vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I would like to thank toAllah SWT, who always guide, bless and
strengthen me in finishing this thesis. I truly thank for everything given to me and my
family.
I also would like to express my deepest gratitude to Christina Kristiyani,
S.Pd., M.Pd., my sponsor, for reading, criticizing, contributing ideas and correcting
my work, from the beginning until the end of this thesis. I am sure that without her
contribution, I would not be able to finish my thesis. In adition, I am very grateful to
Carla Sih Prabandari, S.Pd., M.Hum., Ch. Lhaksmita Anandari, S.Pd., M.Ed.,
Laurentia Sumarni, S.Pd., F. Chosa Rastu Handani, S.Pd., Drs. Y.B. Gunawan,
M.A., Yuseva Aryani, S.Pd., M.Ed., Vonny Indriawati, S.Pd., Indra Nugraha,
S.Pd., and Yosep Lintangakoso, N., S.Pd. for their wilingness to evaluate my
designed materials and give some suggestions on my designed materials.
My special gratitude is also addressed to the manager of Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium Yogyakarta, Riza Harvini, S.Pd. who has given me a permission to
conduct my study in Kartika Dewi Gymnasium Yogyakarta. I also thank the
gymnastics instructors of Kartika Dewi Gymnasium Yogyakarta who have become
the respondents of my questionnaires. I thank them for their willingness to fill in my
questionnaires.
I am deeply grateful to all lecturers of the English Language Education Study
viii
and knowledge they have shared. I also thankmbakTari and mbak Danikfor their help during my study.
My deepest gratitude goes to my beloved parents,Anis Eko Dwi Daswantini
and Nuch Topo Broto, who always inspire my life. I thank them for their endless
love, support, advice, prayers, and patience in every step of my life. I also thank to
my beautiful sisters, Ayik, Rani, Anggun and Mayang who have become my
motivation in finishing my thesis. My deepest gratitude also goes to my beloved
grandparents,eyangSunardjo and eyangIsti Handayani, who always give me the endless love and care.
My special thank goes to I Made Wira Adi Santika, who has given much
spirit, love and inspiration for my life. I thank him for his advice and support in doing
my thesis.
I would like to thankHana, Adi, Bertha, Witri, Patrice, Ana, Fika, Vonny,
Agung, Flora, Heni, Dedeand all PBI 2004 students for the wonderful friendships. I
thank for every beautiful moments and great experiences when I was studying in PBI.
There are other people who I cannot mention individually but surely without
their involvement, directly or indirectly, this thesis would not have been completed.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE ... i
APPROVAL PAGES ... ii
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ... iv
ABSTRACT ... v
ABSTRAK... vi
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS ... vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... ix
LIST OF TABLES ... xii
LIST OF FIGURES ... xiii
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Research Background ... 1
B. Problem Formulation ... 3
C. Problem Limitation ... 3
D. Research Objectives ... 4
E. Research Benefits ... 4
F. Definition of Terms ... 5
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A. Theoretical Description ... 7
1. Instructional Design Models ... 7
a. Kemp’s Model ... 7
b. Yalden’s Model ... 9
2. The Theory of Teaching Speaking... 12
a. Principle for Teaching Speaking... 13
b. Factors Affecting Adult EFL Learners’ Oral Communication ... 14
x
3. English for Specific Purpose (ESP) ... 16
a. The Definition and Categorization of ESP ... 17
b. The Criteria of ESP ... 18
c. Needs Analysis... 19
4. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) ... 23
a. The Definition of CLT ... 23
b. The Characteristics of CLT ... 24
c. The Activities and Materials of CLT ... 26
B. Theoretical Framework ... 29
CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY A. Research Method ... 33
B. Research Participants ... 34
C. Research Instruments ... 35
D. Data Gathering Techniques ... 37
E. Data Analysis Techniques ... 38
F. Research Procedures ... 40
CHAPTER IV. RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION A. The Steps of Designing a Set of English Speaking Instructional Materials for Kartika Dewi Gymnasium in Yogyakarta ... 43
1. Conducting Needs Survey ... 43
2. Considering the Goals, Listing Topics, and General Purpose ... 48
3. Formulating Learning Objectives ... 50
4. Selecting the Syllabus Type ... 52
5. Listing the Subject Content ... 52
6. Selecting Teaching and Learning Activities ... 53
7. Evaluating ... 57
8. Revising ... 57
B. The Findings of the Designed Materials Evaluation ... 58
1. The Description of the Respondents ... 58
2. The Data Presentation ... 59
3. The Respondents’ Comments and Suggestions ... 60
C. The Discussion of the Designed Materials ... 62
xi
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusions ... 67
B. Suggestions ... 69
1. English Instructors in Gymnasium... 69
2. Gymnastic Instructors In Kartika Dewi Gymnasium... 69
3. Other Researchers ... 69
REFERENCES ... 71
APPENDICES ... 74
Appendix A: Questionnaire for Needs Analysis ... 75
Appendix B: List of Questions for Interviews ... 79
Appendix C: Questionnaire for Expert Validation ... 81
Appendix D: The Result of Questionnaire for Expert Validation... 85
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
2.1 Necessities, Lacks and Wants ... 20
3.1 The Points of Agreement ... 39
3.2 The Table of Descriptive Statistics ... 40
4.1 The Data of the Respondents ... 44
4.2 The Result of Informal Interview with Gymnastics Instructors ... 45
4.3 The Learners’ Needs ... 46
4.4 The Learning Topics of the Materials ... 49
4.5 Topics and General Purposes ... 50
4.6 The Learning Indicators ... 50
4.7 The Teaching Learning Activities ... 54
4.8. The Description of the Respondents ... 58
4.9 The Descriptive Statistics of the Materials Evaluation Survey ... 59
4.10 The Topics, the Titles, the Sections and the Subsections of Designed Materials ... 63
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
2.1 Kemp’s Instructional Design Model ... 9
2.2 Yaldens’s Instructional Design Model ... 10
2.3 The Division of Language Teaching Based on the Learner Purpose ... 18
2.4 Function to Form (allen, 1997) ... 30
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, the writer would like to present the research
background, the problem formulation, and the problem limitation. Besides, this
chapter also presents the objectives of the study, the benefit of the study, and
definition of terms.
