• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

HI - Week VII - Subject of International Law - Week VI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "HI - Week VII - Subject of International Law - Week VI"

Copied!
25
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Subject of International Law

(2)

What is subject to international

law?

A legal person who has a capacity to enter into legal relations and to have legal rights

(3)

States

notwithstanding differences of an economic, social, political or other nature. In particular, sovereign equality includes :

States are juridically equal

State enjoys the rights inherent in full sovereignty

State has the duty to respect the personality of other states

The territorial integrity and political independence of the state are inviolable

The right to freely choose and develop its political, social, economic and cultural systems

(4)

States II

– Peaceful co-existence

– Independence  the 1949 Draft Declaration

on the Rights and Duties of States prepared by International Law Commission

• Nicaragua Case 1986  Independence cant be

presumed  unless stated in the treaty, the level

(5)

States - III

• Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States 1933, art. I :

(6)

States - IV

• Has been supplemented by – once independence achieved –

(7)

Permanent Population

• Determination  nationality

• No lower limit

– Nauru  12.000 inhabitants

– The Vatican City • Mini States

– The Vatican City  entertains diplomatic

(8)

Territory

• No limitation to the size of a State – Nauru  eight square miles

– The Vatican City  less than 100 acres

• State boundaries is crucial but absolute certainty is not required  Israel

• State of Palestine declared in 1988 

cant be regarded as a state

• Self – determination  Western Sahara

(9)

Government

• Two aspects :

– Internal  the capacity to establish and maintain law

– External  independency at international level

• Aaland Island Case  stable political

organization had been created

• Does stable political organization apply to the State that already exist?  Somalia

• Failed state or Etats sans Gouvernement 

Somalia

(10)

Government - II

• Three elements of failed states :

– Internal collapse of law and order  total or

near breakdown of structures guaranteeing law and order

– Absence of bodies capable of representing the State at the International level

– Geographical and territorial aspect :

(11)

Government - III

• Failed state : a state that has failed for all practical purposes lost the ability to exercise its legal capacity since it can not commit the State in an effective and

legally binding way  concluding

(12)

Capacity to Enter into relations with

other states

• Montevideo 1933 refers to Independence in law from the authority of any other state

 the capacity to conduct the relations

(13)

Recognition

• Distinction :

– Of a state  fulfills the criteria of statehood

– Of a government  effective control of a state

(14)

International Organizations

• Refers to an organization established by agreement between two or more states

• Article 104 of the UN Charter  the

(15)

International Organizations – II

• Article 43 of the UN Charter  empowers

the UN to make certain types of treaties with member states

• Reparation for injuries case

– The UN had international legal personality

(16)

Individuals

• Treaty of Versailles 1919 jurisdiction of

the Mixed Arbitral Tribunals

• The Polish – German Convention 1922 

independent procedural status of

(17)

Individuals - II

• The Permanent Court of International Justice, Danzig Railway Officials Case 1925, Poland v. Danzig railway officials 

(18)

Individuals - III

• Customary International Law 

(19)

Individuals - IV

• International Military Tribunal of Nürnberg and the International Military Tribunal of Tokyo

“crimes against international law are

(20)

Individuals - V

• To the extent:

– crimes against humanity – Non human rights :

• La grand case  art 36 (1) (a) of the Vienna

(21)

Insurgents and National Liberation

Movements

• Insurgency  full scale war and vaguely to allow

foreign states a certain freedom to deal with internal war

• National Liberation Movements or Belligerents

– anti government forces which have established a “government” and a military organization

– Controls a substantial area of the original state’s territory

(22)

Insurgents and National Liberation

Movements - II

(23)

The Holy See and Vatican City

(24)

The Holy See and Vatican City - II

• Today’s status :

– Has no permanent population apart of functionaries

– Exists to support the work of the Holy See – Italy carries out substantial administrative

regarding the city

– Party to international treaties

(25)

The Holy See and Vatican City - III

• Engage diplomatic relations • Recognition by states

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

749 Supra + RetropUblIC Prostatectorny Inst... 831 USG with obstetric tranducer +

For example, arguments on whether the court should exercise jurisdiction over nationals of states that did not ratify the treaty creating the court sometimes relied on explicit

Some investment treaties have choice of law provisions, which enumerate the sources of law to be consulted requiring application of host State, international law, as well as

Dari pasal-pasal di atas sangat jelas bahwa bentuk kekerasan seperti perkosaan dalam rumah tangga, baik terhadap istri (marital rape) maupun anak atau orang lain (yang dilarang

9 What this means in terms of my research is that rather than following suggestions for an alternative approach to transitional justice in the form of “transformative justice” as

The findings show the protection of TCE in Indonesia based on Article 38 of the Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (Copyright Law 2014) was implemented through the Draft

31 International Court of Justice, Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v.. coasts” of the two States, the “relevant area” to be delimited, as well as the

However by still recognizing the United Kingdom’s historic rights and economic dependency on certain fish stocks located in such a fishing zone, 32 the Court implied that Iceland