-1
QUESTIONS· IN ENGLISH AND
'"1"
TOBA BATAK LANGUAGE
t)
- ~ ! i i . i. :l l j i ! l ! I [ j ' \a Thesis
by
Imelda M. Simorangkir
NIM: 055010174.
(&.S Vaivenitas Methodist
Indonesia)
sub•ltted to
die
'nl''+ AppiW Lillpiada Study Proanm Ia partial fulfiiiiDnt ., ... ri,IIN•Intl for tileDeane
ofMa ... ter Hamaaion.-"'
---·~----~--- --·-·
Advisers' Statements
I certifY that l have read this thesis and that, in my opinion it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a Thesis for the Degree of Magister Hwnaniora.
'ng. M.Pd
First A viser
'I certifY that I have read this thesis and that, in my opinion it is fully adequate in scope
and quality as a Thesis for the Degree of Magister Humaniora.
Prof Amrin Saragih,
M."
Second Advisert
Approval
. ., • Trus Thesis was examined on 20 September 2007 by the Board of Examiners.
·•
0 "
Board of Examiaers
Dr. Busmin Guming, M.Pd.
Prof. Amrin Saragib, M.A, Ph.D
Prof. Tina Mariany Arifin, M.A., Ph.D
Prof. D.P Tampubolon. Ph.D
Dr. Lince Sihombing, M.Pd
Approved by
The Director ostgraduate School
Prof. Dr. Belfrik Manullang NIP: 130 518 778
\
.
'·-I ..
.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
7/7t.,£,
to1fwvrm1y
~.rtGer
•
u
the tYrlter :,fon
e"iJ>'T1!oUion for1:/i,
.3/~,
11111t tProtectlon ..U.ce
thelie.Jbrtrb.s
to thecvm;rfeti<m
af
tli'i4
e:ntirfef{~.:£
'"
IfJ'117'tial
fo/fi/'-mt
oj'
t!ii. reyuiNnrJtmtl for theDt;yee
if
g~
'1fum1171ior, 1ft thetP
oo~t
!i'r".Cu..te "Jtutlleo.f
Lsfuli~lie<!'
'nyu/sties dtlfte "Uniwr.sity o.f$t!'un.
'Nr.rt(y. t!ii. writer wcu!.t'lil<e t o r tliimk., to fi,.,. at!'vi.sc.>r,,,
;15,._
.l5Ui11rbt
umbt.1,
.'/ll'tJS.c
adtJSrof
~
"Jnf!Pii:
.'/ll';t,
fPii.:/5.
wlio liave f!Jetrtdlie wrlt&r a! .so woui.C lifie to
convey
tier yatitutCe to t!ii. Weat!' o.fLsli.sli'.1'/ie.C Ln'fu1.stic.J,
tJSrof
7bt•va=m.my
;'fnfln.
.'Jil';t. tJSii..t:
~r~~d
' lier
aetmy.
:IJ,.,,
ir'nll.m
"J~
:fJd9'L
~
::Af:.tfS.t:
~r~~t!'
'Zu! tm.Ce:cmnbtm
:tir.
'Xu.ce
~
.tflltl'tJSTO.
:JJ:JS
:T""'.J'u6olrm,
whc.lit~Ve
.,
' >
'
--
- - - -
--~econtlfy.
tli8
Writer i" m<>lt.ratefoF
to lier lief<MHI' ;ptrTe11t4.~
dbilor...,.&-
anti1f.m.
flito,...,,
lier.n.ner.,,
~.,A..
.
£wll-.
..J..m
anti lierli!J{cw£ botlier
&c{r
tmtfJ,.,
to heN lief<:Netl"fi'le",£;,
~·
· ~utmlttt
~.,.,
.£y.
a-.
~0\'it.
.
:JiUcttt.
~-"
· ~
~~
::tr-u-.,
tmtSit
Medan,24September 2007
The writer
ABSTRACT
,· · Simonmgkir, Imelda Malawaty. QnestioDS in English and Toba Batak Language.
I
)
.
'-Thesis. Post Graduate School Stllte University ofMedan. 2007.
