73
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
World Health Organization
(WHO). Dengue and severe dengue [internet].
2014 [updated 2014 Mar; cited 2014 Nov 2]. Available from:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/
2.
Sukohar A. Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD). Medula Unila. 2014; 2(2):1-15
3.
World Health Organization
(WHO). Comprehensive guidelines for prevention
and control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. India: Regional
Office for South-East Asia. 2011
4.
Pusat Data dan Surveilans Epidemiologi Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Buletin
Jendela Epidemiologi Topik Utama Demam Berdarah Dengue. Jakarta:
Buletin Jendela Epidemiologi. 2010; 2:1-4
5.
Supriyantoro, Primadi O, Sitohang V, Budijanto D, Hardhana B, Soenardi TA,
dkk. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia tahun 2014. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan
Republik Indonesia. 2014
6.
Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Profil esehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah
tahun 2012 [internet]. 2012 [updated 2012; cited 2014 Sept]. Available from:
http://www.dinkesjatengprov.go.id/dokumen/2013/SDK/Mibangkes/profil201
2/BAB_I-VI_2012_fix.pdf
7.
Namongsa V, Sirivichayakul C, Songsithichok S, Chanthavanich P,
Chokejindachai W, Sitcharungsi R, dkk. Differences in Clinical Features
Between Children and Adults with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever/ Dengue
Shock Syndrome. Thailand: Southest Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;
44(5):772-9
8.
Hammond SN, Balmaseda A, Perez L, Tellez Y, Saborio SI, Mercado JC, dkk.
Differences in Dengue Severityin Infants, Children, and Adult in A 3-Year
Hospital-Based Study in Nicaragua. Nicaragua: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;
73(6): 1063-1070
9.
Wichmann O, Hongsiriwon S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Chotivanich K,
Sukthana Y, Pukrittayakame S. Risk factor and clinical features associated
with Severe Dengue Infection in adult and children during the 2011 epidemic
in Chonburi, Thailand. Thailand: Trop med Int Health. 2004
10. Aggarwal A, Chandra J, Aneja S, Patwari AK, Dutta AK. An Epidemiologic
of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever and Dengue Shock Syndrome in Children in
Delhi. Delhi: Indian Pediatr. 1998; 35(8):727-32
11. Bhaskar ME, Moorthy S, Kumar S. Dengue Haemorrhagic fever among adults
– An Observational study in Chennai, south India. India: Indian J Med Res.
2010; 132(6):738-740
12. Shepherd, Moore S. Dengue [internet]. 2014 [updated 2014 Mar 14, cited
2014 Sep]. Available from:
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/215840-overview
13. Candra, Aryu. Demam Berdarah Dengue: Epidemiologi, Patogenesis, dan
factor Risiko Penularan. Semarang: FK UNDIP. 2010
14. Hasibuan, WS. Chapter II [online]. 2010 [cited 2015 Feb 7]; Available from:
http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/20820/4/Chapter%20II.pdf
15. Silitonga, ML. Chapter I [Online]. 2011 [cited 2015 Feb 7]; Available from:
http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/20820/4/Chapter%20II.pdf
16. Dadiyanto DW, Muryawan H, Anindita. Buku Ajar Ilmu Kesehatan Anak.
Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. 2011
17. Halstead SB. Pathogenesis of dengue: Challenges to molecular biology.
Puerto Rico: Science. 1988; 239(4839):476-481
18. WHO. Water-related Disease Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever
[internet].
2015
[cited
2015
Jan
13].
Available
from:
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/diseases/dengue/en/
19. Dengue Fever Investigation Guideline. Kansas Disease Investigation
Guideline
[internet].
2010
[cited
2014
Nov].
