• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

with Severe Dengue Infection in adult and children during the 2011 epidemic in Chonburi, Thailand. Thailand: Trop med Int Health

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "with Severe Dengue Infection in adult and children during the 2011 epidemic in Chonburi, Thailand. Thailand: Trop med Int Health"

Copied!
31
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

73

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1.

World Health Organization

(WHO). Dengue and severe dengue [internet].

2014 [updated 2014 Mar; cited 2014 Nov 2]. Available from:

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/

2.

Sukohar A. Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD). Medula Unila. 2014; 2(2):1-15

3.

World Health Organization

(WHO). Comprehensive guidelines for prevention

and control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. India: Regional

Office for South-East Asia. 2011

4.

Pusat Data dan Surveilans Epidemiologi Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Buletin

Jendela Epidemiologi Topik Utama Demam Berdarah Dengue. Jakarta:

Buletin Jendela Epidemiologi. 2010; 2:1-4

5.

Supriyantoro, Primadi O, Sitohang V, Budijanto D, Hardhana B, Soenardi TA,

dkk. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia tahun 2014. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan

Republik Indonesia. 2014

6.

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Profil esehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah

tahun 2012 [internet]. 2012 [updated 2012; cited 2014 Sept]. Available from:

http://www.dinkesjatengprov.go.id/dokumen/2013/SDK/Mibangkes/profil201

2/BAB_I-VI_2012_fix.pdf

7.

Namongsa V, Sirivichayakul C, Songsithichok S, Chanthavanich P,

Chokejindachai W, Sitcharungsi R, dkk. Differences in Clinical Features

Between Children and Adults with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever/ Dengue

Shock Syndrome. Thailand: Southest Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;

44(5):772-9

8.

Hammond SN, Balmaseda A, Perez L, Tellez Y, Saborio SI, Mercado JC, dkk.

Differences in Dengue Severityin Infants, Children, and Adult in A 3-Year

Hospital-Based Study in Nicaragua. Nicaragua: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;

73(6): 1063-1070

9.

Wichmann O, Hongsiriwon S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Chotivanich K,

Sukthana Y, Pukrittayakame S. Risk factor and clinical features associated

(2)

with Severe Dengue Infection in adult and children during the 2011 epidemic

in Chonburi, Thailand. Thailand: Trop med Int Health. 2004

10. Aggarwal A, Chandra J, Aneja S, Patwari AK, Dutta AK. An Epidemiologic

of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever and Dengue Shock Syndrome in Children in

Delhi. Delhi: Indian Pediatr. 1998; 35(8):727-32

11. Bhaskar ME, Moorthy S, Kumar S. Dengue Haemorrhagic fever among adults

– An Observational study in Chennai, south India. India: Indian J Med Res.

2010; 132(6):738-740

12. Shepherd, Moore S. Dengue [internet]. 2014 [updated 2014 Mar 14, cited

2014 Sep]. Available from:

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/215840-overview

13. Candra, Aryu. Demam Berdarah Dengue: Epidemiologi, Patogenesis, dan

factor Risiko Penularan. Semarang: FK UNDIP. 2010

14. Hasibuan, WS. Chapter II [online]. 2010 [cited 2015 Feb 7]; Available from:

http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/20820/4/Chapter%20II.pdf

15. Silitonga, ML. Chapter I [Online]. 2011 [cited 2015 Feb 7]; Available from:

http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/20820/4/Chapter%20II.pdf

16. Dadiyanto DW, Muryawan H, Anindita. Buku Ajar Ilmu Kesehatan Anak.

Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. 2011

17. Halstead SB. Pathogenesis of dengue: Challenges to molecular biology.

Puerto Rico: Science. 1988; 239(4839):476-481

18. WHO. Water-related Disease Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever

[internet].

2015

[cited

2015

Jan

13].

Available

from:

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/diseases/dengue/en/

19. Dengue Fever Investigation Guideline. Kansas Disease Investigation

Guideline

[internet].

2010

[cited

2014

Nov].

