jakarta.

Laksana Agung Saprasetya Dwi dan Diyah Woro Dwi Lestari. (2010). Faktor-faktor risiko penularan HIV/AIDS pada laki-laki dengan orientasi seks heteroseksual dan homoseksual di Purwokerto. Mandala of Health. Volume 4, Nomor 2: 133-123.

Liu, H, H. Yang, X Li, N Wang, H Liu, B.Wang, et al. (2005). Men who have sex with men and human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted disease control in China. Cell Res 15 (11-12): 858–864.

Mansjoer, A. (2001). Kapita selekta kedokteran. Edisi 3 Jakarta. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Mariam, S. (2010). Perbandingan respon imunologi empat kombinasi antiretroviral berdasarkan kenaikan jumlah CD4 di Rumah Sakit dr. H. Marzoeki Mahdi Bogor periode maret 2006-maret 2010. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Mathers, Bradley M, Louisa D, Chiara B, James L, Lucas W, Mathew. (2012). Mortality among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 91:102–123

Muzah, BP, S Takuva, M Maskew, and S Delany-Moretlwe. (2012). Risk factors for discordant immune response among HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Southern African

Journal of HIV Medicine 13(4).

Nieuwkerkk PT, Sprangers MA, Burger DM, Hoetelmans RM, Hugen PW, Dannerr SA, et al. (2001). Limited patient adherence to highly active antiretrovirall therapy for HIV-1 infection in an observational cohort study. Archh Intern Med. 161:1962-1968.

Nurbani, F. (2009). Dukungan sosial pada odha. Universitas Gunadarma. Jakarta. Nursalam. (2007). Asuhan keperawatan pada pasien terinfeksi HIV. Penerbit

Salemba Medika. Jakarta.

Nursalam. (2009). Model holistik berdasar teori adaptasi (roy dan pni) sebagai

upaya modulasi respons imun (aplikasi pada pasien HIV & AIDS).

Universitas Airlangga.

Pare, Amelda Lisu, Ridwan Amiruddin, Ida Leida. (2012). Hubungan antara

pekerjaan, pmo, pelayanan kesehatan, dukungan keluarga dan diskriminasi dengan perilaku berobat pasien tb paru. Epidemiologi

Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat. Universitas Hasanudin. Makasar

Price, SA dan Wilson LM. (1992). Phathophysiology. Clinical Concepts of Disease processes. 4th edition. Mrsby Year Book. Inc.

Radji, M. (2010). Imunologi dan virologi. PT. ISFI Penerbitan. Jakarta. Rasmun. (2004). Stres, koping, dan adaptasi. Jakarta: Agung Seto.

Sawitri, A. A. S., Blogg, J., & Angela, R. (2010). Estimating the number of the people who inject drugs in Bali. Drug and alcohol review, 31(6), 813–7. Sielma, F .(2012). Faktor yang memepengaruhi Sistem Imun. Jakarta.

Smith CJ, Caroline A Sabin, Mike S Youle, Sabine K, Fiona C Lampe, S Madge, et al. (2004). Factors influencing increases in CD4 cell counts of HIV-positive persons receiving long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy.

The Journal of Infectious Diseases 190: 1860- 1868.

Spiritia. (2005). Serial buku kecil hepatitis virus dan hiv. Yayasan Spiritia.

Sumarman dan Krisnawati Bantas. (2012). Peran pengawas minum obat dan

kepatuhan periksa ulang dahak fase akhir pengobatan tuberkulosis di kabupaten bangkalan. Epidemiologi FKM Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Surat Edaran Nomor 129 Tahun 2013 Pelaksanaan Pengendalian HIV/AIDS Dan

Infeksi Menular Seksual (IMS). Mentri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.

Jakarta.

Susila, I Gusti Ngurah Putu. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kepatuhan minum ARV pada pasien odha di klinik VCT RSUD Sanjiwani Gianyar Tahun 2013. Program studi ilmu kesehatan masyarakat. Universitas udayana. Denpasar.

