30th IAS
MANCHESTER
International Association of Sedimentologists
The University of Manchester and The City of Manchester
are pleased to welcome you to:30th IAS MEETING OF
SEDIMENTOLOGY
2nd - 5th September 2013
Welcome to the 3oth IAS Meeting of Sedimentology, held at the
University of Manchester in the United Kingdom, under the auspices of
the International Association of Sedimentologists.
These proceedings contain all the abstracts of the presentations that
appear at the conference.
They are arranged in folders by session under 9 themes, namely:
• Theme 1: Resources
• Theme 2: Climate and Earth Surface Environments in Deep Time
• Theme 3: Marine and Coastal Depositional Environments
• Theme 4: Continental Depositional Environments
• Theme 5: Basin Analysis
• Theme 6: Impact of Glacial Processes on Sedimentation
• Theme 7: Post-Depositional Modification of Clastic and Carbonate
•
Sediments
• Theme 8: Prediction and Visualization of Sedimentary Processes and
•
Systems Through Modelling
• Theme 9: Sedimentology at the Biological Interface
The
Programme Overview
provides an outline of when each session will
be held during the conference.
The abstracts can be viewed by exploring the folders on this USB stick
using a file manager. Each abstract has a name that combines the
theme and session number, with a prefix to discriminate poster from
oral presentations, and finally a number that indicates the run order in
the case of oral presentations, or poster board number in the case of
poster presentations.
T1S2_O4
Reservoir Characterization of Mid Main Carbonate (MMC) interval in Cipadati Field (North West Java Basin, Indonesia) to Support Detailed Reservoir Zonation
Winardi, S.1, Toha, B.1, Suryono, S.S.1, Prasetya, I. 2
1
Dept of Geological Eng-UGM, Jl. Grafika No 2, Yogyakarta-55281, Indonesia (winards@yahoo.com)
2
PT. Pertamina EP, Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio No. 164, Jakarta Selatan-12950, Indonesia
Generally the MMC is known as a carbonate build up interval in the North West Java Basin, Indonesia, which contains hydrocarbons in some fields such as Rengasdengklok and North Cilamaya. In the Cipadati Field the MMC was drilled by the Explo#1 well and had a thickness of 79 meters. Previously the MMC was assumed to be a homogeneous carbonate reservoir, so petrophysical values gained from the Explo#1 well were used as default values along the entire interval. Further characterization of the MMC is needed to gain a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of the reservoir including depositional stages, geometry, vertical facies changes, secondary pore types and porosity value. These parameters provided petrophysicists with the information necessary to divide the MMC reservoir into more detailed reservoir zones.
The most reliable data to characterize the reservoir is core data, however core is non-continuous through the interval so image logs were used as support data in the non-cored intervals. Well calibration was done using image logs, especially in combination with core, thin sections, cuttings and other log data. Lithological texture could be observed within the image logs, so, based on Dunham limestone classification the
lithofacies was identified. Seismic facies analysis, supported by well data, was also conducted to reveal the development of carbonate stages and their geometry during the formation of the MMC. The high resolution of the image log tool provided detailed observation of porosity types greater than 2.5 mm. The reservoir zonation was done based on lithofacies, pore types and porosity value.
The result of characterization shows that MMC is not a continuous single homogeneous carbonate but formed in 12 depositional stages. Externally the geometry of the MMC is of a carbonate buildup (classified as a skeletal mound carbonate), but internally the geometry of each stage varies from mound to sheet drape. Overall the MMC was deposited onto the shelf platform. The MMC in this area does not represent a reef build up. Various lithofacies are found ie alternation between wackstone and packstone in lower part and some shale interruption near the top of the interval. Secondary pore types which are observed along interval are vugular (isolated vugs, interconnected vugs, channeling vugs) and fracture porosity (open fracture and partially mineral filled fracture). The result of porosity calculation shows a variation between 5 and 19 percent. Based on its characteristic the reservoir can be divided into 19 zones (11 reservoir zones and 8 non-reservoir zones).
Acknowledgements
!
"
By :
Winardi, S.
1Toha, B.
1, Suryono, S.S.
1, Prasetya, I.
21
Dept of Geological Eng-UGM, Jl. Grafika No 2, Yogyakarta-55281, Indonesia
2
PT. Pertamina EP, Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio No. 164, Jakarta Selatan-12950, Indonesia
winards@yahoo.com
September 2013
Outline
Geological Background
Data & Analysis
Result & Discussion
Geological Background
3
(After TT Jabarut 1998 vide Pertamina, 2005)
BP study team, 1996
CIPADATI
MMC
MMC
MMC in Explo#1 well was assumed to be a single
homogeneous reservoir.
Previously, petrophysic analysis used
single/same parameter for whole interval.
