UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA
ANALYZE THE PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PURE
BASED COOLANT AND COMBINATION OF
OIL-BASED COOLANT WITH PALM OIL ON CUTTING
SURFACE IN MILLING OPERATION
Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University Technical Malaysia Melaka for the Bachelor Degree of Manufacturing
Engineering in Manufacturing Process
By
Mohd Hafis Bin Bajuri
APPROVAL
This thesis submitted to the senate of UTeM and has been accepted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Manufacturing (Manufacturing Process). The members of the supervisory committee are as follow:
……… Supervisor
DECLARATION
I hereby, declare this thesis entitled “Analyze The Performance Between Pure Oil-Based Coolant And Combination Of Oil-Oil-Based Coolant With Palm Oil On Cutting Surface In Milling Operation” is the result of my own research except as cited in the
references.
Signature : ………. Author’s Name : MOHD HAFIS BIN BAJURI
UTeM Library (Pind.1/2007)
BORANG PENGESAHAN STATUS TESIS* UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA
JUDUL:
SESI PENGAJIAN: 2007/ 2008
Saya _____________________________________________________________________ mengaku membenarkan t esis (PSM/ Sarj ana/ Dokt or Falsaf ah) ini disimpan di
Perpust akaan Universit i Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) dengan syarat -syarat kegunaan sepert i berikut :
1. Tesis adalah hak milik Universit i Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
2. Perpust akaan Universit i Teknikal Malaysia Melaka dibenarkan membuat salinan unt uk t uj uan pengaj ian sahaj a.
3. Perpust akaan dibenarkan membuat salinan t esis ini sebagai bahan pert ukaran ant ara inst it usi pengaj ian t inggi.
4. **Sila t andakan (√)
Analyze The Performance Between Pure Oil Based Coolant And Combination Of Oil Based Coolant With Palm Oil On Cutting Surface In Milling Operation.
MOHD HAFIS BIN BAJURI
UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA Karung Berkunci 1200, Ayer Keroh, 75450 Melaka
Tel : 06-233 2421, Faks : 06 233 2414
Perpust akawan Kolej Universit i Teknikal Kebangsaan Malaysia KUTKM, Ayer Keroh
MELAKA.
Saudara,
PENGKELASAN TESIS SEBAGAI SULIT/ TERHAD
- TESIS SARJANA MUDA KEJURUTERAAN PEMBUATAN (PROSES PEMBUATAN): TAJUK:
Sukacit a dimaklumkan bahawa t esis yang t ersebut di at as bert aj uk “ Anal yze The Perf ormance Bet ween Pure Oil Based Coolant And Combinat ion Of Oil Based Cool ant Wit h Palm Oil On Cut t ing Surf ace In Milling Operat ion” mohon dikelaskan sebagai t erhad unt uk t empoh lima (5) t ahun dari t arikh surat ini memandangkan ia mempunyai nilai dan pot ensi unt uk dikomersialkan di masa hadapan.
Sekian dimaklumkan. Terima kasih.
“ BERKHIDMAT UNTUK NEGARA KERANA ALLAH”
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Bismillahhirrahmanirrahim. Assalamualaikum
First of all, thank to ALLAH S.W.T for giving me the strength to complete this Project Sarjana Muda. Thank to my family for their support in every aspect.
Special thank to my supervisor, En. Ammar bin Abd. Rahman, and UTeM’s lecturer that helped and guided me throughout this project.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Cutting Fluid 5
2.1.1 Principle of Cooling and Lubrication 5 2.1.2 Cooling Ability of Cutting Fluids 6 2.1.3 Types of Cutting Fluids 8
2.1.7 Cutting Fluid Health Hazards and Recycling 15 2.2 Palm Oil 16
2.2.3 Palm Oil (Vegetables Oil) to Become Cutting Fluids 17
2.6.4 Method to Analyze Surface Roughness 24
2.6.4.1 Average Roughness (Ra) 24
3.2.2.1 Bacteriostatic Emulsifiable Oil Coolant (FUCHS) 32 3.2.3 Selection of Additional Compound (Palm Oil) 33
3.2.4 Selection of Workpiece Material 33
3.2.5 Selection of Cutting Tool 34
3.2.6 Selection of Parameters 35
3.2.7 Selection of Method for Analysis 36
3.2.7.2 Method to Observe the Surface Texture 37
3.3.6.2 Surface Roughness Tester (SJ-301) Procedure 42
3.3.6.3 Metallurgy Microscope Procedure 42
CHAPTER 4: RESULT
4.1 Introduction 43
4.2 Surface Roughness Analysis 44
4.2.1 Relationship between Surface Roughness and Machining Time 45 4.2.2 Relationship between Surface Roughness and Cutting Speed 46
4.3 Surface Texture Analysis 48
CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION
5.1 Comparison of Surface Roughness Value 51
5.2 Comparison for Cutting Speed 52
5.3 Comparison for Machining Time 55
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure Description Page
2.1 Cooling curves of all fluids experiment 7
2.2 A flood method of cutting fluid is applied on the workpiece. 13 2.3 A jet method of cutting fluid is applied on the workpiece directed
at the cutting zone.