Available from : http://www.pps.unud.ac.id/thesis/detail-922-faktorfaktor- yang-mempengaruhikepatuhan-minum-arv-pada-pasien-odhadi-klinik-vct-rsud-sanjiwani-gianyartahun-2013.html

Tortora, J Gerard, Gerdell R Funke, Christine L Case. (2010). Microbiology An

Introduction. 10th edition. United States. Pearson, pp. 487 and 542.

Ubra, RR. (2012). Faktor- faktor yang berhubungan dengan kepatuhan

pengobatan minum ARV pada pasien HIV di Kabupaten Mimika Provinsi Papua tahun 2012. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

UNAIDS. (2013). Case Report United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Available from: http://www.unaids.org. 12 Februari 2014. (19:00).

Van Lelyveld SFL, Gras L, Kesselring A, Zhang S, De Wolf F, Wensing AMJ, et al. (2012). Long-term complications in patients with poor immunological recovery despite virological successful HAART in Dutch Athena cohort.

AIDS London, England [Internet]. [cited 2013 Oct 2];26(4):465–74.

Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112603.

Viard, JP, Amanda M, Antonio C, Ole K, Birgit R, George P, Norbert V. (2001). Influence of age on CD4 cell recovery in human immunodeficiency virus– infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy: evidence from the EuroSIDA study. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 183:1290–4: 1290-1294.

Wolbers, M, Munuel B, Bernard H, Hansjakob F, Matthias C, Barbara H et al. (2007). CD4+ t-cell increase in HIV-1 infected patient with suppressed viral load within 1 year after start of antiretroviral therapy. International

Media Press 1359-6535(12): 889-897.

Yayasan Kerti Praja (YKP). (2014). Profil Yayasan Kerti Praja. Available from:

http://www.kertiprajafoundation.com. 28 April 2014 (13.30).

WHO. (2004). Division of aids table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric adverse events 2004; clarification august 2009.Version 1.0. Available from :http://rsc.techres.com/Document/safetyandpharmacovigilance/Table_for_ Grading_Severity_of_Adult_Pediatric_Adverse_Events.pdf.

WHO. (2008). Guideline Antiretroviral Therapy For Hiv Infection In Adults And

Adolescents. WHO.

WHO. (2010). Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents Recommendations for a public health approach 2010 revision. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/adult2010/en/. 13 Mei 2014 (17:00).

FORMULIR PENGUMPULAN DATA PASIEN

HIV/AIDS YANG MELAKUKAN TERAPI ARV

TAHUN 2002-2012 DI KLINIK AMERTA YAYASAN

KERTI PRAJA DENPASAR

DATA DEMOGRAFI PASIEN

NO VARIABEL DATA

1 Nama Pasien 2 No RM

3 Tanggal Lahir / Umur (saat kunjungan pertama) 4 Nama Konselor 5 Jenis Kelamin 6 Risiko atau Paparan

(saat kunjungan pertama)

1. Risiko seksual

(Jabarkan apa risikonya: misalnya apakah ganti-ganti pasangan, bagaimana pemakaian kondom, mencari pekerja seks, mencari waria, cewek café) 2. Risiko IDU

(Jabarkan apa risikonya: misalnya apakah

menggunakan jarum suntik, menyuntik bersama)

3. Risiko lainnya (jelaskan: misal tatto, piercing, transfuse darah)

7 Pekerjaan 8 Pendidikan

9 Kadar CD4 Tanggal Test CD4 Pertama Kali: Hasil:

Tanggal Kunjungan Kunjungan Ke-

Kadar CD4+

Alasan Kunjungan Tanggal Test Tanggal Hasil

Hasil Test Jumlah CD4 %CD4

Infeksi Opportunistik Pemeriksaan Fisik

Jenis IO Tanggal Diagnosis Berat Badan

Darah

Tanggal Test Tanggal Hasil Hemoglobin

Terapi ARV

Tanggal Mulai ART

Supervisor ART atau Pengawas Minum Obat

(PMO) ada/tidak Hubungan

Output STATA Analisis Univariat Total 311 100.00 female 126 40.51 100.00 male 185 59.49 59.49 sex2 Freq. Percent Cum. . tab sex2

last observed exit t = 8.692676 earliest observed entry t = 0 764.6407 total analysis time at risk, at risk from t = 0 143 failures in single failure-per-subject data

