• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: An Investigation of Students’ Speaking Challenges in Academic Speaking Classes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: An Investigation of Students’ Speaking Challenges in Academic Speaking Classes"

Copied!
38
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

AN INVESTIGATION OF

STUDENTS’ SPEAKING

CHALLENGES IN ACADEMIC SPEAKING CLASSES

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Mega Artika Setyasari

112014063

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS

UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN SATYA WACANA

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

iii

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This thesis covers no such materials as has been submitted for examination in any

courses or accepted for the fulfillment of any degree or diploma in any university.

To the best of my knowledge and my belief, this contains no material previously

published or written by any other person except where due to references is made

in the text.

Copyright@2018. Mega Artika Setyasari and Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali,

M.Hum.

All right reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced by any means without

the prior permission of at least one of the copyright owners of the English

Language Education Program, Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Kristen

Satya Wacana, Salatiga.

(6)
(7)

v

TABLE OF CONTENT

An Investigation of Students’ Speaking Challenges in Academic Speaking

Classes

COVER PAGE ….……….. i

APPROVAL PAGE ……….……….. ii

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT……… iii

TABLE OF CONTENT…..………...…...………….. v

ABSTRACT………...……...…….... vii

INTRODUCTION ………...……….. 1

Background of the Study ………...……… 1

Statement of the Issue ...………. 1

Research Questions …...………. 2

Objective of the Study ………...……… 2

Scope of the Study ………...….. 2

Significance of the Study .………...…….…... 2

LITERATURE REVIEW ………... 2

Academic Speaking Class ...……….……..……….………….. 3

Factors that Causes Speaking Challenges ……….……..………...…... 3

Strategies to Deal with the Challenges ………...…... 4

Related Studies on Challenges in Academic Speaking …………...………….. 5

THE STUDY …………..……… 7

Research Design ……….…..………..……….. 8

(8)

vi

Research Participants …….………...………... 9

Data Collection Instruments………..……….………. 10

Data Collection Procedures………...……….………. 11

Data Analysis Procedures………...………... 12

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ………. 13

Speaking Challenges in Academic Speaking Classes …..………..…… 13

Deficiency of Grammar, Vocabulary and Pronunciation ………...….…. 14

Lack of Self Confidence ………...……… 16

Strategies to Deal with the Challenges ………..……….……… 17

Independent Practice ……… 18

Peer Practice ………...……….. 19

Prepare Essential Points ………... 20

CONCLUSION ……….………... 21

Conclusion………..………...……...……….…. 21

Suggestions ………..………..………...….…… 22

ACKNOWLEGMENT………..………...………. 24

(9)

vii

Abstract

This study aims to investigate speaking problems faced by university students and how they dealt with their problems. More specifically, this study was conducted in Academic Speaking classes at English Language Education Program, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana (ELE-UKSW), Salatiga. Many ELE-UKSW students experience a lot of anxieties when joining Academic Speaking class. Therefore, it is crucial to discover the strategies used by the students to speak English fluently. The participants of the study were forty students of the 2016 academic year at ELE-UKSW. The researcher used qualitative method, and the data for the study were collected using open-ended questionnaire and interview. The analysis of the data showed that the participants experience speaking challenges such as deficiency of grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation and self-confidence which became the primary factors perceived by the students. Besides, this study seemed to indicate that students had essential strategies in dealing with their speaking challenges. Eventually, this study proposed some strategies to help students minimize their anxieties and master their oral skill. These strategies are independent practice, peer practice and prepare essential points as an attempt to support the development of their vocal ability specifically in Indonesian contexts.

(10)

1

INTRODUCTION

Speaking is one of the most critical skills in English as a foreign language

(EFL) (Febriyanti, 2011). It is as the active use of words to convey meaning and

the medium through which a new language is faced, comprehended, applied, and

taught (Al Hosni, 2014). People can express their opinion, knowledge, and

emotion to others through speaking (Irsyad & Narius, 2013). In general, Ur (1996)

also stated that speaking is the most important skill among four skills; speaking,

listening, reading, and writing. Similarly, speaking becomes one of the essential

skills that has to be mastered in English language learning besides listening,

reading and writing (Irsyad & Narius, 2013). Thus, it is important for EFL

students to learn and enhance their verbal skill.

However, for young EFL students, speaking is difficult (Hosni, 2014).

Besides that, Indonesian students have less exposure to speaking English

compared to students from countries where English is a second language

(Febriyanti, 2011). In fact, Indonesian students find it challenging to talk in

English in their English class. Furthermore, speaking is more difficult than other

skills which are writing, listening and reading (Paakki, 2013). Many students also

experience speaking difficulties at the English Language Education Program in

Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana (ELE-UKSW).

