DAFTAR PUSTAKA.

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Bachkar , Khalid; Won , Koo and Szmerekovsky, Joseph. 2013. An Analytical Hierarchy Process framework to Mitigate the Security Risk in the Global Container Supply Chain. The Journal of Management and Engineering Integration Vol. 6, No. 1

Bai, Xuije. 2015. Credibility-Based Biobjective Fuzzy Optimization for Supplier Selection Problem with Disruption. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2015

Bello, Marlene J. Suarez. 2003. A Case Study Approach to The Supplier Selection Process. http://grad.uprm.edu/tesis/suarezbello.pdf didownload tanggal 11 Mei 2009.

Fatmawati, Medelina Shinta. 2007. “Penggunaan Metode AHP dalam Mengukur Kualitas Jasa Lembaga Amil Zakat di Surakarta”. Skripsi Sarjana Yang Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.

Haque, Mahbubul; Syahriyar, Ahmed. 2014. A Conceptual Framework of Supplier Selection and Order Allocation: an Integrated of AHP and LP Modeling. Journal of Global Business Issues; Fall 2014; 8,2; ABI/INFORM research pg.1

Heizer, Jay dan Barry Render. 2005. Manajemen Operasi. Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hu, Lei. 2012. AHP Method for Supplier Evaluation Index System Modeling and Evaluation Research. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 121-126 (2012) pp 3677-3681

Jha, Goutam Kumar. 2013. Supplier in Manufacturing Environment Using Range of Value Method i-manager’s Journal on Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 3 . No.3 - July 2013

Jin, Hui. 2013. Suppliers Selection of Auto Parts Enterprise Based on Fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications(JDCTA) .Volume7,Number3,February 2013

Kaur, Prabjot. 2014. Selection of Vendor Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analitycal. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Operations Research Volume 2014, Article ID 987690, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/987690

(2)

Li, Lisha. 2014. Research on Airline Operational Control Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols 496-500 (2014) pp 1365-1368

Ning, Zhang. 2015. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method for civil aviation airport security information management. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 701-702 (2015) pp 40-43

Nydick, Robert L and Ronal Paul Hill. 1992. Using the Analitic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28 (2) 31-36.

Ryan Taufik, Yeni Sumantri. 2014. Penerapan Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Readymix Berdasarkan Integrasi Metode AHP dan Topsis. http://jrmsi.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jrmsi/article/view/151.

Didownload tanggal 10 Februari 2017.

Saaty, Thomas L. 1988. Multi Criteria Decision Methode : The Analitycal Hierarchy Process. University of Pittsburgh.

Sachdey, Haras J. 2013. The Challenges of Obtaining a Competitive Advantage for Processed Material Suppliers: A Conceptual Study. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness vol. 7(1) 2013

Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Research Methods For Business: Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis.Salemba Empat: Jakarta.

Stock, James. R And Douglas Lambert. 2001. Strategic Logistic Management. 4th Edition. New York : McGraw-Hill.

Subakti, Irfan.2002. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November. Surabaya.

Sugiyono.2006.MetodePenelitianAdministrasi.EdisiRevisi.Bandung : Alfabeta. Supriyono, Wisnu Arya Wardana, dan Sudaryo. 2007. Sistem Pemilihan Pejabat

Struktural dengan Metode AHP. Seminar Nasional III. STTN-BATAN. http://jurnal.sttn-batan.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/30-supriyono-ahp-hal-311-322. pdf didownload tanggal 12 November 2016.

Surjasa, Dadang, Pudji Astuti, dan Hario Nugroho. Usulan Supplier Selection Dengan Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Dengan konsep Vendor Managed Inventory Pada PT ABC. http://www.fab.utm.my/download/ConferenceSemiar/ICCI2006S3PP06.pdf didownload tanggal 12 November 2016.

Tahriri, Farzad, dkk. 2008. A Review of Supplier Selection Methods In Manufacturing Industries. Suranaree J. Sci. Technol. Vol. 15 No. 3; July - September 2008.

(3)

Teknomo, Kardi. 2006. Analytic Hierarchy Process (On-Line). Available : http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/

Universitas Sebelas Maret. 2003. Buku Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. Surakarta : Fakultas Ekonomi UNS.

