A
P
S
Y
C
H
O
A
N
A
L
Y
T
I
C
S
T
U
D
Y
O
F
E
M
M
A
’
S
A
D
U
L
T
E
R
Y
E
E
R
H
T
G
N
I
S
U
-
P
A
R
T
M
O
D
E
L
O
F
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
I
N
S
’
T
R
E
B
U
A
L
F
E
V
A
T
S
U
G
M
A
D
A
M
E
B
O
V
A
R
Y
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
f o e e r g e d e h t r o
F SarjanaSastra s r e tt e L h s il g n E n I
y B
A I L I C E C Y D N I C
6 6 0 4 1 2 4 0 1 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
A
P
S
Y
C
H
O
A
N
A
L
Y
T
I
C
S
T
U
D
Y
O
F
E
M
M
A
’
S
A
D
U
L
T
E
R
Y
E
E
R
H
T
G
N
I
S
U
-
P
A
R
T
M
O
D
E
L
O
F
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
I
N
S
’
T
R
E
B
U
A
L
F
E
V
A
T
S
U
G
M
A
D
A
M
E
B
O
V
A
R
Y
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
f o e e r g e d e h t r o
F SarjanaSastra s r e tt e L h s il g n E n I
y B
A I L I C E C Y D N I C
6 6 0 4 1 2 4 0 1 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v
Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T S
n e e b s a h h c i h w l a ir e t a m o n s n i a t n o c s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h t t a h t y fi tr e c I
, t a h t d n a , y ti s r e v i n u y n a t a e e r g e d r e h t o y n a f o d r a w a e h t r o f d e tt i m b u s y l s u o i v e r p
o n s n i a t n o c s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h t , e g d e l w o n k y m f o t s e b e h t o
t mateira l
e h t n i e d a m s i e c n e r e f e r e u d e r e h w t p e c x e n o s r e p r e h t o y n a y b n e tt ir w y l s u o i v e r p
s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u e h t f o t x e t
a k a y g o
Y tra ,Septembe r29 ,2014
i v
e
r
o
m
s
i
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
g
a
m
I
n
a
h
t
t
n
a
t
r
o
p
m
i
s
i
e
g
d
e
l
w
o
n
K
.
e
g
d
e
l
w
o
n
k
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
g
a
m
i
;
d
e
t
i
m
i
l
d
l
r
o
w
e
h
t
s
e
l
c
r
i
c
n
e
ii v
ro
F
y
M
d
e
a
r
yl
eb
ol
ev
d
s
re
ts
is
d
ii i v
T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A S
d n a t s ir h C s u s e J d r o L e h t o t s k n a h t t s e g g i b y m y a s o t t n a w I l l a f o t s ri F
o t t n a w o s l a I . s i s e h t y m h s i n if n a c I o s s g n i s s e l b t a e r g r i e h T r o f y r a M r e h t o M
y m o t e d u ti t a r g y m e v i
g beloved famliy especially my parents who have raised e
m ,pray fo rme and encouragemet o ifnish my t hesis .It hank my uncle fo rhi s y
m d n a t r o p p u s l a i c n a n
if beloved sisters Karen ,Kairn and Claudia fo rchee irng .
n w o d l e e f I r e v e n e h w p u e m
l a i c e p s y
M thanks ea r also dedicated to my thesi sadvisor , Dr . F.X i
d a w s i
S ,M.A .who ha salway sbeen paiten tto help me du irng the proces .s .
e m it n i s i s e h t y m h s i n if t o n n a c I e c n a d i u g s i h t u o h ti
W Ithank my Co-adviso r
D . h P , A . M , i n a y l u M i r S B . A . a r
D fo rgivingmes uggesitonsso Icani mprovemy s
i s e h
t . Ithank al lmy l ecturer sfrom Engilsh Letter sDepa trmentwho help met o h
s il g n E n r a e
l bette rand make sme sma trer . Ialso thank al lthe staf fo fSanata . t n e d u t s s r e tt e L h s il g n E s a y d u t s y m g n ir u d e m g n i p l e h r o f y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D
o h w s d n e ir f y m o t s k n a h t g i b y m e v i g o t t n a w
I suppo tr and help me
k n a h t o t t n a w I . s s e c o r p g n it ir w s i s e h t e h t g n ir u
d lla 2010 student sespecially
s d n e ir f t s e b y m k n a h t o t t n a w I . tr o p p u s e m g n i v i g r o f C s s a l c n i e s o h
t Ma ira
a k it r a K d n a i n a R a i h t n y
C Violtiawhoplayani mpo tran tpatri nmyt hesi swiritng . k
n a h t o t t n a w o s l a
I Cynthia ,Marsha ,Grad iand also my KKN firendsfor t hei r .t
r o p p u s l a r o m
y m o t s k n a h t t s e p e e d y m y a s o t t n a w I t s a e l t o n t u b t s a
L d earboyf irend ,
s il a t a
x i y
m h s i n
if thesi .sI t hank himf o rcheeirng meupwhen Iamdown and alsohelp s s
s e c o r p g n it ir w s i s e h t e h t g n ir u d e
m . I thankhim rfo standingbymys ide .