Febriyanti (2011) has looked at the significant benefits of speaking where

students can learn many things by speaking. Speaking is a key for students to

learn their target language (Indrianty, 2016). She further notes that students

(11)

2

focuses on investigating speaking challenges faced by ELE-UKSW students in

Academic Speaking classes. More specifically, I aim to answer these research

questions: [1] What are the speaking challenges faced by students in Academic

Speaking classes? [2] How do the students deal with those challenges?

Furthermore, studies concerning the issues of students’ speaking

challenges and strategies to deal with those challenges in EFL classrooms in the

higer education context in Indonesia have not been sufficient. Therefore, this

study aims to fill the gap by investigating speaking challenges faced by university

students in Indonesia and strategies to deal with their speaking challenges. More

significantly, this study examines speaking difficulties faced by ELE-UKSW

students and their strategy in handling the problems. This study is expected to be

useful for EFL teachers and students and hopes to inform EFL teachers about their

students’ speaking difficulties in attending their speaking class. Significantly, they

have to motivate their students by giving them some strategies to uncover the

challenges. Hopefully, it can also help EFL students who are still experiencing

speaking difficulties, so they would be able to speak well by implementing the

strategies.

LITERATURE REVIEW

This section provides all of the information related to the study about

students’ speaking challenges and their speaking strategies. First of all, this part

will explain Academic Speaking class. The second part will describe factors that

(12)

3

the challenges. Then, the last part will explain related studies on challenges in

Academic Speaking.

Academic Speaking Class

Academic Speaking class is to help students feel more relaxed in

communication, such as leading and participating in discussions (Christianson &

Watanabe, 2009). They further perceived that Academic Speaking class

implements several teaching techniques like the use of video, recording groups,

and peer review activities. Also, it requires some activities such as mini lecturers,

presentations, class discussions, and group project work as mentioned by Singh

(2013). Other speaking activities are interacting with classmates and asking

questions (Bachman, 1990). It means that in the Academic Speaking class,

students can practice their English with other students by asking and answering

questions related to the topic learned. This is also supported by Basturkmen

(2007) who said that Academic speaking class often report development ideas and

information. Moreover, other types of activities can be implemented in this class.

Thus, it is useful for teachers to know these kinds of activities.

Factors that Cause Speaking Challenges

In English speaking contexts, some factors of speaking challenges faced

by EFL learners includes; inhibition, nothing to say, low or uneven participation

and the use of mother-tongue (L1) (Ur, 1996). This means that students are not

(13)

4

mistakes. Secondly, students do not have enough motivation to speak English

because their experience in English is limited. This view is supported by Paakkii

(2013) who stated that one of the factors that students usually have in the speaking

class is lack of practice. Third, students do not have the chance to practice

speaking English because the class has too many students. Fourth, students tend to

use their mother tongue (L1) rather than second language (L2) or English. Not

only that, a previous study has reported that students have some complications in

speaking English. These linguistic difficulties means that students experience

some problems such as deficiency of vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation

(Kayaoğlu & Sağlamel, 2013).

Strategies to Deal with the Challenges

To boost students’ speaking skill, teachers have to create a unique teaching

strategy in their teaching (Febriyanti, 2011) by utilizing their approach in their

teaching. Firstly, teachers can ask students to practice their speaking by

emphasizing on fluency and accuracy. Skehan (2009) said that fluency is to

produce speech at a standard speed and without any interruption. On the contrary,

accuracy is the use of English correctly. Secondly, teachers ask students to

conduct a group project. The group project can be a medium where students can

speak in English actively with their friends (classmates). Another strategy dealing

with the challenges according to Huq (2014) is that TTT (teacher talking time)

should be minimized. In other words, STT (student talking time) can be

(14)

5

Related Studies on Challenges in Academic Speaking

There is a plethora of research that has been carried out internationally to

investigate students’ speaking challenges. In Banjarmasin (South Kalimantan of

Indonesia), a related study was undertaken by Febriyanti (2011). Her study aimed

to describe what teaching speaking English is and the problems faced by the

teachers and students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The results of her

study showed that firstly, some speaking challenges faced by students were that

they did not want to speak anything in English and they retained on using their

L1. Secondly, their teacher found that it was difficult to handle students in a large

class because it was hard for teachers to manage a class. Thirdly, the materials

given by the teacher did not fulfill the students’ need. Last, students did not have

enough motivation to learn or speak English. This study also suggested that

teachers could apply fun activities to develop their students’ speaking skill. These

activities are discussions, role play, simulations, information gap, brainstorming,

storytelling, interviews, story completion, reporting and playing cards.

Paakki in October 2013 did a research study on the difficulties of speaking

in English. This research was conducted in Finland and Japan. The study was

aimed to discover problems in speaking English. The findings of his study show

that speaking English was difficult for some Finnish and Japanese learners. In

fact, the speaking challenges were remembering words, making sense of (syntax,

grammar, and vocabulary), remembering the tenses, grammar, etc. Third,

(15)

6

to the Finnish informants who had problems in lack of vocabulary and fear of

errors in grammar and pronunciation.

Another study was conducted by Al Jamal and Al Jamal (2013) in Jordan

(Arab). The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate difficulties that

may be faced in an EFL setting. This study was conducted by using an adapted

questionnaire and interview with a sample of 64 students who were interviewed

and 566 students as questionnaire respondents. The findings of this study showed

some difficulties of EFL students’ speaking skill. It was found that the class

involved too many students (large class), thus results in lack of time and more use

of the L1 which is Arabic.

A related study was carried out by Singh (2013) on Academic Speaking

practices in Malaysia. This study was conducted using an adapted questionnaire

with a sample of 131 international graduate students. The results showed that the

top five challenges in Academic Speaking were communicating ideas fluently,

speaking accurately (grammar), communicating ideas confidently, speaking

clearly (pronunciation) and participating actively in discussions. The other results

found that, strategies on overcoming those Academic Speaking challenges were

practicing discussion orally, forcing students to speak in the class, practicing

spelling and pronunciation, talking to peers, and supplementing linguistic strategy

(e.g., utilizing educational media in oral presentations).

Another study was done by Al Hosni in June 2014 on speaking difficulties

faced by young EFL learners. Five grader students were the participants in the

(16)

7

speaking difficulties which were linguistic difficulties, mother tongue usage, and

inhibition. For that reason, the study demonstrated that teachers only taught from

the textbook that accentuates on teaching reading and writing rather than

speaking.

To sum up, the following may be said about the previous studies discussed

in this section. All the previous reviews above mentioned that students in

Indonesia, Finland, Japan, Arab, Oman, and Malaysia still faced some challenges

in students’ speaking class. Students’ speaking challenges were insufficient in

their vocabulary repertoire, grammar, pronunciation, motivation to learn and to

practice English. Additionally, students tended to use their L1 rather than L2, and

they did not give more attention to the teacher’s explanation. Last, the materials

given by the teacher did not fulfill the students’ desire. In that case, the teacher

only focused on the textbook and did not focus on the real world context that

students’ desire.

THE STUDY

This section discusses the details of the research methodology was used in

this study which explains the research design, context of the study, research

participants, data collection instruments, data collection procedures, and data

(17)

8

Research Design

The study aims to find out speaking challenges faced by ELE-UKSW

students’ specifically in Academic Speaking classes and how they dealt with those

challenges. To achieve the research objective, the study was approached

qualitatively. According to Creswell (2007), some characteristics of the qualitative

research are natural setting, new design, interpretative inquiry and complex.

Naturally, the data of the research was collected by talking directly or face to face

interaction. Second, the process of collecting the data was changed or shifted after

knowing the participants’ responses (e.g., questions from the questionnaire were

changed and modified). Third, qualitative research tends to interpret what the

participants and the researcher mean such as what they hear, see and understand.

Last, qualitative research was a one way to find out detailed understanding of the

difficulties and the strategies. Therefore, by using qualitative research, the

research would be able to explain students’ speaking problems and their strategies

according to some respondents.

Based on this approach, firstly the researcher collected the data by

distributing questionnaires and interviewing some participants directly. Williams

(2003) stated that questionnaires are used to gather information about the views

and behavior of interviewees. Secondly, questions of the questionnaire and

interview were modified if some of the participants did not understand the

questions well. Thirdly, the participants were allowed to interpret what students

hear, see, and follow in Academic Speaking class. Fourthly, the researcher

(18)

9

regarding students’ speaking challenges and the strategies to deal with them in

Academic Speaking classes.

Context of the Study

This research was conducted in Academic Speaking classes at

ELE-UKSW, Salatiga. Academic speaking class is one of the language skill courses

offered in the fourth semester. In this course, the students learn English language

aspects through speaking through the language forms that are used in presentation

skills, academic discussion, interview and academic consultation with their

teachers. At the end of this course, ELE-UKSW students are expected to acquire

some speaking competencies. The two competencies were adapted from a

classroom syllabus developed by Sinanu (2015), where: Students’ English oral

proficiency and oral communication techniques in the academic context will be

developed into a standard equal to a post-intermediate level. The reason of

choosing the class was because commonly, most of ELE-UKSW students were

able to speak simple English in the course of Academic Speaking, but some of

them decided to be quiet and not participate in speaking during class.

Research Participants

The researcher implemented quota sampling to select the research

participants. According to Mason (2002) cited by Robinson (2014), quota

sampling is set out on a series of categories. In other words, quota sampling

(19)

10

have taken Academic Speaking class and had some speaking problems during the

class. Students of 2016 academic year who have just taken Academic Speaking

class and were still fresh with the course were the participants of this study.

Data Collection Instruments

The research data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire.

This was to receive more complete answers based on the participants’ experience

in Academic Speaking class. Guion, Diehl, and McDonald (2001) stated that

open-ended question allows respondents to answer their questions by using their

own words. Moreover, the researcher used the open-ended questionnaire due to

some benefits. The researcher could response spontaneously, avoid bias and

collect many answers from the respondents (Reja, Manfreda, Hlebec & Vehovar,

2003).

The researcher translated the questions in the questionnaire into

Indonesian. Then, the participants were permitted to fill in written responses of

the questions by using the same language. This is due to the researcher’s aim to

ensure that the participants could wholly understand the meaning of each question

and could contribute clear and deep responses to each question.

The researcher conducted a semi-structured interview to support the

questionnaire data. The semi-structured interview was to specify some areas or

topics that the researcher desired to ask (Rabionet, 2011) and preparation is

needed before conducting the interview (Qu & Dumay, 2011). The researcher

(20)

11

researcher asked the questions subsequently (follow-up and probing questions).

Follow-up and probing questions were to prolong the answers of the interviewees

through a critical approach from the interviewer (Qu & Dumay, 2011). Overall,

these cases support the view that was to clarify further information from the

interviewees on the questionnaire (Mali, 2015).

The questions of the questionnaire and the interview were the same. They

contain three items. The questions on the questionnaire and interview have been

successfully applied in some studies. Therefore, the researcher adapted the

questions from previous studies.

Table 1. The Questionnaire and Interview Questions

No Questions Adapted from

1. Tell me your speaking challenges in Academic Speaking class. Academic Speaking class (give some examples to support your answer) .

Data Collection Procedures

Before distributing the questionnaire to the students of 2016 academic

year, piloting was done to ensure that the questionnaire was understandable for the

participants. Participants for piloting were 15 students of 2015 academic year.

After the piloting, the researcher distributed the questionnaire sheets to students of

2016 academic year where they took CISL (Current Issues in Second Language

Teaching) and CIAPL (Current Issues in Applied Linguistics) classes in that

(21)

12

Speaking class in the previous semester. These are the steps taken to collect the

research data. First, the researcher asked permission to some lectures in the CISL

and CIAPL classes for allowing their students to fill in the questionnaire. Second,

the researcher explained the goal of the study in the class after getting permission

from the lecturer. At that time, the questionnaires were distributed to the

participants.

After distributing the questionnaire, the interview was conducted. The

interview process was recorded using a voice recorder. According to Al Yateem

(2012), recording helped interviewers keep accurate records which supports them

to analyze their data. In the process of interviewing, the participant and the

researcher saw his/her written response to the questionnaire. Also, the researcher

permitted the participants to provide further clarification to what they had written

on the questionnaire by using the same language similar in filling the written

questionnaire (Indonesian). Finally, the recorded oral information was transcribed

and analyzed to support the data obtained from the questionnaire. Guion et al.

(2001) claimed that deciphering was to script out each question and answers from

the interviewee and analyzing was to identify themes from the interviewees’

responses after re-reading the interview transcripts.

Data Analysis Procedures

The data analysis was determined from the questionnaires and

interviewees. Firstly, after the data has been collected from the questionnaire, the

(22)

13

interviewed. Secondly, the interviews involved five participants who had many

speaking problems and gave various answers on the written questionnaire.

Consequently, the researcher obtained more affluent speaking challenges from

those participants as her data. Thirdly, several themes emerged from the data

analysis. According to Aronson (1995), thematic analysis emphasize on

identifying themes. It means that thematic analysis developed themes based on the

data that the researcher had. Furthermore, thematic analysis was a method of

analyzing qualitative data by using some steps such as identifying, analyzing and

reporting themes from the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006, as cited by Vaismoradi,

Turunen & Bondas, 2013).

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

This section provides two main sub-sections based on the research

questions, namely the students’ speaking challenges and the strategies in dealing

with the difficulties in Academic Speaking classes at ELE-UKSW. To convey the

trustworthy discussions, the conclusions of each sub-section are supported by

excerpts from questionnaire data (QNR) and interview data (ITW). For this study,

the researcher translated all the passages into English.

Speaking Challenges in Academic Speaking Classes

The data analysis collected on this issue revealed that there are two major

(23)

14

Speaking classes. They are deficiency of grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation and

lack of self-confidence.