Watjatrakul, Boonlert. 2014. Vendor selection strtegy for IT outsourcing: the weigthed-criteria evaluation technique. Journal of Entreprise Information Management Vo. 27 No. 2, 2014 pp. 122-138

Weber, Charles A., John R. Current and W.C. Benton. 1991. Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operations Research 50 (1991) 2-18.

Zhu, Shi Sheng. 2011. An Improved AHP Model Applied in Supply Chain Management. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 55-57 (2011) pp 1910-1916

(4)

Lampiran 1. REKAP HASIL KUISIONER KRITERIA SUPPLIER

*** Breakdown

Kriteria Harga Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

Kualitas 3 9 0.333 13 1.44

Layanan 7 9 0.778 34 3.78

Ketepatan Pengiriman 5 9 0.556 25 2.78

*** Breakdown

Kriteria Kualitas Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

Harga 7 9 0.778 49 5.444

Layanan 7 9 0.778 21 3.000

*** Breakdown

Kriteria Layanan Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

Harga 3 9 0.333 19 2.111

Kualitas 7 9 0.778 17 1.889

*** Breakdown

Kriteria Pengiriman Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

Harga 5 9 0.556 31 3.444

Kualitas 5 9 0.556 25 2.778

(5)

Kriteria Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman Harga 1 1.444 3.778 2.778 Kualitas 5.444 1 2.333 3.111 Layanan 2.111 1.889 1 2.111 Ketepatan Pengiriman 3.444 2.778 3.444 1 Jumlah 12.000 7.111 10.556 9.000

Kriteria Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman

Harga 0.083 0.203 0.358 0.309

Kualitas 0.454 0.141 0.221 0.346

Layanan 0.176 0.266 0.095 0.235

Ketepatan Pengiriman 0.287 0.391 0.326 0.111

Kriteria Rata-rata Prioritas

Harga 0.238 II

Kualitas 0.290 I

Layanan 0.193 IV

Ketepatan Pengiriman 0.279 III

BOBOT PENILAIAN KRITERIA

NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN KRITERIA

RATA-RATA PENILAIAN KRITERIA

Lampiran 2. NORMALISASI MATRIK DAN PRIORITAS KRITERIA

(6)

*** Breakdown

Kriteria Harga Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

H1 vs H2 8 9 0.889 58 6.444 H2 vs H1 2 9 0.222 6 0.667 *** Breakdown

Kriteria Kualitas Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

K1 vs K2 9 9 1.000 35 3.889 K1 vsK3 8 9 0.889 28 3.111 K2 vs K1 5 9 0.556 5 0.556 K2 vs K3 7 9 0.778 13 1.444 K3 vs K1 6 9 0.667 14 1.556 K3 vs K2 8 9 0.889 20 2.222 *** Breakdown

Kriteria Layanan Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

L1 vs L2 5 9 0.556 23 2.556 L1 vs L3 3 9 0.333 20 2.222 L2 vs L1 6 9 0.667 32 3.556 L2 vs L3 6 9 0.667 10 1.111 L3 vs L1 8 9 0.889 47 5.222 L3 vs L2 8 9 0.889 22 2.444 *** Breakdown

Kriteria Ketepatan Pengiriman Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot

D1 vs D2 9 9 1.000 59 6.556 D2 vs D1 2 9 0.222 2 0.222

(7)

Kriteria H1 H2 H1 1 6.444 H2 0.667 1 Jumlah 1.667 7.444 Kriteria H1 H2 H1 0.6 0.866 H2 0.400 0.134

Kriteria Rata-rata Prioritas

H1 0.733 I

H2 0.267 II

BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA HARGA

NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA HARGA

RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA HARGA

Kriteria K1 K2 K3 K1 1 3.889 3.111 K2 0.556 1 1.444 K3 1.556 2.222 1 Jumlah 3.111 7.111 5.555 Kriteria K1 K2 K3 K1 0.321 0.547 0.560 K2 0.179 0.141 0.260 K3 0.500 0.312 0.180

Kriteria Rata Prioritas

K1 0.476 I

K2 0.193 II

K3 0.331 III

BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS

NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS

RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS

Kriteria L1 L2 L3 L1 1 2.556 2.22 L2 3.556 1 1.111 L3 5.222 2.444 1 Jumlah 9.778 6.000 4.331 Kriteria L1 L2 L3 L1 0.102 0.426 L2 0.364 0.167 0.257 L3 0.534 0.407 0.231