x
S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P E L T I
T ii
.. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P L A V O R P P
A i ii
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P E C N A T P E C C
A i v
.. … … H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L v
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T
S v i
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P O T T O
M v ii
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P N O I T A C I D E
D v iii
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A xi
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T x i
.. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … T C A R T S B
A x iii
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … K A R T S B
A x iv
N O I T C U D O R T N I : I R E T P A H
C ……………………………………………………. 1
A .Backgroundoft heStudy……………………………………………………….... 1
B .ProblemFormulaiton…………………………………………………………… ... 6
C .Objecitveo fStudy………………………………………………………………... 7
.D Deifniitono fTerms………………………………………………………………. 7 :
I I R E T P A H
C REVIEWOFLITERATURE……………………………………. . .. 9
A .Reviewo fRelatedStudies………………………………………………………... 9
.B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s…………………………………………………........ 01
1 .Theoryo fCharacte randCharacte irzaiton……………………………………... 01
2 .TheRelaitonbetweenLtieratureandPsychology……………………………... 1 1
3 .Freud’ sPsychoanalyitcTheory……………………………………………… ... 21
a.I d……………………………………………………………………………... 31
b .Ego…………………………………………………………………………… 41
c .Superego…………………………………………………………………….. 16
C .Theoreitca lFramework………………………………………………………… . . 1 7 R
E T P A H
C III :METHODOLOGY……………………………………………….... 1 8 A .Objec toft heStudy……………………………………………………………… .. 8 1 B .Approachoft heStudy……………………………………………………………. 8 1 C .Methodoft heStudy……………………………………………………………. .. .. 1 9
S I S Y L A N A : V I R E T P A H
C ………………………………………………………....... 21
.A Characteirsitc so fEmmaBovary………………………………………………….. 21
1.Unreailsitc………………………………………………………………………. 21
2.Demanding……………………………………………………………………… 25
3.Sel ifsh…………………………………………………………………………... 28
4 .Deceiftul………………………………………………………………………... 0 3
5.Reilgiou s ………………………………………………………………………. 31
B .TheWayEmma’ sCharacteirsitc sLead sHert oAdu tleryi nThePerspecitveof
FreudianThree-Par tMode lo fPersonaltiy…………………………………. ... .... 33
i x
2 .TheRelaitonbetweenEmma’ sCharacteirsitcandhe rAdutleryi nt he
Perspecitveo fFreudianThreePar tMode lo fPersonaltiy…………………... ... .... 36
A .Emma’ sThreePar tMode lo fPersonaltiy………………………………… ... 36 …
1 .Emma’sI d……………………………………………………………………. 36
2 .Emma’ sSuperego……………………………………………………………. 41
3 .Emma’ sEgo………………………………………………………………….. 47
B .TheI nteracitonBetweenEmma’ sThreePar tMode lo fPersonaltiyt oHer
Adu tlery……………………………………………………………………….. 5 0 :
V R E T P A H
C CONCLUSION……………………………………………………… 56 …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Y H P A R G O I L B I
B ….. 6 0
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … X I D N E P P
A … 61
l e s m e h t d l o h t o n n a c e l p o e p e m o S . y ti l a n o s r e p a f
o ve sagainstt emptaitonandkeep l o rt n o c o t e l b a n u e r a y e h t , d r o w r e h t o n I . d I e h t r o e ri s e d r i e h t g n i w o ll o f
l u ft s u l e h t t s n i a g a s e v l e s m e h
t desrie and disobey t he norms i n t hesociety which d n if o t s e ir t d n a , e l p i c n ir p y ti l a e r e h t s e t a r e p o o g e e h T . o g e r e p u s y b d e t n e s e r p e r
e h t n I . d I e h t y fi t a r g o t ) o g e r e p u s o t g n i d r o c c a ( s y a w e l b a t p e c c a y ll a i c o s
i o g e e h t , n o s r e p d e t s u j d a l l e w a f o y ti l a n o s r e
p sthe dominan tforce (Pettjiohn , )
2 6 2 : 2 9 9
1 .
o t s m i a y d u t s s i h
T analyzet her elaitono fEmmaBovary’ sadutleryandhe r f
o l e d o m t r a p e e r h t n a i d u e r F . t c e p s a l a c i g o l o h c y s
p personaltiy u ses a sthe main .
y d u t s s i h t f o y r o e h
t Thewrtie raimsto explain moreabou tEmma’ sadutlery and o
t d e t a l e r y l g n o rt s s i ti w o
h he rpsychologica laspect .
n o it a l u m r o F m e l b o r P . B
.
