• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Demographia World dan Urban Areas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "Demographia World dan Urban Areas"

Copied!
112
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Demographia

World Urban Areas

(2)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Demographia World Urban Areas (Introduction)

1

URBAN AREA LISTINGS

Table 1: Largest Urban Areas in the World

19

Table 2: Urban Areas by Land Area (Urban Footprint)

34

Table 3: Urban Areas by Urban Population Density

50

Table 4: Urban Areas by Geography (Including Selected under 500,000 Population)

66

SUMMARY TABLE

Table 5: Summary: Urban Areas Over 500,000

110

COVER PHOTOGRAPH

demographia.com/db-worldua-index.htm

Manila: Ortigas Business District (by Author)

DEMOGRAPHIA WORLD URBAN AREAS

12

th

ANNUAL EDITION

April 2016

(3)

RELATED PUBLICATIONS

Toward More Prosperous Cities: Framing Essay on Urban Policy

12th Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey

The Evolving Urban Form (Profiles of World Urban Areas)

A Question of Values: Middle-Income Housing Affordability and Urban Containment Policy

City Sector Model

(Urban Core & Suburban Small Area Analysis within US Metropolitan Areas

Demographia World Urban Areas

(Built-Up Urban Areas or Urban Agglomerations)

12th Annual Edition: April 2016

CONTENTS OF THIS SECTION

1.

Demographia World Urban Areas

2.

Revisions in the 12

th

Edition

3.

Distribution of Large Urban Area Population

4.

Built-Up Urban Areas: Definitional Issues

5.

Smaller Urban Areas (Under 500,000 Population)

6.

Geographical Notes

7.

Methodology

8.

Caution: Trend Analysis

9.

Cover Illustration: Ortigas, Manila

10.

Comments and Suggestions

1. DEMOGRAPHIA WORLD URBAN AREAS

Demographia World Urban Areas (Built-up Urban Areas or

Urban Agglomerations) is the only annually published inventory

of population, corresponding land area and population density

for urban areas with more than 500,000 population. Unlike

metropolitan area lists, Demographia World Urban Areas

applies a generally consistent definition to built-up urban

areas.

1

This report contains population, land area and population density for all 1,022 identified built-up urban

areas (urban agglomerations or urbanized areas) in the world with 500,000 or more population. The total

population of these urban areas is estimated at 2.12 billion, 53 percent of the world urban population in

2016.

2

A number of smaller urban areas are also listed. Overall, data is provided for 1,744 urban areas of all sizes,

which comprise a population of 2.27 billion people, 56 percent of the world urban population.

1

Other regularly published urban agglomeration lists do not contain consistently defined entities. They tend to mix

metropolitan areas, municipalities (parts of metropolitan areas) and urban areas (built up urban areas or

agglomerations). None of these lists include urban land area data. The United Nations list is unique in providing

notes that clarify the nature of its each of its listings (core cities, metropolitan areas, urban areas and others).

(4)

2. REVISIONS IN THE 12

th

EDITION

Revised Data: Highlights

New census data and estimates as well as later satellite imagery has led to some substantial revisions in

the 2016 edition of Demographia World Urban Areas. The most notable are indicated below:

The Mumbai built-up urban area has been expanded to incorporate the Bhiwandi, Kalyan and

Vasai-Virar urban areas. This is generally consistent with the definition of the Census of India, with

the exception that Demographia includes Bhiwandi.

A new estimate for Kinshasa has been developed, from 2014 data provided by the Institut National

de la Statistique of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The data was not sufficient,

however, to develop revised estimates for other built-up urban areas in the DRC.

A new population census ends more than 30 years since the last in Myanmar. Built-up urban area

estimates have been updated using this information.

The lower range population estimates for the Lagos built up urban area have been largely

confirmed by the Africapolis project (see Geographical Notes, below). There has been

considerable controversy about the population of Lagos for years and local governments had

claimed the census of Nigeria had severely under-counted its population. The new information is

generally consistent with the Nigerian federal government population data.

Demographia World Urban Areas has begun to use the Africapolis population and urban land area

data where available, considering them to be the closest approximation to national census data on

built-up urban areas. Africapolis data covers West African nations and most importantly, appears to

provide reliable data on the built-up urban areas of Nigeria, where official data has often been

challenged. The availability of the Africapolis data makes it unnecessary for Demographia World

Urban Areas to develop independent built-up urban area data in West Africa outside Nigeria, where

no difficulty in census data is indicated.

A new urban area of more than 5,000,000 residents has been identified by Africapolis, Onitsha,

Nigeria.

New population estimates are available for some larger municipalities (prefectures) in China.

Almost without exception, population growth has been well below projected levels, which are

largely based on United Nations forecasts. Population estimates for built-up urban areas with base

years before 2013 are likely to be high, as a result.

Later local government population estimates (2015) in China indicate a further slowing of

(5)

turnaround from the 650,000 annual population increase registered between the 2000 and 2010

censuses.

3

Revised Format

Tables have been simplified and reorganized. The population base, base year and estimates for built-up

urban areas with less than 500,000 population are shown in Table 4 only. Table 4 contains all urban areas

covered, in alphabetical order by Geography and built-up urban area name.

3. DISTRIBUTION OF WORLD POPULATION BY URBAN AREA SIZE AND CONTINENT

In recent years, the world

has become more than

one-half urban for the first

time in history (54.5

percent in 2016). Yet, it

would be a mistake to

believe that the world's

urban residents live in

settings similar to 5th

Avenue in New York or

within the fourth ring road

of Beijing or in inner Paris,

or for that matter in large

urban areas. Even in

urban settings that are not

particularly dense, such

as suburban areas.

Further, more than 70

percent of the world’s

population lives in urban

areas with less than 500,000 residents

4

or in rural areas (See: What is a Half-Urban World?

5

).

Approximately one quarter (23.9 percent) of the world population lives in urban areas of 1,000,000

population or more. Less than 30 percent (28.6 percent) lives in urban areas with 500,000 or more

population.

6

More than 70 percent of the world's population lives outside urban areas with 500,000 or more

residents (Figure 1).

7

3

Wendell Cox (2010), “The Evolving Urban Form: Shanghai

,” The New Geography,

http://www.newgeography.com/content/002283-the-evolving-urban-form-shanghai

4

The of urban areas under 100,000 is estimated by applying ratios from

, Making Room for a Planet of Cities

(Shlomo Angel, with Jason Parent, Daniel L. Civco, and Alejandro M. Blei) to the Demographia data.

