• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Chapter.2 Linear programming Models

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Chapter.2 Linear programming Models"

Copied!
22
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Chapter 2

Linear Programming Models:

Graphical and Computer Methods

(2)

Steps in Developing a Linear

Programming (LP) Model

1) Formulation

2) Solution

(3)

Properties of LP Models

1) Seek to minimize or maximize

2) Include “constraints” or limitations

3) There must be alternatives available

(4)

Example LP Model Formulation:

The Product Mix Problem

Decision: How much to make of > 2 products?

Objective: Maximize profit

(5)

Example: Flair Furniture Co.

Two products: Chairs and Tables

Decision: How many of each to make this month?

(6)

Flair Furniture Co. Data

Contribution $7 $5

Carpentry 3 hrs 4 hrs 2400

Painting 2 hrs 1 hr 1000

Other Limitations:

(7)

Decision Variables:

T = Num. of tables to make

C = Num. of chairs to make

Objective Function: Maximize Profit

(8)

Constraints:

• Have 2400 hours of carpentry time available

3 T + 4 C < 2400 (hours)

• Have 1000 hours of painting time available

(9)

More Constraints:

• Make no more than 450 chairs C < 450 (num. chairs)

• Make at least 100 tables

T > 100 (num. tables)

Nonnegativity:

Cannot make a negative number of chairs or tables

(10)

Model Summary

Max 7T + 5C (profit)

Subject to the constraints:

3T + 4C < 2400 (carpentry hrs)

2T + 1C < 1000 (painting hrs)

C < 450 (max # chairs)

T > 100 (min # tables)

(11)

Graphical Solution

• Graphing an LP model helps provide

insight into LP models and their solutions.

• While this can only be done in two

(12)

Carpentry

Constraint Line

3T + 4C = 2400 < 2400 hrs

Infeasible > 2400 hrs

3T + 4C = 2

(13)

Painting

Constraint Line

(14)

0 100 500 800 T

C 1000

600 450

0

Max Chair Line

C = 450

Min Table Line

T = 100

Feasible

(15)
(16)

0 100 200 300 400 500 T

more chairs than tables New optimal point

(17)

LP Characteristics

Feasible Region: The set of points that satisfies all constraints

Corner Point Property: An optimal

solution must lie at one or more corner points

(18)

Special Situation in LP

1. Redundant Constraints - do not affect the feasible region

Example: x < 10 x < 12

(19)

Special Situation in LP

2. Infeasibility – when no feasible solution exists (there is no feasible region)

(20)

Special Situation in LP

3. Alternate Optimal Solutions – when

there is more than one optimal solution

(21)

Special Situation in LP

4. Unbounded Solutions – when nothing

prevents the solution from becoming infinitely large

(22)

Using Excel’s Solver for LP

Recall the Flair Furniture Example:

Max 7T + 5C (profit)

Subject to the constraints:

3T + 4C < 2400 (carpentry hrs)

2T + 1C < 1000 (painting hrs)

C < 450 (max # chairs) T > 100 (min # tables)

T, C > 0 (nonnegativity)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

multiobjective problem. In this sense, it is necessary to the following results. Remark 2.1 The concepts of expected value, minimum variance, etc., weak and properly

The degree of sensitivity can range from no change of the optimal solution, with the only change in the optimal value of the objective function, up to a considerable change of

In other word, if we find the optimal value in main variable of the primal, than we know that this is the optimal value for the dual in slack variable, and vice versa. Even though

linear relationships of decision variables describing the problems objective. always consists of maximizing or minimizing

The following table represents a specific iteration of transportation technique used in the process of solution of transportation problem with cost values.. The value

Conclusions The optimal solution for multiple DG placement is addressed by using a novel hybrid ABC-HC algorithm considering multi-objective function which includes minimization of

Solution: Remark: Since fx, y =x2 +y2−x−y+ 1 is a continuous function defined on a bounded closed diskx2 +y2 ≤1, according to some theorems not mentioned fx, y can attain global

Results: The performance is appraised rely on the relative gap Optimal Solution  OFV / OFV  100 , where OFV is the obtained objective function value achieving with another method