Available
from:
http://www.kdheks.gov/epi/Investigation_Guidelines/Dengue_Fever_Investiga
tion_Guideline.pdf
20. Chuansumrit A, Tangnararatchakit K. Pathophysiology and management of
Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Bangkok: Transfusion Alternatives in
Transfusion Medicine. 2005
21. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Clinical Guidance
[internet]. 2014 [updated June 2014; cited 2015 Feb 5]. Available from:
www.cdc.gov/dengue/clinicalLab/clinical.html
22. Behrman, Kliegman, Arvin. Nelson Ilmu Kesehatan Anak. Jakarta: Penerbit
Buku Kedokteran EGC. 2000
23. Tsai JJ, Chokephaibulkit K, Chen PC, Liu LT, Hsiao HM, Lo YC, dkk. Role
of Cognitive Parameters in Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever and Dengue Shock
Syndrome. Taiwan: Journal Biomedical Science. 2013; 20(1):88
24. Noisakran S, Perng GC. Alternate Hypothesis on the Pathogenesis of Dengue
Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF)/ Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS in Dengue Virus
Infection. Atlanta: Biol Med. 2008; 233:401-408
25. Leon LR. Invited review: cytokine Regulation of Fever: Study Using gene
Knockout Mice. Massachusetts (Amerika): J Appl Physiol. 2002;
92:2648-2655
26.
World Health Organization
(WHO).Handbook For Clinical Management of
Dengue. Geneva: WHO Press. 2012
27. Wahid SFSA, Sanusi S, Zawawi MM, Ali RA. A Comparison of the Pattern of
Liver Involvement in Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever with Classic Dengue Fever.
Malaysia: Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000; 31(2):259-263
28. Garna, H Herry. Buku Ajar Divisi Infeksi Virus dan Penyakit Tropis. Jakarta:
Sagung Seto. 2012
29.
World Health Organization
(WHO). Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever Diagnosis,
Treatment, Prevention and Control Second Edition. Geneva: WHO press.
1997
30. Dhooria GS, Bhat D, Bains HS. Clinical profile and outcome in children of
Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in North India. Iran J Pediatr. 2008;
18(3):222-228
31. Sahidulalam ABM, Sadat SA, Swapan Z, Ahmed AU, Karim MDN, Paul HK,
dkk. Clinical profile of dengue fever in children. Bangladesh J Child Health.
2009; 33(2):55-58
32. Ratageri VH, Shepur TA, Wari PK, Chavan SC, Mujahid IB, Yergolkar PN.
Clinical profile and outcome of Dengue Fever cases. Indian Journal of
Pediatrics. 2005;72(8):705-706
33. Ahmed S, Arif F, Yahya Y, Rehman A, Abbas K, Ashraf S, dkk. Dengue
Fever Outbreak in Karachi 2006
–
A study of profile and outcome of children
under 15 years of age. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008; 58(1):4-8
34. Guilarde AO, Turchi MD, Siqueira JB, Feres VCR, Rocha B, Levi JE, dkk.
Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever among adult: clinical outcomes
related to viremia, serotypes, and antibody response. Brazil: The Journal of
Infection Diseases. 2008
35. Tee HP, How SH, Jamalludin AR, Safhan MNF, Sapian MM, Kuan YC, dkk.
Associated with Development of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever or Dengue
Shock Syndrome in Adults in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan.
Pahang: Mcd J Malaysia. 2009; 64: 316-320
36. Pawitan JA. Dengue Unfection: Predictors for Severe Dengue. Jakarta: Acta
Med Indones-Indones J Intern Med. 2011
37. Guzman MG, Kouri G, Bravo J, Valdes L, Vazquez S, Halstead SB. Effect of
Age on outcome of Secondary Dengue 2 Infection. Cuba: Int J Infect Dis.
2002; 6(2):118-124
38. Chua MN, dkk. Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time as a
predictor of bleeding in patients with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Filipina:
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993; 24(1):141-143
39. Setiati TE, Wagenaar JFP, Kruif MD, Mairuhu ATA, Corp ECM, Soemantri
A. Changing epidemiology of Dengue Heaemorrhagic Fever in Indonesia.
Jakarta: Dengue Buletin. 2006; 30:1-4
40. Halstead, Scott B. Dengue. Amerika: Imperial College Press. 2008
41. Setiati, Tatty Ermin, Soemantri. Manifestasi klinis kegawatan anak.
Semarang: Pelita Insani. 2010
42. Kresno SB. Respons imun terhadap infeksi virus. In:
Imunologi
– Diagnosis
dan Prosedur Laboratorium.
