t ling 1004711 bibliography

(1)

E. Wityasminingsih, 2012

Prepresentasi Religiusitas Hisanori Kato dalam telaah Islam Fundamentalis dan Liberal di Indonesia (Analisis Wacana Kiritis pada Bagian Introduction Buku Hisanori Kato)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu

PUSTAKA RUJUKAN

Alwasilah, A.C. 2009. Pokoknya Kualitatif, Dasar-dasar Merancang (cet) Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya

Abdullah. 2004. Tafsir Ibnu Katsir, Jilid 6. Jakarta: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’i

Abdul Hamid bin Abdul Majid, Mudzakarati As-Siyasiyah, hal. 133, 177, Beirut: Muasasah Ar-Risalah, 1406 H.

Amin, Muhammad. 2004. Studi Agama Normativitas atau Historitas?

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004

Barker, Chris, Cultural Sudies, Teori & Praktik, 2004. Kreasi Wacana: Bantul

Burhan, Nurgiyantoro. 1998. Teori Pengkajian Sastra. Bulaksumur. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

Brown, G. dan Yule, G. 1983. Discouse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dardjowidjoyo, Soedjono. 2003. Psikolinguistik. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

Eriyanto 2003. Analisis Framing: Konstruksi Ideologi dan Politik Media, Yogyakarta: LKIS

Eriyanto 2011. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media, Yogyakarta: LKIS

Fairclough, N. dan Wodak, R. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis”, dalam van Dijk, T.A. (ed) Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage Publication

Fiske, J. 1990. Introduction to Communication Studies, Second Edition. London: dan New York: Routledge

Foucoult, M. 1981. “The Order of Discourse” dalam Young, R. (ed) Untying the Text: A Poststructuralist Reader. London: RKP

Glock, C.Y. 1962.On the study of religious commitment. Religious Education, 57(Research Suppl.), S98-S110.

(2)

Keraf, Gorys. 1991. Tata Bahasa Rujukan Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Halliday, M. A. K dan Hassan, R. 1979. Cohession in English, London dan New York: Longman

Kato, Hisanori, 2002. “Agama dan Peradaban”. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat

Kato, Hisanori, 2011. “The Clash of Ijtihad Fundamentalist versus Liberal Muslim: The Development of Islamic Thinking in Contemporary Indonesia”. Delhi: ISPCK

Koentjaraningrat, 1975. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia

Koentjaraningrat, 1981. Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia

Kuntowijoyo, 1998. Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi untuk Aksi, Bandung: Mizan

Knott, Kim, 2005. Insider/Outsider Perspectives, dalam The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Edited by John R. Hinnells (London: Routledge Taylor and Fancis Group

Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Latif, Yudi, "Politik Islam Antara Dua Fundamentalisme", Koran Tempo, Jumat, 27 Desember 2002.

Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H.,&Janssens, M. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory crosscultural research in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 167-214.

Macksood Aftab, "What Does Fundamentalism Really Mean?"

Diakses dari http://www. themodernreligion.com/terror/def-fundy.html

(diunduh 22/02/2012, jam 22:10)

Martin, Richard C. 2010, Perdekatan Terhadap Islam dalam Studi Agama, terjemahan Zakiyuddin Baidhowy, Yogyakarta:UIN Sunan Kalijaga Press

Mohammed Arkoun, “Lectures du Coran”, diterjemahkan oleh Machasin dengan

judul, Berbagai Pembacaan al-Qur’an (Jakarta: INIS, 1997), 9.

(3)

Nababan, S. U. S., 1998. Psikolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Pennington, Donald. C, Gillen, Kate, & Hill, Pam,1999. Social Psychology, Arnold: London

Padden, W. E. 1988. Religious worlds: The comparative study of religion. Boston, MA: Beacon.

Pargament, K. I. 1997. The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford

Samovar, Larry A, Porter, Richard. E., McDaniel, Edwin R., (2010) Komunikasi Lintas Budaya (Communication Between Cultures), Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Schultz, P.W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behavior: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 540-558.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92-116

Smart, N. (1998). The world’s religions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, H. (1991). The world’s religions. New York: HarperCollins.

Subagyo, P. A. 2012, “Bingkai Wacana dalam Tajuk tentang Terorisme: Kajian Pragmatik Kritis atas Editorial Suara Pembaharuan dan Republika”.

Disertasi di Fakutas Ilmu Budaya (FIB) UGM

Stuart Hall (Ed.), 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations dan Signifying Practices, London: Sage Publications

The Earl of Cromer, Modern Egypt, Vol. II, p. 228-229, New York: Macmillan, 1908.

(4)

Thompson, John B. 1984, Studies in the Theory of Ideology, Barkeley Los Angeles: University of California Press

van Dijk, T. A. 1990. Social Cognition and Discourse”. Dalam H. Giles dan W. P Robinson (eds). Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, hlm 163-186

van Dijk, T.A. 1996. “Discourse, Power and Access” dalam C.C. Coulthart dan M. Coulhard (eds) Texts and Practices: Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, hlm 84-104

van Dijk, T.A. 2003. “The Discourse-Knowledge Interface” dalam G. Weiss dan R. Wodak (eds). 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdiciplinarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, hal 85-109

van Dijk, T.A. 2005. “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production: A CDA Perspective.” Dalam R. Wodak dan P. Chilton (eds)

2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, hal 71-100.

van Dijk. T.A. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press.

Wodak, R (2004). “Critical Discourse Analysis” dalam Searle, C. Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage