ASIEíJTS 0F TtrE EORtiOlï/iI, PEYSIOLOGT 0F FRIIIT DEVEIOP¡IET{T
I]f
UITTS VTII-ITER.ê, ].,. thesis subnitteå
by
John tr* Consid.ine B,îg:r.Sci.(Melb), IÐ4.
f0 the Ihiversity of lklelaide for the d.egree of
MÀSTSR OXI AGRICI]TTTIRÂL SCIEIVCE
Dept. of Plant Pþsiology,
University of .A,ôelaide 1969
WAITE (ì. INSTITUTE
rt.-to
LIBRARY
.r{..-l
(nHtr
oF
l_ r_ t_
Page T.ABLE OF CO}ITENTS
List of figures List of tables l,ist of plates
Summary
Statement
I. General- Introd.uction
(¡)
(+)
II, ô ju
v
ix
x xi.
](Y
1
(r ) 1
(z)
Structr:re and development of the fruit
lhe relationship between plant grouth regulators
and- fruit set and ùevelopment
(i) Gibbereltins
(ii ) Growth retard.ants
the relationship between end-ogenous grov'rth regulators
and. fruit set and- d.evelopment
(i) End.ogenous gibberellin-like compounds
(:-i) End.ogenous abscisic acid--l-ike conpounds The relationship between the grora.th retardant
CCC and- end-ogenous gibberellin-like and abscisic acid.-like compounds
t
intt
ona:ld. CCC on fruit clrrster clevelonment
+,4
o
9
(r ) (z) (¡)
(+)
(r)
fntrod-uction
Materials and- methods Resul-ts
(i ) Dorad-i11o (ii) Muscat
(iii ) sul-tana (iv) Cape Cunant (-.) Zani,e Gurrant Discussion
Conclusions
10
11
12 12 13 16 16 18
21
22 25 53
^a
l-v Table of Contents (contínued.)
IfI. Gibberellin-like and. abscisic acid--like ggmpegn(þ
i n rrnqne nr¡¡ni os and. ¡nthoz.a orÀ tho affon* nf *ho
aDDlice,tion of CCC
Page
64 6+
65 75 B6
92
103 104 120
125
138
146
153
(r ) (z) (¡)
(q)
Introduction
Materials and. method.s
Results
Discussion and conclusions
vr.
ïV.
General DiscussionV.
Acknowled.Er¡ents.Appendlces
A.
Experiments on extraction and. assay techniques3.
Colwnn chromatography stud.iesC.
Experiments related_to
the gas liquid_chronatography
of
plant hormonosD.
Extr¡eriments ¡elated.to
the d_etectionof
growüh substances on chromatogra,msE.
Anatomical stucliesof
ornrle d.evelopment inCape Cr:nant
frI. Siblioeralhv
LTST CF" FIGURES
Figures from section II on the intoraction of GÀ and- tCC on
reprocluctive fruit cluster cle-,relopment
1¡
Pagc 2T 28 20 2A
3O
31 31 32
Figurc 2.1 tr'igi.me 2.2
Figure 2"1 Figr-lre 2.
{
Figure 2,!
Fi6ure 2.6 tr'igure
2.I
rrMuscat 1966-7
Ca.pe
1,a66-7Cape
1966-7Zante
1966-7DoraC'i1l-o 1967-8
-
ìtumber ofIt
seeded berri-es per cluster - Number of seeclLess berries per
cluster.
- Total number of berries pel cfuster
lt It
3O
X'igure Figure Figure
Figure ï'igure Figure Figtr-re Fi6ure Figu-re Figure Figure
2" 16 2"17 2.18 2"19 2"20 2"21 2"2?