Deficiency of grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation

The most apparent speaking challenge encountered by the students was

lack of vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation. Most of the students shared

about their grammar problem by stating: “When speaking English in Academic

Speaking, our difficulties lie in the grammar that is still often wrong

(students6,18,25,29,36,38,39/QNR/translated by the researcher); because the use

of wrong grammar makes what we want to say cannot be conveyed properly

(students8,11,27/QNR/translated by the researcher); and it is required to speak

English with the correct grammar” (students5,7,23,40/QNR/translated by the

researcher). Further, in harmony with the written responses, one interviewee

clarified how students encountered grammar challenge:

Excerpt 1

I have prepared what I wanted to say in my head. But when we talk about what is on the head sometimes, it comes out differently, for example, like grammar mistakes, I wanted to say something, but it means different. (Nana/ITW/translated by the researcher)

This challenge was also found by Al Roud (2016), where weak grammar is one of

the problems which students have in speaking English in the classroom.

Additionally, Lindblad (2011) claimed that female students are the ones who

usually experience grammar problem in their speaking.

Some of the students also shared their perspectives that vocabulary is one

(24)

15

say (students3,6,13,25,32,33/QNR/translated by the researcher); because we are

lacking of vocabulary (students11,15,21,30/QNR/translated by the researcher);

not paying attention to word selection (students7,8,9/QNR/translated by the

researcher); and have difficulty in remembering new vocabulary”

(student40/QNR/translated by the researcher). In the interview, a participant

articulated similar point of views to this vocabulary problems, that sometimes

there may be difficulties in vocabulary but it is still minor (Elisa/ITW/translated

by the researcher). It is also proved by Indrianty (2016) that deficiency of

vocabulary is recognized to lead in speaking anxiety for students in the oral

English classroom.

Besides those two prominent speaking challenges, pronunciation is also an

important challenge that was mentioned by the participants. Concerning this

category, some participants stated that “I felt nervous and scared of my

pronunciation (students4,27/QNR/translated by the researcher); sometimes I am

afraid when my pronunciation is not clearly heard by my friends or lecturer

(students25,29/QNR/translated by the researcher) and that it will sound ridiculous

(student12/QNR/translated by the researcher) because of some inappropriate

pronunciation” (student32/QNR/translated by the researcher). Consistent with the

questionnaire results, a participant conveyed the following thoughts: “Sometimes,

I feel like my pronunciation is wrong” (Veren/ITW/translated by the researcher).

In line with this category, Al Roud (2016) said that lousy pronunciation could

(25)

16

stated that male students usually have pronunciation problem in their English

speaking.

Lack of self-confidence

Another speaking challenge faced by ELE-UKSW students is lack of

self-confidence. Most of the students believed that they did not feel confident to speak

in front of their friends and lecturer because of nervousness and fear of making

mistakes. This category covers further statements from the respondents, such as

“When they speak English in Academic Speaking class, their troubles are

sometimes still nervousness (students4,20,31,32,37,39/QNR/translated by the

researcher), not confident to speak English

(students2,3,12,19,21,35/QNR/translated by the researcher); for instance

conducting presentation (students7,9,10,16,22,38/QNR/translated by the

researcher) interview session (student10/QNR/translated by the researcher);

debate (student5/QNR/translated by the researcher); and speech

(student16/QNR/translated by the researcher). However, self-confidence will

affect how fast /slow I speak (student28/QNR/translated by the researcher); in

those cases, we have anxiety when we have to speak English in front of many

people such as friends and lecturer

(students6,19,24,35,38,31,36,39,/QNR/translated by the researcher); our friends

are smarter than us in speaking English (students14,37/QNR/decoded by the

(26)

17

explained” (student20/QNR/translated by the researcher). These statements that

emerged from the questionnaire data were in harmony to what two participants

stated in the interviews: “The reason is that if we speak in front of many people

like friends and lecturers, we usually get nervous and it makes us confused about

what we want to speak” (Nana/ITW/translated by the researcher).

Excerpt 2

Some of the speaking challenges that I still remember is speaking fluently in front of friends and lecturer. Then when we made a poster presentation in a formal academic, it was challenging for college students because we must make the poster as creative as possible without decreasing assessment in speaking aspects (Victor/ITW/translated by the researcher).

Similar to Al Nakhalah (2013) who said that lack of confidence usually happens

when students wonder whether their talk has been understood or not by their

audiences. Students have anxiety to speak English especially in front of their

friends and lecturer because of inadequate self-confidence (Abdalla & Elhadi,

2015). They further argued that it is complicated for them when they speak

English in front of their friends and teachers.

Strategies to Deal with the Challenges

It is imperative for ELE-UKSW students to create some strategies in

dealing with their speaking challenges because if they do not discover the

necessary speaking approach, their verbal skill will never improve. More

specifically, the responses of the respondents are classified into three categories,

(27)

18

Independent Practice

ELE-UKSW students usually practice speaking by themselves. This

category involved the statement, “The effort is to prepare and practice the material

that will be delivered well in order to be confident and better prepared when

speaking in front of the crowd (student16,26,37,39/QNR/translated by the

researcher); I often try to talk to myself in front of the mirror so that when we

speak in class, we will be more confident

(students2,12,19,21,23,24,25,28,39/QNR/decoded by the researcher). For

instance, sometimes it is a nonsense dialogue between me and myself and it helps

me a lot to increase my confidence” (student24/QNR/translated by the researcher).

