• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 1200471 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 1200471 Bibliography"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

REFERENCES

Asiri, I. (1996). University EFL Teachers‟ Written Feedback on Compositions and Students‟ Reactions. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Essex.

Barnett, M. A. (1992). Writing as a Process, (Dvorak 155).

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing, 14, 191–205.

Brazil (2001) The Realm of The Red Pen: The Impact of Written Teacher Feedback

on L2 Writing in REACT Vol. 20, No. 2. 5

Broadman, A. C. (2008). Writing to communicate. New York: Pearson Education.

Brown, G., Bull, J. & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher

education. London, England: Routledge.

Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language

Pedagogy. 3rd Ed. White Plains, New York: Pearson Education.

Budimlic, D. (2012). Written Feedback in English.

Caroline, C. e. (2003). Teaching Academic Writing. London: Centre of Language and

Communication, Routledge, Falmer.

Chandler, J. 2003. „The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing‟. Journal of Second

Language Writing 12: 267–96.

(2)

Cohen, A.D. 1994 Assessing language ability in the classroom. Boston: Heinle &

Heinle Publishers.

Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students‟ response to

traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study.

British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Newton: PETA.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford

University Press.

Edeiken-cooperman, N., & Berenato, C. L. (2014). Students ‟ Perceptions of

Electronic Feedback as an Alternative to Handwritten Feedback : One University ‟ s Inquiry, 3(1), 79–85. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n1p79

Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Retrieved from

http://www.scholarship.org/uc/item/6wg540t3.pdf

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types, 63(April), 97–107.

http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in a

tertiary efl context in Indonesia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: developing critical learners. Bandung: Rizqi

Press.

Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher Response to Student Writing: Focus on

(3)

Insights for the Classroom. (pp.178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (2004). Creative writing skills: literary and media text types. Melbourne: Phoenix Education. Ltd. Ferris, D. 2006. „Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on short- and long-term effects of written error correction‟ in K. Hyland and F. Hyland (eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, D. 1995. Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal. 4(4): 18-22.

Ferris, D. R. and B. Roberts. 2001. „Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?‟. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161–84.

Ferris, D. 2006. „Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on short- and long-term effects of written error correction‟ in K. Hyland and F. Hyland

(eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Fregeau, L. A. (1999). Preparing ESL students for college writing: Two case studies.

The Internet TESL Journal [On-line], 5 (10). Available:

http://iteslj.org/Articles/Fregeau-CollegeWriting.html

Hamied, F. A., & Malik, R. S. (2014). Research Methods: A guide For First Time

Researchers. Bandung: UPI PRESS.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to

achievement. New York: Routledge.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. United

(4)

Hino, J. (2006). Linguistic information supplied by negative feedback: A study of its

contribution to the process of second language acquisition (Doctoral

dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts

International, A 67/03, 872.

Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback in assessment. In P. Hyland & A. Booth

(Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 233-247). Manchester:

Manchester University Press.

Ibrahim, I., Abdel, E., & Elashri, F. (2013). The Impact of the Direct Teacher

Feedback Strategy on the EFL Secondary Stage Students ‟ Writing performance, 1–99.

Jamison. (2009) Orange County Public Schools Team. (n.d.). A Writing Resource

Guide, 0–46.

Junining, E. (2012). Critique on giving feedback for students‟ writing, 1–10.

Khatib, M., & Bijani, H. (2012). Evaluating the Effetiveness of Various Types of Error Feedback on Students L2 Writing Quality. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(6), 102-116.

Keh, C. L. (1990). for implementation, 44(October).

Knaap, P. (2005). Genre, text, and grammar. Sydney: University of New South

Wales.

Konttinen, M. (2009). The reality of teacher written feedback : a quantitative study.

Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary

classrooms, 17, 144–164. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001

Lewis Marylin, 2002. Giving Feedback in Language Classes. The University of

(5)

Littleton, Ch et al. (2011).The Role of feedback in Two Fan fiction writing Groups.

