private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
A HYDROLOGICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO WATERSHEDS IN POHANGINA COUNTY
A Thesis Submitted
in PartialFulfillment
ofthe Requirements
forthe
Degree of
MASTER OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE I N SOIL SCIENCE
at
MASSEY UNIVERSITY
by
Shirley Jean Rolston
1973
towards the Pohangina River
SUMMARY
Sequential aerial phot~graphs taken in
1946, 1958, 1966
and1972
were used to study the changes in erosion and vegetation over two a'djacent catchments in the Pohangina County,35
km north east of Palmerston North. Infra red colour and Kodachrome prints were used as well as black and white film for added inter- pretive value.The major problem in these watersheds is the severe canyon gullying that occurs in the unconsolidated Castlecliffian Sand underlying this area.
Number 1 catchment ( 240 ha ) is in a mor~ critical state with regard to erosion, than Number 2 catchmeat
( 200 ha ). It yielded extremely low dry weather flows, with much of the streambed completely dry except in flood events, or fed only by seepage from small springs. Reasons for the significant differenees in the behaviour of the two catchments are suggested.
Attempts were also made with limited resources to look at the flood levels and sediment loads contributed to the Pohangina River by these catchments. It was calculated from a flood 10/3/72 that sediment loads in the order of
3
tonnes/min could be reached at the flood peak. Mechanical analyses showed that80
per cent of this load falls in thesize range of fine sand.
Using a mirror stereoscope and simple morphometri8 and photointerpretive methods, the physical factors contribut- ing to the erosion and headward gully movement in the two catchments were compared and a series of deductions made in eonjunction with the history and manageme•t of the
properties involved. Headward gully movement and increased erosion was proposed to result from climatic events and
•hanges as well as the removal of large areas of scrub and regenerating native bush on the gully sides• Feneing off
v
the gullies, complete withdrawal of stock from them and allowing unrestricted r~generation of native species coupled with the planting cf exotic trees and the erection of con- servation structures should have been instigated as soon as the problem became apparent. These measures have also been advocated by other workers and organizations for simi- lar problems in the same ar ea.
* * * * * * * * *
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FRONTISPIECE
-P
late
1Oblique Ae
ria
lVi&w o f
the Stud
yCatchments
iiiSUHMttRY 6 0 o o o o v o O• o oo o o oo o o o o o o • n o o o• •• • o a o o o o e
'.f',,BLE OF CONTENTS
LI ST OF FIGUHES
• • •0 •• • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LI ST OF TABLES
O O O Oo O o O O• o .. . - " O O O O f t O O O O O O • o o G O O OLIST OF PLATES
•••••• ••••••ooo•••• •.,.••••• • • • • • • oLIST OF APPENDICES
CH
/11-TER ONEIntr oduc ti on
0 0 • • 0 0 0 0 0 • •• 0 . 00 0 0 • • 0 . 0 0CHAPTER TWO
o C'o o o o o o o o oo o oo o o o o o o o o o o oo o o oDes cri ption of the Study
rir~a2. 1
2. 2
2 . 4
Locati
0nTopography ... ...
C lima t e 2.3 . 1 2. 3. 2 2. 3. 3 2. 3.4 Geology 2. 4. 1 2 . 4. 2 2.4. 3 2.4 o4
Gen era l Introducti on Pr ecipitat
ion ••••••Temper a ture
••••••••Wind •••••••••••••••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0
General ••...•••••••
Geo
logicalHistory ••
Stratigraphy
•••••••Developmen
tof
Topogr aphy and Struc-
ture ••.•...•.••••.•iv vi
xi xiiXi ii
xv
1 1
5
5
11
17 17 18
20
21
23
23
23
31
33
2.7
2.8
CHAPTER THREE
Soils
Vegetation Erosion
•0•000•••••••••11»••••
General
Desr.ription of the Soils in the Study Area
...
• • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • •
....•...
Erosion Control Types of Erosion Agriculture and Management History •••••••••••••••••••••
2.8.1
2.8.2
History •••••••••••Present Agriculture and Management ••••
Literature Review
...