Jakarta : FK UI. 2001
43. Immunopaedia. Paediatrics and Adult Immune System [internet]. 2008 [cited
2015
Juli
2].
Available
from:
http://immunopaedia.org.za/fileadmin/docs/2008-09-05-00_Paediatrics%20and%20adult%20immune%20system.pdf
44. Suharti, C. Sudoyo, Aru W. Setiyohadi, Bambang. Alwi, Idrus. Simadibrata
K, Marcellus. Setiati, Siti.
Dasar-dasar Hemostasis dalam
Buku Ajar Ilmu
Penyakit Dalam Edisi IV
. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Departemen Ilmu Penyakit
Dalam FKUI. 2007
45. Fleisher, GR, Ludwig S, dkk. Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine.
Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health. 2010
46. Soedarmo PS dkk. Infeksi Virus Dengue. Dalam: Soedarmo.
Buku Ajar Ilmu
Kesehatan Anak, Infeksi dan Penyakit Tropis Edisi Pertama.
Jakarta: IDAI.
2002; 176-208
47. Setiati, Tatty Ermin, Soemantri. Demam Berdarah Dengue pada anak:
patofisiologi, resusitasi mikrovaskuler dan terapi komponen darah. Semarang :
Pelita Insani. 2009
48. Hadinegoro, Sri Rezeki H., Hindra Irawan S. Demam Berdarah Dengue.
Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia. 2005
49. Smith DR dan Khakpoor A. Involvement of the liver in dengue infections.
Thailand: Dengue Bulletin. 2009;33:75-86
50. Mourao MPGM dkk. Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever and Acute Hepatitis. Brazil
J Infect Dis Salvador. 2004;8(6):461-464
78
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 3.
Output uji statistik
Analisis subjek penelitian
Descriptives
Kategori Usia Statistic Std. Error
Usia Responden Anak Mean 7.9908 .51595 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 6.9636 Upper Bound 9.0179 5% Trimmed Mean 7.9280 Median 7.6700 Variance 21.030 Std. Deviation 4.58586 Minimum .42 Maximum 17.17 Range 16.75 Interquartile Range 7.00 Skewness .123 .271 Kurtosis -.723 .535 Dewasa Mean 34.1181 1.40117 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 31.3262 Upper Bound 36.9100 5% Trimmed Mean 33.2163 Median 31.1700 Variance 147.246 Std. Deviation 12.13449 Minimum 19.50 Maximum 70.00 Range 50.50 Interquartile Range 11.92 Skewness 1.323 .277 Kurtosis .865 .548
Deskripsi karakteristik subjek penelitian
Kategori Usia * Jenis Kelamin Crosstabulation
Count
Jenis Kelamin Total
Laki-laki Perempuan
Kategori Usia
Anak 34 45 79
Dewasa 36 39 75
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .382a 1 .536 Continuity Correctionb .208 1 .648 Likelihood Ratio .382 1 .536
Fisher's Exact Test .628 .324
Linear-by-Linear Association
.380 1 .538
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 34,09. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kategori Usia * Status Gizi Crosstabulation
Count
Status Gizi Total
Gizi Baik Berisiko Malnutrisi Kategori Usia Anak 65 14 79 Dewasa 60 15 75 Total 125 29 154 Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .131a 1 .718 Continuity Correctionb .024 1 .877 Likelihood Ratio .131 1 .718
Fisher's Exact Test .837 .438
Linear-by-Linear Association
.130 1 .719
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Deskripsi dan analisis bivariat profil klinis subjek penelitian
Kelompok Usia * Lama Demam Crosstabulation
Lama Demam Total
<=4 hari >4 hari
Kelompok Usia
<5 tahun
Count 4 17 21
% within Kelompok Usia 19.0% 81.0% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 15 35 50
% within Kelompok Usia 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 0 8 8
% within Kelompok Usia 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 13 62 75
% within Kelompok Usia 17.3% 82.7% 100.0%
Total
Count 32 122 154
% within Kelompok Usia 20.8% 79.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.055a 1 .304 Continuity Correctionb .686 1 .408 Likelihood Ratio 1.061 1 .303
Fisher's Exact Test .327 .204
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.048 1 .306
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15,58. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Report
Jumlah Hari Demam
Kategori Usia
Mean N Std.