5

Wendell Cox (2012), "What is a Half-Urban World,"

The New Geography

,

http://www.newgeography.com/content/003249-what-a-half-urban-world.

6

Caution is suggest in comparing categories with data from last year’s edition is not valid. Because urban areas shift

(generally upward) in population categories, the urban area components of each population category have changed.

7

The of urban areas under 100,000 is estimated by applying ratios from

, Making Room for a Planet of Cities

(6)

A slight majority of the

large urban area

population lives in

built-up urban areas

with between 4,000

and 10,000 persons

per square kilomter

(approximately 10,000

to 25,000 persons per

square mile).

Approximately

one-quarter live at higher

densities and one

quarter live at lower

densities (Figure 2)

More than one-half of

the population (53

percent) of large

built-up urban areas

(500,000 and over) are in Asia, living in 542 of the 1,022 large urban areas (Figure 3). The Asian areas

comprise 57 percent of the world’s large urban area population.

There are 36 megacities in the world (urban areas over 10 million population). A total of 79 urban areas are

indicated with 5,000,000 or more population.

4. BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS: DEFINITIONAL ISSUES

An urban area ("built-up urban area,"

8

urbanized area or urban agglomeration)

9

is a continuously built up

land mass of urban development that is within a labor market (metropolitan area or metropolitan region. An

urban area contains no rural land (all land in the world is either urban or rural). In some nations, the term

"urban area" is used, but does not denote an urban area as a built-up urban area.

10

An urban area is best thought of as the “urban footprint” --- the lighted area that can be observed from an

airplane (or satellite) on a clear night. National census authorities in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland,

France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States designate urban

8

"Built up urban area" is the new urban area term now used by National Statistics in the United Kingdom. It may be

the most descriptive short term for urban areas.

9

Called a "population centre" in Canada and an "urban centre" in Australia. The term "urban area" is used (or

translated into English) in China and New Zealand. However, in these countries "urban areas" extend well beyond

the built-up urban area and are thus more similar to metropolitan areas.

10

In China, sub-city or sub-regional districts called “shixiaqu” (

市辖区

) are sometimes referred to as urban areas.

(7)

areas. Except in Australia, the authorities use a minimum urban density definition of 400 persons per

square kilometer (or the nearly identical 1,000 per square mile in the United States).

By necessity, average data masks significant variations within urban areas. Within urban areas, urban

population densities can

range from below 400

per square kilometer

(1,000 per square mile),

particularly in North

American urban areas,

to over 1,000,000 per

square kilometer

(2,500,000 per square

mile) in informally

developed

neighborhoods

11

of

some Asian cities (such

as in Dhaka).

12

There are also

significant differences in

density variation within

built-up urban areas.

Average urban density

does not provide any information on such variations, nor can it be assumed that an urban area with a

higher average density will have higher neighborhood densities. For example, the population density of the

Phoenix urban area is more than half-again higher than that of the Boston urban area. Yet, the highest

population densities of Boston are at least five times that of the highest density areas in Phoenix. Moreover,

Boston has a far larger commercial core (“central business district” or “downtown”). The difference is that

the Phoenix suburbs are denser than the Boston suburbs. Higher density suburbs are also responsible for

making Los Angeles the most densely populated large urban area in the United States, despite its much

lower urban core densities relative to New York. This creates an irony that the city most associated with

urban dispersion (“urban sprawl”) in the United States is, in reality, the least dispersed (least “sprawling”).

Similarly, London and Athens have similar population densities. Yet, the core densities in Athens are

considerably higher than in London. The Athens suburbs, however, are among the least dense in the world.

The Essen-Dusseldorf and Milan urban areas have almost identical densities, yet core densities are

considerably higher in Milan. Demographia World Urban Areas defines the population and density of urban

footprints, regardless of their internal density profiles.

11

Called slums, shantytowns or favelas.

12

See: Wendell Cox, (2012), “The Evolving Urban Form: Dhaka,”

The New Geography

,

(8)

Urban Areas Contrasted with Metropolitan Areas

An urban area

(built-up urban area or

urban agglomeration)

is fundamentally

different from a

metropolitan area. A

metropolitan area is a

labor market. It

includes a principal

built-up urban area

(the largest urban

area in the

metropolitan area). It

also includes rural

areas and may

include additional,

smaller built-up urban

areas. Both rural

areas and built-up

urban areas outside

the principal built-up

urban area are considered “exurban” (Figure 4).

13

Urban areas draw employees from a labor market area larger than the area of continuous development.

For example, INSEE, the census authority of France defines the Paris urban area ("unité urbaine") as 2,845

square kilometers and the Paris metropolitan area (aire urbaine) as 17,100 square kilometers, indicating

that more than 80 percent of the land area is outside the Paris urban area. Similarly, in the United States,

the 52 metropolitan areas with more than 1,000,000 population had only 19 percent of land in urban use,

with the remainder of 81 percent being rural.

14

Because of the fundamental differences between urban areas (or urban agglomerations) and metropolitan

areas, population comparisons should be made only within the two categories, not between.

Metropolitan Area Densities

Metropolitan area densities can be calculated, but are of limited value and can produce misleading results.

This is because there are no international standards for delineating metropolitan areas, rendering them

non-comparable (at best) between nations. Among the least useful metropolitan areas for density

comparisons are those of the United States, where counties are used as the building blocks. The size of

counties in the United States varies up to 1,500 times and, as a result, metropolitan densities are principally

13

All land is that is not urban is considered rural.

14

Wendell Cox (2010), "Rural character in America's Metropolitan Areas

, The New Geography, "

(9)

reflective of the rural densities.. The most expansive metropolitan area in the United States is

Riverside-San Bernardino, at 27,300 square miles (71,000 square kilometers), not much smaller than Austria. Most of

this area is well beyond commuting range, which means that it is not a genuine labor market. The situation

is similar, but not as extreme in some other metropolitan areas of the United States. Metropolitan area

densities in the United States therefore cannot even be validly compared even among themselves.

Further, metropolitan densities should not be confused with urban densities. Urban densities can be

calculated only using urban populations and excluding populations of rural areas. All metropolitan areas

have rural areas and thus no metropolitan density measure can be a genuine urban density measure.

