• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T FIS 1402411 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T FIS 1402411 Bibliography"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Afiatun, U, dan Putra, NMD. (2015). Implementasi Model Think Pair Share (TPS) Berbasis Problem Posing (PP) Pada Pembelajaran Fluida Dinamis. Unnes Physic Education Journal, 4(1).

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, hlm. 131-152.

Allen, M.J., & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement. Theory. Monterey: Brooks/ Cole.

Alvermann, D.E., Phelps, S.F. (2002). Content reading and literacy: succeeding

intoday’s diverse classroom. Boston, MS: Allyn and Bacon.

Anderson, L. W., (2003). Clasroom Assessment: enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Angell, C., et al. (2007). “Multiple representations as a framework for a modelling approach to physics education”. Department of Physics, University of Oslo, NORWAY, and Per Morten Kind, School of Education, Durham University, UK.

Arifiyanti, LM. (2015) Pengembangan Buku Pedoman Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Metakognisi Sesuai Level Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Asyhari, A., dkk. (2016). Pengembangan modul fisika SMA berbasis srategi REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring) pokok bahasan gerak melingkar kelas X SMA. Mathematic Science education National Conference Fakultas Tarbiyah & Keguruan IAIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Atherton, JS. (2013). Learning and teaching; Assesment: Problem sheets

[Online]. Diakses dari

(2)

122 Azwar, S. (1986). Reliabilitas dan validitas: interpretasi dan komputasi.

Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Black, P., et al. (2004). Working Inside The Black Box: Assessment for Learning

in the Classroom. [Online]. Diakses dari

http://www.defause.cse.Ucla.edu/DOCS/pb_wor_2004.

Bere, C.V. (2014). The use of worksheets in the classroom.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman. ISBN: 0-801-0334-6 [LB1028.B6 1989]

Cateel, D B., and Narkawicz, M G. (2006). Effectiveness of Foldables TM versus lecture/worksheet in teaching social studies in third grade classrooms. Forum on public policy: A journal of the oxford round table.

Chingos, M.W., Whitehurst, G.J. (2012). Choosing Blindly: instructional materials teacher effectiveness and the common core. Washington: Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings.

Coe, R. (2002). It’s the effect size: what effect size is and what it is important. The British Educational Research Association Annual Conference¨Exeter.

Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NY: Academic Press in Coe, Robert (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User. Draft version.

Cohen, E. G. (1991). Teaching in multiculturally heterogeneous classrooms: Findings from a model program. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 26(1), hlm. 7–23.

Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), hlm. 1–35.

Costa, A. (1985). Developing Minds. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Cox, A.J., Junkin, W.F. (2002). Enhanced Student Learning in the Introductory Physics Laboratory. Physics Education, 37(1), 37-44

(3)

123 Dolin, J. (2001). Representational forms in physics. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis, E. Kallery (Eds.).

Science Education Research in the Knowledge-Based Society. Proceedings of the

Third International Conference of the ESERA (pp. 359-361). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Ennis, RH. (1993). Critical Thinking Asessement. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), hlm. 197-186.

EOS-SEI Times. (2012). Designing in-class, group based worksheet ctivities.[Online]. Diakses dari http://www.eos.ubc.ca/research/cwsei/eossei-times.html

F., Dhanny, A., dan Salmah, U. (2013). The Development of Students Worksheet using PMRI Approach on Materials of Rectangle and Square for the VII Grade Students of Junior High School. Proceeding The First South East Asia Design/Development Research (SEA-DR) International Conference.

Fung, C.K., To, T., Leung, K. (2016). The influence of collaborative group work

on students’ development of critical thinking: the

teacher’s role in facilitating group discussions. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11(2), hlm. 146-166.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi analisis multivariate, denagn program IBMSPSS 19 (edisi kelima). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Gillis, V.R. dan McDougall. (2007). Reading to learn science as an active process.

Gobert, J. D., dan Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of casual and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36,hlm. 39-53.

Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education, hlm. 197-218.

Gullford., J.P. (1956). Fundamental Statistics in phsychology and Education. New York: Mc. Graww-Hill Book Co. Ind.

(4)

124 Hand, B., Gunel, Murat., & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing Embedded Multimodal Representations in a Writing to Learn Approach to the Teaching of Electricity. Journal of research in science teaching, 46(3), hlm. 225-247.

Hanson, D. M. (2012). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities.

Diakses dari

http://quarknet.fnal.gov/fellows/TLDownloads/Designing_POGIL_Activitie s.pdf

Heuvelen, A.V. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research based instructional strategies. Am. J. Phys, 59 (10), hlm 891-897.

Irwandani. (2015). Multi representasi sebagai alternatif pembelajaran dalam fisika. [Online]. Diakses dari http://ejournal.iainradenintan.ac.id/index.php,

Irwin, J.W., Davis, C.A. (1980). Assessing Readability: The Checklist Approach. Journal of Reading, 24, hlm. 124-130.

