• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Gambaran Profil Wajah pada Oklusi Normal berdasarkan Fotometri pada Mahasiswa India Tamil Malaysia FKG USU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Gambaran Profil Wajah pada Oklusi Normal berdasarkan Fotometri pada Mahasiswa India Tamil Malaysia FKG USU"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

29

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd Ed. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2007: 3-4, 67-9, 128-30.

2. Riedel RA. Esthetics and it’s relation to orthodontics therapy. Angle Orthod

1979; 10(3): 168-78.

3. Moghbel B, Sodagar A, Etezadi T. Determination of Holdway soft tissue norms in Iranian adolescents. Iran J Orthod 2010; 5: 32-8.

4. Albarakati SF. Soft tissue facial profile of adult Saudis: lateral cephalometric analysis. Saudi Med J 2011; 32(8): 836-42.

5. English JD, Peltomaki T, Pham-Litschel K. Mosby’s orthodontics review. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2009: 53, 58, 113-4.

6. Taki AA, Oguz F, Abuhijleh E. Facial soft tissue values in Persian adults with normal occlusion and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(3): 491-4. 7. Fernandez-Riverio P, Smyth-Chamosa E, Quintanilla D,

Suarez-Cunqueiro M. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25(4): 393-9.

8. Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthod 2005; 75(3): 326-32.

9. Scavone H, Zahn-Silva W, do Valle-Carotti KM, Nahas AC. Soft tissue profile in white Brazillian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(1): 58-63.

10.Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2007: 179-81, 191-5.

11.Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics current principles and technique. 3rd Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000: 13-6, 80, 378.

(2)

30

13.Glasser P. Ethnic identity and the perception of facial profile aesthetics: a preliminary study. Thesis. London: The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Western Ontario, 2012: 4.

14.Reddy M, Ahuja NK, Raghav P, Kundu V, Mishra V. A computer-assisted angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of north Indian adults. J Ind Orthod Soc 2011; 45(3): 119-23.

15.Martins LF, Vigorito JW. Photometric analysis applied in determining facial type. Dent Press J Orthod 2012; 17(5): 71-5.

16.Anibor E, Okumagba MT. Photometric facial analysis of the Urhobo ethnic group in Nigeria. Arch Apll Sci Res 2010; 2(3): 28-32.

17.Calhoun KH, Stambaugh KI. Facial analysis and preoperative evaluation. 2006.

http://mmspf.msdonline.com.br/ebooks/HeadNeckSurgeryOtolaryngology/sid 1281784.html. (9 Agustus 2014)

18.Samawi S. A short guide to clinical digital photography orthodontics. 2008.

http://www.free-ebooks.net/ebook/A-Short-Guide-to-Clinical-Digital-Photography-in-Orthodontics/pdf?dl&preview. (4 Agustus 2014)

19.Evans S, England P, Jones M, Bowen Ruth. Orthodontics photography. 2008. http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ca d=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imi.org.uk% 2Ffile%2Fdownload%2F2152%2FIMINatGuidelinesOrt&ei=IGjgU6mUFcu UuASLhoGADQ&usg=AFQjCNEUFusgP1BKL4dxdeNSbUvMKvsl5g&bv m=bv.72197243,d.c2E. (4 Agustus 2014)

20.Stutts WF. Clinical photography in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod 1978; 74(1): 1-31.

21.American Board of Orthodontic. Case preparation: facial photograph requirements.

(3)

31

22.Meneghini F. Clinical facial analysis: elements principles technique. Padova: Springer, 2005: 24, 47, 55-6.

23.Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2001: 104-5.

24.Grybauskas S. Influence of facial profile on facial attractiveness. 2007. http://www.orthognathicsurgery.info/en/attractivenes_of_face/influence_of_fa cial_profile. (4 Juli 2014)

25.Ardhana W. Ortodonsia I: prosedur pemeriksaan ortodontik. 2009. http://wayanardhana.staff.ugm.ac.id/materi_orto1_pem.pdf. (5 Agustus 2014) 26.Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Color atlas of dental: Orthodontic diagnosis.