Urban Areas and Urban Extents Contrasted

In some cases, urban areas have virtually grown together, yet are still considered separate urban areas.

This report confines urban areas to a single metropolitan area (below) or labor market area. Continuous

urbanization that extends beyond individual labor markets (metropolitan areas) can be called "urban

extents."

What constitutes a particular metropolitan area is a matter of judgment and there are no generally accepted

international principles for delineating metropolitan areas (unlike urban areas). However, it is necessary to

“draw a line,” especially where adjacent urban areas have “grown together,” but remain essentially distinct

labor markets. For example, the following urban extents are composed of more than one urban area:

The coast of Japan from Tokyo-Yokohama to Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto has nearly “grown together.”

Yet, this ribbon of urbanization is far too large to be a single metropolitan area (labor market)

and thus considered to be multiple urban areas (an urban extent).

The Pearl River Delta urban areas of Shenzhen, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Jiangmen, Huizhou,

Zhuhai, Guangzhou and Foshan in China’s Guangdong province are very close to one-another

and in some cases the built-up urban areas are virtually adjacent. Yet, this is not considered a

single urban area there is not a single, unified labor market. Demographia World Urban Areas

considers Guangzhou and Foshan as a single urban area, because they have become more

economically integrated than the other urban areas. Each of the other areas in the Pearl River

Delta economic region is classified as a separate urban area. The urban extent also includes

Hong Kong. However, there is a second reason that Hong Kong is not a part of a Pearl River

Delta urban area --- there is border control between Hong Kong and Shenzhen that does not

permit the free exchange of labor.

The Yangtze River Delta contains at least 11 nearby (though not always adjacent) urban areas

stretching from Ningbo Shanghai, and Nanjing. This includes Ningbo, Shaoxing, Hangzhou,

Jiaxing, Shanghai, Kunshan, Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Zhenjiang and Nanjing. Some

sources consider this a single metropolitan area or even a single built-up urban area. It is

neither. Moreover, there is considerable rural territory between some, breaking up the

(10)

The same applies to the Northeastern "megalopolis" of the United States. The continuous

urban development that exists is has rural separations in some cases and each of the major

metropolitan areas represents a separate labor market. Thus virtually continuous urban areas

of the Northeast corridor are considered separate, including Hartford, New York, Philadelphia,

Baltimore and Washington.

International Urban Areas

Urban areas (and metropolitan areas) are confined to a single nation, unless there is virtual freedom of

movement (principally labor) between the adjacent nations. This is indicated by the lack of customs or

immigration facilities at borders, or the broad access to work permits for working in adjacent countries.

Currently, this condition is met only between some continental nations of the European Union. For

example, the Lille urban area is in both France and Belgium yet is considered a single urban area because

there is freedom of labor movement without trade, immigration or customs barriers. Treaty provisions

render Geneva (Switzerland)-Annemasse (France), Basel (Switzerland) along with suburban areas of

France and Germany as a single built-up urban area. Similarly, Milan together with Chiasso in Switzerland

is a single built-up urban area.

However, Detroit-Windsor El Paso-Ciudad Juarez and San Diego-Tijuana are not considered single urban

areas because of their border controls restricting the free movement of labor. As noted above, the

Shenzhen and Hong Kong urban areas, despite their adjacency, are also considered to separate because

of their international-style border controls.

Municipality (City or Commune)

An urban area is different from a municipality (also often called a city or a local government authority).

Municipalities have political boundaries that usually constitute only a part of the urban area. For example,

the city of Seoul represents less than one-half of the population (and a declining proportion) of the

Seoul-Incheon urban area, which extends well beyond the municipality. On the other hand, a municipality may be

considerably larger than an urban area and therefore contain considerable non-urban (or rural) territory.

Zaragoza, Spain is an example. A large part of the municipality of Mumbai is rural, composed of the Rajiv

Ghandi National Park and thus not included in the urban area.

The translated term "city" is generally used to denote sub-provincial (or in some cases provincial)

(11)

Combined Urban Areas

In the United States, metropolitan areas may be combined into combined statistical areas, which are, in

effect, larger metropolitan areas or metropolitan regions, with somewhat less stringent economic

interchanges (employment commuting).

15

Where the urban footprint (composing a single labor market)

materially extends beyond the metropolitan area to form a combined statistical area (CSA) Demographia

creates a combined built-up urban area. For example, the New York urban area stretches from the New

York metropolitan area, well into other parts of the New York combined statistical area (into the Bridgeport,

New Haven and Trenton metropolitan areas). These continuous urban areas are considered a combined

urban area.

In Canada, where the national census authority (Statistics Canada) also defines metropolitan areas, the

Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa metropolitan areas are also considered a single labor market and are

combined into a single combined urban area. While Canada does not designate combinations of

metropolitan areas, Statistics Canada has indicated that if criteria similar to that of the United States were

applied the Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa metropolitan areas could be combined.

16

Other metropolitan areas are combined in nations that do not report built-up urban area data. For example,

Guangzhou and Foshan, and Tehran and Karaj are combined because of strong transport links that make

commuting feasible.

COMBINED URBAN AREAS

Designated only in Nations Reporting Urban Agglomeration Data

NATION

COMBINED URBAN AREA & Constituent Urban Areas (Source Code “N”)

Canada TORONTO: Hamilton, Oshawa, Toronto

United States BOSTON: Boston, Nashua (NH)

United States CHICAGO, Chicago, Kenosha (WI), Round Lake Beach United States DALLAS-FORT WORTH: Dallas-Fort Worth, Denton, McKinney United States HOUSTON: Houston, Conroe

United States LOS ANGELES: Los Angeles, Riverside-San Bernardino, Mission Viejo

United States NEW YORK: Bridgeport (CT), New Haven (CT), New York, Trenton (NJ), Danbury (CT), Twin Rivers (NJ) United States ORLANDO: Kissimmee, Orlando

United States PHOENIX: Phoenix, Avondale, Buckeye

United States SAN FRANCISCO: Concord, Livermore, San Francisco, San Jose, Vallejo United States SEATTLE: Seattle, Bremerton, Indianola

A combined urban area consists of adjacent urban areas that are located within the same labor market area

5. SMALLER URBAN AREAS (LESS THAN 500,000 POPULATION)

Information is provided for some smaller urban areas. These urban areas are not representative of all

urban areas under 500,000. Smaller urban areas are shown (1) to indicate urban areas often shown by

international sources to be larger, (2) where national census authority data is produced for urban areas.