The thesis addresses questions in English and Toba Batak Language (TBL). Specifically, the srudy describes similarities and differences of question sentences in. the two languages. The objectives of the srudy are to describe the similarities and differences in
structure and mood between English and TBL. Mood is one part of analyzing sentence in Systemic Functional Linguistic (SFL). The da"tll for TBL are taken from some informants. Tbe fmdings indicate that there are two types of question in English and TBL, they are those using question words and yes/no questions. In English a question there are eigllt question words in English and eleven in TBL. In question sentences. English uses tense sequence finite as the marker but in TBL there is no tense ~'equence
one of the Mood elements in English is finite but in TBL the Mood is constituted by most mood element consists only adjunct. The finite as the tense sequence marker in
English includes to be, auxiliary verbs, and modal such as Am, Are, Did, Do, Will, Can, etc. Finite as the question marker in TBL are do and na ..
•
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1. The Ba(:kgrouud of the Study
Human beings u.o;e and need language every day. They can express
everything in their mind by using language. Language follows every human's
activity. If someone cannot communicate with the other, s/hc would find
everything in his or her world difficult; therefore it is important to see clearly what
language is. According to the Webster's New World College Dictionary (1986)
language is human speech or the ability to communicate by human speech, and the
vocal sounds used in spoken or the written symbols for them. By the ability to
communicate, human beings are able to express their ideas, to live and work.
Without language, problems in society may appear legions and misunderstanding.
Sapir (1921 :8) defines language as a purely human being and non-instinctive
method of communicating ideas, emotion and desires by mean of voluntarily
produced symbols. The function or role of language may be differently
interpreted. Thus, Hall (1968:158) says that language is an institution where by a
human being communicates and interacts with one another by means of habitually used oral-auditory, arbitrary and symbols. Jn the light of this defmition, language
•
2
given culture, or other people who have learned the system of culture to
commwricate and interact
Language as a means of communication is not only used for daily
commwrication but also for its great concern with other field. Language has so many interrelationshlps with variable aspects of human life. Acconting to
Bloomfield (1933:3) language plays a great part in our life. English is the most important language in the world. There is a term whlch says that if one wants to
know the world one must know English. English has the most speakers in the
world. Many citizens in other nations study English as their second language. In Indonesia, as one of the developing countries, English is learnt as a
foreign language. Indonesia are constituted by ethnic groups such as the Javanese,
Bataks and others. The Bataks as one of the biggest ethnic groups in Indonesia and
the biggest in Sumatera Utara also learn English for special purposes sueh as
tourism, academic and occupational pwposes. Learning English for the Bataks is
not easy because the patterns, structures and gnunmar of English are viewed as
very different by the Bataks. The differences can be seen in the pattern of the
sentences.
In general, sentences differ in lCrlllS of moocl, i.e positive sentence, negative sentence, and interrogative sentence. Tilis addresses questions in English and Toba
baralc Language (TBL). An interrogative sentence is one that introduces a question. Newby (1987:69) introduces two typeS of question in English. They are
'•
3
eXpect a yes or no answer. Whereas wh-quest:ion is a question started with question words (who, what, which, whose, when, where, why, and how). It is also used to signal the need for further information. The essence of studying how questions are formed
in
English
and TBL is tha1 learners can gain benefit the comparisons, thus enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of learning the languages.In TBL according to Sibarani (1997:139) based on the formation question sentences is divided into nominal question sentences, temporal question sentences, numeral question sentences, adjectival question sentences, special question sentences, causal question sentences, and verbal question sentences. TBL also has yes-no question. Sibarani's dcscriptioos arc structurally based.
•
4
Complement and Adjunct. There can be only one Predicator, one or two
Complement and an indefinite
number
of Adjunct up to, in principle, about seven .~iled description about the SFL theories is devoted in chapter 2.
Similarities and differences of questions in English and
TBL
arcassumed
to be inherent in the two languages. This study specifically addresses the two aspects. 'The importance of studying questions in the two languages lies on therelevance to learning the two languages. It is specifically expected that by knowing the similarities and differences of questions in the two languages, the learners can effectively and sufficiently learn English or
TBL.