A. The Research Background
English is an important language in this world especially in Indonesia. It is
becoming more and more important because English has role as international
language. Indonesia is expanding some cooperations with other countries around
the world. It demands Indonesian should be able to communicate with foreigners
in order to develop the cooperation with other countries. They have to be ready for
globalization era. There are some working fields that require the staffs to master
English.
Gymnasia are also the ones that demand their gymnastics instructors to
master English since gymnastics instructors have direct contact with the
customers frequently. They have to understand how to use English in their job
because they realize the importance of English mastery for their gymnastics
instructors in order to improve their service quality. Reinforcement is needed for
them because they are not only required to study English but also they required to
use English in their job.
There are some gymnasia in Yogyakarta. One of them is Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium. Kartika Dewi Gymnasium is located at Bhayangkara street. It is near
with Malioboro street as one of tourism destinations. As a result, Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium has some foreign customers that make the staffs are required to
master English, especially for the gymnastics instructors. Most of the gymnastics
instructors of Kartika Dewi Gymnasium have some difficulties to communicate
with the foreign customers. There are 15 foreign customers in Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium Yogyakarta. They are students and tourists.
Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors need appropriate materials to
improve their English speking abilities in order to train their foreign customers.
English for gymnastics instructors is a particular part of English for Specific
Purposes (ESP). There are some aspects that have to be considered in designing
suitable materials, such as, learners’ characteristics, the purpose of learning,
learners’ needs. The materials is designing based on the learners’ needs and
interests.
Speaking is one of basic skills in English that has important role as a mean
of communication. “Speaking is an instrumental activity in which speakers talk in
order to have some effects on their listeners” (Clark and Clark, 1977: 224). The
designing materials aim to help Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors to improve
their English speaking ability.
In order to improve Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors’ abilities in
speaking English, the writer designs the materials using Communicative
target language. According to Larsen-Freeman (2001: 128), “the goal is to enable
students to communicate in target language. To do this students need knowledge
of the linguistic forms, meanings, and fuctions.” In this study, the materials is
designed in order to help Kartika Dewi Gymnasium Instructors to communicate
with their foreign customers using English in appropriate forms, social context,
meanings and fuctions. By providing the materials wich are suitable and
applicable to their work field, they will be able to communicate with foreign
customers well in order to improve their service quality.
B. Problem Formulation
Considering the background, the problem of the study can be formulated
as follows.
1. How is a set of instructional materials to teach speaking to Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta designed?
2. How does the designed set of instructional materials to teach speaking to
Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta look like?
C. Problem Limitation
English is an international language that should be mastered. One of skills
that influences in communicating with others is speaking. Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium instructors are people who have contact with foreigners. They have to
limited to the discussion of designing a set of instructional materials to teach
speaking to Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta.
D. Research Objectives
Based on the problems stated in the problem formulation part, the writer
would like to elaborate two objectives. They are stated follows.
1. To design a set of instructional materials to teach speaking to Kartika Dewi
instructors in Yogyakarta.
2. To present a set of instructional materials to teach speaking to Kartika Dewi
instructors in Yogyakarta.
E. Research Benefits
1. Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors
For Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors, this design materials improve
their understanding and ability in English that also improve their service quality to
their customers. They use their ability to teach the other staffs of Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium that make their knowledge more useful.
2. English Instructors
This design materials help English Instructors to develop and design
English materials for specific purpose. Besides, it helps them to improve the
understanding and selecting appropriate materials to achieve the goal of teaching
learning process.
For the next research, this design materials contribute further researchers
and anyone who are interested in designing materials for specific purpose.
Besides, it gives the new innovation and creativities to improve the materials
designed for specific purpose.
F. Definition of Terms 1. Instructional Materials
According to Dick and Reiser (1983:3), “instructional materials can be in
the form of printed materials, computer assisted instructions, and televised
instructions.” In this study, instructional material is needed to facilitate teachers
and learners in teaching and learning process. The materials are focused on the
discussion in order to develop the learners’ speaking skill.
2. Speaking
“Speaking is an instrumental activity in which speakers talk in order to
have some effects on their listeners” (Clark and Clark, 1977: 224). Speaking is
one of means to communicate with others. In speaking, a message is transferred
from a speaker to a hearer. The speaker produces the message and the hearer
receives the message. In this study, speaking is one of skill that very important
since the learners are required to be able to communicate in target language.
3. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
According to Larsen-Freeman (2001: 128), “communicative competence
involves being able to use the language appropriate to a given social context.” It
target language in communication using authentic materials. In this study, the
learners are not only expected to master structure but also to practice to
communicate in target language as well as native speakers. The activities have to
be selected appropriately that can support communicative learning situation.
4. Kartika Dewi Gymnasium Instructors
Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors are people who work in Kartika
Dewi Gymnasium as the gymnastics instructors. They are classified into some
kinds of job, namely body language instructors, pilates instructor, aerobic
instructors and fitness instructors. Their age is about 24 to 54 years old. Their
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter is divided into two important parts, namely theoretical and
theoretical framework.
A. Theoretical Description
In this section, the writer discusses instructional materials design models,
the theory of teaching speaking, English for Specific Purpose (ESP), and
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT).
1. Instructional Design Models
In this research, the writer presents two instructional design models by
Kemp and Yalden as the basic theories in conducting this study. Those
instructional design models are discussed as follows.
a. Kemp’s Model
The first instructional design model used in this study is Kemp’s Model. In
his book, Instructional Design A plan Unit and Course Development, Kemp
(1977: 8) states that “the instructional design plan is designed to supply answers
to three questions, which may be considered as the essential element of
instructional technology.” Those three questions are as follows.
1) What must be learned? (objectives)
2) What procedures and resources will work best to reach the desired learning
level? (Activities and resources)
3) How will we know when the required learning has taken place? (Evaluation)
In order to be able to answer those questions, Kemp forms eight steps that
must be carried out in the design process (Kemp, 1977: 13-100). The eight steps
are specified below.
1) Consider goals, and then lists topics, stating the general purposes for
teaching each topic.
2) Enumerate the important characteristics of the learners from whom the
instruction is to be designed.
3) Specify the learning objectives to be achieved in terms of measurable
student behavior outcomes.
4) List the subject to support each objective.
5) Develop pre-assessment to determine the students’ background and
present level of knowledge about the topic.
6) Select teaching or learning activities and instructional resources that will
treat the subject content, so the students will accomplish the objectives.
