ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NOMOR PERKARA 11-CV-01846-LHK MENGENAI SENGKETA PATEN ANTARA
APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC.
Haryo Wicaksono 110110080093
ABSTRAK
Perlindungan paten di bidang teknologi menjadi semakin penting. Fenomena yang menjadi perhatian saat ini terkait perlindungan paten terhadap teknologi pada telepon pintar adalah sengketa-sengketa paten antara perusahaan pembuat telepon pintar. Sengketa-sengketa tersebut lebih dikenal dengan istilah Smartphone Patent Wars atau Smartphone Patents Licensing and Litigation. Kasus yang paling menarik perhatiannya saat ini tentunya kasus Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. di Pengadilan San Jose, California, Amerika Serikat. Pada kasus ini baik Apple maupun Samsung saling menuntut satu sama lain terkait pelanggaran paten. Sengketa ini akhirnya dimenangkan oleh Apple. Putusan ini menuai kontroversi sebab ada paten Apple yang dijadikan gugatan adalah bukan invensi Apple. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui apakah gugatannya memiliki dasar yang sah dan sudah tepatkah putusan hakim beserta para juri.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa paten yang menjadi gugatan di pengadilan tidak memiliki dasar yang sah. Hal ini karena tidak dipenuhinya syarat kebaruan (novelty ) dan non-obviousness 35 U.S.C. section 102 dan 103 serta Pasal 2 dan 3 UU Paten 2001. Sedangkan putusan hakim telah sesuai dengan undang-undang.
ANALYSIS OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT VERDICT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE
NUMBER 11-CV-01846-LHK ABOUT PATENT DISPUTE BETWEEN APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC.
Haryo Wicaksono 110110080093
ABSTRACT
Patent protection in the field of technology becomes more important. The phenomenon that becomes a concern is regarding the protection of patent on the technology in the smartphone is about patent disputes between the smartphone manufacturers. Such disputes, better known as Smartphone Patent Wars or Smartphone Patents Licensing and Litigation. The most attractive case is certainly the case on Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at the court of San Jose, California, USA. In this case, both Apple and Samsung sue each other related patent infringement. The dispute eventually won by Apple. The verdict is controversial because there is Apple's patent that are used as the lawsuit is not the invention of Apple. The purpose of this study to determine whether the suit has a legitimate basis and has the decision of judge and the jury was right.
Based on this study result, it can be concluded that the patent lawsuit in court does not have a legitimate basis. This is because non-compliance with the requirements of novelty (novelty) and non-obviousness 35 USC section 102 and 103 and Articles 2 and 3 of the Patent Act 2001. While the judge's decision was in accordance with the law.
