• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Liquefaction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Liquefaction"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Liquefaction

(2)

Mechanism of Liquefaction

Dry loose sand

Saturated loose sand

Water table

Compaction

PWP increase

in undrained condition (teq<tdiss)

Very loose sand:

Void s

Solid

1/2

1/2

Very Dense sand: Void

s

Solid

1/3

(3)

Excess Pore Water Pressure Generation

Pore water

pressure, Δu

Time

I itial Effe tive over urde stress, σvo'

(4)

Step for Evaluation of Liquefaction (NSPT procedure)

1. Determine the (N1)60 value for

every depth of sand layer

Nm = measured NSPT

CE = energy ratio correction factor CB = borehole diameter corr. factor CR = rod length corr. factor

(5)

Evaluation of Liquefaction (NSPT procedure)

2. Find Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)

τ y = cyclic shear stress

a max = acc. max at ground surface

σv = total overburden stress

σv‘ = effective overburden stress rd = stress reduction factor

Idriss (1999), Golesorkhi (1989):

depth in meter

Source: Kramer (1996)

(6)

Evaluation of Liquefaction (NSPT procedure)

3. Find Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR)

MSF = Magnitude scaling factor (N1)60cs = equiv. clean-sand SPT

Kσ = Overburden correction factor

Pa = at ≈ kPa

(Idriss, 1999)

(Boulanger and Idriss, 2004) (Boulanger and Idriss, 2004)

≤ 37

(7)

Evaluation of Liquefaction (NSPT procedure)

Magnitude Scaling Factor (MSF)

Source: Kramer (1996)

(8)

Spreadsheet (NSPT procedure)

(9)

Step for Evaluation of Liquefaction (CPT procedure)

1. Determine the (qc1) value for every

depth of sand layer

qc = measured cone resistance (kPa or Mpa) qc1 = corr. cone resistance (kPa or Mpa)

qc1N = normalized corr. Cone resistance

Pa = atmospheric pressure = 1 atm = 101 kPa

CN = overburden corr. Factor (Liao and Whitman, 1986)

2. Find Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)

(10)

Evaluation of Liquefaction (CPT procedure)

3. Find Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR)

(Idriss, 1999)

(Boulanger and Idriss, 2004) (Boulanger and Idriss, 2004)

211

(11)

Settlement

Liquefiable Soil

Data:

a max ground = 0.2g

γsa d = 8 kN/ 3

(12)
(13)

Home Work

From Das 1993:

10.2, 10.6, 10.8, 10.10

From Kramer:

Referensi

Garis besar

Dokumen terkait

Figure 7a presents the liquefaction potential in terms of percent depth of liquefied layers for selected sites in Yogyakarta and Padang (H L /H, where H L =4. depth of

Then record the time it takes for the soil to liquefy (Figure 1c). The relationship between the fines content and time to liquefaction is also observed in this research

Grain Size Distribution of Silica Sand and the Liquefaction Potential Curve 25 Precipitation Test Precipitation tests using a transparent tube are conducted to evaluate the

Furthermore, this study computed the geospatial liquefaction probability model using the locations of sand boil and the influencing factors reflecting the ground motion intensities and

Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of empty fruit bunch in subcritical water over bimetallic modified zeolite ABSTRACT Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of empty fruit bunch

Figure 10 Grain Size Distribution of Layer V after Zhou, 1981 The above case histories illustrate liquefaction of silty soils, and further the applicability of using clay content as a

In this research, a random finite element analysis is used for reliability assessment of static liquefaction potential of loose sand under monotonic loading.. The Monte Carlo simulation

ISSN: 2599-3356 Liquefaction Analysis Based on Liquefaction Potential Index Method in Prambanan Temple Complex of Jogjakarta Lisa Fitriyana1* and Bayu Prasetyo Afandi2 1Civil