13
2.4 The mist application of cutting fluid is directed at the cutting zone.
14
2.5 Milling operation consist slab, face, and end milling 19
2.6 Up milling 19
2.7 Roughness, Waviness, lay, and flaw. 23
2.8 Average Roughness (Ra). 25
3.1 Flow Chart for project 27
3.2 Conventional milling machine 31
3.3 FUCHS bacteriostatic emulsifiable coolant 32
3.4 Dimension of the workpiece 33
3.5 Carbon steel AISI 1045 workpiece 34
3.6 HSS cutting tool and tool holder 35
3.7 Portable Surface Roughness Tester: Model Surftest SJ – 301 36
3.8 Metallurgy Microscope 38
3.9 Flow chart for experiment procedure 39
4.6 Surface Texture Image of Workpiece for Cutting Speed 400 rpm 49
5.1 Surface Roughness versus Machining Time for Cutting Speed 100 rpm
52
5.2 Surface Roughness versus Machining Time for Cutting Speed 200 rpm
53
5.3 Surface Roughness versus Machining Time for Cutting Speed 300 rpm
53
5.4 Surface Roughness versus Machining Time for Cutting Speed 400 rpm
54
5.5 Surface Roughness versus Cutting Speed for 5 minutes machining
55
5.6 Surface Roughness versus Cutting Speed for 7.5 minutes machining
55
5.7 Surface Roughness versus Cutting Speed for 10 minutes machining
56
5.8 Surface Roughness versus Cutting Speed for 12.5 minutes machining
LIST OF TABLE
Table Description Page
2.1 General Characteristics of Cutting Fluid 9
2.2 Suitable type of cutting fluids depends to materials machining operation
11
2.3 Benefits of cutting fluid 14
2.4 Composition of Carbon steel AISI 1045 21
3.1 Gantt Chart Of The Study for Projek Sarjana Muda 1 (PSM 1) 28 3.2 Gantt Chart Of The Study for Projek Sarjana Muda 2 (PSM 2) 29
3.3 Milling Machine Specification 30
3.4 Cutting tool description 34
3.5 Parameters Setting 35
3.6 General specification of Mitutoyo Surface Roughness Tester 36
3.7 Experiment design 41
4.1 Surface Roughness Result for (FUCHS) Bacteriostatic Emulsifiable Coolant Mixed With Palm Oil
44
4.2 Surface Roughness Value, Ra for Variable Machining Time 45 4.3 Surface Roughness Value, Ra for Variable Cutting Speed 46
5.1 Surface Roughness Value for (FUCHS) bacteriostatic emulsifiable coolant mixed with palm oil and (FUCHS) bacteriostatic emulsifiable coolant only
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS, SIGNS, AND SYMBOLS
AISI - American Iron and Steel Institute BUE - built up edge
C - Carbon
Cu - Cooper
FKP - Fakulti Kejuruteraan Pembuatan HSS - high speed steel
in - inch
mm - millimetre (metric unit)
Mn - Manganese
P - Phosphorus PSM - Projek Sarjana Muda
Ra - arithmetic mean value (roughness average) Rpm - revolution per minute
Rq - root mean square average S - Sulfur
Si - Silicon
SEM - scanning electron microscopy
UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka USA - United State of America
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Cutting fluids that is also called as coolant or lubricant are widely utilized to
optimize the process of machining operations such as turning, milling, boring,
grinding, and drilling. Historically, cutting fluids have been used extensively for the
last 200 years. Today, it is estimated that over 100 million gallons of metalworking
oil are used each year in the United States, and the volume of cutting fluids used is
many times that of metalworking oil (Dilek Senay, 2001).
Nowadays, cutting fluids are very important in machining processes. It is used
extensively in machining as well as abrasive machining processes. It is used to
reduce the detrimental effects of heat and friction on both tool and workpiece (Lopez
de Lacalle, 2004). Cutting fluids are also used to carry away the heat in machining
operations. This excessive heat can bring damage to the microstructure of metals.