7) Coordinate such support service as budget, personnel, facilities,
equipment, and schedules to carry out the instructional plan.
8) Evaluate students’ learning in terms of their accomplishment of objectives,
with a view to revising and re-evaluating many phases of the plan that
need improvement.
There is the main strength of Kemp’s model from the perspective of
teacher is that there is a concept that the process of designing and developing can
be started from any step. The eight steps design model proposed by Kemp can be
Figure 2.1: The Relationship of Each Step in the Plan of the Other Steps
(Kemp, 1977:9) b. Yalden’s Model
The steps of an instructional design by Yalden, which is called as Yalden's
Language Program Development is shown in Figure 2.2. Evaluation
Support Services
Teaching/ learning activities,
resources Pre-Assessment
Subject Content
Learning Objectives Learner
Characterist ics Goals,
Topics, and General Purposes
Figure 2.2: Language Program Development (Yalden, 1987:88)
1) Needs survey
This survey is related with the awareness of the learners’ needs. Survey is
conducted to identify and specify what learners’ needs in learning English
included motivations, learning background, and personal needs. It is very
important to determine the goal of learning.
2) Description of purpose
This step describes the goals of the materials design based on the previous
step or learners’ needs. The materials should be selected in order to facilitate
students to achieve the formulated goals. It will become an important foundation
in the next step.
3) Choice of syllabus
“Specifying learning objectives is a developmental process that requires
refinement, changes and additions as the writer develops subsequent planning
steps” (Kemp, 1977: 24). The choice of syllabus should be determined based on
4) Production of proto-syllabus
“The proto-syllabus is description of language and language use to be covered
in the program” (Yalden, 1987: 89). The syllabus has to cover all of goals of
learning process so the syllabus can be concluded as language itself. Language is
developed to achieve the goals of certain program.
5) Production of pedagogical syllabus
“The pedagogical syllabus is the development of teaching, learning, and
testing approaches” (Yalden, 1987: 89). It means that the pedagogical syllabus is
reflected as the planning of implementation of teaching and learning process. The
implementation includes teaching, learning, and testing approaches also the
development of teaching materials and testing sequences.
6) Development and implementation of classroom syllabus
In this step, the materials and activities should be developed in the form of
lesson plan. The materials and activities have to be scheduled and have
appropriate method based on learners’ needs. Teachers have to understand the
principle of teaching, teaching materials, and the goal of learning.
7) Evaluation
This step is aimed to evaluate all components in the language program. The
evaluation includes students, the teaching and the program itself.
8) Recycling stage
In the last step is aimed to fit between goals set and student performance. The
content is reassessed in class. The materials and teaching methodology are
2. The Theory of Teaching Speaking
In this section, the writer also discusses some basic theories related with
speaking because speaking is the main learning concern of this study. This section
consists of three parts, namely principle for teaching speaking, factors affecting
adult EFL learners’ oral communication, and components underlying speaking
effectiveness.
a. Principle for Teaching Speaking
According to Bailey (1994: 54), there are five principles for teaching
speaking that can be applied. They are as follows.
1) Be aware of differences between second language and foreign language
learning contexts
Bailey (1994: 54) states “there are two broad contexts in learning
speaking; they are foreign language and second language situations.” The
differences between foreign language and second language situations are foreign
language is the target language which is not used in communication in the
learners’ society, whether second language is the target language which is used in
the learners’ society. In this case, English for Kartika Dewi Gymnasium
instructors is included into foreign language learning context.
2) Give students practice with both fluency and accuracy
Bailey (1994: 55) states “accuracy is the extent to which students’ speech
matches what people actually say when they use the target language.” It means
that the learners have to understand what the functions and the meaning of
extent to which speakers use the language quickly and confidently, with few
hesitations or unnatural pauses, false starts, word searches, etc.” The learners have
to speak fluently that it supports their confidence in speaking.
3) Provide opportunities for students to talk by using group work or pair work,
and limiting teacher talk
Bailey (1994: 55) states “it is important for language teachers to be aware
of how much we are talking in class.” Students have to be provided opportunities
to talk through pair work and group work. It will encourage students to practice
their target language to communicate in class.
4) Plan speaking tasks that involve negotiation for meaning
Bailey (1994: 55) states “language teachers have to plan the tasks that
relate with the process of negotiating for meaning.” This is the process that
learners make progress by communicating in the target language since interaction
is needed to make learners understand and to be understood.
5) Design classroom activities that involve guidance and practice in both
transactional and interactional speaking
Bailey (1994: 56) states “interactional speech is communicating with
someone for social purposes that include both establishing and maintaining social
relationships.” Learners have to understand the function of target language as the
use their society. Furthermore, Bailey (1994: 56) also states “transactional speech
involves communicating to get something done, including the exchange of goods
and/or services.” It means learners should be able to use target language in their
b. Factors Affecting Adult EFL Learners’ Oral Communication 1) Age or maturational constraints
Krashen, Long and Scarcella (1982) argue “who begin learning a second
language in early childhood through natural exposure achieve higher proficiency
that those beginning as adult.” In this case, adult learners have to make harder
effort to learn second language since they are more difficult to be focused in
learning meanwhile children are more simply to focused on learning.
2) Aural medium
“In fact, during interaction, every speaker plays a double role both as a
listener and a speaker” (Mendelsohn&Rubin, 1995:35). It means both speaking
and listening have important roles to build effective interaction.
3) Sociocultural factors
“It is well known that each language has its own rules of usage as to when,
how, and to what degree of speaker may impose a given verbal behavior on his or
her conversational partner” (Berns, 1990). It is harder for nonnative speakers to
choose appropriate forms in certain situations since it is influenced by the cultural
norms. Each place in the world has its own norms and cultures. The different
forms of norms and cultures have to be considered in communications.
4) Affective factors
“The affective side of the learner is probably one of the most important
influences on language learning success or failure” (Oxford, 1990: 140). The
affective factors related to L2 or foreign language learning is emotions,
only to pay attention to the learning process but also to pay attention to learners’
affective factors.
c. Components Underlying Speaking Effectiveness
Hyme’s theory, Canale and Swain (1980) propose that “communicative
competence includes grammatical competence, discourse competence,
sociolinguistic competence, and strategic competence.” It means communicative
competence have to reflect the use of the linguistic system and functional aspects
of communication, respectively.
