• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

INCREASING STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING ABILITY THROUGH GUIDING QUESTIONS TECHNIQUE AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 PRINGSEWU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "INCREASING STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING ABILITY THROUGH GUIDING QUESTIONS TECHNIQUE AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 PRINGSEWU"

Copied!
70
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

0

INCREASING STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING

ABILITY THROUGH GUIDING QUESTIONS TECHNIQUE AT

THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE

OF SMP NEGERI 5 PRINGSEWU

(A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

By SUKENDAR

Submitted in a Partial Fulfillment of The Requirement for S-1 Degree

In

The Language and Arts Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty

LAMPUNG UNIVERSITY BANDAR LAMPUNG

(2)

CURRICULUM VITAE

The writer’s name is Sukendar. He was born in Lampung Selatan, July 25th 1966. He is the second son of harmonious couple Mad Sodri and Sutijem. He has two

daughters named Ayu Pratikta Sari and Ivana and a son named Aditya Dwi

Setyadi. He entered SD N 1 Sidoharjo in 1974. Having graduated from the

Elementary School in 1980, he went to SMP Persiapan Pringsewu and graduated

in 1983. He finished his High School at SPG Xaverius Pringsewu and graduated

in 1986. He finished Diploma 2 of Lampung University in 1989.

In this year, he was registered as an S-1 dalam jabatan student of Lampung

University at English Education Program of Teacher Training and Education

Faculty in 2010, he carried on Teaching Practice Program (PPL) at SMPN 5

(3)

CONTENT List of Tables………... List of Appendices……….

i

A. Background of the Problem………. B. Formulation of the Problem………. C. Objectives of the Research………... D. Uses of the Research……… E. Scope of the Research……….. F. Definition of Terms………..

II. FRAME OF THEORIES

A. Concept Writing………... B. Concept of Paragraph Writing……….. C. Concept of Recount Text……….. D. Concept of Teacher’s Performance………... ….. E. Concept of Guiding Questions Technique……….…….. F. Correlation between Guiding Questions Technique and Recount

Text……….. G. Teaching Writing……….. H. Procedure of Teaching Recount Text through Guiding Questions. I. Advantages and Disadvantages of using Guiding Questions……..

III. METHOD OF CLSSROOM ACTION RESEARCH

A. Concept of Classroom Action Research………... B. Setting of the Research……….

(4)

C. Subject of the Research……… D. Research Procedure……….. E. Material and Teacher’s Training Procedure……... F. Indicator of the Research………. G. Instrument of the Research………... H. Data Analysis………...

IV. RESULT OF THE RESEARCH

A. Cycle I

V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

(5)

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendices

1. Example of Recount Text……… 2. Lesson Plan 1………... 3. Lesson Plan 2………... 4. Observation Sheet of Students Activities Cycle I ………... 5. Observation Sheet of Students Activities Cycle II ……….. 6. Teacher Observation Form Cycle I ………. 7. Teacher Observation Form Cycle II ……… 8. Result of Cycle I ………... 9. Result of Cycle II ……… 10. Surat Keterangan Mahasiswa ………... 11. Surat Keterangan Izin Penelitian ……….. 12. Surat Keterangan Telah Mengadakan Penelitian………. 13. The Example of Students’ Recount Text Writing ………

(6)

LIST OF TABLES

Tables

1. Marking Composition……… ……… 2. Specification of writing test………. 3. Students’ writing score Cycle I……… 4. Students’ score in each component of writing at Cycle I……… 5. Observation format result in cycle I……… 6. Observation format result in cycle II ...……… 7. Students’ score in each component of writing at Cycle I and Cycle II… 8. Observation format result in Cycle I and Cycle II ...………. 9. Graph of students' writing score in cycle I and II……… 10. Students’ score in each component of writing at Cycle 1 and Cycle II….. 11. The students’ activity score in cycle I and cycle II………. 12. Aspects teacher’s performance developed by guiding questions

technique at cycle I and cycle II………. 13. Figure 2 The Cycle of Classroom Action Research ……….

(7)

MOTTO

(8)

ADMITTED BY

1.

Examination Committee

Chairperson : Hery Yufrizal, M.A., Ph.D.

...

Examiner : Drs.

Basturi Hasan, M.Pd.

.

...

Secretary : Budi Kadaryanto, S.Pd., M.A. ...

2.

The Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty

Dr. H. Bujang Rahman, M.Si.