Available

from:

http://www.kdheks.gov/epi/Investigation_Guidelines/Dengue_Fever_Investiga

tion_Guideline.pdf

20. Chuansumrit A, Tangnararatchakit K. Pathophysiology and management of

Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Bangkok: Transfusion Alternatives in

Transfusion Medicine. 2005

(3)

21. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Clinical Guidance

[internet]. 2014 [updated June 2014; cited 2015 Feb 5]. Available from:

www.cdc.gov/dengue/clinicalLab/clinical.html

22. Behrman, Kliegman, Arvin. Nelson Ilmu Kesehatan Anak. Jakarta: Penerbit

Buku Kedokteran EGC. 2000

23. Tsai JJ, Chokephaibulkit K, Chen PC, Liu LT, Hsiao HM, Lo YC, dkk. Role

of Cognitive Parameters in Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever and Dengue Shock

Syndrome. Taiwan: Journal Biomedical Science. 2013; 20(1):88

24. Noisakran S, Perng GC. Alternate Hypothesis on the Pathogenesis of Dengue

Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF)/ Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS in Dengue Virus

Infection. Atlanta: Biol Med. 2008; 233:401-408

25. Leon LR. Invited review: cytokine Regulation of Fever: Study Using gene

Knockout Mice. Massachusetts (Amerika): J Appl Physiol. 2002;

92:2648-2655

26.

World Health Organization

(WHO).Handbook For Clinical Management of

Dengue. Geneva: WHO Press. 2012

27. Wahid SFSA, Sanusi S, Zawawi MM, Ali RA. A Comparison of the Pattern of

Liver Involvement in Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever with Classic Dengue Fever.

Malaysia: Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000; 31(2):259-263

28. Garna, H Herry. Buku Ajar Divisi Infeksi Virus dan Penyakit Tropis. Jakarta:

Sagung Seto. 2012

29.

World Health Organization

(WHO). Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever Diagnosis,

Treatment, Prevention and Control Second Edition. Geneva: WHO press.

1997

30. Dhooria GS, Bhat D, Bains HS. Clinical profile and outcome in children of

Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in North India. Iran J Pediatr. 2008;

18(3):222-228

31. Sahidulalam ABM, Sadat SA, Swapan Z, Ahmed AU, Karim MDN, Paul HK,

dkk. Clinical profile of dengue fever in children. Bangladesh J Child Health.

2009; 33(2):55-58

(4)

32. Ratageri VH, Shepur TA, Wari PK, Chavan SC, Mujahid IB, Yergolkar PN.

Clinical profile and outcome of Dengue Fever cases. Indian Journal of

Pediatrics. 2005;72(8):705-706

33. Ahmed S, Arif F, Yahya Y, Rehman A, Abbas K, Ashraf S, dkk. Dengue

Fever Outbreak in Karachi 2006

A study of profile and outcome of children

under 15 years of age. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008; 58(1):4-8

34. Guilarde AO, Turchi MD, Siqueira JB, Feres VCR, Rocha B, Levi JE, dkk.

Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever among adult: clinical outcomes

related to viremia, serotypes, and antibody response. Brazil: The Journal of

Infection Diseases. 2008

35. Tee HP, How SH, Jamalludin AR, Safhan MNF, Sapian MM, Kuan YC, dkk.

Associated with Development of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever or Dengue

Shock Syndrome in Adults in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan.

Pahang: Mcd J Malaysia. 2009; 64: 316-320

36. Pawitan JA. Dengue Unfection: Predictors for Severe Dengue. Jakarta: Acta

Med Indones-Indones J Intern Med. 2011

37. Guzman MG, Kouri G, Bravo J, Valdes L, Vazquez S, Halstead SB. Effect of

Age on outcome of Secondary Dengue 2 Infection. Cuba: Int J Infect Dis.