2.23
^Tigure 2.11 rr
Figu-re 2. 12 tr Figure 2"13 iluscat Figurc 2. 14 It Figì;re 2. 15 u
- rt seeùle¡ss Jrerries
- ï'resh weigi:t of seeded berries - Length/wiatn ratio of seedeù
berries 32
- Rachis length. 33
- CLustarroight 33
- j'ú-unber of seocled- berries ¡er
cluster' 3:l-
- l'Tutr-ucl of seecll-ess berries per
oluster 31- - Total numT:e:: of berries per
cl-uster 35 - ?ercent seooLess berries 3i - Fresh weight of seeileci berries 36
- Fre,sh weight of seeôIess berries 35
- Length of scedr-ed. berrics 37 - rtrid-th of seecietL bcrrics 3T
- Lonp;th of seedless berries 38 - l,'7idth of seed.less berries 38 - Length/wiatfr ratio seed.eù
berries 39
2"8 2"9 2,10
il
Û
ll
lt
if n
ft n n
rl
?t
lt il il
lt il n lt
il il il ll tt
il il tt
Fi^gare 2"2Q lluscat 1967-8
-
Length/wiatnratio
seeC.lessvi
Page
46 lr7
¿t .4'lI
48
Figure tr'igure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure F.igure Figure Figure Figure
2.25 2.26 2"27 2.28 2"29 2" 30 2"31
éo )Z
2" 33
2.34 2.35 2"36 2.37
il il
Suitana
il
11
il It rt n rì
cape
il il
il It It
ìl il il il il il ll
|l
It
berries .- Rachis length
- Ciuster vreight
- Nr:¡nber of berries Per cluster - Fresh weight of berries
- Length of berries - ItÏíd.th of benies
- Length/vrid.th ratio of berries - Refraction of es¡rressed juice - Rachis length
- Cluster weight
- Total number of berries - Percent seedless berries - Fresh vreight of seedless
bouies - Length/'*i,ftn of seeùl-ess
berries - Raohis length
- Oluster vreight
- Number of seeùl-ess bcrries - Fresh weight of seodlcss
berries
39 40 li0 +r11
41 42 4z 43 43
/1 /.
-r_ r Ll¿[
45
.:i')4tr,
A(,
Figure 2"38
Figure 2.39
Figure 2"{0 Figure 2.41 Fíguee 2"{2
il
1t
il
Zante
lt
rt
il
il
Figure 2"{l tt rr - Lengthfividth ratio of seodl-ess berries 49 îi.gure 2"44 It rr - Refraction of expressed- juice 50 Figure 2.{l rr rr - Ped-icei length 50
Figr:.re 2,{6 !' n - Rachis length ,1
figure 2"17 rilI - Cluster weight 51
Figures from section fII on the analysis of enùogenous growth substances in cleveloping flowers anå fruit
Figuire 3"1 Flow d,iagrarn of extraction tecJ:nique 69 Figure J.2 Chromatography of extracts 80
Figure 3.3 Chromatography of anther extracts 81
Figure 3"4 0ape Currantc Changes in activity of endogenous regulators with time in the presence a;nd absence
of CCC BZ
I'igure 3.5 Sultana¡ Changes in ¡rctivity of en<logenous
regulators lvith tine in the presenco and absence cf CCC
Fi¿¡re 1.6 ÐoraC.illo: Chanrìes in actir¡itÍ of endogenous regulators with time ín the presence and
, absonce of CCC.
Figure 3.7 Changes in the concen'bration of prono'ber ÏfI
vv'ith stage of development in untreatod flowers and. berries
!''igr:re 1.8 Changes in the concentration of the /r3-A-Iike r:cmpound with stage of ctevelopment in
untreated flovrers and berri-es
Figr:re 3.9 The changes in the ratio of the concont¡ation of the l.B¿!-like compound. a.nd. prorooter III r,rrith stage of d.eveÌopment in unt¡eated- flowe¡s ant berri_es
Figures from .tippend.ix Ä.
!'igure À"1 Partition a:ral-ysÍss pre-anthesis Cape Ourrant
Figure Â"2 Anion ercchange chrornatogra¡hy: þost-anthesis Doraùillo and. GA,
Figure A.l Ânion exchangc chromatography: a¡ricot extract,
and- .t13¡l nlus GA,
X'igure A",z[ Test of chromatograp]r¡,r ned-ia for suitability in thc bioassay of plant horrnones
Figures from Âppenùis 3
Figure 3.1 Silica gel partition chromatcgraphy of apricot extract.