311 subjects

311 obs. remaining, representing

0 exclusions

311 total obs.

origin: time start_date

t for analysis: (time-origin)/365.25 exit on or before: failure

obs. time interval: (even_date[_n-1], even_date] failure event: outcome != 0 & outcome < . id: id

. stset even_date , origin( start_date) fail (outcome) id (id) scale(365.25)

75 35 34 37 50 30 29.70856 31 Age 311 25 27 26 27 Variable Obs Percentile Centile [95% Conf. Interval] Binom. Interp. . centile Age, centile(25 50 75)

Total 311 100.00 >=40 years old 41 13.18 100.00 30-39 years old 111 35.69 86.82 <30 years old 159 51.13 51.13 Age2 Freq. Percent Cum. . tab Age2

Total 311 100.00

none 69 22.19 100.00 yes 242 77.81 77.81 2 Freq. Percent Cum. supervisior . tab supervisior2 Total 311 100.00 tb and other 10 3.22 100.00 other 38 12.22 96.78 none 263 84.57 84.57 oi2 Freq. Percent Cum. . tab oi2 Total 311 100.00 homoseksual 48 15.43 100.00 heteroseksual 176 56.59 84.57 idu 87 27.97 27.97 risk_group3 Freq. Percent Cum. . tab risk_group3 Total 311 100.00 no work 85 27.33 100.00 work 226 72.67 72.67 occupation3 Freq. Percent Cum. . tab occupation3

Total 311 100.00

senior high school 159 51.13 100.00 junior high school 64 20.58 48.87 no education & elemantary 88 28.30 28.30 education2 Freq. Percent Cum. . tab education2

75 14.2 13.8 14.5 50 12.9 12.6 13.1 haemoglobin 306 25 11.675 11.3 11.9 Variable Obs Percentile Centile [95% Conf. Interval] Binom. Interp. . centile haemoglobin, centile(25 50 75)

Total 311 100.00 9 5 1.61 100.00 >10 g/dl 280 90.03 98.39 <10 g/dl 26 8.36 8.36 _recode Freq. Percent Cum. haemoglobin . tab haemoglobin_recode 75 60 59 63 50 54 53 55 weight 308 25 48 47 49 Variable Obs Percentile Centile [95% Conf. Interval] Binom. Interp. . centile weight, centile(25 50 75)

Total 311 100.00 9 3 0.96 100.00 >=58 kg 111 35.69 99.04 50-57 kg 100 32.15 63.34 18-49 kg 97 31.19 31.19 de Freq. Percent Cum. weight_reco . tab weight_recode 75 203 194.5316 219.9834 50 108 84.70856 130.5829 CD4_Baseline 311 25 32 23.00829 42.93689 Variable Obs Percentile Centile [95% Conf. Interval] Binom. Interp. . centile CD4_Baseline, centile(25 50 75)

Total 311 100.00 201-350 cell/mm3 83 26.69 100.00 100-200 cell/mm3 80 25.72 73.31 <100 cell/mm3 148 47.59 47.59 ode Freq. Percent Cum. CD4_Baseline_rec

Grafik Kaplan-Meier Analisis Bivariat total 764.6406571 .187016 311 1.475702 4.030116 6.30527 >350 cel 278.0260096 .5143404 143 .6543463 1.396304 2.956879 <350 cel 486.6146475 0 168 . . . outcome time at risk rate subjects 25% 50% 75% incidence no. of Survival time id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome . stsum, by (outcome) Total 311 100.00 >350 cell/mm3 143 45.98 100.00 <350 cell/mm3 168 54.02 54.02 outcome Freq. Percent Cum. . tab outcome