1) Grammatical competence
“Grammatical competence is an umbrella concept that includes increasing
expertise in grammar (morphology, syntax), vocabulary, and mechanics”
(Scarcella & Oxford, 1992: 141). Grammatical competence enables speakers to
use target language accurately and properly. In this case, mechanics refers to basic
sounds of letters and syllables, pronunciations of words, intonation, and stress.
2) Discourse competence
“Therefore, effective speakers should acquire a large repertoire of structures
and discourse markers to express ideas, shoe relationships of time, and indicate
cause, contrast, and emphasis” (Scarcella & Oxford, 1992). Learners are expected
to learn target language that related to structures and discourse in their real life.
3) Sociolinguistic competence
Understanding sociolinguistic side of language helps learners know that
comments are appropriate, how to ask questions during interaction, and how to
argues that “therefore, adult second language learners must acquire stylistic
adaptability in order to be able to encode and decode the discourse around them
correctly.” Learners should understand any means of communication both verbal
and non verbal.
4) Strategic competence
“Strategic competence, which is the way learners manipulate language in
order to meet communicative goals” (Brown, 1994: 228), is perhaps the most
important of all the communicative competence elements. “Simply put, it is the
ability to compensate for imperfect knowledge of linguistic, sociolinguistic, and
discourse rules” (Berns, 1990). With reference to speaking, strategic competence
refers to the ability to know when and how to take the floor, how to keep
conversation going, how to terminate the conversation, and how to clear up
communication breakdown as well as comprehension problems.
3. English for Specific Purpose (ESP)
In this section, the writer would like to discuss English for Specific
Purpose (ESP). It is important to discuss ESP since English for Kartika Dewi
gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta is a part of it that is English for English for
Occupational purpose. This section consists of three parts, namely the definition
and criteria of English for Specific Purpose, the classification of English for
Specific Purpose, and Needs Analysis. By discussing these three parts, the writer
would like to give description what makes English for Kartika Dewi gymnasium
a. The Definition and Categorization of English for Specific Purpose
“English for Specific Purpose must be considered as approach not
product” (Hutchinson and Waters, 1994: 16). It means that ESP is an approach in
learning language. It shows that ESP is not a method in teaching learning
language. The method, materials, and teaching learning content are synchronized
with the learner’s reasons and needs.
According to Hutchinson and Waters (1994:16), “the categorization of
ESP is based on the general nature of the learners’ purpose and specific needs on
specialization.”
Basically, ESP is divided in to two types, they are English for Academic
Purpose (EAP) and English for Vocational Purpose (EVP) or also called English
for Occupation Purpose (EOP). EAP is for learners who needs English for study,
meanwhile, EVP or EOP is for learners who needs English for work. Hutchinson
and Walters propose “the branch of English language teaching based on the
learner purpose.” English for Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta
Figure 2.3: The Division of Language Teaching Based on the Learner Purpose (Hutchinson and Waters, 1994: 16)
b. The Criteria of English for Specific Purpose
Robinson (1991:2) proposes some criteria of English for Specific Purposes
(ESP). The criteria are as follows.
1) ESP is ordinarily goal-directed
People learn English because of instrumental motivation. They learn
English to achieve certain goals. The purposes can be the requirements of study or
job. People who are working in the tourism fields should master English well.
They need English to support their job. In this case, the learners need to
communicate with their customers foreign tourists because Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium is located in the town centre of Yogyakarta. English as Mother
Tongue (EMT)
General English (GE)
English as Foreign Language (EFL)
English for Occupational Purposes (EOP) English for Academic
Purposes (EAP)
English as Second Language (ESL)
English for Specific Purposes (ESP)
English for Kartika Dewi Gymnasium Instructors English Language
2) Needs analysis is paramount
The first step to define the aim of course is identifying needs analysis.
Need analysis is needed to identify and specify what learners’ needs in learning
English. It emphasizes the target of course requirement. In this research, the
learners’ needs are obtained from interviews and questionnaires.
3) Specified time for the course
Time allocation is important in achieving the objectives in each learning
process of the course. It should be allocated in proportional schedule by
considering teachers and students.
4) People who learn ESP are usually adult
People who learn ESP course are normally have already experienced in
learning English. They have learnt General English. They are not beginners. They
need ESP program relates with the requirements of their study or job. It requires
them to learn English more specific relate to their study or job. It will be
influenced the materials that should be designed base on learners’ condition.
5) People who learn ESP should be the same
People who learn ESP must have same kind of work field or study
although their ages are different. In this research, the learners’ work background is
gymnastics instructors.
c. Needs Analysis
As we know that ESP is defined as an approach that differentiates between
ESP and General English. In this case, need analysis has very important role. We
such as observation, interview and distributing questionnaires. Needs analysis will
influence the materials designed and also give some information to teachers to
motivate their learners in learning process.
Hutchinson and Waters (1994:54) categorize learners’ needs in to two
parts, namely target needs and learning needs.
1) Target needs
Target needs refer to the target situation in terms of three parts, namely
necessities, lacks and wants.
a) Necessities are what learners have to do to function effectively in the target
situation that determined by the requirements of the target situation.
b) Lacks are what learners have already known so that the materials’ designers
can decide which the necessities the learners’ lacks. It also determines what is
needed to improve.
c) Wants are the learners’ needs that have to be considered. It is also important to
consider learners’ wants in the target situation.
[image:37.595.91.518.215.751.2]Necessities, lacks and wants can be presented in the table 2.1.
Table. 2.1: Necessities, lacks and wants (Hutchinson and Waters, 1994:58) OBJECTIVE (i.e. as
perceived by course designers)
SUBJECTIVE (i.e. as perceived by learners)
NECESSITIES The English needed for success in Agricultural or Veterinary Studies
To reluctantly cope with a ‘second-best’ situation
LACKS (Presumably) areas of
English needed for Agricultural or Veterinary Studies
Means of doing Medical Studies
WANTS To succeed in
Agricultural or Veterinary Studies
2) Gathering information about target needs
There are some ways to gather information about language such as
distributing questionnaires, interviews, observation, data collection and informal
consultation with sponsors, learners and others. It is possible to use more than one
ways in gathering information. In this research, the writer uses interviews and
distributing questionnaires. The frameworks of questionnaires are needed to get
the information about the learners’ needs. Hutchinson and Walters (1994:54)
propose the frameworks of questionnaires as follows.
a) Why is the language need?