Isnan, F. (2014). Tentang Kurikulum 2013: Sebuah Paradigma Baru. [Online]. Diakses dari http://www.kompasiana.com/immawan.faisal/tentang-kurikulum-2013-sebuah-paradigma-baru_54f36b377455139f2b6c74d4

Kariawan, I.G., dkk. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Setting Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. e- Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, 1, hlm, 1-11.

Karsli, F & Sahin, C. (2009). Developing worksheet based on science process skill: factors affecting solubility. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), hlm. 1-12.

Kaymakci, S. (2012). Areview studies on worksheets in turkey. David publishing: US-China education revie, A, hlm. 57-64.

Kohl, P.B., D. Rosengrant and ND. Finkelstein. (2007). “Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics”. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 3, 010108.

Kutnick, P., & Berdondini, L. (2009). Can the enhancement of group working in classrooms provide a basis for effective communication in support of school based cognitive achievement in classrooms of young learners? Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), hlm. 71–94.

(5)

125 and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lemke, J.L. (2004). The literacies in science. In E.W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 13-32). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.

Leslie, D., Pelecky. (2000). Interactive worksheets in large introductory physics course. The physics teacher, 38, hlm. 166-167.

Liliasari. (1997). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Materi Subjek untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Konseptual Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA (Suatu Studi Pengembangan Berpikir Kritis). Laporan Hibah Bersaing Dikti : tidak diterbitkan.

Liliasari. (2009). Berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran sains kimia menuju profesionalitas guru. Prosiding seminar UPI.

Macmanus. (1985). Worksheet induced behavior in the british meseum (natural history). Journal of biological education, 19(3), hlm. 237-242.

Majid, A. (2009). Perencanaan pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mandaelis, S., dkk. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Kedondong. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Pendidikan,2(4).

Martomidjojo, R. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Biologi Sel Berbasis Concept Attainment Guna Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Penguasaan Konsep Mahasiswa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Disertasi UPI : tidak diterbitkan

Matlin. (1994). Cognition. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), hlm. 297-313.

Meltzer, D.E. (2005). Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational mode. Am. J. Phys., 73, hlm. 463-478.

(6)

126 Meyers, C. (1986). Teaching students think critically. London: John-Bass

Publishers.

Michael, M. (2010). Unlocking the potential of multimodal repreentation (MMR) to foster dialogue that promotes learning in science. Australia: Edith Cowan University.

Mortensen, MF., Smart, K. (2007). Free choice worksheet increase students’

exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of research in science teaching, 44(9), halm. 1389-1414.

Mukminan. (2014). Tantangan pendidikan di abad 21. Makalah disajikan dan dibahas pada seminar nasional teknologi pendidikan 2014. “Peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran pendayagunaan teknologi pendidikan”. Diselenggarakan oleh Prodi Teknologi pendidikan program pascasarjana – Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Nasika, F. (2012). Pengembangan Student’s Worksheet Dengan Penemuan Terbimbing Pada Materi Teorema Pythagoras. Jurnal Mathedunesa, 1(1), hlm..1-8.

Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational Design Research in Educational Design Research. New York : Routledge

Nitko, A.J. (1996). Educational Assessment of Students, Second Edition. Ohio: Merrill an imprint of Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs.

Nyamupangedengu, E. (2009). Worksheets and learning in south African museums. (Tesis). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Nyamupangedengu, E., Lelliot, A. (2012). An exploration on learners use of worksheet during a science museum visit. African journal of research in mathematics, science and technology education, 16(2).

Önen, A. S. and Koçak, C. (2010). Determining the Critical Thinking Levels of

Student Teachers and Evaluating Through Some Variables‖. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(3), hlm. 865-867.

Otor, E E., et al. (2015). Influence of Improvised teaching instructional materials

on chemistry students’ performance in senior secondary schools in vandeikya

local goverment area of benue state, Nigeria. Interntional research in education, 3(1).

(7)

127 Oliveras, B., Márquez, C., Sanmartí, N. (2011). The Use of Newspaper Articles as a Tool to Develop Critical Thinking in Science Classes. International Journal of Science Education, hlm. 1-20.

Pierce, C. E., et al. (2013). Environments for fostering effective critical thinking in geotechnical engineering education (GeoEFFECTs). European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), hlm. 281-299.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2013 No. 54 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan republik Indonesia Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum

Prain, V. dan Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of techers and students use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), hlm. 1843-1866

Prasetyo, W. (2012). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) Dengan Pendekatan PMR Pada Materi Lingkaran di Kelas VIII SMPN 2 Kepohbaru Bojonegoro. Mathedunesa Journal, 1(1), hlm.1-8.

Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Jogjakarta: Diva Press.

Redfield, DL. (1981). A comparison of the effect of using various types of worksheet on pupil achievement. Annual meeting of the American educational research association, LA, California.