. sts graph, by (outcome)

. sts graph, failure risktable ytitle (proportion of participans)

54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 39.68 60.32 100.00 female 50 76 126 63.78 36.22 100.00 male 118 67 185 sex2 <350 cell >350 cell Total outcome row percentage frequency Key . tab sex2 outcome, row

_Isex2_2 1.926014 .3243581 3.89 0.000 1.384553 2.679227 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -708.95251 Prob > chi2 = 0.0001 LR chi2(1) = 15.10 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -708.95251 Refining estimates:

Iteration 2: log likelihood = -708.95251 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -708.97106 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

i.sex2 _Isex2_1-2 (naturally coded; _Isex2_1 omitted) . xi:stcox i.sex 54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 56.10 43.90 100.00 >=40 years old 23 18 41 53.15 46.85 100.00 30-39 years old 59 52 111 54.09 45.91 100.00 <30 years old 86 73 159 Age2 <350 cell >350 cell Total outcome row percentage frequency Key . tab Age2 outcome, row

_IAge2_3 1.286774 .3406648 0.95 0.341 .7658649 2.161982 _IAge2_2 .9278241 .1687669 -0.41 0.680 .649585 1.325242 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -715.83845 Prob > chi2 = 0.5149 LR chi2(2) = 1.33 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -715.83845 Refining estimates:

Iteration 3: log likelihood = -715.83845 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -715.83845 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -715.84663 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

i.Age2 _IAge2_1-3 (naturally coded; _IAge2_1 omitted) . xi: stcox i.Age2

Age2 1.064208 .132668 0.50 0.618 .8335137 1.358753 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -716.37867 Prob > chi2 = 0.6192 LR chi2(1) = 0.25 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.37867 Refining estimates:

Iteration 2: log likelihood = -716.37867 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -716.37869 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 60.00 40.00 100.00 tb and other 6 4 10 57.89 42.11 100.00 other 22 16 38 53.23 46.77 100.00 none 140 123 263 oi2 <350 cell >350 cell Total outcome row percentage frequency Key . tab oi2 outcome, row

_Ioi2_3 .6065762 .3089024 -0.98 0.326 .2235662 1.645753 _Ioi2_2 .868653 .2312338 -0.53 0.597 .5155349 1.463641 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -715.83013 Prob > chi2 = 0.5107 LR chi2(2) = 1.34 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -715.83013 Refining estimates:

Iteration 3: log likelihood = -715.83013 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -715.83016 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -715.84688 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

i.oi2 _Ioi2_1-3 (naturally coded; _Ioi2_1 omitted) . xi: stcox i.oi2

Prob > chi2 = 0.5525 chi2( 2) = 1.19 ( 2) _Ioi2_3 = 0 ( 1) _Ioi2_2 = 0 . testparm _Ioi* 54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 26.51 73.49 100.00 201-350 cell/mm3 22 61 83 56.25 43.75 100.00 100-200 cell/mm3 45 35 80 68.24 31.76 100.00 <100 cell/mm3 101 47 148 ode <350 cell >350 cell Total CD4_Baseline_rec outcome row percentage frequency Key

. tab CD4_Baseline_recode outcome, row

_ICD4_Basel_3 4.376091 .8604664 7.51 0.000 2.976566 6.433648 _ICD4_Basel_2 1.661272 .3717586 2.27 0.023 1.071419 2.57586 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -688.841 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 LR chi2(2) = 55.32 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -688.841 Refining estimates:

Iteration 4: log likelihood = -688.841 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -688.841 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -688.85275 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -692.89875 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

i.CD4_Baseli~de _ICD4_Basel_1-3 (naturally coded; _ICD4_Basel_1 omitted) . xi: stcox i.CD4_Baseline_recode