Kriteria Rata Prioritas

L1 0.034 III

L2 0.121 II

L3 0.178 I

BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN

NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN

RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN

Kriteria D1 D2 D1 1 6.556 D2 0.222 1 Jumlah 1.222 7.556 Kriteria H1 H2 D1 0.818 0.868 D2 0.182 0.132

Kriteria Rata-rata Prioritas

D1 0.409 I

D2 0.091 II

BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA PENGIRIMAN BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA PENGIRIMAN

RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA PENGIRIMAN

(8)

CR Value = 0.048 OK

Pairwise comparisons

Item Number Item Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Kriteria Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman

1 Harga 1.00 1.44 3.78 2.78 2 Kualitas 0.69 1.00 3.00 4.67 3 Layanan 0.26 0.33 1.00 2.11 4 Ketepatan pengiriman 0.36 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sum 2.32 2.99 8.25 10.56 STANDARDIZED MATRIX

Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman Weight

1 Harga 0.43 0.48 0.46 0.26 40.9%

2 Kualitas 0.30 0.33 0.36 0.44 36.0%

3 Layanan 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.20 13.7%

4 Ketepatan pengiriman 0.16 0.07 0.06 0.09 9.5%

CI and CR worksheet

Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman SUM SUM/Weight

1 Harga 0.41 0.52 0.52 0.26 1.71 4.18 2 Kualitas 0.28 0.36 0.41 0.44 1.50 4.16 3 Layanan 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.20 0.56 4.13 4 Ketepatan pengiriman 0.15 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.38 4.05 count 4.00 lambda max 4.129 CI 0.043 CR 0.048 constant 0.9

(9)

CR Value = 0.000 OK

Kriteria H1 H2 1 H1 1.00 6.44 2 H2 0.16 1.00 Sum 1.16 7.44 STANDARDIZED MATRIX H1 H2 Weight 1 H1 0.87 0.87 86.6% 2 H2 0.13 0.13 13.4% 3 CI and CR worksheet H1 H2 SUM SUM/Weight 1 H1 0.87 0.87 1.73 2.00 2 H2 0.13 0.13 0.27 2.00 3 count 2.00 lambda max 2.000 CI 0.000 CR 0.00 constant 0

(10)

CR Value = 0.033 OK

Kriteria K1 K2 K3 1 K1 1.00 3.89 3.11 2 K2 0.26 1.00 1.44 3 K3 0.32 0.69 1.00 Sum 1.58 5.58 5.55 STANDARDIZED MATRIX K1 K2 K3 Weight 1 K1 0.63 0.70 0.56 63.0% 2 K2 0.16 0.18 0.26 20.0% 3 K3 0.20 0.12 0.18 16.9% CI and CR worksheet K1 K2 K3 SUM SUM/Weight 1 K1 0.63 0.78 0.53 1.94 3.07 2 K2 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.61 3.02 3 K3 0.20 0.14 0.17 0.51 3.02 count 3.00 lambda max 3.039 CI 0.019 CR 0.033 constant 0.58

(11)

CR Value = 0.006 OK

Kriteria L1 L2 L3 1 L1 1.00 2.56 2.22 2 L2 0.39 1.00 1.11 3 L3 0.45 0.90 1.00 1.00 Sum 1.84 4.46 4.33 STANDARDIZED MATRIX L1 L2 L3 Weight 1 L1 0.54 0.57 0.51 54.3% 2 L2 0.21 0.22 0.26 23.1% 3 L3 0.24 0.20 0.23 22.6% CI and CR worksheet L1 L2 L3 SUM SUM/Weight 1 L1 0.54 0.59 0.50 1.64 3.01 2 L2 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.69 3.00 3 L3 0.24 0.21 0.23 0.68 3.00 count 3.00 lambda max 3.007 CI 0.003 CR 0.006 constant 0.58

(12)

CR Value = 0.000 OK

Kriteria D1 D2 1 D1 1.00 6.56 2 D2 0.15 1.00 Sum 1.15 7.56 STANDARDIZED MATRIX D1 D2 Weight 1 D1 0.87 0.87 86.8% 2 D2 0.13 0.13 13.2% 3 CI and CR worksheet D1 D2 SUM SUM/Weight 1 D1 0.87 0.87 1.74 2.00 2 D2 0.13 0.13 0.26 2.00 count 2.00 lambda max 2.000 CI 0.000 CR 0.00 constant 0