For study
For work
For some other purpose, e.g. status, examination, promotion.
b) How will the language be used?
Medium: speaking, writing, reading, etc.
Channel: e.g. telephone, face to face
Types of text or discourse: e.g. academic texts, lectures, informal
conversation, technical manuals, catalogues.
c) What will the content areas be?
Subjects: e.g. medicine, biology, architecture, shipping, commerce,
engineering
Level: e.g. technician, craftsman, postgraduate, secondary school
d) Who will the learner use the language with?
Level of knowledge of receiver: e.g. expert, layman, student
Relationship: e.g. colleague, teacher, customer, superior,
subordinate
e) Where will the language be used?
Physical setting: e.g. office, lecture theater, hotel, workshop,
library
Human context: e.g. alone, meeting, demonstrations, on telephone
Linguistic context: e.g. in own country, abroad
f) When will the language be used?
Concurrently with the ESP course or subsequently
Frequently, seldom, in small amounts, in large chunks
3) Learning needs
According to Hutchinson and Waters (1994:61), “it is naive to base a
course design simply on the target objectives, just as it is naïve to think that a
journey can be planned solely in terms of the starting point and the destination.“
Learning needs are very important to be considered since it will be influenced in
selecting materials. It is the means to reach destination. It explains the starting
point to reach the objectives.
4) Analyzing learning needs
There are some questions as a framework for analyzing learning needs. A
learning needs analysis framework is as follows:
1. Why are the learners taking the course?
3. What resources are available?
4. Who are the learners?
5. Where will the ESP course take place?
6. When will the ESP course take place?
4. Communicative Language Teaching
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is suitable approach in
designing the instructional materials. This study tries to design a set of English
speaking instructional materials using communicative tasks. In this case, the
writer believes that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is appropriate
approach to enable learners to communicate in the target language. There are
some theories about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) used in designing
the speaking materials for Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors. There are three
points that will be discussed. They are as follows.
a. The definition of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
According to Larsen-Freeman (2001: 128), “communicative competence
involves being able to use the language appropriate to a given social context.” To
do this, the students need the knowledge of the linguistics forms, meaning, and
functions. In learning English, learners have to master some skills such as
listening, speaking, reading, and writing that have important roles to communicate
in the target language. In fact, in Indonesia, students are only taught writing,
reading and grammar. Learning grammar is strange for some learners. In this
communicating what they have learned before. Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT) can support learners to apply their ability in English. Speaking is
one of important skill in communication. Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors
have to able to communicate in English since they often have foreigner customers.
b. The characteristics of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
Celce-Murcia (2000: 8) gives an outline of the Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT). The outline shows the characteristics of the Communicative
Language Teaching (CLT) as follows.
1) It is assumed that the goal of language teaching is learner ability to
communicate in target language. It means that through this approach the
learners are expected to be able to use the target language in communication.
2) It is assumed that the content of a language course will include semantic
notions and social functions, not just linguistics structure. The learners are
expected not only to learn English grammar but also to apply the target
language in communication.
3) Students regularly work in groups or pairs to transfer (and if necessary,
negotiate) meaning in situations in which one person has information that the
others lacks. On the other words, the students have responsibility on their own
learning process.
4) Students often engage in role-play or dramatization to adjust their use of target
5) Classroom materials and activities are often authentic to reflect real life
situations and demand. The learners are able to use target language in their
daily life after the course.
6) Skills are integrated from the beginning; a given activity might involve
reading, speaking, and also writing (this assumes the learners are educated and
literate).
7) The teacher’s role is primarily to facilitate communication and only
secondarily to correct errors. Teacher is supposed to select materials and
activities that can encourage the students to communicate in target language
actively. The students used to correct their mistakes and their friends’
mistakes in learning target language.
8) The teacher should be able to use the target language fluently and
appropriately. In other words, the teacher is a model of learning.
Diane Larsen and Freeman (2001: 129) state some characteristics of the
teaching/learning process based on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT).
They are as follows.
1) The most obvious characteristic of CLT is that almost everything that is done
is done with a communicative intent. It means that the students have to use
target language in communicative activities in learning. The activities that are
selected have to support communicative learning situation.
2) CLT uses authentic materials. It is supposed to give students opportunity to
develop strategies for understanding target language as well as native
3) The activities in CLT classroom often carry out students in small groups. It
will be very effective to know the development of each student. The students
also have more time to speak and share in small class. It will maximize
students’ opportunities to improve their ability in communicating the target
language.
c. The activities and materials of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Littlewood (1981: 17-18) summarizes of communicative activities
contributions to language learning.
1) They provide ‘whole-task practice, in the classroom through various kinds of
communicative activity, structured in order to suit the learners’ ability.
2) They improve motivation by relating learners’ classroom learning to their
objective and helping them to achieve it. The learners’ ultimate objective is to
take part in communication with others.
3) They allow the natural learning which operates when a person is involved in
using the language for communication.
4) They can create a context which supports learning by providing personal
relationship which can help to ‘humanize’ the classroom and to create an
environment.
According to Larsen and Freeman (2000: 132-134), there are some
materials that associated with CLT. They are as follows.
1) Authentic materials
“Authentic materials are intended to overcome the typical problem that
to expose students to natural language in a variety of situations” (Larsen and
Freeman, 2000: 132). In the learning process, teachers can use materials that
associated with real life. The examples of authentic materials are newspaper
articles and a live radio or television broadcast. However, those are authentic
materials for high intermediate level. For students with lower level, it might be
possible to use more accessible materials, for instance, the use of a weather
forecast when working on prediction.
2) Scrambled sentences
According to Larsen and Freeman (2000: 133), “scrambled sentences are
the type of exercise teaches students about cohesion and coherence properties of
language.” It means that students are expected to understand target language the
discourse level. The activities that are given such as arrange the sentences in
scrambled order, some scrambled sentences in a dialogue, disorder a picture strip
story.
3) Language games
Larsen and Freeman (2000: 133) state “games are used frequently in
CLT.” Games are important to make students comfortable during teaching
learning process that will support communicative practice. One of games in CLT
is the card game. Students are asked to list their classmate’s activities in the
following week. Through this activity, students can improve their vocabulary and
writing skill. They will predict the activities using their own word. Students will
feel free to list activities by writing what they listen from their friend.