2002; 6(2):118-124

38. Chua MN, dkk. Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time as a

predictor of bleeding in patients with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Filipina:

Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993; 24(1):141-143

39. Setiati TE, Wagenaar JFP, Kruif MD, Mairuhu ATA, Corp ECM, Soemantri

A. Changing epidemiology of Dengue Heaemorrhagic Fever in Indonesia.

Jakarta: Dengue Buletin. 2006; 30:1-4

40. Halstead, Scott B. Dengue. Amerika: Imperial College Press. 2008

41. Setiati, Tatty Ermin, Soemantri. Manifestasi klinis kegawatan anak.

Semarang: Pelita Insani. 2010

42. Kresno SB. Respons imun terhadap infeksi virus. In:

Imunologi

– Diagnosis

dan Prosedur Laboratorium.

Jakarta : FK UI. 2001

(5)

43. Immunopaedia. Paediatrics and Adult Immune System [internet]. 2008 [cited

2015

Juli

2].

Available

from:

http://immunopaedia.org.za/fileadmin/docs/2008-09-05-00_Paediatrics%20and%20adult%20immune%20system.pdf

44. Suharti, C. Sudoyo, Aru W. Setiyohadi, Bambang. Alwi, Idrus. Simadibrata

K, Marcellus. Setiati, Siti.

Dasar-dasar Hemostasis dalam

Buku Ajar Ilmu

Penyakit Dalam Edisi IV

. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Departemen Ilmu Penyakit

Dalam FKUI. 2007

45. Fleisher, GR, Ludwig S, dkk. Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine.

Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health. 2010

46. Soedarmo PS dkk. Infeksi Virus Dengue. Dalam: Soedarmo.

Buku Ajar Ilmu

Kesehatan Anak, Infeksi dan Penyakit Tropis Edisi Pertama.

Jakarta: IDAI.

2002; 176-208

47. Setiati, Tatty Ermin, Soemantri. Demam Berdarah Dengue pada anak:

patofisiologi, resusitasi mikrovaskuler dan terapi komponen darah. Semarang :

Pelita Insani. 2009

48. Hadinegoro, Sri Rezeki H., Hindra Irawan S. Demam Berdarah Dengue.

Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia. 2005

49. Smith DR dan Khakpoor A. Involvement of the liver in dengue infections.

Thailand: Dengue Bulletin. 2009;33:75-86

50. Mourao MPGM dkk. Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever and Acute Hepatitis. Brazil

J Infect Dis Salvador. 2004;8(6):461-464

(6)

78

LAMPIRAN

(7)
(8)
(9)

Lampiran 3.

Output uji statistik

Analisis subjek penelitian

Descriptives

Kategori Usia Statistic Std. Error

Usia Responden Anak Mean 7.9908 .51595 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 6.9636 Upper Bound 9.0179 5% Trimmed Mean 7.9280 Median 7.6700 Variance 21.030 Std. Deviation 4.58586 Minimum .42 Maximum 17.17 Range 16.75 Interquartile Range 7.00 Skewness .123 .271 Kurtosis -.723 .535 Dewasa Mean 34.1181 1.40117 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 31.3262 Upper Bound 36.9100 5% Trimmed Mean 33.2163 Median 31.1700 Variance 147.246 Std. Deviation 12.13449 Minimum 19.50 Maximum 70.00 Range 50.50 Interquartile Range 11.92 Skewness 1.323 .277 Kurtosis .865 .548

Deskripsi karakteristik subjek penelitian

Kategori Usia * Jenis Kelamin Crosstabulation

Count

Jenis Kelamin Total

Laki-laki Perempuan

Kategori Usia

Anak 34 45 79

Dewasa 36 39 75

(10)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .382a 1 .536 Continuity Correctionb .208 1 .648 Likelihood Ratio .382 1 .536

Fisher's Exact Test .628 .324

Linear-by-Linear Association

.380 1 .538

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 34,09. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Kategori Usia * Status Gizi Crosstabulation

Count

Status Gizi Total

Gizi Baik Berisiko Malnutrisi Kategori Usia Anak 65 14 79 Dewasa 60 15 75 Total 125 29 154 Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .131a 1 .718 Continuity Correctionb .024 1 .877 Likelihood Ratio .131 1 .718