Deviation
Median Minimum Maximum Range Variance % of Total N
Anak 5.92 79 2.231 5.00 3 16 13 4.977 51.3%
Dewasa 6.61 75 2.229 6.00 3 13 10 4.970 48.7%
Test Statisticsa Jumlah Hari Demam Mann-Whitney U 2309.500 Wilcoxon W 5469.500 Z -2.395
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .017
a. Grouping Variable: Kategori Usia
Kelompok Usia * Perdarahan Spontan Crosstabulation
Perdarahan Spontan Total
Tidak Ya
Kelompok Usia
<5 tahun
Count 6 15 21
% within Kelompok Usia 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 21 29 50
% within Kelompok Usia 42.0% 58.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 5 3 8
% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 50 25 75
% within Kelompok Usia 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 82 72 154
% within Kelompok Usia 53.2% 46.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.577a 1 .001 Continuity Correctionb 9.552 1 .002 Likelihood Ratio 10.711 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 10.508 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35,06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Peteki Crosstabulation Peteki Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 10 11 21
% within Kelompok Usia 47.6% 52.4% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 23 27 50
% within Kelompok Usia 46.0% 54.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 5 3 8
% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 58 17 75
% within Kelompok Usia 77.3% 22.7% 100.0%
Total
Count 96 58 154
% within Kelompok Usia 62.3% 37.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.003a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 12.786 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 14.329 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 13.912 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,25. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Ekimosis / Purpura Crosstabulation
Ekimosis / Purpura Total
Tidak Ya
Kelompok Usia
<5 tahun
Count 17 4 21
% within Kelompok Usia 81.0% 19.0% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 45 5 50
% within Kelompok Usia 90.0% 10.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 8 0 8
% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 74 1 75
% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 144 10 154
% within Kelompok Usia 93.5% 6.5% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.412a 1 .011 Continuity Correctionb 4.862 1 .027 Likelihood Ratio 7.369 1 .007
Fisher's Exact Test .018 .011
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.370 1 .012
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,87. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Epistaksis Crosstabulation Epistaksis Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 18 3 21
% within Kelompok Usia 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 41 9 50
% within Kelompok Usia 82.0% 18.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 7 1 8
% within Kelompok Usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 70 5 75
% within Kelompok Usia 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
Total
Count 136 18 154
% within Kelompok Usia 88.3% 11.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.572a 1 .059 Continuity Correctionb 2.686 1 .101 Likelihood Ratio 3.697 1 .055
Fisher's Exact Test .079 .049
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.549 1 .060
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,77. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Perdarahan Gusi Crosstabulation
Perdarahan Gusi Total
Tidak Ya
Kelompok Usia
<5 tahun
Count 19 2 21
% within Kelompok Usia 90.5% 9.5% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 50 0 50
% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 8 0 8
% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 71 4 75
% within Kelompok Usia 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 148 6 154
% within Kelompok Usia 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .807a 1 .369 Continuity Correctionb .232 1 .630 Likelihood Ratio .819 1 .365
Fisher's Exact Test .434 .316
Linear-by-Linear Association .801 1 .371
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,92. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Hematemesis Crosstabulation Hematemesis Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 18 3 21
% within Kelompok Usia 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 48 2 50
% within Kelompok Usia 96.0% 4.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 8 0 8
% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 74 1 75
% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 148 6 154
% within Kelompok Usia 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.565a 1 .109 Continuity Correctionb 1.404 1 .236 Likelihood Ratio 2.807 1 .094
Fisher's Exact Test .210 .117
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.548 1 .110
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,92. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Melena Crosstabulation Melena Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 19 2 21
% within Kelompok Usia 90.5% 9.5% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 49 1 50
% within Kelompok Usia 98.0% 2.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 8 0 8
% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 70 5 75
% within Kelompok Usia 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
Total
Count 146 8 154
% within Kelompok Usia 94.8% 5.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .643a 1 .423 Continuity Correctionb .192 1 .661 Likelihood Ratio .648 1 .421
Fisher's Exact Test .487 .331
Linear-by-Linear Association .639 1 .424
