• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

BIBLIOGRAPHY Alwasilah, A.C. (2007).

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "BIBLIOGRAPHY Alwasilah, A.C. (2007)."

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

62

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alwasilah, A.C. (2007). Language, Culture, and Education: A Portrait of Contemporary Indonesia. Bandung: ADIRA (Cho & MacArthur).

Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2017). Identifikasi Gaya Belajar & Respon Mahasiswa untuk menentukan strategi pembelajaran pada perkuliahan Fisiologi Hewan. In prosiding seminar nasional V 2017 Hayati Biologi Sains, dan pembelajarannya. Kediri: Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri.

Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2017a). Analisis Persepsi Mahasiswa dan Dosen terhadap motivasi belajar pada perkuliahan Fisiologi Hewan. In Prosiding Seminar Nsional Biologi 2017. ”inovasi pembelajaran dan penelitian Biologi (IP2B)”. Surabaya : Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Anderson, M. & Anderson Kathy. (1997). Text Types. Macmillan Education:Australia PTV, Ltd.

Andrade & G.J. Cizek, eds. Handbook of Formative Assessment. New York, NY:Routledge.

Andrade, H., Kristen Huff, & Georgia Brooke. (2012). Assessing Learning: The Students at the Center Series. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.

Ayu, Y. R. (2018). Collaborative Learning dalam upaya peningkatan keaktifan mahasiswa pada proses pembelajaran Jurnal Efisiensi, 15-23.

Bijami, M., Seyyed, H., & Maryam, S. N. (2013). Peer Feedback in Learning English Writing: Adventages and Disadvantages. Journal of Studies in Education (Vol. 3).

Bitchener, J., & Ute Knoch. (2008). The Value of Written Corrective Feedback for Migrant and International Students. Language Teaching Research. Vol.

12 No 3.

Brammer, C.; Rees, M. (2007). Peer review from the students’

perspective:invaluable or invalid. Composition Studies, Volume 35, Number 2.

Brookhat, S. (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students.

Alexandria: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

(2)

63

Budianto, S., Mukminatien, N., & Adnan Latief, M. (2017). The Debate of Written Corrective Feedback: What to do And Where to Go. KnE Social Sciences, 1(3), 372.

Capri, E. (2013). The Effect of Peer Feedback Technique Towardstudents’ Ability in Writing Analyticalexposition Text. State Islamic University Of SultanSyarif Kasimriau Pekanbaru.

Chaoa, Y. C. J & Lob, H. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language.

Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411.

Churiyah, Yayah. (2011). Komunikasi Lisan dan Tertulis. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, andevaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol.4).

Cullen, R. Kullman, J, & Wild, C. (2013). Online collaborative learning on an ESL teacher education programme. ELT Journal, 67(7), 425-433.

Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critica1 distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19.

Dale, H. (1997). Co- authoring in the classroom. Creating an environment for effective collaboration. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.

Dorning, Alyssa. (2018). Talk it Out: Peer Collaboration in the Writing Process.

John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference. 5.

Erika, Felix. (2018). Improving Students’ Writing Ability in Recount Text Using Picture Series. KnESocialSciences, 343-351.

Eriya, H. S. (2017). The Influence Of Using Peer Review Technique TowardsStudents’ Recount Text Writing Ability. Raden Intan State Islamic University Lampung.

Faridah, D. (2016). Improving Students’ Pronunciation Skill by Using Oral Peer Feedback. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

(3)

64

Fransisca, Y. E. D. (2016). Peer Feedback Through E-Mail and Students’Improvement in Writing Narrative Text. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative Writing Features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18- 30.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Common core state standards, writing, and students with LD: Recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research &

Practice.

Grami, G. M. A. (2010). The Effects of Integrating Peer Feedback into University Level ESL Writing Curriculum: A Comparative Study in a Saudi Context.

Unpublished Thesis. Newcastle: Newcastle University.

Gunawan, I. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hajar, O. A. (2019). The Effect of Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Anxiety and Students’ Writing Ability, English Language and Teaching Program, School Of Graduate Studies, State Islamic Institute Of Tulungagung.