New York: Thieme Medical Publisher Inc., 1993: 173-175.

27.Jacobson A. Radiographic cephalometry: from basic to videoimaging. Hong Kong: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1995: 175, 180.

28.Dvortsin DP, Ye Q, Pruim GJ, Dijkstra PU, Ren Y. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis. Angle Orthod 2011; 81(5): 889-94.

29.Sunarti L. Sejarah kependudukan Malaysia: terbentuknya masyarakat

majemuk Malaysia.

http://luckymulyadisejarah.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/sejarah-kependudukan-malaysia/. (6 Agustus 2014)

30.Ramakrishnan JN. Masyarakat India Malaysia dan dasar ekonomi baru: satu kes kajian terhadap penyertaan ekuiti. Tesis. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 1996: 21-2.

31.Department of Statistics Malaysia. Population distribution and basic

demographic characteristic report 2010.

www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?option=com_content&id=1215. (8 Agustus 2014)

(4)

32

33.Ross KL. Genetic distance and language affinities between Autochthonous human populations. http://www.friesian.com/trees.htm. (21 Agustus 2014) 34.Asghari A, Rajaeih S, Hassannia F, Tavakolifard N, Neisyani HM, Kamrava

SK et al. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Iranian young adults: anthropometric and angular measurements. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2014; 28(49): 1-8.

35.Hwang HS, Kim WS, Mc. Namara JA. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002; 72(1): 72-80.

36.Chhajed S, Kodemaru S, Singh G, Cholleti SK, Kothari S. Facial soft tissue cephalometric norms in a central India ethnic population. J of Indian Orthod Soc 2014; 48(1): 7-13.

37.Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning part I. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103: 299-312.

38.Sharma P, Arora A, Valiathan A. 20 November 2014. Age changes of jaws and soft tissue profile. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/301501. (18 Desember 2014)

39.Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod 1990; 60(3): 177-90. (Abstract)

40.Formby WA, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105(5): 464-76. (Abstract)

41.Mehta P, Tikku T, Khanna R, Maurya RP. Holdaway’s soft tissue

cephalometric norms for the population of Lucknow, India. J of Oral Health Res 2010; 1(4): 153-9.

42.Kalha AS, Latif A, Govardhan SN. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008; 133(6): 876-81. (Abstract)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah tipe senyum terbanyak yang dimiliki mahasiswa India Tamil Malaysia FKG USU adalah consonant smile berdasarkan analisis smile arc , average smile

Hasil uji normalitas data (uji Shapiro – Wilk ) pada lampiran 10 menunjukkan bahwa data pengukuran proporsi tinggi wajah pada 12 orang pria dan 34 orang wanita mahasiswa India

Tipe wajah ditentukan melalui rumus facial index, sedangkan ukuran lebar lengkung gigi didapatkan dari hasil pengukuran jarak interkaninus, interpremolar dan intermolar.. Data

Lateral cephalometric norms for Saudi adults: A meta analysis. Cephalometric evaluation based on steiner’s

Bersama ini saya mohon kesediaan Saudara/i untuk berpartisipasi sebagai subjek penelitian saya mengenai “GAMBARAN TIPE SENYUM BERDASARKAN FOTOMETRI PADA MAHASISWA INDIA

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tipe senyum pada mahasiswa India Tamil Malaysia FKG USU yang dianalisis berdasarkan smile arc , incisor display dan gingival display

Menyatakan bersedia untuk ikut turut serta dalam penelitian yang berjudul GAMBARAN PROPORSI TINGGI WAJAH BERDASARKAN FOTOMETRI PADA MAHASISWA INDIA TAMIL MALAYSIA FKG USU dan

Kesimpulan, tipe senyum terbanyak yang dimiliki mahasiswa India Tamil Malaysia FKG USU adalah consonant smile berdasarkan analisis smile arc, average smile berdasarkan