Unpublished, PhD, Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 346537.

Martin, J. . (2009). Discourse Studies. London: Continuum.

Matsumura, L. C., Patthey-Chavez, G. G.., Valdes R., & Garniez, H. (2002). Teacher

feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students' revision in

lower- and higher-achieving urban schools. The Elementary School Journal,

103(1), 3-25.

Mi, l. (2009).Adopting Varied Feedbacks Modes in the EFL Writing Class. US-China

foreign language, 7, 1.

Moqimipour, K., & Shahrokhi, M. (2015). The impact of text genre on Iranian intermediate EFL students‟ writing errors: An error analysis perspective.

International Education Studies, 8(3), 122–137.

http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p122

Mukarto, & Sujatmiko. (2007). English on sky 2 for junior high school students year

VIII. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Neman, B. S. 1995. Teaching students to write. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Nicol, D. 2009. Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34, no. 3: 335–52.

Notodiputro, P. D. (2013). Kurikulum 2013-Kompetensi Dasar. Jakarta: Kementerian

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Osterholm, Katherine K. Writing in the Native Language- Listening Reading and

writing Analysis ortd Application. Ed. Barbara H. Wing. Middlebury,

(6)

Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia

of Qualitative Research Methods. (Vol.2). Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-8.

Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O‟Donovan. 2010. Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35, no. 3:

277–89.

Richards, Jack C. and Renandya, Willy A. (2002) Methodology: Language

Teaching, An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Rusinovci, X. (2015). Teaching Writing Through Process-Genre Based Approach.

David Publishing, 5(10), 699–705.

http://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.10.006

Saragih, N., Silalahi, R., & Pardede, H. (2014). The Effectiveness of Using Recount

Text to Improve Writing Skill For Grade III Students of Kalam Kudus

Elementary School 2 Pematangsiantar, 19(1), 56–64.

Secondary school. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2016, from

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secondary school

Seow, A. (2002) “The Writing Process and Process Writing”. In Richards, J. and Renandya, W. (Eds.) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of

Current Practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

p.p. 315-320

Siahaan, S., & Shinoda, K. (2008). Generic text structure. Graha Ilmu.

(7)

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research,

78(1), 153-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654307313795

Teddlie, C. (2009). Journal of Mixed Methods Research. http://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners‟ Written Accuracy. ITL

International Journal of Applied linguistics, 156, 279-296.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/itl.156.0.2034439

Williams, C. (2007). Research Methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research,

5(3), 65–72. http://doi.org/10.1093/fampract/cmi221

(8)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Judul : Kinetika dan mekanisme reaksi Biotransformasi alpha pinena hasil isolasi dari minyak terpentin dengan enzim lipase dari pseudomonas aeruginosa (TAHUN KE-II). Program :

Laporan ini disusun berdasarkan penelitian yang telah dilaksanakan di laboratorium Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, pada tanggal Mei sampai Juli 2014 Adapun judul dari

Sesuai Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2012, tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/

Setelah saya memastikan keberadaan polip di dalam hidung bapak/ibu, selanjutnya saya akan mengambil sebagian/sedikit polip tersebut dengan menggunakan alat pencubit untuk diperiksa

Keterkaitan teori sinyal dengan Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), likuiditas merupakan kemampuan bank dalam membayar kewajiban jangka pendeknya, semakin tinggi Loan to

Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengetahui persepsi pelajar terhadap pengaplikasian kemahiran amali, pengaplikasian pengetahuan daripada segi pengetahuan teori dan

Atas dasar pertimbangan itu, maka nilai-nilai pendidikan budaya dan karakter bangsa harus didasarkan pada nilai-nilai dan kaidah yang berasal dari

Akan tetapi jika dibandingkan dengan kernel Linear dan Rbf dapat mengurangi tingkat akurasi yang dihasilkan pada saat penggunaan kombinasi 6 ekstraksi ciri dan kombinasi 3