Reid, D. (2006). Readability and Science Worksheets in Secondary Schools. Journal research in science & technological education, 2(2), hlm. 153-165.

Rizal M & Wasis. (2012). Pengembangan LKS fisika berbasis teori kecerdasan majemuk (multiple intelligence) materi alat optik pada kelas VIII SMP Negeri 01 Madiun. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 1 (1), hlm. 120-127.

Russell, T. & McGuigan, L. (2001). Promoting understanding through

representational redescription: an illustration referring to young pupils’ ideas

about gravity. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis, E. Kallery (Eds.) Science Education Research in the KnowledgeBased Society. Proceedings of the Third Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun

(8)

128 International Conference of the ESERA (pp. 600-602). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Rosengrant, D., E. Etkina and AV. Heuvelen. (2007). “An Overview of Recent Research on Multiple Representations”.Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey GSE, 10 Seminary Place, New Brunswick NJ, 08904

Ruwanto, B. dan Pujianto. (2009). Pelatihan penulisan buku ajar (hand out) sains (fisika) untuk meningkatkan kreativitas & life skill guru dalam mengembangkan media pembelajaran bagi guru-guru fisika SMP di daerah istimewa yogyakarta. Laporan P2M. Yogyakarta: UNY

Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2003). Special issue introduction: External and internal representations inmultimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 13, hlm. 117-1.

Sharma, R M. (2014). Teaching integrated science through the use of interactive worksheets. Caribbean Curriculum, 22, hlm. 85-103.

Simon, N. (2015). Improving Higher-Order Learning and Critical Thinking Skills Using Virtual and Simulated Science Laboratory Experiments. New Trends in Networking, Computing, E-learning, Systems Sciences, and Engineering, 312, hlm.187-192.

Sinaga, P., Suhandi, A., dan Liliasari. (2014). Improving the ability of writing teaching materials and self regulation of pre service physics teacher through representational approach. International journal of sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR).

Sinaga, P., Suhandi, A., Liliasari. (2015). The effectiveness of scaffolding design in training writing skills physichs teaching materials. International journal of instruction, 8(1), hlm. 19-32.

Sitepu, B.P., (2010). Keterbacaan. [Online]. Dapat diakses: https://bintangsitepu.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/keterbacaan/

Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Surata, I N., dkk. (2013). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika Berdasarkan Model Siklus Belajar dan Penalaran Formal. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Pendidikan, 1 (3).

(9)

129 Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (pendekatan kuantitatif,

kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta

Sujati. (2005). Menganalisis kualitas tes sebagai salah satu kompetensi guru professional. Jurnal Imiah Guru COPE, 1, hlm. 39-46.

Thomas, T. (2011). Developing First Year Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian Social Science, 7(4).

Thomas, G.H., dan Dawson, J.B. &.(1972). Item analysis and examination statics. Birmingham: The Union of Educational Institutions.

Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka.

Ulusoy, M. (2006). Readibility approaches: implications for Turkey. International Education Journal,7(3), hlm. 323-332.

Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional pasal 1 ayat 20.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wang, Q., et al. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), hlm. 95-104.

Widjajanti, E. (2008). Kualitas Lembar Kerja Siswa. Makalah disampaikan dalam Kegiatan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat dengan judul pelatihan penyusunan LKS mata pelajaran kimia berdasarkan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan bagi guru SMK/MAK.

William, B. (2015). The worksheet in the history classroom. The social studies. Vo. 32. pp.22-23

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Agama diperkenankan hadir dan menggunakan motivasi religius hanya dalam ruang publik informal, jika akan memasuki ruang publik formal, agama harus menyederhanakan bahasa

Şahıs veya idareler, yaptırmayı tasarladıkları bir işi müteahhit eliyle yaptırmak için bu işe ait; Proje, metraj, keşif, şartname, sözleşme taslağı ve diğer

Dalam rangka memperbaiki dan meningkatkan kualitas proses dan produk pembelajaran matematika di SLB, model pembelajaran kooperatif TAPPS berbantuan LKS dapat

Pengetahuan Kebijakan Rencana Tanggap Darurat Sistim Peringatan Bencana Kemampuan Memobilisasi Sumber Daya Indeks sekolah KESIAPSIAGAAN KOMUNITAS SEKOLAH. „ Komunitas sekolah

Kata nuthfah dalam bahasa al- Qur’an adalah setetes yang dapat membasahi .” Informasi al- Qur’an tersebut sejalan dengan penemuan ilmiah abad ke dua puluh ini

Akan tetapi, primer tersebut tidak dapat digunakan untuk deteksi LAMP karena terjadi false positive. Primer outer yang didesain dalam penelitian ini masih dapat dikembangkan

Pelaksanaan tindakan mengacu pada Rencana Kegiatan harian (RKH) yang telah dirancang sebelumnya. Tindakan yang diberikan adalah menyampaikan pembelajaran melalui

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat apakah kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Two Stay - Two Stray lebih baik