Other strategies are searching in the dictionary and internet which includes

Google, Youtube and Facebook (students15,18,30,32/QNR/ decoded by the

researcher); singing English songs (student36/QNR/translated by the researcher);

watching videos or movies in English (students11,37/QNR/ transcribed by the

researcher); listening to English songs (students11,26 /QNR/translated by the

researcher); reading many materials and articles in English

(students3,11,13,15/QNR/ transcribed by the researcher). These statements were

in line with those clarified in the interview, as stated by some interviewees:

Excerpt 3

In dealing with my difficulties which are vocabulary, lack of confidence and pronunciation. I like to read some articles in English because by reading the articles it will enhance my vocabulary. For instance, if there is a vocabulary who I do not know, I keep looking for it in the dictionary, then I write it and read it aloud. Then, to deal the feeling of lack of confidence, I give myself a pep-talk that, I can do it/self- motivation (Veren/ITW/translated by the researcher).

Excerpt 4

(28)

19

exact pronunciation from watching those videos. The last is that I listen to English songs because I like to listen to songs, I implement it to learn, and practice

pronouncing the words or the sentences that are in the songs (Victor/ITW/translated by the researcher).

Similary, according to Christianson, Hoskins, and Watanabe (2009) who stated

that watching and listening videos helps students improve their language in the

presentation and discussion matters.

Peer Practice

The next strategy would seem to indicate that speaking is not always

practiced alone because there is a need for interaction with other people. This

category is shown by the comments, “I deal with it by asking my friends to

practice together and help correct each other’s vocabulary, grammar and

pronunciation if it was wrong” (students4,29,36/QNR/translated by the

researcher). This category cited by the participants was what has been clarified by

an interviewee:

Excerpt 5

So, the first step to handle with my difficulties is that I practice my speech

contionously probably with friends, professors or others. Furthermore, I was able to pass from this Academic Speaking class because I often consulted with the lecturer. So, if the lecturer gave an assignment, I will regularly consult it with the lecturer. Additionally, I also asked my friends for help if I do not know the projects given by the lecturer. (Victor/ITW/translated by the researcher)

The findings above support the research done by Lindblad (2011) who said that

communicating with friends is one of the ways to practice students’ speaking

ability. Giving peer feedback is a tool for students in enhancing their oral skills

(29)

20

their mistakes, especially vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation, it would

improve the oral skill better.

Prepare essential points

Another prominent strategy is preparing some critical marks on a piece of

paper before speaking. After writing the significant points, students can memorize

them, and they will be comfortable because they have prepared all aspects of their

talk includ their vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation. Some students

conveyed this strategy in their written responses, “We write some key points so

that it will be easy to memorize what we will speak or present about

(students3,5,6,22,33/QNR/translated by the researcher); create my own dictionary

(student3/QNR/translated by the researcher) and write down the new vocabulary

in our notebooks” (students3,40/QNR/translated by the researcher). These

statements that emerged from the questionnaire data were in harmony to what two

participants stated in the interview: “I write some points later on, on this slide I

will say this, and on another slide I add this. So, my slides do not contain text but

more images. Because images help me to be more pro-active in speaking”

(Nana/ITW/translated by the researcher). “I get a new vocabulary if the word is

memorable and I remember it directly. But, if it is too hard to remember I will

write it in a notebook or maybe on my handphone” (Victor/ITW/decoded by the

researcher). These strategies are in line with Erling, Ashmore and Kapur (2016)

who argued that writing critical points before speaking is one of students’

(30)

21

strategy will reduce errors in the linguistic aspects such as vocabulary, grammar,

and pronunciation (Al Roud, 2016).

Importantly, the present study highlights the essence of insufficient

grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and self-confidence in speaking English in

front of other people in Academic Speaking class. Likewise, the previous studies

by Al Hosni (2014); Paakki (2013); Kayaoğlu and Sağlamel (2013) and Singh

(2013) stated that some speaking problems such as insufficient vocabulary

repertoire, speaking accurately (grammar), speaking clearly (pronunciation) and

inhibition (fear of producing mistakes to speak English in front of others). In a

sense, showing strategies to improve students’ speaking challenges such as:

independent practice, peer practice and prepare essential points will help

ELE-UKSW students’ proficiency in speaking English.