1 W hataret hecharacterisitc so fEmmaBovaryi nMadameBovary? .
2 How dot hecharacteirsitcs leadt ohe radutleryf rom theperspecitve f
y d u t S e h t f o s e v it c e j b O . C
e h t r e w s n a o t s i y d u t s s i h t f o e v it c e j b o e h
T three quesiton sformulated i n F
. n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h
t ris ti sto ifnd ou tEmma Bovary’ scharacteirsitc sa s n
i n e e
s thestory .Then, t hewrtiert irestorelated EmmaBovary’ scharacteirsitc s e
tl u d a r e h o
t ry . A tfe r that , the wrtie r connects Emma’ s characteirsitc s and y
ti l a n o s r e p f o l e d o M t r a P e e r h T n a i d u e r
F ,to see how Emma’ saciton srtongly l
a c i g o l o h c y s p o t d e t a l e
r aspect .s
s m r e T f o n o it i n if e D . D
e r a y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u s m r e t y e k e h t , g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m y n a d i o v a o T
. s w o ll o f s a d e n if e d
e e r h T .
1 -par tMode lo fPersonaltiy
e e r h
T -par tmode lo fhuman personaltiy o r“t ir-patrtie human psyche” is y
b d e t s e g g u s y r o e h t e h
t Austiran neurologis tSigmund Freud ,which state stha t e h t y l e m a n , s e c r o f e e r h t f o n o it c a r e t n i e h t f o t l u s e r e h t s i r o i v a h e b s ' n o s r e p y r e v e
a , o g e r e p u s , d
i ndego( Pettjiohn ,1992 :262) .
d I . 2
, s e v ir d l a c i g o l o i b r o l a u t c n it s n i c i s a b t s o m e h t s i d i e h
T which
e d i s n o c d n a e r u s a e l p e t a i d e m m i k e e s y l e v i s l u p m i d n a y l s u o i c s n o c n u
“ rnothing
2 6 2 : 2 9 9 1 , n h o ji tt e P ( ” e s l
o g E . 3
o g e e h
T i s“a consciou sfacutly fo rperceiving and deailng intelilgenlty ”
y ti l a e r h ti
w i tact s ilke a mediato rbetween the id and the superego (Pettjiohn , 2
6 2 : 2 9 9
1 ) .
o g e r e p u S . 4
o g e r e p u s e h
T i ssocieta land parenta lvaluest ha thavebeeni nsitlledi nt he , n h o ji tt e P ( d I e h t f o s e s l u p m i e h t s n i a rt s e r d n a s u o i c s n o c n u y l e g r a l s i t I . n o s r e p
2 6 2 : 2 9 9
9
R E T P A H
C I I
W E I V E
R OFLITERATURE
s e i d u t S d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R . A
Thef ristr elated study i sSanataDharmaUniverstiy ;Engilsh Educaiton m
a r g o r
P Undergraduate Thesi sw irtten by Yohanes Basuki Wahyu Lasityanto d
e lt it n
e AnAnalysi so fCentra lCharacteri n GustaveFlauber’t sMadameBovary n
o d e s a
B t he Theory o fSefl-concept .Lasityanto topic i sabou tthe analysi so f s
’t r e b u a l F e v a t s u G n i r e t c a r a h c l a rt n e
c MadameBovarybased on t heory o fse – l f t
p e c n o
c .Theobjecitveoft hi sstudy ist o ifndou tEmma’ ssel fconcep tin lfuence o
t he rpersonaltiy and also her personaltiy pattern developm ent based on the r
o i v a h e b r e h n i d e z il a u t c a s a t p e c n o c f l e s f o y r o e h
t .Hi sanalysi spoint sou tthose fl
e s a m m
E -percepiton sturn he rinto an unreailsitc ,ideailst ,senitmental ,and e
li t a l o
v wfie .Heri dea land rtanstiory sel fconcepti sthe mos tdominant force in y
ti l a n o s r e p r e h g n i p o l e v e
d pattern .Unilke Lasityanto study ,thi sstudy does no t e
s
u thet heoryofs el fconcept .Thiss tudyalsofocusesonhe rpsychologica laspec t e
e r h T n a i d u e r F f o e v it c e p s r e p e h t n
i -Par tmode lo fpersonaltiy .