3.1
Flow and Sediment Measurementsand other Factors Aff8cting Erosion
3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5
...
1~nalysis of Stream Flows •••...••••••
Flood Flow Charo.cteristics Stream Sediment Loads • • • • • • • • • o • •
Rainfal l and Climatic Effects on Erosion Miscellaneous Effects
on Erosion
vii
38 40 38
53 59 59 65 71
71
7275 75
75
7879 84
90
3.2
Aerial Photography in Soil Conservation and Hydrological Studies • • • $ • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •3 .2.1
The Applications of Aerial Photography3-2~2 Factors affecting Photoi nterpretation •••
3 . 2.3
The Re la ti ve Merits of Different Films3.3
Photogrammetric and Mor phometric Techniques•...•...•.
3.3.1
Areal Analysis • • 0 • • •3.3.2
Slope Analysis3.3.3
Drainage AnalysisCHrl.FTER FOUR
Field and Laboratory Techniques and
Equipment • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • •
401
4.,2
Sediment and Flow Measurements
4 .1.1
Monthly Flow Record~ ••4.1.2
Flood Flow Records4.1.3
Flood SedimentCollection and Analysis
4.1.4
Rainfal l Records4.1.5
Other Measur ements and Observations • • • • • • 0 • •Comparison of Different Film
Types
.•...•••..•.•...
Photogrammetric and Morphometric Measurements • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Areal Analysis Slope Analysis Drainage Analysis
94
94 103 107 120
12 0 121 126
12 9
129 129 131 134 134 135
136
137
139 142
147
CHA!-'TER FIVE Results
5.2
5.3
CHAPTER SIX
...
Sediment and Flow Measurements
5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1 ..
3
5.1.4 5.1.5
Monthly Flow Records ••
Flood Flow Records •••••
Flood Sediment Analysis Rainfal l Records •••••o Other Observations •••
Comparison of Different Film Types
5.2.1 Qualitative Observations of the Different
Applications of Aerial Photographs
Factors Affecting Photo Interpretation •••••••
The Merits of Different Film Types ••••••••••
Phot ogrammetric and Morphometric Measurements • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Ar eal Analysis •••••••
Slope Analysis • · · · Drainage Analysis
Discussion and Conclusions
ix
149
149
1
L~9149 153 157 159
161
161
167
168
172
172 182 191
199
6.1 Field Measurements and Observations 199
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3 6.1.4
Stream and Flood Flows Sediment Loads
Erosion
The Effects of Rainfall and Climate on Erosion
199 201 202 205
6.2 The Qualitative Use of Aerial
6.3
6 .. 4
Photographs
6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3
Applications ••••••••••
Limitations ••••••••••••
Different Film Types
The Use of Fhotogrammetric and Morphometric Measurements for Com- paring and Evaluating Watershed Characteristics and Problems ••••••••
6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3
Ar eal Measurements
Slope Analysis •••••••••
Drainage Analysis ·~····
Conclusions
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY • o • o o o o • c o e o e o o • • o o o 1 1 o o o e • C ' o o o o o o e •
AFPENDICES o o e o e o o o • o • o • o • • o • • • • o • o o e o o t t o o e . : t o o o o
209 209 210 211
212
212 213 214
215
217 219 245
Figure
2.1 2.2
2.3 2.4
2.5
2.6 2.7 2.8
5.1
5.6
5 •. 75.8 5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.13
5.14 5.15
LIST OF FIGURES
Locality Map • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • • •
Specific Locality Map • • • • 0 • • • • • • • .,. • • • • •
Stratigraphic Column Culling's Gully •••••
Distribution of Soils Over the Study Area Raumai Sandy Loam Profile No. 1
xi
Page
6 8
3439 41
Raumai Sandy Loam Profile No. 2 ••••••••• 42 Pchangina Steepland Soil Profile Ne. 1 49 Pohangina St eepland Soil Profile No. 2 50 Monthly Dry Weather Flows, December
1971 - 150
December
1972
• • C 1 0 • • 0 • • • • • • 0 • • · · ·Relationship Between Recorded Water
Depth and Dischar ge fer Number 2 Catchment Relationship Between Depth of Sediment Deposited at the Flood Level Recorder in Number 2 Catchment and Previous Maximum
( 2 day total ) Rainfal l •••••••••••••••
1972 Monthly Rainfall Totals for Study Area • • • • • • • • ft 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Changes in Ercsion over the Study Area from Sequential Aerial Photographs Changes in Regeneration over the Study Area from Sequential Aerial Photographs.