15

Metropolitan areas require a 25 percent employment interchange between constituent counties (US metropolitan

areas are no longer based on central municipalities, but now use "central counties"). Combined statistical areas

require a 15 percent employment interchange between adjacent metropolitan areas.

16

Statistics Canada (2008), “Defining and Measuring Metropolitan Areas: A Comparison between Canada and the

(12)

The first instance is relevant to China. The Chinese term "shi" is popularly translated as "city" in English.

Yet, "shi" does not denote urban. Chinese "shi" and equivalent terms are simply divisions of divisions of

provinces or province equivalent. China is divided into more than 3,000 "shi," most of which are primarily

rural (in land area), just as the United States is divided into more than 3,000 counties and France into more

than 30,000 communes, with most of their respective land areas typically being rural.

None of these divisions is inherently urban. Analysts often refer to Chinese "cities" of more than 1,000,000

population that have little urbanization. For example, Laibin is a "shi" in Guanxi, with more than 2 million

residents. The local authorities have designated an urban area of more than 900,000 population. Yet the

urbanization of Laibin is estimated at less than 100,000 residents.

This year's edition shows smaller urban areas in Table 4. Tables 1, 2 and 3 contain information only on the

larger urban areas (500,000 and over population).

6. GEOGRAPHICAL NOTES

Larger Geographical Areas

West Africa:

Demographia World Urban Areas uses base population data (2010) from Africapolis, where

available (West Africa).

17

Africapolis uses various techniques, including an analysis of satellite photographs

to develop population estimates for built-up urban areas in West Africa. Moreover, the urban are definition

used by Africapolis is consistent with the general approach by Western European governments that define

built-up urban areas. The Africapolis data is particularly useful in West Africa, where most national

statistical authorities (like those of most nations) do not report urban agglomeration data.

Nigeria:

Unlike other nations of West Africa,

there have been strong criticisms of the Nigerian census for

decades, which makes the Africapolis built-up urban area data particularly important in Nigeria. For

example, the most recent federal census (2006) been severely criticized by local officials in Legos state as

having missed many people. The census indicated that Lagos metropolitan area population was

approximately 9 million. By comparison, a local census conducted at about the same time indicated a

population of 17.5 million. Authoritative neutral analysis generally finds lower population levels, more

consistent with data from the federal census.

18

The detailed analysis by Africapolis is believed to be the

most accurate population estimates for the urban areas of Nigeria.

Democratic Republic of the Congo:

The government recently published provincial population estimates,

which made it possible to produce a far more reliable estimate for the Kinshasa urban area, which

constitutes nearly all of the population of Kinshasa province. Population estimates for other urban areas are

not considered reliable. The last census was more than 30 years ago (1981) and reasonably current urban

population estimates have not been identified.

17

Agencie Francaise de Develloppment,

Africapolis Urbanization Trends: 1950-2020: A Geo-statistical Approach West Africa,´,

http://www.afd.fr/webdav/site/afd/shared/PUBLICATIONS/THEMATIQUES/autres-publications/BT/Africapolis_Final-Report_EN.pdf

.

18

Adewale Maja-Pearce and Eleanor Whitehead (2014 , “Factsheet: Nigeria’s Population Figures,”

Africa Check: Sorting Fact

(13)

Pakistan:

Population estimates are not considered reliable.

Census data were reported for Karachi for

2011 in the Indian press, but there is no indication of such results from the Pakistani census authorities. No

other data was reported. The last complete census was in 1998 and recent estimates have not been

identified.

Specific Built-Up Urban Areas

The notes below notes identify some additional components that (1) might be thought to be separate, (2)

are classified as separate by statistical agencies or are (3) listed to indicate to better describe the

geography of an urban area. No attempt is made to otherwise provide an inventory of municipalities or

other entities in urban areas, because of their large numbers For example, the Paris urban area has more

than 400 local government authorities. Thus, the lack of a municipality name does not indicate that it is not

included in an urban area.

Built-up Urban Area (Urban Agglomeration) Notes

Aachen, Germany

Extends into the Netherlands; Includes Heerlen, Netherlands.

Amersfoort, Netherlands

Included in Utrecht.

Amman, Jordan

Includes Az-Zarqa.

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Includes Haarlem

Ansan, Korea

Included in Seoul-Incheon.

Avondale, AZ, USA

Included in Phoenix.

Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India

Included in Delhi.

Basel, Switzerland

Extends into France and Germany

Bataysk, Russia

Included in Rostov.

Bhiwandi, Maharashtra, India

Included in Mumbai (beginning in 2016).

Bogor, Indonesia

Included in Jakarta

Boston, MA, USA

Includes Worcester and Nashua.

Bridgeport, CT, USA

Included in New York.

Biuckeye, AZ, USA

Included in Phoenix.

Chanan (Shantou), GD, China

Included in Chaoyang

Chaoyang (Shantou), GD, China

Includes Chaonan

Chiasso, Switzerland

Included in Milan, Italy (single labor market)

Chicago, IL, USA

Includes Kenosha and Round Lake Beach

Choloma, Honduras

Included in San Pedro Sula

Chungli, China: Taiwan

Included in Taipei.

Concord, CA, USA

Included in San Francisco

Conroe, TX, USA

Included in Houston.

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, USA

Includes Denton and McKinney

Danbury, CT, USA

Included in New York.

Darwin, NT, Australia

Includes Palmerston.

(14)

Delhi, NCT, HA, UP, India

Includes Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Noida, Gurgaon and

Bahadurgarh urban areas and New Delhi.

Denton, TX, USA

Included in Dallas-Fort Worth

Dhaka, Bangladesh

Nayaranganj included.

Dongguan, Guangdong, China

2010 census population was well below previous local estimates

Dongyang, ZJ, China

Included in Yiwu (Jinhua)

Dubai, UAE

Includes Sharja

Ezhou, Hubei, China

Includes Huangzhou (Huanggang).

Faridabad, Haryana, India

Included in Delhi.

Foshan, Guangdong, China

Included in Guangzhou-Foshan

Francisco Morato, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Included in Sao Paulo

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Shown as a separate urban area. Some sources combine

Fukuoka with Kitakyushu (such as the United Nations).

Geneva, Switzerland

Extends into France

Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Included in Delhi.