NIP 19600315 198503 1 003

(9)

DEDICATION

The script is proudly dedicated to:

His beloved parents who keep on praying for my success and life

His beloved wife

His beloved daughters and son

His beloved friends

(10)

Research Title : INCREASING STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING ABILITY THROUGH GUIDING QUESTIONS TECHNIQUE AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 PRINGSEWU

Student’s name : SUKENDAR

Student’s number : 1013107008

Department : Language and Arts Education

Program Study : English Education

Faculty : Teacher Training and Education

APPROVED BY

Advisory Committee

Advisor 1 Advisor 2

Hery Yufrizal, M.A., Ph.D. Budi Kadaryanto, S.Pd., M.A.

NIP 19600719 198511 1 001 NIP 19810326 200501 1 002

The Head of Language and Arts Education Department

Drs. Imam Rejana, M.Si.

(11)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Alhamdulillah, praise to Allah SWT the Beneficent and Merciful, Who has given mercies, blessing, and everything to the writer in finishing his script, entitled

“Increasing Students’ Recount Text Writing Ability through Guiding Writing in

the Form of Guiding Questions Technique at the First Semester of the Eighth Grade of SMPN 5 Pringsewu”. This script is submitted as compulsory fulfillment of requirement for SI degree of English departement at Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Lampung University. It is necessary to be known that this script would never have come into existence without any supports, encouregement, and assistence by serveral outstanding people and institutions. Therefore. The writer would like to address his respect and gratitude to the following:

1. Hery Yufrizal, M.A., Ph.D., as his first advisor who has guided the writer

patiently in writing the script. His deep gratitude is also extended to Budi Kadaryanto, S.Pd., M.A., as his second advisor, who has given him expertise and guidance in writing this scientific script and invaluable teaching experience.

2. Drs. Basturi Hasan, M.Pd., as his examiner who has given suggestion and

critics to the script. It will be hard for the writer to make the script becomes perfect without his contributions.

3. Dra. Siti Tatiana., as the Headmaster of SMPN 5 Pringsewu for allowing

(12)

4. Prof. Dr. Patuan Raja, M.Pd., as the writer’s academic advisor.

5. Prof. Dr. Cucu Sutarsyah, M.A., the Head of English Study Program.

6. Drs. Imam Rejana, M.Si., the Chairperson of Language and Arts Education

Department.

7. Drs. Bujang Rahman, M.Si., the Dean of Teacher Training and Education

Faculty.

8. Drs. Imam Rejana, M.Si., the Chairperson of Language and Arts Education

Departement.

9. All lectures in English Department for their invaluable teaching.

10. The writer beloved parents Mad Sodri and Sutijem. Thanks for their

patience and willingness to wait for the writer’s gradution. His sincere thanks and love are also dedicated to his children; Ayu Pratikta Sari, Aditya Dwi Setyadi, and Ivana.

11. My beloved comrades Eng’10 of English Departement. His thankfulness is

also due to his discussion group; Amat Fatoni, Sukisman, Akhilah, Kuswoyo, Dedi, Herlina.

12. Anyone that cannot be mentioned directly or indirectly who has helped the

writer in completing this script. The writer does appreciate any opinion and suggestion for the improvement of this script,

Bandar Lampung, March 2012 The writer,

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)

REFERENCES

Angelo, T. and Cross, P. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: Second Edition. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass.

Bramer, George. 1981. Writing for Readers. Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing

Co.

Brown, Douglas. 2000. Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to

Language Pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley, Longman Inch.

Byrne, Donn. 1988. Teaching Oral English. New Jersey: Longman Group

Limited.

Coffey, Margaret Pogemiller. 1987. Communication Trough Writing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Corey, S. 1953. Action Research Improve School Practice. New York: Teachers’ College, Columbia University.

Mc. Crimmon and James, M. 1984. Writing with Purpose. New York: Mifflin Company.

Davies, K. Ivor. 1981. Instructional Concerns. Washington, D.C: Mc Graw- Hill, Inc.

Derewianka, Beverly. 1990. Exploring How Texts Work. Sidney: Primary English Teaching Association.

Diharyono, S. 1990. Teaching Writing through Story to Improve Students’ Writing Ability. Bandar Lampung. Lampung University Press.

Edelstein, M. and Pival, E. 1998. The Writing Commitment. New York: Harcourt Broce Javanovich Publisher.

(68)

Finnochiaro, Mary and Banomo M. 1973. The Foreign Language Learning a Guide for Teacher. New York: Regent Publishing Company.

Gale. J.A. 1974. Group Work in School. Sydney: Mc. Graw – Hill Company Australia Pty. Limited.

