Lampiran 1 : FORMAT UJI ORGANOLEPTIK SKALA HEDONIK
Nama Panelis : ... Umur : ... Pekerjaan : ... Alamat : ... ... Tanggal : ... Produk : Cookies
Petunjuk Pengisian
Ujilah sampel dibawah ini dengan baik sesuai dengan nomor kode sampel, dan nyatakanlah pendapat Anda tentang apa yang dirasakan oleh alat indera. Kemudian beri skala kode dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut :
Untuk uji organoleptik rasa memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat enak : 5 Cukup enak : 3 Enak : 4 Kurang enak : 2 Tidak Enak : 1
Untuk uji organoleptik warna memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat suka : 5 Cukup suka : 3 Suka : 4 Kurang suka : 2
Tidak suka : 1
Untuk uji organoleptik aroma memakai skala hedonik :
Tidak harum : 1
Untuk uji organoleptik tekstur atau kerenyahan memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat renyah : 5 Cukup renyah : 3 Renyah : 4 Kurang renyah : 2 Tidak renyah : 1
Berilah skala kode pada tabel dibawah ini sesuai kode sampel yang Anda konsumsi dengan baik :
Kode Sampel
Uji Organoleptik
Rasa Aroma Warna Tekstur
C1
C2
C3
C4
Panelis,
LAMPIRAN 2
TABEL : REKAPITULASI HASIL ANALISIS UJI HEDONIK COOKIES N
O
Nama
Panelis Umur L/P
UJI ORGANOLEPTIK (UJI HEDONIK)
20. Melisa 22 P 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 4
21. Herwita 40 P 5 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4
22. Indra 41 L 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
23. Rikardo 21 L 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 4
24. Budi 22 L 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 2 2 4 4 4 4
25. William 22 L 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 3 2 4 4 4 4
26. Bella 21 P 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 4
27. Marini 22 P 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 5 2 2 4 4 4 4
28. Resa 22 P 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 5 2 3 4 4 4 3
29. Tina P. 47 P 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4
30. Zulfan 45 L 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 2 2 4 4 4 4
LAMPIRAN 3
General Linear Model Indikator Warna
Descriptive Statistics
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: warna
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Source
Greenhouse-Geisser 10.625 2.416 4.398 11.573 .000 Huynh-Feldt 10.625 2.651 4.008 11.573 .000 Lower-bound 10.625 1.000 10.625 11.573 .002 Error
(warna)
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Measure:MEASURE_1
Estimated Marginal Means
Estimates
warna
95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 4.000 .136 3.723 4.277
2 4.200 .074 4.048 4.352
3 3.767 .092 3.578 3.955
Pairwise Comparisons
95% Confidence Interval for Differencea
Based on estimated marginal means
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Multivariate Tests Each F tests the multivariate effect of warna. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
LAMPIRAN 4
a. Exact statistic b. Design: Intercept
Within Subjects Design: aroma
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure:MEASURE_1
Greenhouse-Geisser 18.967 2.038 9.306 18.945 .000 Huynh-Feldt 18.967 2.194 8.647 18.945 .000 Lower-bound 18.967 1.000 18.967 18.945 .000 Error(aroma) Sphericity Assumed 29.033 87 .334
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
95% Confidence Interval for Differencea
Mean Difference
1 2 -.667* .088 .000 -.846 -.488
3 .367* .148 .019 .065 .669
4 .233 .124 .070 -.020 .487
2 1 .667* .088 .000 .488 .846
3 1.033* .182 .000 .660 1.407
4 .900* .130 .000 .634 1.166
3 1 -.367* .148 .019 -.669 -.065
2 -1.033* .182 .000 -1.407 -.660
4 -.133 .196 .502 -.534 .268
4 1 -.233 .124 .070 -.487 .020
2 -.900* .130 .000 -1.166 -.634
3 .133 .196 .502 -.268 .534
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).
Multivariate Tests
Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.