Guangzhou-Foshan, Guangdong, China

Includes Foshan

Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Included in Delhi.

Haarlem, Netherlands

Included in Amsterdam.

Hague, Netherlands

Included in Rotterdam-Hague

Hamilton, ON, Canada

Included in Toronto.

Heerlen, Netherlands

Included in Aachen, Germany.

Himeji, Hyogo, Japan

Included in Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto.

Hitachi, Japan

Included in Mito.

Houston, TX, USA

Includes Conroe.

Huangmei (Huanggang), HUB

Included in Jiujiang, JX.

Huangshui, HUB

Includes Daye (county level city)

Huangzhou (Huanggang), Hubei, China

Included in Ezhou.

Hubli, West Bengal, India

Does not include Dharwad.

Huiyang qu (Huizhou), Guangdong, China

Included in Shenzhen.

Huizhou, Guangdong, China

Huicheng qu only

Incheon, South Korea

Included in Seoul-Incheon,

Jakarta, Indonesia

Higher estimate than other sources (such as the United

Nations), which are largely limited to DKI Jakarta. Continuous

urbanization extends into Tangerang, South Tanerang, Borgor,

Bekasi and Karawang.

Jianbizhen (qu), China

Included in Zhenjiang, JS

Jiangyin (Wuxi), GD, China

Included in Zhangjiaggang (Suzhou) JS

Jinjiang, Fuzhou, China

Included in Quanzhou.

Jiujiang, JX, China

Includes Huangmei (Huanggang), HUB.

Kalyan, Maharashtra, India

Included in Mumbai (beginning in 2016).

(15)

Karaj, Iran

Included in Tehran.

Karawang, Indonesia

Included in Jakarta

Kenosha, WI, USA

Included in Chicago.

Kissimmee, FL, USA

Included in Orlando.

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

Shown as a separate urban area. Some sources combine

Kitakyushu with Fukuoka (such as the United Nations), which is

not a part of the continuous urbanization of Kitakyushu.

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

The population is higher other agglomeration estimates (such

as the United Nations), which does not include all of the

continuously developed urban area. Includes Port Klang.

Lagos, Nigeria

Demographia uses the Africapolis estimate as the base. See

discussion above on Nigeria.

Leiden, Netherlands

Included in Rotterdam-Hague

Leon, Mexico

Includes Silao

Lille, France

Extends into Belgium (single labor market)

Livermore, CA, USA

Included in San Francisco.

Los Angeles, CA, USA

Includes Riverside-San Bernardino and Mission Viejo.

Manila, Philippines

Higher than other estimates, which are largely limited to the

National Capital Region. Continuous urbanization extends into

Cavite, Laguna, Bulucan and Rizal.

Maputo, Monzambique

Includes Matola.

McKinney, TX, USA

Included in Dallas-Fort Worth.

Miami, FL, USA

Includes the former urban areas of Fort Lauderdale and West

Palm Beach, which have been incorporated by the US Census

Bureau.

Milan, Italy

The population is higher other agglomeration estimates (such

as the United Nations), which does not include all of the

continuously developed urban area, which stretches well into

Como, Lecco and Varese provinces. Extends into Switzerland

(single labor market). includes Chiasso, Switzerland.

Mission Viejo, CA, USA

Included in Los Angeles.

Mito, Japan

Includes Hitachi

Moscow, Russia

Demographia is indebted to Richard Forstall, who has provided

local authority area population data for portions of Moscow

Oblast within the Moscow urban areas. Other estimates (such as

the United Nations estimate) largely limited to the municipality of

Moscow,

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Includes Kalyan, and the Panvel urban area. As of 2016, also

includes the Census of India urban areas of Bhiwandi, Kalyan,

Vasai-Virar beginning in 2016.

Nara, Nara, Japan

Included in Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto.

Nashua, NH, USA

Included in Boston.

Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Included in Mumbai.

(16)

New Delhi, NCT, India

Included in Delhi

New York, NY-NJ-CT, USA

Includes Bridgeport, New Haven, Trenton, Danbury and Twin

Rivers urban areas

Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Included in Delhi.

Ordos, NM, China

See Yijinhuoluo-Kangbashi (Ordos), NM

Orlando, FL, USA

Includes Kissimmee.

Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto, Japan

Portions of the prefectures of Osaka, Kobe, Kyoto and Nara

area included. Includes Himeji. United Nations estimates

separate Osaka-Kobe and Kyoto and exclude both Nara and

Himeji.

Oshawa, ON, Canada

Included in Toronto.

Palmerston., NT, Australia

Included in Darwin

Panvel, Maharashtra, India

Included in Mumbai.

Phoenix, AZ, USA

Includes Avondale and Buckeye (which are designated by the

US Census Bureau as separate urban areas).

Port Klang, Malaysia

Included in Kuala Lumpur.

Quanzhou, Fuzhou, China

Includes Shishi and Jinjiang

Riverside-San Bernardino, CA, USA

Included in Los Angeles.

Rostov, Russia

Includes Bataysk.

Rotterdam-Hague, Netherlands

Includes Leiden

Round Lake Beach, IL, USA

Included in Chicago.

Saarbrucken, Germany

Extends into France

Salzburg, Austria

Extends into Germany (single labor market)

San Francisco, CA, USA

Includes San Jose, Concord, Livermore and Vallejo.

San Jose, CA, USA

Included in San Francisco.

San Pedro Sula, Honduras

Includes Choloma.

Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Includes Francisco Morato.

Seoul-Incheon, Korea

Includes Suweon and Ansan.

Shanghai, China

Includes Taicang

Sharja, UAE

Included in Dubai.

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Includes Huiyang qu (Huizhou). 2010 census population was

well below previous local estimates.

Shishi (shi), Fuzhou, China

Included in Quanzhou.

Silao, Mexico

Included in Leon

Strausbourg, France

Extends into Germany (single labor market)

Stuttgart, Germany

Lower estimate than some other sources (such as the

Millennium City database)

Suweon, Korea

Included in Seoul-Incheon.

(17)

Taipei, China: Taiwan

The population is higher than other estimates (such as the

United Nations), which do not include all population within the

continuously developed urban area (especially in Taipei

County). Includes continuous urbanization in New Taipei and

Taoyuan.

Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

Includes Yuci qu (Jinzhong).

Taoyuan, China: Taiwan

Included in Taipei.

Tehran, Iran

Includes Karaj.