Fisher's Exact Test .837 .438

Linear-by-Linear Association

.130 1 .719

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(11)

Deskripsi dan analisis bivariat profil klinis subjek penelitian

Kelompok Usia * Lama Demam Crosstabulation

Lama Demam Total

<=4 hari >4 hari

Kelompok Usia

<5 tahun

Count 4 17 21

% within Kelompok Usia 19.0% 81.0% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 15 35 50

% within Kelompok Usia 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 0 8 8

% within Kelompok Usia 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 13 62 75

% within Kelompok Usia 17.3% 82.7% 100.0%

Total

Count 32 122 154

% within Kelompok Usia 20.8% 79.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.055a 1 .304 Continuity Correctionb .686 1 .408 Likelihood Ratio 1.061 1 .303

Fisher's Exact Test .327 .204

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.048 1 .306

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15,58. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Report

Jumlah Hari Demam

Kategori Usia

Mean N Std.

Deviation

Median Minimum Maximum Range Variance % of Total N

Anak 5.92 79 2.231 5.00 3 16 13 4.977 51.3%

Dewasa 6.61 75 2.229 6.00 3 13 10 4.970 48.7%

(12)

Test Statisticsa Jumlah Hari Demam Mann-Whitney U 2309.500 Wilcoxon W 5469.500 Z -2.395

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .017

a. Grouping Variable: Kategori Usia

Kelompok Usia * Perdarahan Spontan Crosstabulation

Perdarahan Spontan Total

Tidak Ya

Kelompok Usia

<5 tahun

Count 6 15 21

% within Kelompok Usia 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 21 29 50

% within Kelompok Usia 42.0% 58.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 5 3 8

% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 50 25 75

% within Kelompok Usia 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 82 72 154

% within Kelompok Usia 53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.577a 1 .001 Continuity Correctionb 9.552 1 .002 Likelihood Ratio 10.711 1 .001

Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001

Linear-by-Linear Association 10.508 1 .001

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35,06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(13)

Kelompok Usia * Peteki Crosstabulation Peteki Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 10 11 21

% within Kelompok Usia 47.6% 52.4% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 23 27 50

% within Kelompok Usia 46.0% 54.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 5 3 8

% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 58 17 75

% within Kelompok Usia 77.3% 22.7% 100.0%

Total

Count 96 58 154

% within Kelompok Usia 62.3% 37.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.003a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 12.786 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 14.329 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 13.912 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,25. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(14)

Kelompok Usia * Ekimosis / Purpura Crosstabulation

Ekimosis / Purpura Total

Tidak Ya

Kelompok Usia

<5 tahun

Count 17 4 21

% within Kelompok Usia 81.0% 19.0% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 45 5 50

% within Kelompok Usia 90.0% 10.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 8 0 8

% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 74 1 75

% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 144 10 154

% within Kelompok Usia 93.5% 6.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.412a 1 .011 Continuity Correctionb 4.862 1 .027 Likelihood Ratio 7.369 1 .007

Fisher's Exact Test .018 .011

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.370 1 .012

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,87. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(15)

Kelompok Usia * Epistaksis Crosstabulation Epistaksis Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 18 3 21

% within Kelompok Usia 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 41 9 50

% within Kelompok Usia 82.0% 18.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 7 1 8

% within Kelompok Usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 70 5 75

% within Kelompok Usia 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Total

Count 136 18 154

% within Kelompok Usia 88.3% 11.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.572a 1 .059 Continuity Correctionb 2.686 1 .101 Likelihood Ratio 3.697 1 .055

Fisher's Exact Test .079 .049

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.549 1 .060

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,77. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(16)

Kelompok Usia * Perdarahan Gusi Crosstabulation

Perdarahan Gusi Total

Tidak Ya

Kelompok Usia

<5 tahun

Count 19 2 21

% within Kelompok Usia 90.5% 9.5% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 50 0 50

% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 8 0 8

% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 71 4 75

% within Kelompok Usia 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 148 6 154

% within Kelompok Usia 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .807a 1 .369 Continuity Correctionb .232 1 .630 Likelihood Ratio .819 1 .365