CONCLUSION

In light of the findings on EFL students speaking challenges and strategies

in overcoming their problems, several conclusions and recommendation can be

depicted. First, insufficiency of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation as a

speaking challenge for ELE-UKSW learners makes significant influences in

decreasing their skill. These are supported by Leong and Ahmadi’s (2017)

statement that students’ problems on Academic Speaking are grammar, fluency,

and pronunciation. They further state that self-confidence is considered to be a

factor which affects students’ speaking. Second, insufficient self-confidence to

(31)

22

usually happens because learners feel nervous to speak in front of their friends and

lecturer.

Furthermore, the researcher indicates that those speaking challenges

reduce students speaking skill. The result shows that, they could improve their

skill by utilizing some effective speaking strategies. These strategies are

independent practice, peer practice and prepare important points. Additionally,

learners can practice their speaking ability alone supported by all English aspects

(listening, writing and reading). They can also ask their friends to check whether

the grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation is already correct or not. Last,

students can write some aspects that they are going to speak about in their paper.

In conclusion, these approaches are usually used to handle students speaking

challenges on lack of grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation and self-confidence to

speak English.

This research offers suggestions regarding EFL students’ speaking

challenges and strategies in overcoming their difficulties. First, EFL teachers can

initiate to motivate their students with some strategies to solve their speaking

anxiety. Jamila (2014, p.164) stated that learners who have a minor speaking

problem could speak efficiently. She further mentions that there is a demand to

handle learners’ problem, by practicing their English individually or with peers.

Second, EFL students should not panic if they face many speaking challenges.

They have to uncover suitable strategies for dealing with their problems.

Accordingly, this research is hoped that EFL students are able to develop their

(32)

23

scope, students can easily memorize what they would like to present by writing

the information down (Richards, 2008). Third, apart from these practical

recommendations for EFL teachers and students, it is better for EFL students to

practice speaking English frequently. Irsyad and Narius (2013) asserted that

speakers have to present understanding to listeners which makes speaking a hard

task. They further noted that the speakers must make their listeners understand

what they mean by using speaking strategies.

Most importantly, it is necessary for EFL students to develop their oral

skill because this skill supports them to master other English skills (Hosni, 2014).

Lastly further reaserch conducted in a bigger scope would be needed. Future

studies would be better if other reaserchers investigate speaking challenges in

Academic Speaking class based on lecturer perspectives. Investigation of other

strategies in overcoming students’ speaking challenges through a lecturer’s point

(33)

24

ACKNOWLEGMENT

First of all, I would like to thank to Allah SWT, for always holding me

tight in His hands and always helping me in making my thesis. I would to say my

gratitude to these marvelous people who give me great support and helps to finish

this thesis. Thanks to my beloved parents for always supporting, motivating and

facilitating me during my study. I dedicate these thesis to you because I learn

much about life from you and I love you more than I love myself.

For my best supervisor who is Pak Calvin, I am glad to have you as my

supervisor. I learn many things about literature from you. I also learn how to be a

great teacher from you. For Ibu Martha, thanks for all your help and your

suggestion for perfecting my thesis. You are a very nice lecture for me.

For my students in ELE-UKSW Putri, Sekar, Adrian, Edi and all friends

who are supervised by Pak Calvin, come on friends finish your thesis soon and

come to the real jungle. Special thanks to Veby, Risma and Henny (2014), you are

(34)

25

REFERENCES

Abdalla, M. E., & Elhadi, E. N. (2015). Problems of teaching and learning spoken English in Sudan. SUST Journal of Humanities, 16(4), 1858-6724.

Al Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22-30.

Al-Jamal, D. A., & Al-Jamal, G. A. (2013). An investigation of the difficulties faced by EFL undergraduates in speaking skills. English Language

Teaching, 7 (1), 19-27.

Al-Nakhalah, A. M. M. (2013). Investigating the Difficulties and Problems Faced by the English Language Students of Al Quds Open University in Legal Translation Process. International Journal of English Language & Translational Studies, 1(3), 166-185.

Al-Roud, A. A. (2016). Problems of English speaking skill that university students encounter from their perspectives. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 8(13), 1-9.

Al-Yateem, N. (2012). The effect of interview recording on quality of data obtained: A methodological reflection. Nurse Researcher, 19 (4), 31-35.

Aronson, J. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The qualitative report, 2 (1), 1-3.

Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Basturkmen, H. (2007). Signalling the relationship between ideas in academic speaking from language description to pedagogy. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Auckland, 22 (2).

Christianson, M., Hoskins, C., & Watanabe, A. (2009). Evaluating the

effectiveness of a video- recording based self-assessment system for academic speaking. Language research bulletin, 24, 1-15.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Efrizal, D. (2012). Improving students’ speaking through communicative

(35)

26

Erling, E., Ashmore, K., & Kapur, K. (2016). Building your students' confidence to speak English.

Eveliana, D. S. (2016). A study on how EFL students handle their speaking problems. Unpublished master’s thesis, Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FBS-UKSW.