The second related study is Sanata Dharma Universtiy ; Engilsh e
t a u d a r g r e d n U m a r g o r P n o it a c u d
E Thesi s w irtten by Eko Prasetyaningrum d
e lt it n
e The in lfuence o fEmma Rouaul`t strati so fcharacte rupon he rda liy y
r a v o B e m a d a M s `t r e b u a l F e v a t s u G n i s r i a ff
a . Prasetyanigrum focused on a
m m
e h
t psychologica lapproachf romRothberger ,Wood sand oa ls M. JMurphyt heory n
a s n o i s s e r p x e 9 s s e r p x e o
t d characteirsitcs .The resul to fhi sanalysi sis tha t r e h o t d e t a l e r y l g n o rt s s i c it s il a e r n u d n a r e m a e r d , w o ll a h s ,l a r o m m i s a s ti a rt a m m E
a m m E . y r e tl u d
a alsoha sl s ot o fdisappointmen to fhe rhusbandwhodoe sno tgive .
d e t c e p x e e h s s a e fi l e g a ir r a m a r e h
ThedfiferencebetweenPrasetyanigrum’ sanalysi sandt hi sanalysisi son m
e l b o r p e h t e z y l a n a o t d e s u y r o e h t e h
t formulaiton .Thi sanalysi su s se Sigmund y
s P d u e r
F choanalyitcciritcismwhichfocuse smoreonEmma’ sThree-Par tMode l y
ti l a n o s r e p f
o .Thi sanalysi ss s ee theadu tleryno ta sani mmora lact ,bu tanaciton .s
t c e p s a l a c i g o l o h c y s p y b d e c n e u lf n i
c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ a m m E d e z y l a n a s e i d u t s d e t a l e r o w t e s o h
T s by using a
o h c y s p t n e r e f fi
d nalyitc theo ires .Lasityanto’ s analysi sused the theory o fsefl- t l u s e r e h T . y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p r e g r e b h t o R d e s u s ’ m u r g i n a y t e s a r P d n a t p e c n o c
d n a s ti a rt r e h o t d e t a l e r y l g n o rt s y r e tl u d a s ’ a m m E t a h t t u o s t n i o p s i s y l a n a e s o h t f o
y d u t s s i h t ,s e i d u t s e s o h t e k il n U . y ti l a r o m f o k c a
l aimst o analyze EmmaBovary r
e h tr u
f and deepe r into he r psyche by using Freud’ s Three-Par t Mode l o f d
n a o g E , d I f o s t s i s n o c h c i h w y ti l a n o s r e
p Superego.
s e i r o e h T d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R . B
.
1 Theoryo fCharacterandCharacteriza iton
. y r o t s a n i tr a p l a it n e s s e t s o m e h t s i r e t c a r a h
C Abram s(2009:42 ) s
e t a t
s tha tcharacter sarethe person presented in a dramaitc o rnarraitve o
h w k r o
, y l e t a n u tr o f n U . ti s s e r p e
r repressi ngaf eeilngwli lno tmakei tgoawaybu t s
y a w l a l li
w eb int heunconsciou smindands omedayi twli l ifndawayou t e
h t o
t consciou smind .There wli lalways eb a return o fthe repressed . o
t n i d e d i v i d , e h c y s p f o l e d o m t r a p e e r h t d e t s e g g u s d u e r
F ego ,supe rego
d n
a id thoseare refers t o t heconsciousness ,conscienceand unconsciou .s a e z y l a n a o t d e il p p a s i ti n e h w s w a lf e m o s s a h o s l a y r o e h t s i h t ,r e v e w o H
e h t n o d e s u c o f y l n o s i y r o e h t s i h t , t s ri F . k r o w y r a r e ti
l psyche o fthe s
e r o n g i t i s e m it e m o s d n a r e t c a r a h
c othe r aspect s which in lfuence a .
e v it o m s ’ r e t c a r a h c
) a I d
y l e ri t n e s i h c i h w y ti l a n o s r e p f o t c e p s a e h t s i d I e h T
e h t f o s e d u l c n i d n a s u o i c s n o c n
u insitncitve and p irmiitve s
r o i v a h e
b . Accordingt o TheFreudReader, sI di consideredast he n
o
n -moralp irnciple:
t i , y ti l a r o m f o , l o rt n o c l a u t c n it s n i f o w e i v f o t n i o p e h t m o r F
y a
m besaidoft hei d t ha ttii st otallynon-moral ,oft heego o
t s e v ir t s ti t a h
t bemoral ,andoft hes uper-egot hati tcanbe r
e p u
s -mora landt henbecomea scrue la sonlyt hei dcanbe . s
i t
I remarkable tha t the more a man checks hi s e
r e v e s e r o m e h t r o ir e t x e e h t s d r a w o t s s e n e v i s s e r g g
a -tha ti s e
v i s s e r g g
a -hebecomesi nhi segoideal( Gay ,1989:655 .)
d r o w r e h t o n
I s ,Id i sthe pleasure p irnciple which ha sno s
i t I . y ti l a r o m h ti w n o it a l e
d n a s d e e n l a c i s y h p d n a l a n o it o m
e ared irvenbypleasurep irnciple . p
e h t s i
tI irmarycomponen to fpersonaltiy:
e h t y b d e n r e v o
G pleasure p irnciple , the id demand s n
o it a c if it a r g e t a i d e m m
i :“ Iwanti tnow!”Today ,wewould d
i e h t y fi t n e d
i ast hep irmiitve, r epitilan “gut”brainhoused ,
m e t s n i a r b e h t n
i along wtih the“emoitonal” ilmbicbrain (Heller ,2005:90 .)