CD4_Baseline_recode 2.107826 .2132113 7.37 0.000 1.728757 2.570016 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -689.56274 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 LR chi2(1) = 53.88 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -689.56274 Refining estimates:

Iteration 3: log likelihood = -689.56274 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -689.56282 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -690.10381 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

. xi: stcox CD4_Baseline_recode

54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 66.67 33.33 100.00 9 2 1 3 54.95 45.05 100.00 >=58 kg 61 50 111 55.00 45.00 100.00 50-57 kg 55 45 100 51.55 48.45 100.00 18-49 kg 50 47 97 ode <350 cell >350 cell Total weight_rec outcome row percentage frequency Key

_Iweight_re_9 .5379353 .5441865 -0.61 0.540 .0740691 3.906818 _Iweight_re_3 1.297204 .2663116 1.27 0.205 .8674799 1.939801 _Iweight_re_2 1.059106 .2215948 0.27 0.784 .7028196 1.596007 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -715.29111 Prob > chi2 = 0.4895 LR chi2(3) = 2.42 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -715.29111 Refining estimates:

Iteration 4: log likelihood = -715.29111 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -715.29111 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -715.29127 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -715.31395 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

i.weight_recode _Iweight_re_1-9 (naturally coded; _Iweight_re_1 omitted) . xi: stcox i.weight_recode

weight_recode 1.139365 .1182997 1.26 0.209 .9295719 1.396506 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -709.6974 Prob > chi2 = 0.2088 LR chi2(1) = 1.58 Time at risk = 753.7467488

No. of failures = 142

No. of subjects = 308 Number of obs = 308 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -709.6974 Refining estimates:

Iteration 2: log likelihood = -709.6974 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -709.69741 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -710.4873 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 40.00 60.00 100.00 9 2 3 5 52.86 47.14 100.00 >10 g/dl 148 132 280 69.23 30.77 100.00 <10 g/dl 18 8 26 n_recode <350 cell >350 cell Total haemoglobi outcome row percentage frequency Key

. tab haemoglobin_recode outcome, row

_Ihaemoglob_9 2.71565 1.845646 1.47 0.142 .7167523 10.28913 _Ihaemoglob_2 1.780192 .649798 1.58 0.114 .8704925 3.640565 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -714.74893 Prob > chi2 = 0.1732 LR chi2(2) = 3.51 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -714.74893 Refining estimates:

Iteration 3: log likelihood = -714.74893 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -714.7491 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -714.82471 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -716.50218 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

i.haemoglobin~e _Ihaemoglob_1-9 (naturally coded; _Ihaemoglob_1 omitted) . xi:stcox i.haemoglobin_recode

haemoglobin_recode 1.79144 .6538277 1.60 0.110 .8760654 3.663263 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -698.93571 Prob > chi2 = 0.0814 LR chi2(1) = 3.04 Time at risk = 755.1101985

No. of failures = 140

No. of subjects = 306 Number of obs = 306 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -698.93571 Refining estimates:

Iteration 3: log likelihood = -698.93571 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -698.93585 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -698.9915 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -700.4537 id: id

origin: time start_date

analysis time _t: (even_date-origin)/365.25 failure _d: outcome

. xi:stcox haemoglobin_recode if haemoglobin_recode ~=9

54.02 45.98 100.00 Total 168 143 311 55.35 44.65 100.00 senior high school 88 71 159 48.44 51.56 100.00 junior high school 31 33 64 55.68 44.32 100.00 no education & eleman 49 39 88 education2 <350 cell >350 cell Total outcome row percentage frequency Key

_Ieducation_3 .874343 .176069 -0.67 0.505 .5892138 1.29745 _Ieducation_2 .9454291 .2263353 -0.23 0.815 .5913597 1.511493 _t Haz. Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] Log likelihood = -716.26814 Prob > chi2 = 0.7913 LR chi2(2) = 0.47 Time at risk = 764.6406571

No. of failures = 143

No. of subjects = 311 Number of obs = 311 Cox regression -- Breslow method for ties

Dokumen terkait