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,90. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Hepatomegali Crosstabulation Hepatomegali Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 6 15 21
% within Kelompok Usia 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 26 24 50
% within Kelompok Usia 52.0% 48.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 7 1 8
% within Kelompok Usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 71 4 75
% within Kelompok Usia 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 110 44 154
% within Kelompok Usia 71.4% 28.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 38.686a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 36.498 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 43.530 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 38.435 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21,43. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Syok Crosstabulation Syok Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 14 7 21
% within Kelompok Usia 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 42 8 50
% within Kelompok Usia 84.0% 16.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 8 0 8
% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 74 1 75
% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 138 16 154
% within Kelompok Usia 89.6% 10.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 12.879a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 11.053 1 .001 Likelihood Ratio 15.321 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 12.796 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,79. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Kebocoran Plasma Crosstabulation
Kebocoran Plasma Total
Tidak Ya
Kelompok Usia
<5 tahun
Count 2 19 21
% within Kelompok Usia 9.5% 90.5% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 8 42 50
% within Kelompok Usia 16.0% 84.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 3 5 8
% within Kelompok Usia 37.5% 62.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 44 31 75
% within Kelompok Usia 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 57 97 154
% within Kelompok Usia 37.0% 63.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 29.404a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 27.622 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 30.623 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 29.214 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27,76. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Hemokonsentrasi Crosstabulation Hemokonsentrasi Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 11 10 21
% within Kelompok Usia 52.4% 47.6% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 25 25 50
% within Kelompok Usia 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 5 3 8
% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 53 22 75
% within Kelompok Usia 70.7% 29.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 94 60 154
% within Kelompok Usia 61.0% 39.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.699a 1 .017 Continuity Correctionb 4.937 1 .026 Likelihood Ratio 5.751 1 .016
Fisher's Exact Test .021 .013
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.662 1 .017
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29,22. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Efusi Pleura Crosstabulation
Efusi Pleura Total
Tidak Ya
Kelompok Usia
<5 tahun
Count 7 14 21
% within Kelompok Usia 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 21 29 50
% within Kelompok Usia 42.0% 58.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 5 3 8
% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 62 13 75
% within Kelompok Usia 82.7% 17.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 95 59 154
% within Kelompok Usia 61.7% 38.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 27.225a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 25.522 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 28.457 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 27.048 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,73. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Asites Crosstabulation Asites Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 18 3 21
% within Kelompok Usia 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
5-14 tahun
Count 48 2 50
% within Kelompok Usia 96.0% 4.0% 100.0%
14-19 tahun
Count 7 1 8
% within Kelompok Usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
>19 tahun
Count 74 1 75
% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%
Total
Count 147 7 154
% within Kelompok Usia 95.5% 4.5% 100.0%
Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.477a 1 .062 Continuity Correctionb 2.183 1 .140 Likelihood Ratio 3.865 1 .049
Fisher's Exact Test .117 .067
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.454 1 .063
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,41. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Kelompok Usia * Edema Palpebra Crosstabulation
Edema Palpebra Total
Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 9 12 21 % within Kelompok Usia 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% 5-14 tahun Count 29 21 50 % within Kelompok Usia 58.0% 42.0% 100.0% 14-19 tahun Count 8 0 8 % within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% >19 tahun Count 75 0 75 % within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total Count 121 33 154 % within Kelompok Usia 78.6% 21.4% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 39.873a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 37.431 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 52.662 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association
39.614 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 154
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,07.