. d e ll if l u f e b o t d e e n h c i h w s e ri s e d n a m u h s t n e s e r p e r d I e h T
r e v e w o
H tii sno talway spossiblef o rpeoplet oalwaysf ollowt hei r d
I immediately . In the society people should behave in an y
a w e t a ir p o r p p
a so t hey wli lbeacceptableby t hesociety .That i s . d I e h t l o rt n o c o t p l e h l li w h c i h w o g e r e p u S d n a o g E e r a e r e h t y h w
) b E go
, d I e k il n
U Ego i st hecomponen to fpersonaltiy t hati sresponsible l
a e d o
t ing wtih realtiy .I ti sdeveloped from the Id and insure stha tthe l a e r e h t n i r e n n a m e t a ir p o r p p a n a n i d e s s e r p x e e b n a c d I f o s e s l u p m i
n I . d lr o
w TheFreudReader , oE sg i deifned :a s
h c a e n i t a h t a e d i e h t d e m r o f e v a h e
W individua lthere i sa coheren t s
i h t ll a c e w d n a ; s e s s e c o r p l a t n e m f o n o it a z i n a g r
o shi ego . tIi st ot hi s o
g e e h t ; d e h c a tt a s i s s e n s u o i c s n o c t a h t o g
e conrtolst heapproachest o y
ti li t o
m -thati ,st ot hedischargeo fexctiaiton sintot heexterna lwo lrd ; s
ti l l a s e s i v r e p u s h c i h w y c n e g a l a t n e m e h t s i t
i own consttiuent h
g u o h t , t h g i n t a p e e l s o t s e o g h c i h w d n a , s e s s e c o r
p even then ti n
o p i h s r o s n e c e h t s e s i c r e x
e dreams( 1989:630 .) y
ti l a e r e h t s a s n o it c n u f o g
s h g i e w t I . d I e h t g n il li fl u f n i c it s il a e r e b o t s d n e t e l p i c n ir p o g E . o g e r e p u S
:t i g n it ti m m o c e r o f e b n o it c a n a f o t if e n e b d n a t s o c e h t
: Fo rthe ego ,percepiton play sthe par twhich in the id fall sto d
e ll a c e b y a m t a h w s t n e s e r p e r o g e e h T . t c n it s n
i reason and e
h t s n i a t n o c h c i h w , d i e h t o t t s a rt n o c n i , e s n e s n o m m o
c passions . ll
A thi sfall sinto ilne wtih popula rdisitnciton swhich we are al l h
ti w r a il i m a
f ;att hesame itme ,however , tii sonlyt o be regarded s
a holdinggoodont heaverageo ri'deally('1989:636 .) e
e s n a c e l p o e p o s s l o rt n o c o g
E the realtiy before fuflliilng thei r d n a t i s l o rt n o c o g E e h t t u b , ” . w o n t i t n a w I “ y a s y a m d I e h T . s e ri s e d
a r b e h t s e c n i v n o
c int owai tunit ltii spossiblet ofollowwha tI dwants:
, e s n e s n o m m o c d n a n o s a e r d e ll a c e b y a m t a h w “ g n it n e s e r p e R
t s a rt n o c n
i to the id ,which contain sthe passion ,s” the ego s
k r o
w diilgenltyt oarbirtatet hebilnddemand soft hei dandt he s
n o it c ir t s e
r t hattheexterna lwo lrd i mpose .s I thelp su ssurvive n
i y l e f a
s the wo lrd by obeying the realtiy p irnciple—“ Imay t
u b w o n t i t n a
w Iknow Ihavet owati”—and byr elyingon t he f
o r e w o
p secondaryprocessthought—sensible,l ogicalt hinking e
h t t u o b
a consequence of eaitng tha t candy ba r before r
e n n i
d (2005 :91).
o e l d d i m e h t n i y r g n u h y r e v s i e n o e m o s n e h w s i e l p m a x e e h
T ft he class . r
e h s t n a w y a m d I e h
T to j us tgo outt o clas sandge tsomel unch ,butt he s
e t a t s o g
E tha ti ti sno tan approp irate itme to have a lunch ,the t eache r ll
i
w be angry and she will eb considered a sinapprop irate ,so the Ego t
a h t s e d i c e
d shewli lhave al unch atfert heclas s ifnished .Ego eventually w
o ll
)
c Superego
f o t c e p s a e h t s i o g e r e p u
S personailty which hold sal lou rinternailzed r
o
m a lstandard sand i deal sacquried f rom both parent sandsociety . tIi susingt he .