Handayani, A A, K., Dantes, Ny., & Ratminingsih, Ni Made. (2013). The Effect of Guided Writing Strategy and Students’ Achievement Motivation on Students’ Writing Competency. Indonesia: e-Journal Program PascasarjanaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Hansson, S. (2014). Benefits and difficulties in using peer response for writing in the EFL classroom. Göteborgs Universitet.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Harmer, J. (1998). How to Teach English. Harlow: Longman.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Heather, P. (2015). Text Type Book. Campbell: Campbell High School. p. 26.

Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics:

Apractical introduction.

Houat, N. (2012). Implementing a Wiki Collaborative Writing Project in a Blended Course. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 1-10.

(4)

65

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing (2nd ed). London: Pearson.

Irianty, D. (2015). The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback In Improving Students’Writing Achievement. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University: Jakarta.

Lufri, L. (2004). Sumbangan efektif berpikir kritis, persepsi, minat, dan sikap terhadap hasil belajar. Jurnal pendidikan Triadik, 8(1), 167-178.

Retrived from http://repository.unp.ac.id/1839/1/A-SE- BKRITIS%286%29.pdf

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Bahasa Inggris Kelas XII.Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, p. 84.

Kodir, Abdul & Indrawati, & Yusron, Irman. (2017). Modul pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam (IPA) sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): kelompok kompetensi h. P4TK IPA, Bandung.

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2009). Writing an Appropriate MethodsSection for a Research Article: Design, Ethical Considerations and Sample.Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 13(3), 255–256.

Lee, H. C & Wang, P. L. (2013). Discussing the factors contributing to students’ involvement in an EFL collaborative wiki project. ReCALL, 25(02), 233 – 249.

Lewis, D. (n.d.). The Issue of Perception: Some Educational Implications.

Limbu, L & Markauskaite, L. (2015). How do learners experience joint writing:

University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers & Education 82, 393-408.

Lin, O. P, & Maarof, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in Summary writing:

Student perceptions and problem. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 599-606.

(5)

66

Listiani. (2016). Peer Review Untuk Pengajaran Ketrampilan Menulis KalimatBahasa Inggris. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, Vol. IX, No. 2.

Lukas, F. T., Oikurema Purwati, & Ahmad Munir (2020). The Challenges of Online Peer Review of Students’ Narrative Writing In Instagram. Jurnal Education and development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan Vol.8 No.1 h. 210-216.

Lyster, R. & Leila R. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake,Cambridge University.

Malle, B. F. (2011). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. In D. Chadee (Ed), Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 72-95). Oxford:

Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrived from

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dbc6/ca9548099b6f2b84d1cd81f3eb13c 07cde7f.pdf

Maryam Farnia, Akbar Sohrabie, & Abdul Sattar. (2014). A Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Act of Suggestion among Iranian Native Speakers of Farsi.

Journal of ELT and Applied linguistics (JELTAL) , 1-14.

Mirzaei, A. & Eslami, Z. R. (2013). ZPD-activated languaging and collaborative L2 writing. Educational Psychology, 35(1), 5-25.

Mubaro, H. (2012). The Use Of Peer Feedback Strategy to Motivate Students in Narrative Text Writing. English Education Journal.

Muhsin, M.A . (2017). Pengaruh Teacher Feedback Terhadap Kemampuan Murid Dalam Pembelajaran Writing. KONFIKS: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3, 157–166.

Muhsin, M. A., & Sastrawati, I. (2017). Pengaruh Teacher Feedback Terhadap Kemampuan Murid Dalam Pembelajaran Writing, 157–166.

Mulligan, C. & Garofalo, R. (2011). A collaborative writing approach:

Methodology and student assessment. The Language Teacher: 35(3), 5-10.

Mursela, F. (2018). The Effect of Peer Feedback Through Instagram on Students’Writing Recount Text. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University : Jakarta..

(6)

67

Nanda Widya. (n.d.). Example of report text

https://www.studiobelajar.com/report-text/

Nordentoft, HM., & Wistoft, K. (2012). Collaborative learning and competence development in school health nursing. Health Education, 112, 448-464.

Nuemann, H. & McDonough, K. (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84-104.

Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness vs. remediation: Self- theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 127-134.

Puji, A. A. (2013). The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback to Improve The Writing Ability of The Tenth Grade Students.Universitas Yogyakarta.