Kelompok Usia * Derajat Penyakit DBD Crosstabulation
Test Statisticsa
Derajat Penyakit DBD
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute .285
Positive .000
Negative -.285
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.767
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .004
a. Grouping Variable: Kategori Usia
Derajat Penyakit DBD Total
Derajat 1 Derajat 2 Derajat 3 Derajat 4
Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 4 10 4 3 21 % within Kelompok Usia 19.0% 47.6% 19.0% 14.3% 100.0% 5-14 tahun Count 17 25 5 3 50 % within Kelompok Usia 34.0% 50.0% 10.0% 6.0% 100.0% 14-19 tahun Count 6 2 0 0 8 % within Kelompok Usia 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% >19 tahun Count 47 27 0 1 75 % within Kelompok Usia 62.7% 36.0% 0.0% 1.3% 100.0% Total Count 74 64 9 7 154 % within Kelompok Usia 48.1% 41.6% 5.8% 4.5% 100.0%
Analisis multivariat subjek penelitian
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
EXP(B) Lower Upper Step 1a PerdSpontan(1) 1.649 .967 2.910 1 .088 5.202 .782 34.595 Hepatomegali(1) 2.379 .630 14.237 1 .000 10.789 3.136 37.118 Syok(1) .749 1.211 .382 1 .536 2.114 .197 22.688 Leakage(1) 1.079 .433 6.209 1 .013 2.941 1.259 6.870 Derajat 1.191 2 .551 Derajat(1) -1.068 .978 1.191 1 .275 .344 .051 2.339 Derajat(3) -19.758 11918.1 61 .000 1 .999 .000 .000 . Constant -3.297 1.250 6.959 1 .008 .037 Step 2a PerdSpontan(1) 1.525 .922 2.738 1 .098 4.596 .755 27.988 Hepatomegali(1) 2.427 .631 14.810 1 .000 11.324 3.290 38.976 Leakage(1) 1.102 .431 6.538 1 .011 3.010 1.293 7.006 Derajat .970 2 .616 Derajat(1) -.909 .923 .970 1 .325 .403 .066 2.460 Derajat(3) -20.345 11959.5 50 .000 1 .999 .000 .000 . Constant -2.642 .614 18.492 1 .000 .071 Step 3a PerdSpontan(1) .671 .403 2.779 1 .096 1.957 .889 4.310 Hepatomegali(1) 2.411 .586 16.917 1 .000 11.148 3.533 35.173 Leakage(1) 1.157 .427 7.351 1 .007 3.179 1.378 7.336 Constant -2.709 .575 22.176 1 .000 .067
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper Step 1a Peteki(1) 1.104 .368 8.977 1 .003 3.016 1.465 6.209 Ekimosis(1) 1.682 1.134 2.199 1 .138 5.376 .582 49.665 Epistaksis(1) .618 .593 1.085 1 .298 1.855 .580 5.930 Hematemesis(1) .388 1.306 .088 1 .766 1.474 .114 19.078 Constant -3.290 1.567 4.407 1 .036 .037 Step 2a Peteki(1) 1.112 .368 9.137 1 .003 3.040 1.478 6.250 Ekimosis(1) 1.773 1.096 2.618 1 .106 5.887 .688 50.409 Epistaksis(1) .617 .592 1.083 1 .298 1.853 .580 5.917 Constant -3.003 1.188 6.390 1 .011 .050 Step 3a Peteki(1) 1.175 .363 10.465 1 .001 3.238 1.589 6.597 Ekimosis(1) 1.814 1.090 2.771 1 .096 6.135 .725 51.938 Constant -2.530 1.079 5.498 1 .019 .080
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Peteki, Ekimosis, Epistaksis, Hematemesis.
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper Step 1a Hemokonsentrasi(1) .332 .429 .599 1 .439 1.393 .602 3.228 EfusiPleura(1) 1.713 .427 16.116 1 .000 5.548 2.403 12.807 Asites(1) .168 1.619 .011 1 .918 1.182 .050 28.230 EdemPalp(1) 21.353 6618.660 .000 1 .997 1876857696.085 .000 . Constant -22.375 6618.660 .000 1 .997 .000 Step 2a Hemokonsentrasi(1) .334 .428 .608 1 .435 1.396 .603 3.231 EfusiPleura(1) 1.715 .426 16.180 1 .000 5.559 2.410 12.822 EdemPalp(1) 21.360 6622.623 .000 1 .997 1890447480.171 .000 . Constant -22.220 6622.623 .000 1 .997 .000 Step 3a EfusiPleura(1) 1.737 .425 16.691 1 .000 5.678 2.468 13.061 EdemPalp(1) 21.435 6629.401 .000 1 .997 2036970950.189 .000 . Constant -22.089 6629.401 .000 1 .997 .000