Tokyo-Yokohama, Japan

Includes large areas Tokyo, Kanagawa, Chiba and Saitama

prefectures and smaller areas of Gunma, Tochigi and Ibaraki

prefectures.

Toronto, ON, Canada

Includes Hamilton and Oshawa.

Trenton, NJ, USA

Included in New York.

Twin Rivers, NJ, USA

Included in New York.

Utrecht, Netherlands

Includes Amersfoort.

Vallejo, CA, USA

Included in San Francisco.

Vasai-Virar, Maharashtra

Included in Mumbai (beginning in 2016).

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Includes Xiangyang.

Xiangyang, Shaanxi, China

Incluced in Xi'an.

Xicheng, Ningxia, China

Included in Yinchuan.

Yanzhou, Jiangsu, China

Includes Jiangdu shi.

Yinchuan, Ningxia, China

Includes Xicheng.

Yiwu (Jinhua), ZJ China

Includes Dongyang.

Yuci qu (Jinzhong), Shanxi, China

Included in Taiyuan.

Zhangjiaggang (Suzhou) JS

Includes Jianyin

Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China

Includes Jianbizhen qu.

7. METHODOLOGY

The current year population estimate is modeled from the base year population, adjusted by population

projections (largely from the United Nations or national statistics authorities).

National census authority population land area data is used where it is reported for urban areas.

19

For other

urban areas, Demographia uses mapping software to estimate continuous urbanization. Demographia uses

small area population data, where available, to match population estimates to urban land area.

Sources for Base Population & Land Area Estimates

A base year population is provided for all urban areas. The base year estimate uses the methodology

indicated by the coding in the “Source: Population” column.

19

There are exceptions.

Demographia

provides separate estimates of some urban areas in India, where no build-up

urban area data is reported (in some cases the Census of India reports municipality rather than urban area data).

Demographia

also provides a separate estimate for the land area of Marseille because the INSEE definition includes

(18)

The tables indicate the method used to estimate both the land area and the base year population of each

built-up urban area. The following codes are used:

Source Codes: Population and Land Area

Code Source of Land Area or Base Year Population Estimate

A

National census authority built-up urban area data (land area or population).

B

Demographia l

and area estimate based upon map or satellite photograph analysis.

C

Demographia

population from lower order jurisdictions, with downward adjustment for rural population.

D.

Population estimate based upon United Nations agglomeration estimate.

F

Other population estimate or other

Demographia

population estimate..

L

Local government population estimate.

N

Combined urban area using national census authority population or land area data

W

Africapolis

population or land area estimate

Presentation of Source Codes in Tables:

The source codes are listed in the “Pop:Area Source” column

following this form: “C:B”, where “C” indicates the source from which the base population was estimated

and “B” indicates the source of the land area estimate. In this example, the population base is estimated by

Demographia and the land area data is estimated by Demographia.

Reliability

The most reliable sources are as follows:

National census authorities, where representative agglomeration data is available (such as in the

United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Sweden, Norway, India and Australia).

Africapolis population and land area estimates (Source code W), which replicate the results that

would likely be obtained if census authorities in West Africa reported built-up urban area data.

Demographia population estimates developed by building up population estimates from lower order

jurisdictional data to match the urban area boundaries. Estimated rural area populations are

deducted. Data is from national census authorities (Source code C). It is intended that ultimately all

population estimates not from national census authorities or Africapolis for urban area will be

estimated by this method.

Urban Density Calculation

(19)

Built-up urban area population densities are expressed in rounded numbers (to the nearest 100 per square

mile or square kilometer). Urban population densities should be considered reasonable approximations.

8. CAUTION: TREND ANALYSIS

Demographia World Urban Areas is a continuing project and attempts to provide “state of the art” data.

Revisions are made as more accurate satellite photographs and population estimates become available. As

a result, Demographia World Urban Areas is not intended for trend analysis.

Year-to-year changes indicated in population and land area may merely reflect better data that was not

used before and may not, therefore indicate a trend. Moreover, the current year population estimates are

nearly always a projection from a base year calculated from census or official estimate data. Changes in

population projection rates can result in substantial current year population estimates that are not related to

actual population growth or loss.

There is little or no historical urban area data and sources are continually improving. Moreover, nearly all of

the data is estimated. Appropriate caution is therefore advised.

9. COVER ILLUSTRATION: ORTIGAS, MANILA

Ortigas, Manila (by author): Dispersion and decentralization have become dominant trends in world cities,

with the exception of those with binding topographical or international boundaries, such as Singapore and

Male (Maldives). Manila is one of the most decentralized cities in the world. Its central business district

(CBD) has long since been exceeded in commercial influence by the Makati CBD. Ortigas is another

expanding business center, just of Makati along the EDSA road artery.(Avenue

Epifanio de los Santos

).

EDSA is perhaps the most important arterial in Manila, not only from the perspective of traffic but also for its

role in political developments over the past three decades.

10. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS

(20)

demographia2@earthlink.net

Demographia

PO Box 841

Belleville, Illinois 62222 USA

(St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois Urban Area, USA)

+1.618.632.8507

(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)