Fisher's Exact Test .434 .316

Linear-by-Linear Association .801 1 .371

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,92. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(17)

Kelompok Usia * Hematemesis Crosstabulation Hematemesis Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 18 3 21

% within Kelompok Usia 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 48 2 50

% within Kelompok Usia 96.0% 4.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 8 0 8

% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 74 1 75

% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 148 6 154

% within Kelompok Usia 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.565a 1 .109 Continuity Correctionb 1.404 1 .236 Likelihood Ratio 2.807 1 .094

Fisher's Exact Test .210 .117

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.548 1 .110

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,92. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(18)

Kelompok Usia * Melena Crosstabulation Melena Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 19 2 21

% within Kelompok Usia 90.5% 9.5% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 49 1 50

% within Kelompok Usia 98.0% 2.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 8 0 8

% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 70 5 75

% within Kelompok Usia 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Total

Count 146 8 154

% within Kelompok Usia 94.8% 5.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .643a 1 .423 Continuity Correctionb .192 1 .661 Likelihood Ratio .648 1 .421

Fisher's Exact Test .487 .331

Linear-by-Linear Association .639 1 .424

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,90. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(19)

Kelompok Usia * Hepatomegali Crosstabulation Hepatomegali Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 6 15 21

% within Kelompok Usia 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 26 24 50

% within Kelompok Usia 52.0% 48.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 7 1 8

% within Kelompok Usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 71 4 75

% within Kelompok Usia 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 110 44 154

% within Kelompok Usia 71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 38.686a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 36.498 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 43.530 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 38.435 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21,43. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(20)

Kelompok Usia * Syok Crosstabulation Syok Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 14 7 21

% within Kelompok Usia 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 42 8 50

% within Kelompok Usia 84.0% 16.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 8 0 8

% within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 74 1 75

% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 138 16 154

% within Kelompok Usia 89.6% 10.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 12.879a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 11.053 1 .001 Likelihood Ratio 15.321 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 12.796 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,79. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(21)

Kelompok Usia * Kebocoran Plasma Crosstabulation

Kebocoran Plasma Total

Tidak Ya

Kelompok Usia

<5 tahun

Count 2 19 21

% within Kelompok Usia 9.5% 90.5% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 8 42 50

% within Kelompok Usia 16.0% 84.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 3 5 8

% within Kelompok Usia 37.5% 62.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 44 31 75

% within Kelompok Usia 58.7% 41.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 57 97 154

% within Kelompok Usia 37.0% 63.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 29.404a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 27.622 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 30.623 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 29.214 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27,76. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(22)

Kelompok Usia * Hemokonsentrasi Crosstabulation Hemokonsentrasi Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 11 10 21

% within Kelompok Usia 52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 25 25 50

% within Kelompok Usia 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 5 3 8

% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 53 22 75

% within Kelompok Usia 70.7% 29.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 94 60 154

% within Kelompok Usia 61.0% 39.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.699a 1 .017 Continuity Correctionb 4.937 1 .026 Likelihood Ratio 5.751 1 .016

Fisher's Exact Test .021 .013

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.662 1 .017

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29,22. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(23)

Kelompok Usia * Efusi Pleura Crosstabulation

Efusi Pleura Total

Tidak Ya

Kelompok Usia

<5 tahun

Count 7 14 21

% within Kelompok Usia 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 21 29 50

% within Kelompok Usia 42.0% 58.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 5 3 8

% within Kelompok Usia 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 62 13 75

% within Kelompok Usia 82.7% 17.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 95 59 154

% within Kelompok Usia 61.7% 38.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 27.225a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 25.522 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 28.457 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 27.048 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,73. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(24)

Kelompok Usia * Asites Crosstabulation Asites Total Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 18 3 21

% within Kelompok Usia 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

5-14 tahun

Count 48 2 50

% within Kelompok Usia 96.0% 4.0% 100.0%

14-19 tahun

Count 7 1 8

% within Kelompok Usia 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

>19 tahun

Count 74 1 75

% within Kelompok Usia 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%

Total

Count 147 7 154

% within Kelompok Usia 95.5% 4.5% 100.0%

Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.477a 1 .062 Continuity Correctionb 2.183 1 .140 Likelihood Ratio 3.865 1 .049

