THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE OF STUDE NT TE AMS ACHI EVE MENT DI VISIO NS (STAD)
BASED ON FACTUAL KNOLEDGE OF STUDENTS IN THE DYNAMIC ELECTRICS SUBJECT MATTER IN CLASS
X EVEN SEMESTER SMA N 4 BINJAI A.Y. 2015/2016
By:
Lindu Denn Sitiomorang Reg.Number: 4103322006
Physics Bilingual Education Study Program
THESIS
Submitted to Acquire Eligible Sarjana Pendidikan
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
BIOGRAPHY
Lindu Deen Situmorang was born in Parlilitan, on Juni, 17st 1992. Father’s name
is Kasdin Situmorang and Mother’s name is Malaya Munthe and the first brother
from four brothers and sister. In 1997 entered State Elementary School SDN.
175790 Hutagalung and graduated in 2003. Then, entered Junior High School
SMP RK. Swasta Santa Maria Pakkat and graduated in 2006. Continued study in
Senior High School SMAN.1 Parlilitan and graduated in 2009. In the middle of
2010, received as the student in State University of Medan with study program is
Physics Bilingual Education, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and
THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE OF STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) BASED ON MIND MAPPING
ON LEARNING OUTCOMES OF STUDENTS IN THE DYNAMIC ELECTRICS SUBJECT MATTER IN CLASS X EVEN
SEMESTER SMA N.4 BINJAI A.Y. 2015/2016 Lindu Deen Situmorang (4103322006)
ABSTRACT
This research aims to know the results of student learning by using cooperative learning model of the type of student teams achievement divisions (STAD) based on mind mapping in experiment class and learning conventional models in the control class, and also to know the influence of cooperative learning model of the type of student teams achievement divisions (STAD) based on mind mapping on learning outcomes of students.
Type of this research is quasi experimental. The population of this research is all the students class X even semester SMA Negeri 4 Binjai A.Y. 2015 / 2016 which consisted of 298 students and consisting of six classes regular and 2 classes excellent. A sample of this research was taken two classes are determined by means of cluster random sampling, namely class X4 as a experiment class and a class X5 as a control class that each class number 39 students and 41 students.
From the data analysis the results obtained average value of experimental class pretest was 34,1 with standard deviation 10.70 and the average value of the control's class pretest 32,94 with standard deviation 11.06, thus obtained Fcount of
1.06 and Ftable of 1,71. Because Fcount < Ftable (1,06 < 1,71), so that the results for
these two classes have pretest homogeneous. Then obtained tcount < ttable (0,47 <
1,99), It concluded there was no significant difference between the results of learning students experiments class with control class. After study completion given obtained average value of experimental class posttest is 76,53 with standard deviation 9.60 and average value of control class is 70,48 posttest with standard deviation 10,77. Both of these data have a normal distribution. Results of hypothesis testing obtained tcount > ttable atau 2,61 > 1,66 so the conclusion is that
PREFACE
titled " The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Based on Factual knowledge of Students in The Dynamic Electrics Subject Matter in Class X Even Semester SMA Negeri 4 Binjai academic Year 2015/2016", prepared to obtain a Bachelor's degree Physical Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural
Science in State University of Medan.
On this occasion the authors like to thank Mr. Prof. Dr. Mara Bangun
Harahap, M.S as Thesis Advisor who has provided guidance and suggestions to
the author since the beginning of the study until the completion of this thesis
writing. Thanks also to Alkhafi Maas Siregar, M.Si., Dr. Derlina M.Si, and Drs.
Abd Hakim S, M.Si., who have provided input and suggestions from the research
plan to complete the preparation of this thesis. Thanks also presented to Dr.
Gratefully and specially to Dear my lovely father K. Situmorang and my
lovely mother M. Munthe and also my young brothers, my youngest sister Reo
Naldo Situmorang, and all family who have prayed and gave me encouragement
and funding to complete the study in State University of Medan.
The author has endeavored to as much as possible in completing this
thesis, but the author is aware there are many drawbacks in terms of both content
and grammar, then the authors welcome any suggestions and constructive
criticism from readers for this thesis perfectly.
The author hope the contents of this paper would be useful in enriching the
repertoire of knowledge.