All tested intervals of MMC were water bearing.
EXPLO#1
Carbonate build up (eq MMC) distribution in Rengasdengklok high (Pertamina, 2005)
(Pertamina, 2005)
Data & Analysis
FMI log data from Explo#1
well at MMC interval
(1444-1523 m depth).
Composite log
data (GR, SP
,
Resistivity, Density
&
Neutron
).
Petrophysic analysis from
previous study.
Cutting description log
Conventional core description
at 1454.71-1461.3 m depth
intervals.
14 samples of
side wall core
description.
5 thin section descriptions.
8 seismic lines across
Cipadati field.
Other wells data around study
area.
Result-1: Reservoir characteristic (Facies, Pore types,
Features of subaerial exposure & Depositional stages)
7
Image display of wackestone and packstone facies.
packstone
wackestone
Distribution of vertical facies unit of MMC in Explo#1
NO.
DEPTH (m)
THIKCNESS (m)
FACIES
1
1444 - 1455
11
Wackestone
2
1455 - 1456
1
Serpih
3
1456 – 1460,3
4,3
Packstone
4
1460,3 - 1460,7
0,4
Serpih
5
1460,7 - 1462,5
1,8
Packstone
6
1462,5 - 1462,7
0,2
Serpih
7
1462,7 - 1496.3
33,6
Packstone
8
1496.3 - 1501,8
5,5
Wackestone
9
1501,8 – 1510,5
8,7
Packstone
10
1510,5 – 1515,3
4,8
Wackestone
11
1515,3 – 1518,5
3,2
Packstone
12
1518,5 - 1523
4,5
Wackestone
911
fracture
vug
Feature of subaerial exposure
4 subaerial exposures are identified along MMC interval, at 1471.3, 1486, 1495, and 1507.8 m depth. High GR reading which is caused by the presence of paleosoil (filled secondary pore), as indicator of subaerial exposure.
Depositional Stages & Lateral Distribution
Result-2: Detailed Reservoir Zonation
15 POROSITY
TYPES
1 1444 - 1453.50 9.5 Wackestone Interconnected vug 2 1453.5 - 1457.00 3.5 non-reservoar
-3 1457 - 1458.00 1.0 Packstone Open fracture + interconnected vugs 4 1458 - 1466.00 8.0 non-reservoar
-5 1466 - 1468.00 2.0 Packstone Open fracture + channeling vugs 6 1468 - 1471.30 3.3 non-reservoar
-7 1471.3 - 1480.00 8.7 Packstone Interconnected vug 8 1480 - 1486.00 6.0 non-reservoar -9 1486 - 1493.50 7.5 Packstone Channeling vug 10 1493.5 - 1495.00 1.5 non-reservoar
-11 1495 - 1495.60 0.6 Packstone Partially interconnected vug 12 1495.6 - 1498.00 2.4 non-reservoar
-13 1498 - 1499.00 1.0 Wackestone Partly mineral filled fracture + vugs 14 1499 - 1507.80 8.8 non-reservoar
-15 1507.8 - 1509.00 1.2 Packstone Interconnected vug 16 1509 - 1510.50 1.5 Packstone Primer-intergranular 17 1510.5 - 1511.00 0.5 Wackestone Interconnected vug 18 1511 - 1515.00 4.0 Wackestone Open/partially healed fracture + vugs 19 1515 - 1523.00 8.0 non-reservoar
-ZONES DEPTH (m) THICKNESS (m) FACIES
Relation between porosity types and
cementation factor (m) equations
Vugular & fossilmoldic porosity, use Nugent (1984)
Vugular & oomoldic porosity, use Nurmi(1984)
Cementation factor (m) of reservoir zones of MMC in Explo#1
NO DEPTH (m) THICKNESS (m)Re-calculation result of Water Saturation (Sw) of MMC in Explo#1
1 1444 - 1453.50 9.5 0.12 1.46 1.5 0.07 0.99
CONCLUSIONS
1.
General reservoir characteristic of MMC in Cipadati Field:
Consist of some lithofacies of wackestone, packstone and shales.
Had some subaerial exposures, found at 1471.3, 1486, 1495 and 1507.8 m
depth.
MMC was formed in12 depositional stages and stage 1, 6, 10, 12 are penetrated
by Explo#1 well.
Both of intergranular primary porosity and secondary porosity types such as
vugular (isolated vugs, interconnected vugs, channeling vugs), fractures (open
fracture, partially mineral filled/healed fracture) are observed. Some dual
porosity of fractures-vugs system also found.
2.
MMC is not a single homogeneous reservoir, it consists of nineteen
(19) different characteristic zones. Eleven (11) zones are reservoir and
eight (8) of them are non-reservoir zones.
19
CONCLUSIONS
3.