Analysis of the Subwatersheds ••••••••
Contour Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Generali.zed C·ontours •••••••••••••••••
Stream Profiles and Crest Line Profiles Multiple Projected Profiles •••••••••
Area-Height Curves ••••••••••••••••••
Hypsometric Curves •••••••••••••••••••
Drainage Analysis •••••••••••••••••••
Surrounding Drainage Network Between the Pohangina and Oroua Rivers •••••••
154 155
158
174
175
180
183
185
186
188
189
190
192
193
Table
I
II I I I
IV
v
VI VII
VIII
IX
x
XI
XII
LIST OF TABLES
Variability of Rainfall at Komako and Colyton
Geological Time Scale ••••••••••••••••
Slope Group Table for Soils of the Study Area •••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Measured Flood Flows •••••••••••••••••
Monthly Water Depth Maxima and Silt Deposition in Number 2 Catchment from Flood Events •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Sediment Loads • • • • • • • • o o • • • • • • • • • • • •
Particle Size Distribution in Flood •••
Sediment Loads •••••••••••••••••••••••
Area of the Catchm8nts Calculated by Five Different Methods • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • 0 .
~nalysis of Subwatersheds
Analysis of Drainage • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • •
Analysis of Drainage Composition •••••
Changes in He~dward Gullying from
1958- 1966 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Page
18 26 47
151 152
153 156
172
181
194
196
197
P l a te
1
2. 1
2.2 2.3
2. 4 2. 5 2. 6
2. 8 2. 9
2.10
2.11 2.12
2.13
2. 14
2 . 15
LI ST OF PLATES
Fr on ti spi ece - Ob lique Aeri a l View of Study Ca tc hments from Ridge Road Looking towa rds
the PohanBina River ••••••••••• .•••.••••••• oAeria l View of th e St udy A rca
,showing Location on the Easte rn Flank of t he
Pohangina An ticli ne be tween the Pohang i na
and Oroua Rivers .••••••••••••.•••••••••••Confluence of Number 1 and Number 2 Gu llies Erosion Debris a t Foo t of Wat erfa ll, Number 1 Gully
11K n ickpoint
11.. .. .... ... ... ... .
Seepage Zone Contributing t o Streamflow
, Number 1 Gully ••••••••••••••••••••••••••Seepage Flow Mee ting D ry Channe l
St eep Gul ly Wa l l showin g High ly Erodib l e Laminated Cast l ecliffian Sand Substra t a and Pop l a r Poles Pl an te d a t th e Bot tom
.Burie d Ash Cl ast with Soil Deve loped on one Sur face , i n Matrix of Coarse Pumiceous Sand Raumai Sandy Loam , Profile No
. 1...
Rauma i Sandy Loam, P:eofile No
. 2... ...
Holling A re a of Rauma i Sandy Loam So ils with Ter races of Ohakea Si lt Loam in the Background ... ... ... .. .... .... ... ...
Co l on i za tion of St eep G ully Faces by Lup ins Pohangina Steepland Soi l Pr ofi le No
.1
Pohangina Steepla nd So il, Pr o file No
.2 Young Pop l a r Po les Planted a t the Reced ing Head of a Tributary of No. 1 Gully showing felled Manuka in the Backgr ound
•••
••
•••
•St oc k Water Dam with Rush growth and
Improved Pasture in the Foreground
••••••xiii
Page
iii
7
10 10
14
14 24
24 43
43
44
44 51 51 55
55
2 . 16
2 . 17
2. 18
2.19
2 .. 2('J) 2.21
2.22
2.23
4 . 1 4. 2 5. 1
5. 3 5. 4
5. 8
Concrete Dam Installed in Number 1
Gully, April 1971
... .. ...