967 Italy Bologna 525,000 60 155 8,800 3,400 C:B 967 Mexico Tampico 525,000 85 220 6,200 2,400 C:B 967 Russia Astrakhan 525,000 46 119 11,400 4,400 C:B 967 South Korea Pohang 525,000 35 91 15,000 5,800 C:B 967 Switzerland Basel 525,000 77 199 6,800 2,600 C:B 967 Trinidad & Tobago Port of Spain 525,000 110 285 4,800 1,800 F:B 978 India Imphal, MN 520,000 25 65 20,800 8,000 A:B 978 Mexico Culiacan 520,000 68 176 7,600 3,000 C:B 978 Nigeria Abeokuta 520,000 24 62 21,700 8,400 W:B 974 Nigeria Bauchi 520,000 34 88 15,300 5,900 W:B 978 Pakistan Larkana 520,000 10 26 52,000 20,100 D:B 978 Russia Ryazan 520,000 50 130 10,400 4,000 C:B 978 United States Worcester, MA-CT 520,000 304 787 1,600 600 A:A 985 China Sanya, HA 515,000 59 153 8,700 3,400 C:B 985 Congo (Dem. Rep.) Likasi 515,000 25 65 20,600 8,000 D:B 970 France Grenoble 515,000 198 513 2,600 1,000 A:A 985 Ghana Sekondi Takoradi 515,000 35 91 14,700 5,700 W:B 985 India Gaya, BR 515,000 12 31 42,900 16,600 A:B 985 India Jalgaon, MH 515,000 15 39 34,300 13,300 A:B 985 India Patiala, HR 515,000 35 91 14,700 5,700 A:B 985 India Rajahmundry, AP 515,000 21 54 24,500 9,500 A:B 985 India Thoothukkudi, TN 515,000 50 130 10,300 4,000 A:B 985 Iraq Hillah 515,000 19 49 27,100 10,500 D:B 985 Iraq Nasiriyah 515,000 22 57 23,400 9,000 D:B 985 Macedonia Skopje 515,000 35 91 14,700 5,700 C:B 985 Russia Tula 515,000 50 130 10,300 4,000 C:B 985 United States Toledo, OH-MI 515,000 240 622 2,100 800 A:A 999 China Bayan Nur, NM 510,000 52 135 9,800 3,800 C:B 999 Egypt Al Mahallah al Kubra 510,000 10 26 51,000 19,700 C:B 999 Egypt Al Mansurah 510,000 13 34 39,200 15,100 D:B 984 France Douai-Lens 510,000 187 484 2,700 1,000 A:A 996 Japan Kanazawa 510,000 53 137 9,600 3,700 C:B 999 Lithuania Vilnius 510,000 85 220 6,000 2,300 D:B 999 Mexico Xalapa 510,000 29 75 17,600 6,800 C:B 999 Russia Naberezhnye Tchelny 510,000 50 130 10,200 3,900 C:B 999 South Africa Bloemfontein 510,000 68 176 7,500 2,900 D:B 999 Spain Murcia 510,000 38 98 13,400 5,200 C:B 1009 Brazil Maringa 505,000 60 155 8,400 3,200 C:B 1009 China Feicheng (Taian), SD 505,000 26 67 19,400 7,500 C:B 1009 China Qianjiang, HUB 505,000 24 62 21,000 8,100 C:B 1009 Colombia Santa Marta 505,000 11 28 45,900 17,700 C:B 1009 Congo (Dem. Rep.) Kolwezi 505,000 19 49 26,600 10,300 D:B 1009 Kazakhstan Karagandy 505,000 113 293 4,500 1,700 D:B 1009 Russia Penza 505,000 47 122 10,700 4,100 C:B 1009 Zambia Ndola 505,000 36 93 14,000 5,400 C:B 1017 Benin Porto Novo 500,000 39 101 12,800 5,000 W:B 1017 China Lhasa, TIB 500,000 40 104 12,500 4,800 C:B 1017 Russia Lipetsk 500,000 41 106 12,200 4,700 C:B 1017 United Kingdom Edinburgh 500,000 46 120 9,800 3,800 A:A 1017 United States Des Moines, IA 500,000 201 521 2,200 900 A:A 1017 United States Wichita, KS 500,000 215 557 2,200 800 A:A

Note: See "Urban Density Calculation" in the Introduction

(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)

997 Djibouti Djibouti 540,000 15 39 36,000 13,900 D:B 997 India Gulbarga, KA 600,000 15 39 40,000 15,400 A:B 997 India Jalgaon, MH 515,000 15 39 34,300 13,300 A:B 997 India Saharanpur, UP 790,000 15 39 52,700 20,300 A:B 997 Indonesia Tasikmalaya 830,000 15 39 55,300 21,400 C:B 997 Syria Al-Hasakah 585,000 15 39 39,000 15,100 D:B 1004 Egypt Port Said 660,000 14 36 47,100 18,200 D:B 1004 India Guntur, AP 765,000 14 36 54,600 21,100 A:B 1006 Colombia Ibague 595,000 13 34 45,800 17,700 C:B 1006 Congo (Dem. Rep.) Tshikapa 730,000 13 34 56,200 21,700 D:B 1006 Egypt Al Mansurah 510,000 13 34 39,200 15,100 D:B 1006 India Bhavnagar, GJ 660,000 13 34 50,800 19,600 A:B 1010 Bangladesh Rajshahi 550,000 12 31 45,800 17,700 C:B 1010 India Ajmer, RJ 590,000 12 31 49,200 19,000 A:B 1010 India Gaya, BR 515,000 12 31 42,900 16,600 A:B 1010 India Kurnool, AP 575,000 12 31 47,900 18,500 A:B 1010 India Malegaon, MH 675,000 12 31 56,300 21,700 A:B 1010 Syria Al-Raqqa 745,000 12 31 62,100 24,000 D:B 1010 Yemen Al-Hudaydah 565,000 12 31 47,100 18,200 D:B 1017 Colombia Santa Marta 505,000 11 28 45,900 17,700 C:B 1017 India Firozabad, UP 585,000 11 28 53,200 20,500 A:B 1017 India Muzaffarnagar, UP 595,000 11 28 54,100 20,900 A:B 1020 China: Macau SAR Macau 655,000 10 26 65,500 25,300 A:B 1020 Egypt Al Mahallah al Kubra 510,000 10 26 51,000 19,700 C:B 1020 Pakistan Larkana 520,000 10 26 52,000 20,100 D:B

Note: See "Urban Density Calculation" in the Introduction

(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)

997 United States Albany, NY 615,000 296 767 2,000 800 A:A 997 United States Grand Rapids, MI 590,000 281 728 2,000 800 A:A 997 United States Jacksonville, FL 1,170,000 530 1,373 2,000 800 A:A 997 United States Louisville, KY-IN 1,035,000 477 1,235 2,000 800 A:A 997 United States McAllen, TX 860,000 358 927 2,000 800 A:A 997 United States Sarasota, FL 690,000 327 847 2,000 800 A:A 1003 France Nantes 890,000 453 1,173 1,900 700 A:A 1003 France Toulon 580,000 295 764 1,900 700 A:A 1003 United States Allentown, PA-NJ 715,000 346 896 1,900 700 A:A 1003 United States Charleston, SC 625,000 293 759 1,900 700 A:A 1003 United States Pittsburgh, PA 1,730,000 905 2,344 1,900 700 A:A 1003 United States Richmond, VA 1,030,000 492 1,274 1,900 700 A:A 1003 United States Tulsa, OK 710,000 336 870 1,900 800 A:A 1010 United States Akron, OH 570,000 325 842 1,800 700 A:A 1010 United States Hartford, CT 965,000 516 1,336 1,800 700 A:A 1010 United States Springfield, MA-CT 650,000 349 904 1,800 700 A:A 1013 United States Atlanta, GA 5,120,000 2,645 6,851 1,700 700 A:A 1013 United States Charlotte, NC-SC 1,600,000 741 1,919 1,700 700 A:A 1013 United States Nashville, TN 1,105,000 563 1,458 1,700 700 A:A 1013 United States Raleigh, NC 1,130,000 518 1,342 1,700 700 A:A 1017 United States Baton Rouge, LA 665,000 367 951 1,600 600 A:A 1017 United States Cape Coral, FL 670,000 330 855 1,600 600 A:A 1017 United States Worcester, MA-CT 520,000 304 787 1,600 600 A:A 1020 United States Birmingham, AL 800,000 530 1,373 1,400 500 A:A 1020 United States Columbia, SC 630,000 380 984 1,400 600 A:A 1022 United States Knoxville, TN 645,000 438 1,134 1,300 500 A:A