Pillai's trace .728 24.047a 3.000 27.000 .000
Wilks' lambda .272 24.047a 3.000 27.000 .000
Hotelling's trace 2.672 24.047a 3.000 27.000 .000
Roy's largest root 2.672 24.047a 3.000 27.000 .000
Each F tests the multivariate effect of aroma. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
LAMPIRAN 5
a. Exact statistic b. Design: Intercept
Within Subjects Design: rasa
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure:MEASURE_1
Greenhouse-Geisser 57.800 1.844 31.338 41.697 .000 Huynh-Feldt 57.800 1.964 29.430 41.697 .000 Lower-bound 57.800 1.000 57.800 41.697 .000 Error(rasa) Sphericity Assumed 40.200 87 .462
Greenhouse-Geisser 40.200 53.488 .752 Huynh-Feldt 40.200 56.955 .706 Lower-bound 40.200 29.000 1.386
Source rasa
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
95% Confidence Interval for Differencea
Mean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.a Lower Bound Upper Bound
2 1 .900* .182 .000 .529 1.271
3 1.333* .246 .000 .830 1.837
4 1.900* .188 .000 1.516 2.284
3 1 -.433* .141 .005 -.722 -.144
2 -1.333* .246 .000 -1.837 -.830
4 .567* .114 .000 .333 .800
4 1 -1.000* .152 .000 -1.310 -.690
2 -1.900* .188 .000 -2.284 -1.516
3 -.567* .114 .000 -.800 -.333
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
LAMPIRAN 6
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: tekstur
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed 8.492 87 .098
Greenhouse-Geisser 8.492 75.379 .113 Huynh-Feldt 8.492 83.459 .102 Lower-bound 8.492 29.000 .293
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts Measure:MEASURE_1
Source tekstur
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Tekstur Linear .735 1 .735 6.242 .018
Quadratic .008 1 .008 .088 .769
Cubic .015 1 .015 .186 .669
Error(tekstur) Linear 3.415 29 .118
Quadratic 2.742 29 .095
Cubic 2.335 29 .081
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Estimated Marginal Means
tekstur
Estimates Measure:MEASURE_1
tekstur
95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
95% Confidence Interval for Differencea
Based on estimated marginal means
LAMPIRAN 7
DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
Gambar : Tanaman Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) 7 bulan usia tanam.
Gambar : Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius hypopthalmus).
Gambar : Lembaran Kering Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Setelah Pengeringan.
LAMPIRAN 8
PERHITUNGAN NILAI GIZI COOKIES
Berpedoman pada pendapat Tarwotjo (1998), kira-kira satu kali makan jajan, seseorang cukup 1-2 potong yang mengandung 150 - 200 kalori. Cookies C2 yang merupakan cookies ideal dengan tingkat kesukaan terbaik dapat
diketahui sumbangan energi cookies didasarkan pada Tabel 4.8 berikut: Tabel 4.8. Hasil Uji Proksimat Tepung Rimpang Bunga Tasbih
(Canna edulis Ker.) dan Cookies
Sampel Satuan
Parameter
Karbohidrat Protein Lemak Serat
Kasar
Abu Air
Tepung %(b/b) 75,3 3,61 0,15 3,62 - -
Cookies 1 %(b/b) 54,3 13,4 24,3 5,49 4,6 3,4 Cookies 2 %(b/b) 54,8 14,1 24,5 4,34 3,4 3,2 Sumber: BARISTAN, 2016.
Berat cookies = 5 gr/keping gr.HA = 5 gr x 54,8% = 2,74 gr; gr.Lipid = 5 gr x 24,5% = 1,225 gr; gr.Protein = 5 gr x 14,1% = 0,705 gr.
Nilai Energi = (4 kkal x gr.HA) + (9 kkal x gr.Lipid) + (4 kkal x gr.Protein) Nilai Energi = (4 kkal x 2,74) + (9 kkal x 1,225) + (4 kkal x 0,705)
= 10,96 kkal + 11,025 kkal + 2,82 kkal
= 24,805 kkal = 25 kkal per keping Asupan serat WHO : 19 – 30 gr/orang/hari.
Serat cookies = 5 gram x 4,34% = 0,217 gram per keping.
LAMPIRAN 9
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N
Paired Samples Correlations
N Correlation Sig. Pair 1 Cookies 1 & Cookies 2 4 .999 .001 Pair 2 Cookies 2 & Cookies 1 4 .999 .001
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences 95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