As stated in the previous discussion that picture strip story is one of
activities which can be conducted in CLT. The activity is carried out by using a
set of picture strip story which is showed to the students. They will predict what is
the next picture based on their opinion using their own words. There is an
information gap. Then, they receive feedback and compare the prediction to
others.
Larsen and Freeman (2000: 134) state “picture strip story gives students
practice in negotiating meaning.” Picture strip story is one of examples of using
problem-solving tasks as a communicative technique.
5) Role play
Larsen and Freeman (2000: 134) state “role plays are very important in
CLT because they give students an opportunity to practice communicating in
different social roles.” This gives students opportunity to practice the target
language in their daily life. In role play, the learners’ focus will be on the
communication activities based on their own knowledge. Furthermore, Larsen and
Freeman (2000: 134) also state that “the role play given to the students can be
structured (for example, the teacher tells the students who they should say in the
role play) or in a less structured way.” CLT is considered more appropriate to
apply since students can have some choices to express what they want to say. The
B. Theoretical Framework
In designing a set of English speaking instructional materials using
communicative tasks for Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta, the
writer combines the instructional materials designed by Kemp and Yalden
discussed in theoretical description since this two models describe clearly
step-by-step procedures about what the designers should do in order to develop her or his
own materials from the beginning process. The framework of design model
consists of eight steps.
Step 1: Conducting needs survey
In designing materials, the writer carry out need survey to find out the
learners’ need. This step is adapted from Yalden’s model and need analysis
proposed by Hutchinson and Waters. Learners’ need is main characteristics in
ESP. It will influence the content of language teaching. The result of need survey
is a basis for specifying goals and objectives for the learning program. It is
conducted through questionnaire and interviews.
Step 2: Considering the goal, listing topics, and general purpose
The goal is constructed based on the students’ needs of the teaching
learning process. This step determines the goals of the materials design based on
students’ need. The topic is expected to facilitate and support students to achieve
the goals. This step is adapted from Kemp’s model.
Step 3: Formulating learning objectives
Objectives are specific outcomes or products of courses which are outlined
General Purposes and Learning Indicators. In English for Specific Purposes, the
material is designed for the purpose of students’ needs. In this study, the specific
objectives are reflected on the indicator.
Step 4: Selecting the syllabus type
Hutchinson and Waters (1994:80) state a syllabus is a document which
says what will (or at least what should) be learnt. In this step the writer uses one
of syllabus types from Krahnke (1987). The syllabus of this designed is functional
syllabus since the contents of this designed materials is the collection of the
functions that are performed when language is used. “The greatest strength of the
functional syllabus is that it includes information about language use that
structural syllabi do not” (Krahnke 1987: 35). The learners may view the language
less than an abstract system of elements. The language is more as a
communicative system.
Allen (1977) gives a clear explanation of how the same language function
interrelating with grammatical form and context can produce different realizations
in any given instance. It can be seen in the figure 2.4.
Function Sentence forms Realization
Imperative Please finish that letter, Miss Jones.
Conditional Perhaps it would be best if you finished that letter. Ordering Infinitive We do expect you to finish that letter.
Modal You must finish that letter, I’m affraid.
[image:47.595.86.513.243.626.2]Participial You should no have difficulty in finishing that letter. Figure 2.4: Function to Form (Allen, 1997)
Step 5: Listing the subject content
In this study, it is important to relate the content with the objectives and
instructional materials for specific purpose, the writer, in organizing subject
content, would adapt the English for Specific Purpose materials proposed by
Hutchinson and Waters (1994: 108). The materials consist of four elements,
namely input, content focus, language focus, and task.
Step 6: Selecting teaching and learning activities
The writer selects Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) to design
English speaking instructional materials for Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors
in Yogyakarta. CLT supports the process of teaching and learning language since
CLT provide opportunity for learners to speak in class. The writer intends to
produce a set of English speaking instructional materials to encourage learners to
communicate target language primary in their work place. Their learning activities
relate with real life which is required authentic materials. The writer applies some
techniques to support communicative classroom activities, for instances,
scrambled sentences, language games, picture strip story and role play.
In teaching and learning process, there are some communicative activities.
They are presentation and role play because tasks in CLT are normally done in
group. The presentation and role play are appropriate with the situation of
learners’ work activities. The writer takes aunthentic materials from some books
and articles related with gymnastics.
Step 7: Evaluating
After designing materials, the writer conducts evaluation by distributing
the second questionnaires. The writer would like to find out strengths and
suggestions related to the materials design. The result of the evaluation will be
used to revise the materials.
Step 8: Revising
After conducting the evaluation, the writer revises and improves the
materials based on the feedback, comments, and suggestion related to the
[image:49.595.83.507.216.713.2]materials design.
Figure 2.5: The Steps in Conducting the Design Conducting needs survey
Considering the goal, listing topics, and general purpose
Selecting the syllabus type
Listing the subject content
Selecting teaching and learning activities
Evaluating
Revising
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
The writer divides this chapter into six main sections. They are research
method, research participants, research instruments, data gathering techniques,
data analysis techniques, and research procedures.
A. Research Method
As mentioned in Chapter I, this study is intended to find the answers to the
problems formulated. Firstly, the writer would try to find how a set of
instructional materials to teach speaking to Kartika Dewi instructors in
Yogyakarta is designed. Secondly, the writer would try to find the design set of
instructional materials to teach speaking to Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors
in Yogyakarta looks like.
To obtain the two goals mentioned above, the writer conducted research
and development (R&D).
Educational research and development (R&D) is a process used to develop and validate educational products. The steps of this process are usually referred to as the R&D cycle, which consists of studying research findings pertinent to the product to be develop, developing the product based on these findings, field testing it in the setting where it will be used eventually, and revising it to correct the deficiencies found in the field-testing stage (Borg and Gall, 1983: 772).
The products can be defined as some materials objects. In this study, the
writer used textbook to be developed. Through learners and textbook, the writer
obtained the information as much as possible as the basis of designing the
materials. The materials would be developed based on the research findings,
tested in the field where it will be used, and revised that would be necessary to be
used in the field where it will be used.
In this study, the writer conducted two kinds of survey to gather the
information needed. They were as follows.