The metal removal rates can be increase by proper use of coolants. Another benefit
of cutting fluid is to improve part quality and dimensional accuracy.
According to Kalpakjian (2001), the effectiveness in cutting operation depends on
several numbers of factors such as the method used to apply the cutting fluid,
temperature encountered, cutting speed and type of machining process. In machining,
the energy that expended in cutting is transformed into heat. The deformation of the
metal to create chips and the friction of the chip sliding across the cutting tool
produce heat. The primary function of cutting fluids is to cool the tool, work piece,
adhesion on the contact edges that causes a built-up edge on the cutting tool or insert.
Cutting fluids also help prevent rust and corrosion and flush chips away.
There is a wide variety of cutting fluids available today. Many new coolants have
been developed to meet the needs of new materials, new cutting tools, and new
coatings on cutting tools. The most common cutting fluids used today belong to one
of two categories are oil-based fluids including straight oils and soluble oils and
chemical fluids including synthetics and semi synthetics. Proper selection and use of
cutting fluids can help to get good result in surface machining.
However, the usage of cutting fluid can also cause problem in a few cases. The direct
contact of machines operator with cutting fluids may cause skin respiratory diseases.
So now, new development is done to produce the friendly environmental cutting
fluid. This type of cutting fluid use the vegetable oil based as compound in cutting
fluid. It avoids the already problem those come from conventional cutting fluid.
Now, the development of palm oil to be a cutting fluid is done. However, it just
reached to the early stages. There are still more improvement must be done to
achieve it.
This research is conducted to analyze the performance between pure oil based
coolant and combination of oil-based coolant with palm oil on cutting surface in
milling operation. The evaluations are defined from the experiment outcomes. All the
findings from this study will prove that whether palm oil is suitable for use as cutting
1.2 Problems Statements
The problems that be based on this study are:
i. There are limited studies or information that exists regarding to the issue of
the palm oil as the cutting fluid in milling operation.
ii. The current coolants are harmful to the operator compared to the new formula
coolant based on vegetable oil (organic) like palm oil which is environmental
friendly.
iii. There have no study proving that whether palm oil is a suitable solution to
mix with coolant. What happened if both of them are mixed?
1.3 Objectives of Project
In recognition the importance of coolant in machining, this project is tried to achieve
the following objectives:
i. To study the performance between pure oil based coolant and combination of
oil based coolant with palm oil on cutting surface in milling operation.
ii. To analyze the surface roughness and observe the surface texture of the
surface machining that was produced on the workpiece from the usage of the
oil-based coolant mix with palm oil and relating them with the parameters
involves.
iii. To compare and identify the best coolant between the oil-based coolant and
the combination of oil-based coolant with palm oil in the aspect of surface
1.4 Scope of Project
This project is done to analyse the coolant application in milling operation in
Manufacturing Laboratory of UTeM. The coolant to be used in this project is a
bacteriostatic emulsifiable cutting oil. The bacteriostatic emulsifiable cutting oil has
mixed with pure palm oil. This coolant afterwards is applied in face milling
operation. All machining processes performed on carbon steel AISI 1045 with
several parameters which are time of machining and cutting speed. This study will be
focusing on the surface of machining consist of the surface roughness and surface
texture. All of the samples will be analyzed using surface roughness tester and
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Cutting Fluid
Cutting fluids play a critical role on metallic surfaces in cutting and forming
operations. During the machining processes of a metal, a considerable quantity of
heat is generated. It happens mainly due to the high plastic deformation in the
primary shear zone and also to the friction of the chip on the surface. The condition
of friction and temperature will cause tool wear. It also results in a poor surface
finish and incorrect dimension. Cutting fluids are used to reduce the detrimental
effects of heat and friction on both tool and workpiece. The cutting fluid produces
three positive effects in the process whish are heat elimination, lubrication on the
chip and tool interface, and chip removal (López de Lacalle et al., 2006). A cutting
fluid's effectiveness depends on factors such as the method used to apply the cutting
fluid, temperatures encountered, cutting speed, and type of machining process
(Kalpakjian, 1991). A fluid's cooling and lubrication properties are critical in
decreasing tool wear and extending tool life. Cooling and lubrication are also
important in achieving the desired size, finish and shape of the workpiece.
