TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FOUR PRIESTS’ HOMILIES
IN CHAPEL OF THE F.I.C. BROTHERS, SEMARANG
A THESIS
By:
09.80.0007
Gabriel Risky Vilandi
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SOEGIJAPRANATA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY
TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FOUR PRIESTS’ HOMILIES
IN CHAPEL OF THE F.I.C. BROTHERS, SEMARANG
A Thesis Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Sastra Degree in the English Letters Study Programme
By:
09.80.0007
Gabriel Risky Vilandi
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SOEGIJAPRANATA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY
SEMARANG
iii
A Thesis Defended in front of the Board of Examiners on June 19th, 2013 and declared acceptable
BOARD OF EXAMINERS
Chairperson (Major) : Heny Hartono, SS. M.Pd. .……….. Secretary (Co) : Emilia Ninik Aydawati, S.P,M.Hum ....……… Member (Examiner) : Angelika Riyandari, SS., MA ………
Semarang, June 19th, 2013 Faculty of Letters
Soegijapranata Catholic University Dean,
ii
A THESIS ON
TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FOUR PRIESTS’ HOMILIES
IN CHAPEL OF THE F.I.C. BROTHERS, SEMARANG
By:
Gabriel Risky Vilandi
09.80.0007
Approved by,
Heny Hartono, SS. M.Pd.
Major sponsor
May 17
th, 2013
Emilia Ninik Aydawati, S.P,M.Hum
iv
I would like to give very big thanks for all of my beloved family. My mother, Martha Srimulyati, you are the great woman I ever have in my life. You always encourage me to finish my final thesis as soon as possible. You even wake up at 2 o’clock in the dawn morning everyday to make some doughnuts and fried rice to be sold in some cafetarias in UNIKA, just to get additional income to make your dream come true, that I can graduate as soon as possible and get a great carrier. Don’t worry mom, now I have finished all of my finals and I will be graduated next August. I promise that I will get a great job and will be responsible for the whole family in the future. For my father, Stephanus Sugiyanto, eventhough you are a stubborn person, even mother and my self often get frustated and angry about it, but I believe that you have a good aim for that. As a household staff in the faculty of psychology in UNIKA, you are a very hard worker for the family. you Even always come home late until 9 o’clock at night everyday and mother is often angry about that, but I believe you do all of this just to see me do all of my study smoothly. I know that your principal is to give all of your children the best education as you can do, even you sacrifice our house to make it happen. I know that less than 4 years from now, you will be retired and take a rest at home. Don’t worry Dad, after this I will continue your task as a “Backbone” for the family in the future. For my beloved grandmother, Christina wakinah, thanks for your blessing grandma, I hope
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to thank my Jesus Christ. You always guide me everytime. Thanks for your never ending blessing in whole of my life. Without You I can’t pass through this all. Thanks God.
v
you are getting well soon. For my little brother Yohanes Andi Setiyanto and my little sister Monique Indah Triana Santi, I hope that both of you can continue your study as well as what I get right now. Thanks for being arround my life. You all are my reasons why I am in this position right now.
x
ABSTRACT
This study is about Transitivity Analysis. The subjects are four priests in Chapel of the F.I.C Brother, Semarang in period of time February and March 2013. The research questions of this study are, “What are the processes used by the four priests in their homilies based on the transitivity analysis system?” And “What is the transitivity process mostly used by the four priests in their homilies?”. The result of the study shows the 1st homily from the 1st priest consists of 58 processes. The 2nd homily consists of 38 processes. Then, the 3rd homily consists of 30 processes. Those three homilies consist of five processes; they are Material, Behavioural, Mental, Verbal, and Relational process.
Meanwhile the 4th homily consists of six processes with addition of existential
process, with over all 109 processes. Overall, the transitivity process mostly used by the four priests in their homilies is Relational Process. The writer thought that the priests used the Relational processes in their homilies to give more explanation about the situation, the role, the information, the existent of something, the example, having of something, suggestion, etc. about the homilies that related to the Bible or the Gospel on that day, and also to simplify the words from the Bible to make the congregation easier to catch the meaning of the homily it self.
xi
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini adalah penelitian tentang transitivity analysis. Subyek dari penelitian ini adalah empat romo di kapel F.I.C brother, semarang dalam kurun waktu februari dan maret 2013. Yang ingin diketahui dari penelitian ini adalah,
“process apa saja yang digunakan oleh keempat romo tersebut dalam
menyampaikan homily mereka?” Dan “process apa yang paling banyak digunakan oleh keempat romo tersebut dalam menyampaikan homily mereka?”. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa homily pertama dari romo yang pertama terdiri dari 58 process. Homily kedua terdiri dari 38 process. Kemudian, homily ketiga terdiri dari 30 process. Dari ketiga homily tersebut terdapat lima
process yaitu Material, Behavioural, Mental, Verbal, dan Relational process.