g n o r w r o t h g ir f o e s n e
s T hetensionbetweent heharshsuper-egoandt heegot ha t o
t d e t c e j b u s s
i i ti scalled the sense o fguitl ;i texpresse s tisel fa sa need fo r )
6 5 7 : 9 8 9 1 ( t n e m h s i n u
p . When someone ha sa srtong Superego and accidentally
s r e p t a h t , o g e r e p u S h ti w t i g n it i m il t u o h ti w d I e h t y e b
o on wli lde ifn tiely fee l .
y tl i u g
tI isi nkeepingwtiht hecourseo fhumandevelopmentt ha texternal n
o i c r e o
c gradually become s internailzed ; fo r a specia l menta l s'
n a m , y c n e g
a super-ego ,take si tove rand include si tamong ti s y
r e v E . s t n e m d n a m m o
c chlid present s thi s proces s o f s
n a e m t a h t y b y l n o ; s u o t n o it a m r o f s n a
rt does i tbecome a mora l e
h t f o g n i n e h t g n e rt s a h c u S . g n i e b l a i c o s d n
a super-ego i sa mos t d
l e if l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t n i t e s s a l a r u tl u c s u o i c e r
p (1989:690).
o t s k r o w o g e r e p u
S suppress those unacceptable urge sfrom the Id and c
it s il a e d i n o p u t c a o g E e k a m o t s e l g g u rt
s standardsr athert hanreailsitcp irnciples . y
li m a f m o r f d r a d n a t s l a r o m r i e h t t e g y ll a u s u e l p o e
P andsociety .Howeve,rf amliy h
c i h w s r o t c a f l a it n e u lf n i t s o m e h t s
i determineaperson’ smorals tandard: B . d e h s i n u p t e g r o s t n e r a p r u o y e b o o t d a h e w , y ll a it i n
I u t a swe e h t d e z il a n r e t n i d n a s t n e r a p r u o h ti w d e if it n e d i e w , d e r u t a
m norm s
a e r e w s t n e r a p r u o f i s a , s u t h g u a t y e h t t a h t s n o it i b i h o r p d n a
s u l u c n u m o
h orl tiltevoicei nsidet hesefl( 2005 :91).
s i e l p m a x e e h
T whenapersonwho ilvesi naconservaitvecoun rtywantst ohavea e
v a h n a c n o s r e p t a h t o g E e h t h ti W . e s r u o c r e t n i l a u x e
s sex wtih someone in an i
a rt s t o n , e c a l p d n a e m it e t a ir p o r p p
t a h t s e t a t s s e l p i c n ir
p shecanonlyhavesex wtih someonewhoha salreadybehe r d
n a b s u
h ,so t o f u flli lherIdand makei tacceptablefort hesocietywhich conside r u
o x e s g n i v a h t a h
t tsideo fmarirageasi mmoral ,shemarire samanand ifnallycan .
y t e i c o s e h t n i y a w e l b a t p e c c a n a n i x e s e v a
h Thekeyo faheatlhypsychologyi s d I e h t n e e w t e b e c n a l a b e h t l o rt n o c n a c h c i h w e c r o f t n a n i m o d a s i o g E e h t n e h w
. o g e r e p u S e h t d n a
C. Theore itca lFramework
o
F rt hi sanalysis t hewrtie rneeds to understand fully how t o i dentfiy t he . y r o t s e h t n i d e z ir e t c a r a h c e h s s e o d w o h d n a c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m
r e ti r w e h t , y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t g n i w o n k r e tf a n e h
T tirestor elate y
r e tl u d a s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t o t s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h
t in the perspecitve o f .
8 1
R E T P A H
C I II
Y G O L O D O H T E M
y d u t S e h t f o t c e j b O . A
l e v o n e h t s i y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o e h
T MadameBovaryby GustaveFlauber t which frislty pubilshed in 1857, t he age o freason .Madame Bovaryi sapar to f
9 1 d i
m th century French ltierary work which ha sbeen a conrtoversia lpiece o f
. y ti l a r o m d n a n o i g il e r o t e v i s n e f f o e b o t d e r e d i s n o c s i tI . a r e t a h t n i k r o
w Madame
y r a v o
B consist soft hreechapter sand330pages .Thisl tieraryworkha sbeenmade s
e i v o m l a r e v e s o t n
i and TV seires .MadameBovary tell sastory abou ta French
. n e m t n e r e f fi d o w t h ti w y r e tl u d a d e tt i m m o c o h w a m m E d e m a n n a m o w
y d u t S e h t f o h c a o r p p A . B
e s u y d u t s s i h
T s Psychoanalyitc Ciritcism by Sigmund Freud .Freud a s
s ’ y r r a B r e t e P n i d e t o u
q Beginning Theory deifne spsychoanalysis as t heform o f f o s n o it c a r e t n i e h t g n it a g it s e v n i y b s r e d r o s i d l a t n e m e r u c o t s m i a h c i h w y p a r e h t
. d n i m n i s t n e m e l e s u o i c s n o c n u d n a s u o i c s n o c
m r e t e h t d e s u t s ri f d u e r
F psychoanalysi s in 1896 . The theory o f e
s o p o r p s i s y l a n a o h c y s
p st ha tproblem sairsef romunconsciou sdesrie sand f o s t e n e t d e t s e t n o c y lt o h e h t n o s t s e r t I . s t c il f n o c d o o h d li h c d e v l o s e r n u
e h t d n a , t c il f n o c , m s i n i m r e t e
d unconscious( Heller ,2005:184).