Medan, Juli 2016
Author,
2.4. Hypothesis 38
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 39
3.1. Location and Time of Research 39 3.2. Population and Research Sample 39
3.3. Research Variables 40
3.4. Research Design 40
3.5. Procedure Research 41
3.6. Tools and Data Collection 43
3.6.1. The Research Instrument 43
3.6.2. The Validity of Test 44
3.7. Data Analysis Techniques 44
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION 48
4.1. Result of Research 48
4.1.1. Description of Research Data 48
4.1.2. Testing of Data Analysis 49
4.2. Discussion 56
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTION 60
5.1. Conclusions 60
5.2. Suggestion 60
TABLE LIST
Page Table 2.1 Model of Cooperative Learning 15
Table 2.2 Cooperative Learning Group Differences With 20
Conventional Learning Group
Table 2.3 Phase of Cooperative Learning Type STAD 22
Table 2.4 Calculation Score Developments 23
Table 2.5 Award Level Group 23
Table 2.6 Resistivity of Materials 28
Table 3.1 The Design of Experiments 40
Table 3.2 Test Prediction 43
Table 4.1 Pre-test Data Normality Test of Experimental and 50
Control Class
Table 4.2 Summary of Homogeneity Test Result of Pre-test Data 50
Table 4.3 Summary of Pre-test t-test Calculation 51
Table 4.4 Post-Test Data Normality Test of Experimental and 52
Control Class
Table 4.5 Hypothesis Test 53
Table 4.6 Test Results of Individual Observations and Results of 54
FIGURE LIST
Page
Figure 2.3 The Symbol for a Resistor in Circuit Diagrams is a zigzag 29
Figure 2.4.a.The Current–Voltage Curve for an Ohmic material 31
Figure 2.4.b. The current curve for a semiconducting 31
Figure 2.5 A simple series circuit 33
Figure 3.1 Step of research 42
Figure 4.1 Bar Chart of Pre-test Data in Experiment and Control Class 49
Figure 4.2 Bar Chart of Post-test Data in Experiment and Control Class 52
suggestions as follows:
5.1. Conclusion
1. Learning outcomes students experiment class are given preferential treatment by using
cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in
Dynamic Electrics subject matter in class X semester II SMA Negeri 4 Binjai A.Y.
2015/2016, with an average value of 34,58 pretes and average value of postes 77,08
include in the good category.
2. Learning outcomes students control class are given preferential treatment by using
conventional learning model in Dynamic Electrics subject matter in class X semester
II SMA Negeri 4 Binjai A.Y. 2015/2016, with an average value of 29,58 pretes and
average value of postes 68,61 include in the good category.
3. There is any effect of the model type of Cooperative Learning Student Teams
Achievement Division (STAD) based on factual knowledge on learning outcomes of
students in the Dynamic Electrics subject matter class X semester II SMA Negeri 4
63 REFERENCES
Aldrich, Clark. 2005. Learing by Doing. Pfeiffer An Important of Willey. San Fransisco
Arends, Richard I. 2009. Learning to Teach Eighth Edition. Mc Graw-Hill. New York
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Penerbit Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Edminister, Joseph A & Mahmood Nahwi. 2003. Theory andProblems of Electric
Circuit Fourth Edition. Mc Graw-Hill. New York.
Hergenhahn,B.R.,Olson, M.H,(2008)., Teori Belajar, Edisi ke 7 , Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Hewit, Paul G. 2006. Conceptual Physics Tenth Edition. Pearson Addison Wesley. San Francisco
James, dkk. 1970. Studying Teaching. Prentice Hall. USA.
Joyce, Bruce & Marsha Weil.1980. Model of Teaching Second Edition. Prentice-Hall. USA
Klein, Stephen B. 1991. Learning Principles & Applications Second Edition. McGraw-Hill. Singapore
Mudyahardjo, Redja. 2009. Pengantar Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Novita.2009. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Koperatif Tipe STAD Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Gerak Lurus di Kelas X SMA N 1
Hamparan Perak TP 2009/2010. Skripsi. FMIPA,UNIMED. Medan
Pidarta, Made.2007. Landasan Kependidikan. Asdi Mahasatya. Jakarta. Slavin, R. Cooperative Learning. Nusa Media. Bandung.
Sudjana,N. 2002. Metode Statistik. Penerbit Tarsito. Bandung.
Trianto. 2007. Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi konstruktivistik.