Sementara itu di homily ke empat terdapat enam process, dengan tambahan
Existential prosess, yang secara keseluruhan terdapat 109 process. Secara keseluruhan transitivity process yang paling banyak digunakan oleh keempat romo dalam menyampaikan homily mereka adalah Relational process. Penulis berpikir bahwa para romo tersebut menggunakan Relational process dalam homily mereka untuk lebih memberikan penjelasan tentang situasi, peran, informasi, keberadaan akan sesuatu hal, contoh, kepemilikan, serta saran dan sebagainya yang berhubungan dengan alkitab atau bacaan injil pada hari itu, dan juga untuk menyederhanakan maksud dari beberapa kata di alkitab untuk membuat umat lebih mudah memahami maksud dari homily tersebut.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page of approval……….. ii
Board of examiners……….. iii
Acknowledgement………... iv
Table of contents……….. vi
Abstract……… x
Abstrak………. xi
Chapter 1 Introduction………. 1
1.1 Background……….... 1
1.2 Field of the study………... 3
1.3 Scope of the study……….. 3
1.4 Problem formulation……….. 3
1.5 Objectives of the study……….. 4
1.6 Significance of this study ………. 4
1.7 Definition of terms……….... 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review……….…….. 6
2.1 Types of process……….… 7
2.1.1 Material process………. 7
2.1.2 Mental process………... 10
2.1.3 Behavioural process……….. 13
2.1.4 Verbal process……… 15
2.1.5 Relational process……….. 17
2.1.6 Existential process………. 20
2.1.7 Meteorological process……….. 20
vii
Chapter 3 Research Methodology……….…... 24
3.1 data collection methodology………... 25
3.1.1 Participants. ………... 25
3.1.2 Instruments ………... 25
3.1.3 Procedures………... 26
3.2. Data analysis methodology………... 26
Chapter 4 Data Analysis………..… 28
4.1 processes, participants and circumstances in the 1st homily …………. 29
4.1.1 Types of processes in the 1st homily………... 29
4.1.1.1 Material processes……… 30
4.1.1.2 Behavioural processes………. 32
4.1.1.3 Mental processes………. 33
4.1.1.4 Verbal processes……….. 35
4.1.1.5 Relational processes……… 36
4.1.1.5.1 Relational attributive processes……… 37
4.1.1.5.2 Relational identifying processes……….. 37
4.1.1.6 Existential processes……… 38
4.1.1.7 Meteorological processes………. 38
4.1.2 Types of participants in the 1st homily... 39
4.1.3 Types of circumstances in the 1st homily ……….. 41
4.2 processes, participants and circumstances in the 2nd homily……….... 43
4.2.1 Types of processes in the 2nd 4.2.1.1 Material processes……… 44
viii
4.2.1.2 Behavioural processes………. 46
4.2.1.3 Mental processes……….. 47
4.2.1.4 Verbal processes……….. 48
4.2.1.5 Relational processes……… 49
4.2.1.5.1 Relational attributive processes……… 49
4.2.1.5.2 Relational identifying processes……….. 50
4.2.1.6 Existential processes……… 51
4.2.1.7 Meteorological processes………. 51
4.2.2 Types of participant in the 2nd homily……….. 52
4.2.3 Types of circumstance in the 2nd homily……… 54
4.3 processes, participants and circumstances in the 3rd homily ……….. 56
4.3.1 Types of processes in the 3rd homily………. 56
4.3.1.1 Material processes……… 57
4.3.1.2 Behavioural processes………. 59
4.3.1.3 Mental processes……….. 59
4.3.1.4 Verbal processes……….. 61
4.3.1.5 Relational processes………. 63
4.3.1.5.1 Relational attributive……… 63
4.3.1.5.2 Relational identifying……… 65
4.3.1.6 Existential processes……… 65
4.3.1.7 Meteorological processes………. 65
4.3.2 Types of participants in the 3rd homily ……….. 66
ix
4.4 processes, participants and circumstances in the 4th homily ………. 70
4.4.1 Types of processes in the 4th homily……….. 70
4.4.1.1 Material processes……… 71
4.4.1.2 Behavioural processes………. 72
4.4.1.3 Mental processes………. 74
4.4.1.4 Verbal processes……….. 76
4.4.1.5 Relational processes………. 77
4.4.1.5.1 Relational attributive processes……… 78
4.4.1.5.2 Relational identifying processes……….. 79
4.4.1.6 Existential processes……… 80
4.4.1.7 Meteorological processes………. 81
4.4.2 Types of participants in the 4th homily ……….. 81
4.4.3 Types of circumstances in the 4th homily ………... 83
4.5 The overall processes from the four priests... 85
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Suggestion ……… 89
5.1 Conclusions……… 89
5.2 Suggestions……… 90
BIBLIOGRAPHY……… 91