2.1.1 Principle of Cooling and Lubrication
Cooling give influences to machining in various ways. At the contact between the
chip and tool, cooling can reduce the chip temperature. It also affects directly the
friction force between the chip and tool. However, contact pressures are so high that
Cooling is mainly indirect via modified conduction through the chip. For the cutting
edge, the coolant always plays a major role in maintaining the machined material at
ambient temperature.
As coolers, cutting fluids decrease cutting temperature through the heat dissipation
(cooling). When water based fluids are used, cooling is more important than
lubrication. It was experimentally proved (Shaw, et al., 1951) that the cutting fluid
efficiency in reducing temperature decreases with the increase of cutting speed and
depth of cut.
As lubricant, the cutting fluid works to reduce the contact area between chip and tool
and its efficiency depends on the ability of penetrating in the chip-tool interface and
to create a thin layer in the short available time. This layer is created by either
chemical reaction or physical adsorption and must have a shearing resistance lower
than the resistance of the material in the interface. In this way it will also act
indirectly as a coolant because it reduces heat generation and therefore cutting
temperature (Sales et al., 2001).
2.1.2 Cooling Ability of Cutting Fluids
Aiming to classify the main cutting fluids based on their cooling ability, Sales (1999)
developed a methodology which consisted in heating a standard workpiece and
monitoring the cooling curve of it. This workpiece was fixed to the clutch of jigs and
rotated at 150 rpm and its temperature was measured using an infrared sensor. The
data acquisition started when the workpiece temperature reached 300°C and the
measurement continued up to room temperature. Emulsions and synthetic fluids were
applied using a concentration of 5%. Synthetic fluids are containing water and
additives. The synthetic oil 1 is different from synthetic oil 2 due to small variations
Figure 2.1: Cooling curves of all fluids experiment (Sales, 1999).
The cooling ability in crescent order is dry cutting, neat, oil emulsion, synthetic-2,
water and synthetic-1. The fact that synthetic oil 1 presented a cooling ability greater
than water, which theoretically has greater convection ability, was a surprise. A
deeper analysis of the curves behavior in high temperature showed that water
presented lower cooling ability even than synthetic oil 2 and neat oil (Sales et al.,
2001).
The explanation of these results may be found on the phenomenon occurring when a
fluid like water, with low ebullition point (100°C), starts contacting a body in high
temperatures. At this moment the quick heat transfer causes the liquid evaporation.
This process reduces a little the hot body temperature, but the vapor forms a barrier
preventing fresh volume of liquid, from reaching its surface and, therefore, decreases
the heat transfer efficiency. Another important factor is the fluid wet ability, which is
regularly higher for cutting fluids than for water. The higher wet ability of the cutting
fluid implies in less splashing action and therefore a greater chance for heat exchange
(Sales et al., 2001).
2.1.3 Types of Cutting Fluids
The main types of cutting fluids fall into two categories based on their oil content:
• Oil-Based Fluids - including straight oils and soluble oils
• Chemical Fluids - including synthetics and semi-synthetics
2.1.3.1 Straight Oil
Straight oils are non-emulsifiable and are used in machining operations in an
undiluted form. They are composed of a base mineral or petroleum oil and often
contain polar lubricants such as fats, vegetable oils and esters as well as extreme
pressure additives such as Chlorine, Sulphur and Phosphorus. Straight oils provide
the best lubrication and the poorest cooling characteristics among cutting fluids
(Boothroyd and Knight, 2006).
2.1.3.2 Soluble Oil
Soluble Oil Fluids form an emulsion when mixed with water. The concentrate
consists of a base mineral oil and emulsifiers to help produce a stable emulsion. They
are used in a diluted form (usual concentration = 3 to 15%) and provide good
lubrication and heat transfer performance. They are widely used in industry and are
the least expensive among all cutting fluids (Boothroyd and Knight, 2006).
2.1.3.3 Synthetic Fluid
Synthetic Fluids contain no petroleum or mineral oil base and instead are formulated
from alkaline inorganic and organic compounds along with additives for corrosion
inhibition. They are generally used in a diluted form (usual concentration = 3 to
10%). Synthetic fluids often provide the best cooling performance among all cutting
2.1.3.4 Semi-synthetic Fluid
Semi-synthetic fluids are essentially combination of synthetic and soluble oil fluids
and have characteristics common to both types. The cost and heat transfer
performance of semi-synthetic fluids lay between those of synthetic and soluble oil
fluids (Boothroyd and Knight, 2006).
Table 2.1: General Characteristics of Cutting Fluid (Nachtman and Kalpakjian, 1985).
Function Straight oils Soluble Oil Synthetic Fluids