Fisher's Exact Test .117 .067

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.454 1 .063

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,41. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(25)

Kelompok Usia * Edema Palpebra Crosstabulation

Edema Palpebra Total

Tidak Ya Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 9 12 21 % within Kelompok Usia 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% 5-14 tahun Count 29 21 50 % within Kelompok Usia 58.0% 42.0% 100.0% 14-19 tahun Count 8 0 8 % within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% >19 tahun Count 75 0 75 % within Kelompok Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total Count 121 33 154 % within Kelompok Usia 78.6% 21.4% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 39.873a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 37.431 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 52.662 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association

39.614 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 154

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,07.

(26)

Kelompok Usia * Derajat Penyakit DBD Crosstabulation

Test Statisticsa

Derajat Penyakit DBD

Most Extreme Differences

Absolute .285

Positive .000

Negative -.285

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.767

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .004

a. Grouping Variable: Kategori Usia

Derajat Penyakit DBD Total

Derajat 1 Derajat 2 Derajat 3 Derajat 4

Kelompok Usia <5 tahun Count 4 10 4 3 21 % within Kelompok Usia 19.0% 47.6% 19.0% 14.3% 100.0% 5-14 tahun Count 17 25 5 3 50 % within Kelompok Usia 34.0% 50.0% 10.0% 6.0% 100.0% 14-19 tahun Count 6 2 0 0 8 % within Kelompok Usia 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% >19 tahun Count 47 27 0 1 75 % within Kelompok Usia 62.7% 36.0% 0.0% 1.3% 100.0% Total Count 74 64 9 7 154 % within Kelompok Usia 48.1% 41.6% 5.8% 4.5% 100.0%

(27)

Analisis multivariat subjek penelitian

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for

EXP(B) Lower Upper Step 1a PerdSpontan(1) 1.649 .967 2.910 1 .088 5.202 .782 34.595 Hepatomegali(1) 2.379 .630 14.237 1 .000 10.789 3.136 37.118 Syok(1) .749 1.211 .382 1 .536 2.114 .197 22.688 Leakage(1) 1.079 .433 6.209 1 .013 2.941 1.259 6.870 Derajat 1.191 2 .551 Derajat(1) -1.068 .978 1.191 1 .275 .344 .051 2.339 Derajat(3) -19.758 11918.1 61 .000 1 .999 .000 .000 . Constant -3.297 1.250 6.959 1 .008 .037 Step 2a PerdSpontan(1) 1.525 .922 2.738 1 .098 4.596 .755 27.988 Hepatomegali(1) 2.427 .631 14.810 1 .000 11.324 3.290 38.976 Leakage(1) 1.102 .431 6.538 1 .011 3.010 1.293 7.006 Derajat .970 2 .616 Derajat(1) -.909 .923 .970 1 .325 .403 .066 2.460 Derajat(3) -20.345 11959.5 50 .000 1 .999 .000 .000 . Constant -2.642 .614 18.492 1 .000 .071 Step 3a PerdSpontan(1) .671 .403 2.779 1 .096 1.957 .889 4.310 Hepatomegali(1) 2.411 .586 16.917 1 .000 11.148 3.533 35.173 Leakage(1) 1.157 .427 7.351 1 .007 3.179 1.378 7.336 Constant -2.709 .575 22.176 1 .000 .067

(28)