Febriyanti, E. R. (2011). Teaching speaking of English as a foreign language problems and solutions. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 1 (2), 127-132.

Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2001). Conducting an in-depth interview. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS.

Huq, M. T. (2014). Speaking in ELT pedagogy in the context of Bangladesh: An overview of problems and recommendations. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 (1), 70-75.

Indrianty, S. (2016). Students’ anxiety in speaking English (a case study in hotel and tourism college in Bandung). ELTIN Journal, Journal of English

Language Teaching in Indonesia, 4(1).

Irsyad, R. F., & Narius, D. (2013). Teaching speaking through retelling stories of cartoon movies at junior high school. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2 (1), 295-301.

Jamila, M. (2014). Lack of confident-a psychological factor affecting spoken english of university level adult learners in bangladesh. Language in India, 14(10).

Kayaoğlu, M. N., & Sağlamel, H. (2013). Students’ perceptions of language anxiety in speaking classes. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 2(2), 142-160.

Leong, L. M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ english speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education.

Lindblad, M. (2011). Communication strategies in speaking English as a foreign language. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Swedish.

(36)

27

Paakki, H. (2013). Difficulties in speaking English and perceptions of accents: A comparative study of Finnish and Japanese adult learners of

english. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Eastern Finland.

Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative research in accounting & management, 8 (3), 238-264.

Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: an ongoing and continuous journey. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563.

Reja, U., Manfreda, K. L., Hlebec, V., & Vehovar, V. (2003). Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Developments in applied statistics, 19(1), 159-177.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25- 41.

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating

complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510-532.

Sinanu, F. (2015). Introduction to argumentative speaking (classroom syllabus). Salatiga: English Language Education Program, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Singh, M. K. M. (2013). Academic speaking practices of international graduate students in a higher education institution in Malaysia: Challenges and overcoming strategies. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(7), 2201-6333.

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.

(37)

28

APPENDIX

Kepada Para Responden,

Nama saya Mega Artika Setyasari. Pada saat ini saya sedang menempuh pendidikan Sarjana Pendidikan (S.Pd) dalam Program Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana (UKSW), Salatiga. Sebagai bagian dari studi, saya sedang melakukan suatu penelitian tentang kesulitan mahasiswa di kelas Academic Speaking. Oleh karena itu, pada kesempatan ini, saya ingin meminta bantuan Anda untuk dapat menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan dalam kuestioner ini. Saya menggunakan pertanyaan-pertanyaan tersebut untuk mendapatkan informasi mengenai tantangan berbicara dan strategi Anda dalam menghadapi tantangan tersebut.

Ini bukan tes, jadi tidak ada jawaban benar atau salah dalam kuesioner ini. Selain itu, jawaban Anda tidak akan mempengaruhi nilai Anda di kelas Academic Speaking. Oleh karena itu, Anda diperkenakan untuk memberikan jawaban berdasarkan pengalaman Anda dalam mengikuti kelas Academic Speaking. Apabila Anda mempunyai pertanyaan lebih lanjut berkaitan dengan penelitian ini, Anda dapat menghubungi saya di nomor telepon berikut ini:

0856 4066 4443

(38)

29

2. Jelaskan upaya Anda dalam menghadapi kesulitan tersebut! (Berikan contohnya!)

Apabila Anda setuju untuk diwawancarai lebih lanjut silahkan lengkapi informasi dibawah ini:

Gambar

Table 1. The Questionnaire and Interview Questions

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Dengan ini diberitahukan, bahwa setelah diadakan penelitian oleh Pejabat Pengadaan sesuai ketentuan – ketentuan yang berlaku maka Pejabat Pengadaan

Direktur Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta dengan ini menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa program pascasarjana berikut ini adalah mahasiswa yang sedang aktif

Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini bahwa remaja putri merokok terjadi pada usia 15 tahun dan 18 tahun, dikarenakan diri sendiri dengan keinginan mencoba-coba atau iseng-iseng merokok dan

78.463.000,- (Tujuh Puluh Delapan Juta Empat Ratus Enam Puluh Tiga Ribu Rupiah) dinyatakan sebagai. pemenang paket pekerjaan Jasa Konsultansi Perencanaan Pembangunan

Menjaga interaksi sosial yang positif dengan lingkungan dan menemukan makna hidup menjadi salah satu tugas perkembangan lansia yang memiliki pengaruh dalam memberi

Berdasarkan angka 1 s.d 7 diatas, Pokja Jasa Konsultansi dan Jasa Lainnya pada ULP Kabupaten Bengkulu Utara mengumumkan pemenang seleksi umum paket pekerjaan

Artinya bila persepsi karyawan terhadap gaya kepemimpinan demokratis positif maka keterlibatan kerja karyawan tinggi, dan sebaliknya bila persepsi karyawan terhadap gaya

[r]