-\J:La
Page
ó)
1Gl
1vî
83
B4
85
B5
110
118
123
tr'igures from .&ppenri-ix C
tr''igure
C.1
GLCof
plant ho¡mones v¡ith QFj as the stationary phaseFigrre
C"2
GT.Cof
plant hormonesïrith
SI 30 as thestationary Bhese
Figure
C"l
GIllof
plant hormonesl improved. recor¡eryof G\ at
higher temperaturesFigure
C.{
GIÆof
plant bormones¡ thc influence of temperature progrer,rnningFigure
C"l
lssayfor
i-nhibj-torsin
post-anthesis CapeCurrant e¡tracts
I'igure
C.6
GLCof
theinhibitive
zonecf
C¿ps Currant extraetthat
correspond.ed-to
tbe Rf of authentic (+) f,.n¿vlii
Page
133
133
134
135
136
137
l_lc
îabIe 2"1 Tabl-e 2"2
Table 2"3
Table 3.1
Table 3.2
Table 3"J
Tab]e -4.1
fabl-e .4,.2 Table D.1
LTST OT' TÄBIES
Sr:.rnmary of results f cr 1966-7 antì- 1967-8 The effect of stage of development on the response of berry weÍ-ght to the application
of
2oppm c¿(t967-8)T'he effect of GA applierl at anthesis ancl CCC applieù pre-anthesis on the length/hid-lh ratio of berries(tg6Z-8)
Cape Currant¡ lhe effeet of CCC on cluster
ôevelopment at maturity, on rrines that ì¡¡ere
sampleù in the analysis of the effect of
CCC on enC.ogenous growth regrrlators Sultanac fbe effect of CCC on cluster
d.evelopment at maturity, on vines that were sampled- in the analysis c¡f the effect of
CCC on encì-cgenous growth regulators
[']re 1eve1 of the liB¡i-l-ike compound present in
ÉIrape e-ttracts anC the effect of CCC applied- iwo weeks pre-anthesis (averaged- over the three cultivars )
Surnrnary of chromatographic ùa.ta for silica gel thin layer plates
Ttre effcct of silica geI G on the refraction of glucose sol-utions
The detection of a number of physiologically important conporrnds on pnper vrith chromo-
genic reagents
Page
5"
59
76 6o
(t
7T
112
116
1 lrl
x
tïsî
0F Pt¿,18S PageSection III
Plate 3.1 One replicate of Sultana extracts after thin- Iayer chromatography
.tlopenclix Â
P1ate 4.1 Chromatograms
of
pl-ant hormones(*nr/+/1, IM, t.
ABA &t¡lì.A) onsilica
ge1 Gin
solvents of composition f¡omleft to rightg
l0s!0:1,CHCI] eEt"Lc.
;
HCOOH; l0s1Ce1; Bjt1Je19 BOsZ0rl;and. JO:30¡1 CHC13; ETOE:HCOOE Appendix 3
Plate 3" 1 Chromatography of fractions eluted. from a silica gel column with rnixtures of chloroform to
methanol (see text for d-etail)
Aonend-i¡r E
?1ate E" 1
7z
114
121
150
150
150
151 151
151
151
152
Plate 8.2 Plate E"l Plate E. .{
Plate E")
?Iate E,6 Plate E" J
Plate E"B
L.S. d-eveloping ovule, 2-3 weeks pre-anthesis-
inegaspo"e mother cell
L-S. d-eveloping ovule t 2-3 weeks pre-anthosj_s- d-iviC-ing megaspore rnother ce1l
L-S. a;ether, 2-3 v¡eeks l¡re-anthesis showing
po11en tetrad.s
T.S. of an ovule at anthesis showing the absence
of the embryo sac
L.S. of a¡r o¡nr1e at anthesis without an embryo sac
T.S. of an owufe at anthesis with a fully
developed. embryo sac
L. S" of the micropylar end- of a fully C.eveloped_
ovule at anthesis demonstrating the presence of an egþ nucleus
L.S. of an ovary sampled. approximately 2 weeks
after anthesis
T.S. of a¡ ovary sampled- approwimately 2 v¡eeks
after anthesis, d.emonstrating the expansion of the nucellus without a concomita¡rt d-evelopment
of the integuments
Plate E"l
152
xl- ÄSPEOTS 0F TIm IIOR]úON.¿I-L PIITSIOL,OGY CF F}ìUIî ÐElEf,OPLtúlI'I
rN VTTIS ./TNIFERI.
SLlflü.¿rÌ,Y
[\ro concplementar¡r stuùÍes v¡ere
unC.ertaken of the horrnonal physiolog;y of set anå
clevelopment of tire fruit of Vitis ¡j-]!ljier,a, wi-th special reference to gibberellin pronoters antr inhibitors" In
one approach the cffects of applications of factorial combinaticns of GX. and- CCC were rneasurecl on -,¡ari-ous parameters of cluster developmont. Time of application of each comporrnd was also exa¡ninetl. In the seooncl-
apprcach, estimati-ons cf entogenous G.Á-like ¡¡nd X3A-1ike compor:ncls .¡¡cre maùe in ext¡acts of flowers anl fruits
ù:rin6ç the critical periorl-s of, anthcsis ancl early pericarp
clevelopment.