1. Pre-design survey
This survey was conducted to find learners’ needs and to gather some
values information in designing materials from the respondents. This survey was
related to the learners in order to know the learners’ expectation from the
materials designed. It was related to their job requirements as the gymnastic
instructors. The information would be the basis for the writer to design the
materials. To obtain the data the writer used questionnaires and interviews.
2. Post-design survey
This survey was conducted to have feedback, comments, and suggestions
related to materials designed. The respondents were the people who were
considered competent in applying the theory of instructional materials design
models, the theory of teaching speaking, English for Specific Purpose (ESP), and
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). The writer used questionnaires to
obtain the data.
B. Research Participants
There would be two kinds of respondents since there were two kinds of
survey study. The first would be the respondents of pre-designed survey and the
1. Pre-design survey
The subjects of this survey were the instructors in Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium Yogyakarta. They were 12 aerobics instructors and 4 fitness
instructors. They are between 24 to 54 years old.
2. Post-design survey
The subjects of this survey were two lecturers of Sanata Dharma
University, one English instructors of Speak First Klaten, and two English
instructors of ELTI Yogyakarta.
C. Research Instruments
Hutchinson and Waters (1994: 59) propose “questionnaires, interviews,
observations, data collections, and informal consultations with sponsor, learners,
and others as instruments to gather data.” In this study, the writer used two kinds
of instruments, namely, questionnaires and interviews.
1. Questionnaires
The writer chose questionnaires since it is brief, clear, and also simple to
be carried out. According to Best (1986: 166), questionnaire is one way in data
collection through which respondents answer questions or respond to statements
in writing. Best (1986: 167) states that there are two types of questionnaires. They
are as follows.
This type of questionnaire consists of questions and list of alternatives, only
provides for marking yes or no, a short response, or checking an item from a
list of suggested responses.
b. Open-ended questionnaire
This type of questionnaire allows the respondents’ own words to state
opinions and suggestions in the space provided.
The writer distributed closed questionnaire to Kartika Dewi Gymnasium
instructors to conduct first survey that was pre-design survey. It aimed to obtain
the learners’ needs. The open-ended questionnaires were distributed to two
lecturers of Sanata Dharma University, one English instructors of Speak First
Klaten, and two English instructors of ELTI Yogyakarta to gain feedback,
comments, and suggestion related to the designed materials.
2. Interviews
Ary (1994: 175) states that there are two types of interview. They are
structured and unstructured interviews. The unstructured interview is more
flexible and informal. The interview was done when the writer needed some
information about the students’ needs and evaluation about appropriate design
materials for the gymnastics instructors in Kartika Dewi Gymnasium. The writer
conducted informal interview during their leisure time since they would not feel
interviewed that eased the interviewed process in order to obtain their opinion
D. Data Gathering Techniques
The writer divided the data gathering into two groups of respondents.
Firstly, the writer conducted pre-designed survey. It was carried out in Kartika
Dewi Gymnasium Yogyakarta. The writer used two kinds of instruments, namely
closed questionnaires and interviews. There were 16 questionnaires which were
distributed. The results of three of them would be consideration about learners’
strength, learners’ weakness, and learners’ expectations to the materials designed.
Besides, the writer also distributed open-ended questionnaires to two
lecturers and three English instructors. They were two lecturers of Sanata Dharma
University, one English instructors of Speak First Klaten, and two English
instructors of ELTI Yogyakarta. In this step, the writer also distributed the
syllabus, lesson plan, and the designed materials.
In the pre-design materials, the writer collected questionnaires that have
been filled by the instructors in Kartika Dewi Gymnasium. By identifying the
result of the questionnaires and interview, the writer constructed the materials.
The second was the post-design materials. The writer collected the questionnaires
that have been filled by two lecturers of Sanata Dharma University, one English
instructors of Speak First Klaten, and two English instructors of ELTI
Yogyakarta. By identifying feedbacks from the second questionnaires, the writer
E. Data Analysis Techniques
The writer divided the result of the questionnaires into two since the writer
conducted two different groups of respondents. The data from Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium were gained from questionnaires and interviews. Another data were
gained from three lecturers of Sanata Dharma University, two English instructors
of Optima Yogyakarta, two English instructors of Speak First Klaten, and two
English instructors of ELTI Yogyakarta. The results of questionnaires from the
needs analysis were presented in the form of table. The format of questionnaire
for the first groups of respondents was closed-form.
Based on the data collected from the questionnaire, the writer counted a
number of students who chose option totally disagrees, disagree, agree, or totally
agree. The result of the table analysis depended on the responses from the
participants. After the writer finished writing down the data from the participants,
the data were counted to find out what option considered as the priority that were
often chosen by the participants. It was in the form of percentage. From the table,
the writer considered the students who chose totally disagree and disagree column
become the samples of disagreed opinion. Whereas, the students who chose totally
agree and agree column become the samples of agreed opinion. The data of
uncertain column were not be used in the data analysis. The writer presented the
raw data as percentage figure by multiplying it by 100 % as the following
formulas.
From the first data, the writer will construct the material based on the
learners’ needs analysis. The materials will be revised after the writer conducted
second survey.
The second data were gained from lecturers and English instructions. The
writer used two formats of questionnaires, namely closed-from and opened-from.
[image:56.595.86.512.246.620.2]There were five points of agreements. They are described in table 3.1.
Table 3.1: The Points of Agreement
Points of agreements Score
Absolutely disagree 1
Disagree 2
Uncertain 3
Agree 4
Absolutely agree 5
The designed materials would be considered acceptable if the central
tendency for each statement was above the scale of 3.
After the distributed questionnaires were collected, the result were
analyzed to find out the evaluation of the designed materials. According to Ary, et
al (2002: 128), the most widely used measure of central tendency is the mean.
Mean is the central value of in a set of scores. In order to calculate the scores of
the closed from questionnaires, the descriptive statistics were needed. The tables
Table 3.2: The Table of Descriptive Statistics
No Statement Central Tendency
Number of the Respondents
Mean
The formula of mean is presented as follows.
= N
X
X:Score
N: Number of the respondents
: Mean
From the second data, the writer gained some feedback, comments, and
suggestions from the participants. It would be the basis to revise the materials.
F. Research Procedures
The writer conducted eight steps to answer problem formulation of this
study. The steps were:
1. Conducting needs survey
First, the writer carried out need survey to find out the learners’ need. It
will influence the content of language teaching. The result of need survey was a
basis for specifying goals and objectives for the learning program. It was
2. Considering the goal, listing topics, and general purpose
The writer was decided based on the students’ needs of the teaching
learning process. This step is determined the goals of the materials design based
on students’ need through questionnaire and interviews.