Undercutting and Slipping on Farm
Track, April 1972 •••••••••••••••••••
Concrete Dam installed in No. 1 Gully in 1973 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Wide flat Aggraded Channel behind this Dam showing the Huge Build up of Sand within a few Months ••••••••••••••• • N6W Poplar Poles Planted on Active Slip Degraded Streambed in No. 1 Gully
showing Original Fence Suspended in the air
...
Cut-over Scrub above No. I Gully
showing Incipient Rilling and Gullying Sheep Grazing on the Steep Exposed Gully Faces • • • •• • 0 • • • • •• • • •• • • •• •• • •
Flood Level Recorder in No. 1 Catchment Flood Level Recorder in No. 2 Catchment Kodachrome herial of the Main Gully and Tributary of No. 1 Catchment ••••••••
Infra Red Aerial of the Main Gully and Tributary of Number 1 Catchment
Black and White 1972 Aerial View of the Lower part of No. 1 Catchment.
Kodachrome Aerial of Part of t he Main Gully of No. 2 Catchment
... .
Infra Red Aerial of Part of the Main Gully of No. 2 Catchment ••••••••••
Black and White 1972 Aerial View of the Lower Part of No. 2 Catchment 1946 Aerial View of Lower Part of the Study Area showing High Incidence of Slipping ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
1958
Aerial of Study Area Showing Increased Regenerative Cover ••••••••••1966
Aerial of Study Ar ea showing Increased Incidence of Slips62
62
63
68
74 74
130 130 162
162
163 164 164
177
178
179
Append ix I
II
III
IV
v
VI
VII VIII
LIST OF
AP~ENDICESSummary of th e Main Cli m
atic Elements in t he Pohang ina District ...
Stratigraphic Table of the Castlecliffian Stage a t Wanganui
• • • 0 • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • •• •Geological Sec tion De scri ptions (1) Culling 's Gully Sec
tionMeasured We stward from A xis
(2)
of the An ticline
••••••••••••Culling's Gul ly Sec tion
Measur ed Eas twa rd from
Ax
is of the Antic line ... "' ...
Soil
ProfileDesc riptions
(1)(2) ( 3)
(4)
Rauma i Sandy Loam
,Pro file No
. 1Rauma
i Sandy Loam ,
ProfileNo
. 2Pohangina
Ste epland So ils,
ProfileNo .
1 •••••••••••••••Pohangina Stccpland So ils, l-rofi l e No
. 2... ..
Common and Botanical Names of
PlantsUsed in the Tex
t....••....••..•....
Land Cap
ability Classe s Used in the Pohangina Survey, 1951
••••••••••••••Monthl y Dry Weather Flows
Correla tion of Maximum Flood Levels with Discharge for Number 2 Catchment ( Raw Da t a for Figure 5
.2 )
••••••••••xv
Page 245
247
248 248
250
252
252 254 256
258
260
262
263
264
IX
x
XI XII
XIII
XIV
xv
Sediment Loads
(1) R~w Data ( Means and Standard ) Errors ) for Table VI
(2)
Raw Data ( Means and Standard Errors ) for Table VIIRainfall Records ( 1 )
(2)
(3)
(4) (5)
Rainfall Reco~d (rum) for 1972 for ~he Study Area
Maximum Daily Rainfall for 1972 1972 Rainfall for the Study Arca c.nd Surround.ins Districts Te
Awa
23-Year Rainfall Figures Maximum Rainfall ir. Selected Time Intc~vals from 10 minutes to 72 hours during 1972Catchment nreas, Raw Data for Table VIII Analysis of Eros~on and Regeneration.
( Data for Figures
5q5
and5.6 )
Determinati0:i o: 1iv0r:J.ge Slop: using 100 Foot Contou~ Interval
Stream and Crest-line Profiles, ( Ra~
Data for Figures 5u10 and 5.11
(1) Straam Profiles "'•• •O •o o oe ne • t "
(2) Cres~-line Proiiles •»>• o• •• o...,.,
Raw Dat.::i. for Construction of Area-height and Hypsometric Curves t:if'lono no o •o o• o c - •
265
266
268 268
269 269
270 271
272
273
275
275
276
277