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper Step 1a Peteki(1) 1.104 .368 8.977 1 .003 3.016 1.465 6.209 Ekimosis(1) 1.682 1.134 2.199 1 .138 5.376 .582 49.665 Epistaksis(1) .618 .593 1.085 1 .298 1.855 .580 5.930 Hematemesis(1) .388 1.306 .088 1 .766 1.474 .114 19.078 Constant -3.290 1.567 4.407 1 .036 .037 Step 2a Peteki(1) 1.112 .368 9.137 1 .003 3.040 1.478 6.250 Ekimosis(1) 1.773 1.096 2.618 1 .106 5.887 .688 50.409 Epistaksis(1) .617 .592 1.083 1 .298 1.853 .580 5.917 Constant -3.003 1.188 6.390 1 .011 .050 Step 3a Peteki(1) 1.175 .363 10.465 1 .001 3.238 1.589 6.597 Ekimosis(1) 1.814 1.090 2.771 1 .096 6.135 .725 51.938 Constant -2.530 1.079 5.498 1 .019 .080

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Peteki, Ekimosis, Epistaksis, Hematemesis.

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper Step 1a Hemokonsentrasi(1) .332 .429 .599 1 .439 1.393 .602 3.228 EfusiPleura(1) 1.713 .427 16.116 1 .000 5.548 2.403 12.807 Asites(1) .168 1.619 .011 1 .918 1.182 .050 28.230 EdemPalp(1) 21.353 6618.660 .000 1 .997 1876857696.085 .000 . Constant -22.375 6618.660 .000 1 .997 .000 Step 2a Hemokonsentrasi(1) .334 .428 .608 1 .435 1.396 .603 3.231 EfusiPleura(1) 1.715 .426 16.180 1 .000 5.559 2.410 12.822 EdemPalp(1) 21.360 6622.623 .000 1 .997 1890447480.171 .000 . Constant -22.220 6622.623 .000 1 .997 .000 Step 3a EfusiPleura(1) 1.737 .425 16.691 1 .000 5.678 2.468 13.061 EdemPalp(1) 21.435 6629.401 .000 1 .997 2036970950.189 .000 . Constant -22.089 6629.401 .000 1 .997 .000

(29)
(30)
(31)

Lampiran 6.

Daftar riwayat hidup

Identitas

Nama

: Diajeng Rindang Galih Annisa

NIM

: 22010111120038

Tempat/ tanggal lahir : Gresik/ 3 Januari 1993

Jenis kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Jl. Merak Raya no. 33 Rewwin Waru Sidoarjo, Jawa

Timur

Nomor telepon/ HP

: 081803068985

Alamat email

: diajengrindang@gmail.com

Riwayat pendidikan formal

1.

SD

: SD Al Hikmah Surabaya

2.

SMP

: SMP Al Hikmah Surabaya, lulus tahun: 2008

3.

SMA

: SMA Negeri 5 Surabaya, lulus tahun : 2011

4.

FK Undip

: Masuk tahun 2011

Keanggotaan organisasi

1.

Asisten laboratorium Parasit FK Undip 2014

2.

Kementerian Kebijakan Publik BEM FK Undip 2012-2013

3.

Asisten laboratorium Fisika FK Undip 2012

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Berbeda dengan sesi sebelumnya, data D3 sesi 201602 ini diambilkan dari data dosen eligibel D1/D2 pada PDDIKTI sesuai dengan kondisi terakhir.. Data D2 yang tidak masuk D3 dapat

Irawan (2005) mengemukakan bahwa konversi tanah lebih besar terjadi pada tanah sawah dibandingkan dengan tanah kering karena dipengaruhi oleh tiga faktor, yaitu pertama,

[r]

Demster shafer (DS) kerusakan pewangi tidak turun/ larut yang dipilih dengan menggunakan nilai believe yang telah ditentukan pada setiap gejala Pl(s)= 1 – Bel(¬s)

Consistent with these studies, we also observed significant changes in the expression levels of the genes involved in glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, translation, and

30/12/KEP/DIR Tanggal 30 April Tahun 1997 mengenai tingkat kesehatan suatu lembaga keuangan, merupakan parameter yang digunakanoleh Bank Indonesia untuk melihat

Namun, produk plastik yang banyak digunakan sebagai kemasan produk pangan ini mengandung bahaya tersendiri, yaitu, kemungkinan terjadinya migrasi atau berpindahnya zat-zat

65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause cancer which would require a warning under the statute: Chloroform New