3. Formulating learning objectives
The writer specified goal achievements into General Learning Objectives
and Specific Learning Objectives. In English for Specific Purposes, materials will
be designed for the purpose of students’ needs. In this study, the specific
objectives are reflected on the indicator.
4. Selecting the syllabus type
In this step the writer uses one of syllabus types from Krahnke (1987). The
syllabus of this designed is functional syllabus since the contents of this designed
materials is the collection of the functions that are performed when language is
used.
5. Listing the subject content
Since this study deals with designing a set of English speaking
instructional materials for specific purpose, the writer, in organizing subject
content, would adapt the English for Specific Purpose materials proposed by
Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 108). The materials consist of four elements,
6. Selecting teaching and learning activities
The writer selected Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) to design
English speaking instructional materials for Kartika Dewi gymnasium instructors
in Yogyakarta. The writer applies some techniques to support communicative
classroom activities, for instances, scrambled sentences, language games, picture
strip story and role play.
7. Evaluating
After designing materials, the writer conducted evaluation by distributing
the second questionnaires and conducting second interviews. The writer would
like to find out strengths and weaknesses of the designed materials through some
feedbacks, comments, and suggestions related to the materials design. The result
of the evaluation will be used to revise the materials.
8. Revising
After conducting the evaluation, the writer revised and improved the
materials based on the feedback, comments, and suggestion related to the
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presents the result and discussion of the findings of the
survey conducted to design and evaluate the instructional materials design. This
chapter is divided into two major parts. The first part concerns with the steps of
designing a set of English speaking instructional materials for Kartika Dewi
Gymnasium instructors in Yogyakarta. The second part concerns with what the
designed set of instructional materials to teach speaking to Kartika Dewi
Gmnasium instructors Yogyakarta look like.
A. The Steps of Designing a Set of English Speaking Instructional Materials for Kartika Dewi Gymnasium Instructors in Yogyakarta
In designing a set of English Speaking instructional materials, the
writer developed a model consisting of seven steps. They are conducting needs
survey, considering the goal, listing topics, and general purpose, formulating
learning objectives, listing the subject content, selecting teaching and learning
activities, evaluating, revising. These steps answered the first question in the
Problem Formulation. Each step is elaborated as follows.
1. Conducting needs survey
The needs survey is an important part to find out the learners’ needs. To
obtain the data, the writer conducted a survey study through giving questionnaires
and doing informal interviews to the Kartika Dewi Gymnasium instructors.
a. The Result of the Questionnaires for Gymnastics Instructor in Kartika
Dewi Gymnasium
The questionnaires were distributed to 16 gymnastics instructors at Kartika
Dewi Gymnasium. The questionnaires that were distributed are
closed-questionnaires. The filling questionnaires would be foundation for the writer to
[image:61.595.86.515.238.619.2]design the materials. The descriptions of the respondents were presented in the
table 4.1.
Table 4.1: The Description of the Respondents
Respondents Sex Education Background Female Male SMA D3 S1 Gymnastics instructors in
Kartika Dewi gymnasium Yogyakarta
13 3 4 3 9
Based on the data of the participants, there were differences of education
background. It influenced the techniques in delivering materials. The learning
activities were synchronized to make effective learning for all learners.
In distributing the questionnaires, the writer asked the learners about their
perceptions in learning English. From the results of needs analysis related to
learners’ perception in learning English, there were 6% of participants or only 1
participant who considered that learning English was difficult although 94% of
participants or 16 participants stated that they learning English was easy and
enjoyable. All of the participants considered that they were not forced in learning
English. It indicated that they had great motivation to learn English since all of the
participants agreed that English was important for their life. All of the participants
Their needs and difficulties in learning speaking skills were also
considered in designing materials. The respondents were asked about other
elements in learning speaking skill. There were 56% of participants or 9
participants who considered that grammar was needed in learning speaking skill
while 44% participants or 7 participants disagreed with this statement. All of the
participants answered vocabulary was needed in learning speaking skill. All of the
participants also answered pronunciation is needed in learning speaking skill.
The respondents were asked about their difficulties in learning speaking
skill. There were 75 % of participants or 12 participants who did not know how to
make good sentences while only 25% of participants or 4 participants had
difficulties in making good sentences. Their biggest difficulty in learning
speaking skill was they did not know the vocabulary. There were 81% of
participants or 13 participants who had difficulties in pronouncing the words.
b. The Result of the Informal Interview with Gymnastics Instructors in
Kartika Dewi Gymnasium
In order to obtain additional information, the writer also conducted an
informal interview with five gymnastics instructors in Kartika Dewi Gymnasium.
[image:62.595.88.517.190.755.2]The gathered data is presented in table 4.2.
Table 4.2: The Result of Informal Interview with Gymnastics Instructors
No. Questions Answers
1 Why do the gymnastics instructors in Kartika Dewi learn English?
a. mainly for their job.
b. to improve their service especially to their foreign customers.
c. to be able to communicate with the foreigners everywhere.
2 How important is English for gymnastics instructor in Kartika Dewi?
No. Questions Answers
Gymnasium have some foreign customers. This condition demanded the gymnastics instructor master English.
3 What are their duties? They trained the customers, gave the customers suggestions, and helped the customers to solve their problems.
4 What criteria should a gymnastics instructors have?
Attractive, friendly, patient, able to speak some foreign languages especially English. 5 What topics that should be taught to the
gymnastics instructors?
Greetings, introduction, asking and offering help, giving instructions, giving suggestions, thanking, apologizing, handling complaints.
6 What classroom atmosphere do the gymnastics instructors like?
Relax, interesting, informal, but still serious and focus in learning.
7 What techniques are appropriate for the gymnastics instructors?
Group discussions, role plays, dialogues. 8 What are their difficulties in learning
English?
They did not confident to communicate in English since they do not have sufficient knowledge of basic English.
Based on the results of the interview, the writer analyzed the needs of the
learners in learning English. The learners’ needs were analyzed in terms of
necessities, lacks, and wants as proposed by Hutchinson and Waters (1994: 55).
[image:63.595.86.514.106.619.2]The learners’ needs are specified in the table 4.3.