Hallen, A. 2003. Bimbingan & Konseling. Jakarta: Quantum Teaching Publisher

Harris, David. 1969. Testing English as Second Language. New York: Grow Hill Inch.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2005. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York:

Grow Hill Press.

Hedge, Tricia. 1988. Resource Book fo Teacher Writing. New York: Oxford University Press

Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Current English:

University Press. New York.

Jacobs, Holly D., Zinkgraf S.A., Wormuth D.R., HartfielV.F ., and Hughey J.B. 1981. Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Tokyo:

Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Juwitasari, Ratna. 2005. Increasing Students’ Descriptive Writing through CTL.

Lampung University: Unpublisher Paper.

Kemmis, S., and Mc. Taggart. R.1982. The Action Research Planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Kemmis, S. 1982. The Action Research Planner. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University Press.

Keraf, Gorrys. 1982. Exposition and Description. Jakarta: Nusa Indah.

Lado, Robert. 1964. Language Teaching. Bombay: TATA Mcgraw – Hill Publishing. Co. Ltd.

Liberti, D. 2006. Improving Students’ Coherency in Writing Paragraph through Transitional Signal at the First Year of SMA N 2 Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Unpublished Script.

Linderman, Erika. 1983. A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

(69)

Mills. T. 1967. The Sociology of Small Group. New Jersey: Hall. Inc. Englewood Cliff.

Murcia, Marine C. 1978. Testing English as Second of Foreign Language. London: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Noprianto, E. 2007. Developing the First Year Students Narrative Paragraph Writing Ability through Guided Writing at SMAN 9 Bandar Lampung. Lampung University: Unpublished Script.

Oja, S. N., and Pine, G.J. 1989. Collaborative Action Research: Teachers’ Stages of Development and School Contexts. Peabody Journal of Education, 64(2), 96 – 115. EJ 396 002.

Oliver, Robert.T., Zelko H.P., and Holtzman P.D. 1962. Communicative Speech: Third Edition, New York: Hold, Renehart and Winston, Inc.

Oshima A. and Hoque A. 1990. Writing Academic English: a Writing and Sentence Structure Workbook for International Students. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publisher, Inc.

Pasaribu, Il. and Simanjuntak, E. 1982. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung:

Penerbit Tassito.

Raimes, Ann.1983. Technique in Teaching Writing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Setiyadi, Ag. Bambang. 2000. Penelitian Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Asing. Bandar Lampung: University Lampung Press.

Tarigan, Guntur. 1987. Menulis Sebagai Suatu Ketrampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

Trykas, Lynn Qutman. 1987. Handbook for Writer. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. Englewood Cliff.

Universitas Lampung. 2006. Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Lampung:

Lampung University Press.

Weissberg, Robert.1988. English Teaching Forum. Volume XXI, number 3 Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Wikipedia. 2006. Syntax, www.goegle.com. (Accessed in November 8 th, 2006)

(70)

Yuwono, Iwan. 1994. Developing Students’ Ability in Writing Recount Text through Guiding Questions Technique at the Second Year Students of SMPN 1 Terbanggi Besar Lampung Tengah. Lampung University: Unpublished Script.

Zamel, Vivian. 1985. Technique and Procedure in Second Language Teaching. Quezon: Quezon City Alenar Phonix Publishing House Inc.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Tujuan : untuk mengetahui manfaat penatalaksanaan fisioetrapi berupa terapi latihan dalam mengurangi nyeri, mengurangi oedem, meningkatkan lingkup gerak sendi, meningkatkan

[r]

Otot yang bekerja pada proses kelahiran adalah otot polos dan otot lurik di. bagian serviks serta bagian lain yang menunjang

(TrikoCombiG dan Trico-G) mampu menekan intensitas serangan penyakit JAP pada saat pengamatan 90 hari setelah aplikasi (HSA) sampai 120 HSA secara nyata dibandingkan dengan

Hasil perawatan pada hari ketiga, minggu keempat dan minggu kedelapan memperlihatkan luka bekas operasi sudah menyembuh dan tidak ada tanda - tanda terjadinya

Dengan demikian yang dimaksud dengan judul di atas adalah pelaksanaan Active Learning dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam, cara yang sistematik, menarik dan

Pembuktian Kualifikasi terhadap peserta Calon Daftar Pendek Jasa Konsultansi Penyusunan Dokumen Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang yang dilaksanakan tanggal 02 April 2014,

Hal ini dikarenakan dengan jumlah murid yang sedikit dalam satu kelas membuat guru bisa total dalam memberikan perhatian kepada murid ketika mengajar.. Para murid