y d u t s s i h
T u s se Freud’st irpatrtiemode lo fpersonaltiywhichconsis tofI d ,
l e d o m e ti tr a p ir t s ’ d u e r F d n u m g i S d n a m e l b o r p t s ri f e h t r e w s n a o t n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
t s i s n o c h c i h w y ti l a n o s r e p f
o s o fId ,Ego and Superego to answe rthe second
s e t a l e r ti w o h r e v o c s i d d n a m e l b o r
p toEmma’ sacitono fcommtiitngadutlery.
h t d a e r o t s i p e t s t s ri F . y d u t s s i h t e t e l p m o c o t s p e t s l a r e v e s e r a e r e h
T e
, n e h T . y l e t e l p m o c k r o w y r a r e ti
l thewrtie rgathers ther elatedstudie ,st heo ire sand
s e c n e r e f e
1 2
R E T P A H
C I V
S I S Y L A N A
Theentriequesitons inproblem f ormulaiton areanswered i nt hi sseciton
t g n i z y l a n a y
b heworkusingprovidedt heo ires .Thef ris tpar tanswers thequesiton
d n o c e s e h t d n a s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ y r a v o B a m m E f
o par tdividesintot wo sub patrs ,
t r a p b u s t s ri f e h
t answers ht e relaiton between Emma’ scharacte irsitc sand he r
s r e w s n a t r a p b u s d n o c e s e h t e li h w y r e tl u d
a et h wayEmma’ scharacteirsitcsl ead s
o
t he radutleryi nt heperspecitveo fFreudian’ sThree-Par tmode lo fpersonaltiy .
.
A Characterisitc so fEmmaBovary
’ y r a v o B a m m E s n i a l p x e n o it c e s s i h
T scharacteirsitcs .In Madame y
r a v o
B ,Emma si descirbed a sunreailsitc ,demanding ,selifsh ,deceiftul s
u o i g il e r d n
a woman .Thewrtie ruse sMurphy’st heoryo fcharacteirzaiton
. y r a v o B a m m E f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t e b ir c s e d o t
.
1 Unrea ils itc
n
I Madame Bovary ,Emma i sdescirbed a sa woman who ha s c
it s il a e r n
u expectaitons; she i sa dreame rwho longs fo ran idea llover .
l c it n a m o r y b d e t c e f f a n e e b s a h a m m
E tierature ;shel oves t o read .She si
r e H . e r u t a r e ti l n i s e ir o t s d n a s d r o w c it n a m o r f o n o i s s a p e h t y b d e r ri t s
s a h e r u t a r e ti l c it n a m o r f o n o i s s a
n ir b l li
w g t hesame passion t ha tshe feels when she readsthose roman itc
.s l e v o n
a m m
E ’ sdesriest oge tmariredare la soin lfuencedbyhe reagernes s
. e g n a h c a r o
f When sheget smarired ,she persuades hersefl t hat et h love
f o s m a e r d s y a w l a e h
s i sarleady wtihin he rgrasp ,(1993:37) .She ilves a
d n a s u o n o t o n o
m tediou slfie in he rfather’ sfarm .He rfather ,Monsieu r
t l u a o
R alsot hinkst hats hei snotr eallyusefulf ort hef armand tii st hebes t
. s e lr a h C y r r a m r e h t e l o t n o i s i c e
d A tfe rshegets marired ,shequickly gets
. n o i s i c e d r e h s t e r g e r d n a d e t n i o p p a s i
d Emmawould ask hersel fagain and
y h W ' : n i a g
a -w - hy did Ieve rmarry '?( 1993:42 .)
d i d e h
S tn o gof o radatewtih Cha lre sbeforeshedecidestomarry
. m i
h Chalre sist heone ow sh i charmedbyhe rbeauty .Het houghtt ha tshe
d l u o
w be a pefrec twfie fo rhim .She did tn o know much abou tChalre s
. r o t c o d a s a n o it a p u c c o s i h t p e c x
e When theyge tmarired ,shediscovered
s e lr a h C t a h
t w asadul land bo irngman .Sheevendreamed tha tshewould
d n u o f e v a
h anothe rman who me tal lhe rexpectaitonsi fshe had notme t
: s e lr a h C
t h g i m s e c n a t s m u c ri c f o t e s t n e r e f fi d e m o s r e h t e h w d e r e d n o w e h S
d e ir t e h s d n a ; n a m t n e r e f fi d e m o s g n it e e m r e h n i d e tl u s e r e v a h t o n
e v a h d l u o w y e h t e fi l e h t , s e c n a t s m u c ri c y r a n i g a m i e s o h t e r u t c i p o t
i g a m i e h s , r e v e w o H . d n a b s u h r e h t o n w o n k n u e h t ,r e h t h g u o r
b ned
; m i
h hewasn’ tabi t ilkeChalres .Hemigh thavebeen handsome , c
it e n g a m , d e h s i u g n it s i d , y tt i
w -the kind o f man he r conven t .)