1.2. The Problem of the Study
In relation to the background of the study, the problems are formulated in
the form of the questions as follows:
I. How are questions realized in English and 'IBL?
2. What are the similarities of English and TBL questions?
3. What are the differences of English and T BL questions?
1.3. The Objective of the Study
In relation to the problems, the objectives ofthis study are
1. to describe the realizations of questions in English and TBL ,
5
3. to describe differences of questions realizations of
mood
in English and TBL.1.4. The Scope ofthe Study
The study is focused on questions in both English and the TBL. The questions are reali7..ed in interrogative moods. Thus, the study also involves interrogative moods of sentences. Realizations of questions in moods of the two languages share similarities. However, they also differ in some aspec.:ts. Both the similarities and differences of questions in the two· languages are addressed in this study.
1.5. The Significance ofthe Study
The fmdings of study are expected to provide relevant information for 1. those who want to add their knowledge of questions in the TBL.
2. those who want to find out the similarities and tb.e differences of the use interrogative sentences in Toba Batak Language and English.
• •
.
.
ri
'
CHAPTERV
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
S.l Conclusions
Based on the above analysis, it could be concluded that: l. The similarities between both languages
arc
drawn below:• Both languages have question sentences using question words and yes/no
question.
• The question words are placed in initial part of the sentence.
2. The differences between both languages are drawn below:
• There
arc
eight question words in English, but inTBL
there are eleven question words.Question
wordsin English
andTBL are:
In English:
( I) What (5) Why
In TBL:
(2) Who (6) Which
(I) Aha (2) Ise (5) Nandigan (6) Boasa
(9) Sadia (10) Mahua
(3) Where (7) Whose
(3) Dia (7)Boba
(II) Mai.liua
n
(4) When (8) How
•
•78
• English has finite such as to be,
auxiliary
verbs, and modals. TBL doesn't have any finite.• TBL puts predicator and complement in initial part of the sentence to make a question sentence.
5.2
SuggestionsIn relation to the conclusion, suggestions are staged as the following: I. Traditional languages are getting rarely in used especially by young generation.
· Many young generations don't know their traditional language detail.
2. It is suggested to introduce the traditional language to young generation because Indonesia is rich by tradition.
..
REFERENCES
Azar, Betty Schr.unper. 1992. Fundamental of English Grammar Secorui edition. U.S. A. Regents/ Pressice Hall.
, Bloch, Band Tragger, s. 1942. An Outline a/Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
, Bloomfield, Leonardo. 1993. Language. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
· Hall, R. 1968. An Introduction to Linguistics. Philadelphia: Chilton
Halliday, M.A. K., 1975. Learning How to Mean: Exploration in the Developmenl of language. Londoo: Edward Arnold.
---, 1978. language as Social Semiotic. Loodon: F.dward Arnold.
1978. An lmroduction to Funcliona/ Grammar. London: Edward
-·--·-··---, 2004. An lmroduclion to Funcrional Grammar. New York: Oxford University l'ress.
Marrin, J. R., 1997. Analysis Genre: Funclional Paramelers. London: Cassel.
Martin, Pedro, 2003. A Genre Analysis of English and Spanish Research Paper Ab.tlracl in Experimental Social Science. www. Elsevier. Com
· Murphy, Raymond. 2001. English Grammar in Use Indonesia. Erlangga
Newby, M. 1987. The Slructure of English. London, Cambrige Uni:vCJSity Pres.
Samraj, Betty, 2005. An Exploralion of Genre Set: Research Arlicle A.bslract and Introductions in Two Discipline. www. Elsevier. Com.
Saragih, Amrin, 2003. Bahasa dalam Konreks Sosial: Pendekatan Linguistik Fungslona/ Sislemik terhadap Tata Bahasa dan Wacana. Medan: Program Studi Linguistik Pasca Sarjana USU.
Sibarani, Robert 1997. Sintak.sis Bahasa Ba1aJ: Toba. Medan. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Press.
•
80
Sinar, T., 1998. Ana/Isis Slruktur S!cematika cenre. Medan: USU
Press.
---, 2003. Ana/isis Wacana Berorientasi LFS. Medan: Program Pasca Sllljana USU.
Sapir, T. 1921. Language: An Introduction to The Study of Speech. New York: Hardcourt,
Brace and World.