Note: See "Urban Density Calculation" in the Introduction

(68)

Table 4

BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS BY GEOGRAPHY (INCLUDING SELECTED UNDER 500,000 POPULATION)

Urban Areas 500,000 & Over Population

Rank Geography Urban Area Square Miles KilometersSquare Per Square Mile Per Square Kilometer

Afghanistan Herat 475,000 19 49 25,000 9,700 C:B 2016 2015 460,000 121 Afghanistan Kabul 3,650,000 100 259 36,500 14,100 C:B 2016 2016 3,650,000 967 Afghanistan Kandahar 525,000 25 65 21,000 8,100 C:B 2016 2015 510,000 Albania Berat 40,000 2 6 18,200 7,000 C:B 2010 2010 40,000 Albania Fier 50,000 6 14 9,000 3,500 C:B 2010 2010 50,000 790 Albania Tirana 635,000 33 85 19,200 7,400 C:B 2016 2010 560,000 116 Algeria Algiers 3,675,000 170 440 21,600 8,300 C:B 2016 2008 3,250,000 858 Algeria Constantine 590,000 46 119 12,800 5,000 C:B 2016 2008 590,000 494 Algeria Wahran 1,015,000 63 163 16,100 6,200 C:B 2016 2008 920,000 928 Angola Benguela 555,000 40 104 13,900 5,400 C:B 2016 2014 500,000 858 Angola Huambo 590,000 50 130 11,800 4,600 C:B 2016 2014 530,000 Angola Kuito 335,000 32 83 10,500 4,000 C:B 2016 2014 300,000 Angola Lobito 290,000 33 85 8,800 3,400 C:B 2016 2014 260,000 53 Angola Luanda 6,955,000 380 984 18,300 7,100 C:B 2016 2014 6,400,000 814 Angola Lubango 615,000 84 218 7,300 2,800 C:B 2016 2014 550,000 21 Argentina Buenos Aires 14,280,000 1,035 2,681 13,800 5,300 C:B 2016 2010 13,370,000 Argentina Comodora Rivadavia 175,000 18 47 9,700 3,800 C:B 2010 2010 175,000 317 Argentina Cordoba 1,595,000 140 363 11,400 4,400 C:B 2016 2010 1,532,000 610 Argentina La Plata 815,000 88 228 9,300 3,600 C:B 2016 2010 750,000 811 Argentina Mar del Plata 620,000 42 109 14,800 5,700 C:B 2016 2010 575,000 501 Argentina Mendoza 1,010,000 95 246 10,600 4,100 C:B 2016 2010 942,000 371 Argentina Rosario 1,355,000 90 233 15,100 5,800 C:B 2016 2010 1,264,000 903 Argentina Salta 570,000 42 109 13,600 5,200 C:B 2016 2010 525,000 Argentina San Juan 480,000 45 117 10,700 4,100 C:B 2016 2010 450,000 872 Argentina Santa Fe 580,000 45 117 12,900 5,000 C:B 2016 2010 500,000 545 Argentina Tucuman 920,000 44 114 20,900 8,100 D:B 2016 2015 910,000 377 Armenia Yerevan 1,325,000 145 376 9,100 3,500 C:B 2016 2011 1,350,000 435 Australia Adelaide, SA 1,150,000 329 852 3,400 1,300 A:A 2016 2011 1,104,000 Australia Albany, WA 25,000 32 82 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 27,000 Australia Albury, NSW-VIC 75,000 45 116 1,700 700 A:A 2011 2011 77,000 Australia Alice Springs, NT 25,000 19 49 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 24,000

Latest

Estimate Base Year Population EstimateBase Year Population

Estimate

(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)

Gambar

Table 1LARGEST BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS IN THE WORLD: 2016
Table 2BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS BY LAND AREA (URBAN FOOTPRINT)
Table 3BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS BY URBAN POPULATION DENSITY
Table 4BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS BY GEOGRAPHY (INCLUDING SELECTED UNDER 500,000 POPULATION)
+2

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Berpijak dari kondisi di atas, maka Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Nonformal dan Informal pada tahun 2014 akan melanjutkan kebijakan

Figure 3a illustrates the photosynthetic and N-cycling con- straints derived for the stands assuming that, compared with the old stand, the young stand has lower maintenance

Berdasarkan proses pelelangan pengadaan Barang/jasa bagian Layanan Pengadaan Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Buton Selatan Tahun Anggaran 2016, penawaran saudara dinyatakan lulus

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada pengaruh yang signifikan game online terhadap komunikasi interpersonal pada peserta didik kelas X SMA Kristen Satya Wacana

Pengelolaan Dana Corporate Sosial Responsibility (CSR) Pendidikan Dari Perusahaan Pertambangan Batu Bara (Studi Tentang Pengelolaan Dana CSR Pendidikan Untuk Sekolah

Penelitian yang akan meneliti “Pengaruh Penggunaan Multimedia Animasi Terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Materi Diagram Fasa Dalam. Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah

Menurut Robbin (2002 : 155) menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat 6 bagian dari hambatan komunikasi efektif, yaitu penyaringan( Filter ), persepsi selektif, gaya gender, emosi, bahasa

Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah semua data penderita yang didiagnosa secara histopatologi sebagai tumor nasofaring di Laboratorium Patologi Anatomi Fakultas Kedokteran