Putri, W. I. (2018). The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback Practice in Improving Student’s Writing Performance: The Case of Tenth Grade Students of SMANegeri 3 Demak in the Academic Year of 2018/2019. A Final Project English Education Department. Faculty of Languages and Communication Science.Sultan Agung Islamic University.

Perkins, D. (2003).King Arthur’s Round Table: How CollaborativeConversations Create Smart Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &Sons.

Rae, J., Taylor, G., & Roberts, C. (2006). Collaboration learning: A connected community for learning and knowledge management. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. 3, 225-233.

Renandya, W. A., Puji, H., & Editors, W. (2016). English Language Teaching Today (Vol. 5). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38834-2

Reynolds, B. L & Anderson, T. A. F. (2015). Extra-dimensional in-class communications: An action research exploring text-chat support of face- to-face writing. Computers and Composition, 35, 52-64.

Sanggam, S. (2008). The English Paragraph. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Schunk. D. H., Pintrich, P. H., & Meece, J. L. (2012). Motivation in Education:

Theory, Research, and Application. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

(7)

68

Shehadeh. A. (2011). Effects and students perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286–305.

Sholihah, U. (2018). Teknik Peer-Review Melalui Google Docs: Alternatif PirantiKolaborasi Dalam Menulis. Universitas Widya Dharma Klaten WidyaWacana Vol. 13 Nomor 2.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’

reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.

Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143–159.

Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative Writing in L2 contexts: Processes, Outcomes, and Future Directions. Annual ReviewofAppliedLinguistics, CUP, 31, 275-288.

Storch, N. (2013). CollaborativeWriting in L2 Classrooms. MutlilingualMatters:

New York.

Sutton, R., Matthew H., & Karen D. (2011). Feedback in Schools. Peter Lang Publishing: New York.

Topping, K.L. (2010). Peers as a Source of Formative Assessment. In H.L.

Troyka L. Q. (1987). Handbook for Writers. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Tudge, J. R. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A vygotskian analysis. Child Development,63,1364- 1379.

Tudge, J., & Winterhoff, P. (1993). Can young children benefit from collaborative problem solving? Tracing the effects of partner competence and feedback. Social Development, 2(3), 242- 259.

Umirisanti, M. (2019). Students’ Perception Toward Oral Peer Feedback in Writing Class. Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.

Vygotsky, L.(1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.

(8)

69

Widiyowati, I. I. (2015). Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan respon mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan model pembelajaran advance organizer pada materi larutan penyangga.

Pancaran Pendidikan, 4 (1), 89-104. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/pancaran/article/view/1331

Yu, S & Lee, I. (2014). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory practice.

Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 572-593.

Yugestina,. Patuan Raja., & Mahpul. (2018). Pairing in Peer Review TechniqueAccording to Students’ Proficiency Levels on Improving Students’ WritingAchievement. Universitas Lampung..

Yuliani, E. (2018). Students’ Perception About Peer Feedback on Students’ Work at Stain Kediri. State Islamic Institute of Kediri.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

aktivitas selama proses pembelajaran berlangsung, baik itu aktivitas guru maupun aktivitas siswa. Hasil observasi proses pembelajaran diperoleh dari lembar observasi yang

Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan status gizi dengan kebugaran jasmani atlet bulutangkis serta menganalisis hubungan asupan

Kompetensi Profesional (kemampuan penguasaan materi pembelajaran secara luas dan mendalam) yang meliputi:2. konsep, struktur, dan metoda keilmuan/teknologi/seni yang

mengundang Saudara untuk melaksanakan Pembuktian Kualifikasi dengan membawa asli dan fotocopy seluruh dokumen yang sesuai dengan daftar isian dokumen

Kenaikan jumlah penduduk juga diimbangi dengan kenaikan Pendapatan Daerah Regional Bruto (PDRB) setiap tahunnya. Peningkatan tersebut tidak lepas dari peran

Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah dengan metode hukum normatif, yaitu menelaah dan menganalisa perundang-undangan khususnya perundang-undangan

Perlakuan aplikasi pupuk dsar NPK berpengaruh nyata terhadap diameter batang umur 15-60 HST dan produksi per plot.. Interaksi antara frekuensi pemupukan POC dan aplikasi pupuk

dilakukan seseorang dapat dilihat dari hasil yang telah dicapai dalam. belajar, yaitu berupa