Pre-anthesis applications of GÀ
increasecl fruit-set in the stenospermocarpic Sulta^na, rlecreasecl sot in tJ:c parthcirccarpic lapo ancì hacf nc¡
effect on three othet cultivars. Anthesis
applicaticns increasecl the set of seed_less benies in Doradillo, had no effect on I,{uscat, tape cr Zanter md c-ecreaseiì- set iir sultana. Post-anflresis .applications increaseù the set of seeåless berries on cultivars other than the parthenocarpic. Pre-anthesis ap;rlications of
CCC increaseå set thou¿çh not ali,vays signifioantly. post- anthesis applications r¡¡ere without effect on set. t----..--..-
xra
n
Àppl-ications cf G.tl, prior to anthesis were the most effective in reducing seecl- .levelopmentg post-
anthesis applications lvere '¡rithcut effect on Doracr.illo
but reciucec'r seeÒ d-evelopnent in l,[uscat. Intermec]-iate resuJ.is ï\rere generally obtained from anthesis applicaticns. I'Vith one exception (Muscat pre-arithesis 196Ç7) CCil ciiù not alter the
proportion of seeåecl anir. seeôl-ess berries set"
In general both ccmpounds exerteù
signifioant, usualì-y oirposite, effects on pericarp d-evelopment" ïlhere seeà growth was unaffecterl- by G,A.
application, this compoun.,l hacl no influence olt the final fresh weight of the berry. Ilowever, if seed developrnent was imperfect then GA ha,L a profound. effect on the final
size of the roemy. The magnitucle of this effect ùepenC-ecì-
upon the cul-tivar ancl time of applicatione those berries in which seecl clevelopment vras incomplete sho¡,'¡eil greatest response to G.rt applied at set, but vrhere no seed- growth occurred at all then response ï\¡as greatest to a"nthesi-s
applioations. CCC, irrespective of tíme of application, significantly recr:ucerl berry size in all cultivars except those rn¡hich vrere parthenocarpi_c.
G-4. significa^ntly affecteù the shape
of bemies, especially wh.en appliecÌ at anlhesis. The
clegree of the response vras unrel_ated to seell d_evelopment,
although in the seeded- cultivar I'nluscat the change in
shape \¡/as unaccompanied by any change in berry vreight.
Cape was the most responsivo, while l\fuscat, SuJtana ancl
Zante repre less so. DoracliLlo was r:naffecteC_. CCC
significa.ntl-y recì.uced. the renglh/-,tlid-th ratio of a1l_ berries with a norrnal_ ratio greater than about 1"1"
XI11
GÀ often significantly increased
the length cf the rachis anct pedicel but only when
applied- pre-anthesis. There was a trencl, sometimes
significant, for CCC to retard- the elongation of the
rachis a¡rd the ped-icel.
Cluster vreight was affecteci by
the treatments in a manner similar to berry weight"
Pre-anthesis applications of GÀ to seeclec) cultivars resultecl in '.lecreaseù yieì-d- because a greater proportion of berries had- inhibitecl seecl growth a¡:rL were smalIer.
Later applications of GA, notably in Doraùi11o, increased.
yielcl because of retuceù inhibition of seed growth and_
greater set a¡icì clevelopment of seec"less berries" -Anthesis
applications of G.A. were most effective Ín increasing yield- in zante and- cape, while post-anthesis applications
ïuere more effective in Sultana.
fn tho exami_nation of enC.ogenous growth
regulators in the fruit of Ðoratli11o, sultana anc]- caper
qualitative d-ifferences in GA-rike compounds were noteti- betlveen the parthenocarpic cultivar, Cape, ar:cL the
other two cultivarsi the ùifference between Sul_tana a.reô
Dorad-illo appearec to be only quantitative" significant i
changes in ooncentration of GA-rike substances during eorly íLl
development occumecì q¿ly 1n the seedeù cul_tivar Doraclil1o. l
No significant response to CCC was noteù. ,,
xLv
Jtn ¿3.4-1ike ccmpound. was present ì_n
all extrasts examj.ne'ù and. sigr:ifica::t changes occr:med in its concent¡ation. îhere 'was a trencl in all three
cuLtivars (significant in DoraCrillo, P- 0.0)) for the
leve1 of the inh-lbitor, which was generally highest at anthesis, to ùecline nole slowÌy after treatment with
ccc.
These results and the results of othe¡s a¡e usecl to formulate a general b.¡4lothesis of the control of fruit-set and. pericarp C.evelopment in Vitis vinifera.
-
ï\'
This thesis contains no material r:vhich
has been accepted for the avrard of any other d-egree or di-plorna i-n any u:riversity ano, to the best of my belief, no material which has previously been published- or .¿lr¡itten bJ' another person has been included, except v¡hen d-ue reference is made in the text of this thesis"