2 4 : 3 9 9 1 ( d e ir r a m s s e lt b u o d d a h s e t a m l o o h c s
tI iss tatedtha tshehasunreailsitcexpectaitons .Shealway swant sa
d n a t c e f r e
a m m
E i sno tonlyexpecitngaperfec tman ,bu tshealso l ongsfo ral uxu irousl fie .
e h
T realtiy i st ha tshei sno t irch .He rhusband i sasecond ratedocto rwho doe s
t o
n earn much f ort he ilving .When shecomesto t heball ,sheseest hel uxu irou s
s m a e r d e h s e fi
l o fandyearnsf ori :t
ll a b e h t f o y r o m e m e h
T would not l eave her .Every Wednesday shet old e e r h T . . . o g a s k e e w o w T . . . o g a k e e w e n O ! h A ' : e k o w e h s s a f l e s r e h
r e h n i d e s u f n o c w e r g s e c a f e h t e lt ti l y b e lt ti L ‘ ! e r e h t s a w I , o g a s k e e w
e h t d n a s e ir e v il e h t ; e ll ir d a u q e h t f o e n u t e h t t o g r o f e h s ; d n i
m splendid
d e tr a p e d s li a t e d e h t f o e m o S . d e r r u l b e m a c e b s m o o
r -bu tthe yearning
) 3 5 : 3 9 9 1 ( d e n i a m e
r .
.
2 Demanding
a m m
E si also a demanding person ,she alway swant ssomething .She want s
t d n a b s u h r e
h o behavej ustt heway shewantshim t o be ,bu thej us tneve rmeet s
e h s , r e h o t s g n i h t n i a tr e c o d o t s r e v o l r e h s d n a m e d o s l a e h S . s n o it a t c e p x e r e h l l a
s i d s l e e
f appointedwhens omethingdoe snothappenass heexpected.
a m m
E thinkstha tamanshouldbeasr omanitcandpassionateast hecharacte r
c it n a m o r e h t n
i novel ssher ead .Shedemandst ha taman should be ilkewha tshe
t a h t t h g u o h t e h S . d e r u t c i
p ti w as a man' srole ,though ,to know everything .
“Shouldn' t he be exper ta tal lkind s o f things ,able to iniitate you into the
? s e ir e t s y m e h t ll a , e fi l f o s t n e m e n if e r e h t , n o i s s a p f o s e it i s n e t n
i ” (1993:39)
a m m
E feel stha the rhusband’ s affeciton fo rhe ri sneve renough .She
s k n i h
t tha thei sno tpassionateenough;heonly embraces heri n cetrain moment s
o d y l e r a r d n
a e sromanitct hings t o her .Shewant she rmarirage t o bepassionate.
d n a b s u h r e h s t n a w a m m
, n o it a r a p e s r i e h t t u o b a g n ir b d l u o w t a h t e h p o rt s a t a c a r o f d e g n o l n e v e
r b o t e g a r u o c e h t t' n d a h e h s e c n i
s ingi tabou thersefl( 1993:275 .)
.
3 Selifsh
a m m
E Bovary alway sthink so fhersel fand only concern she rown matters .
g n i h t t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t s i ti f i s a n o i s s a p d n a e r u s a e l p r e h t u o b a s e r a c y l n o e h S
d lr o w r e h n
i . Emm 'a spassion sarethesoleconcerno fherl fie:f o rmoneyshehas
n a n a h t t h g u o h t e r o m o
n archduches s(1993:269.) Shedoe sno treally care even
s a h e h s h g u o h
t lot so fdebt sbecauseo fhe rriresponsibleacitons .
s e lr a h
C ’ career i son the edge since he accidentally falie d to surgery hi s
. e t y l o p p i H , t n e it a
p A sChalres’ w fie, Emmadoe sno tsuppo tro rconsolehimShe
l e e
f s humiilated ,and she think stha tCha lre si sno teven wo trhy to receive he r
. e v o
l Shethinkstha tChalresi san i ncompeten tand unwo trhy man .Shedoe snot
s g n il e e f s i h t u o b a e r a
c andr eputaiton,s heonlycare sabou thers:
tt i s , a m m
E ing oppostie ,wa swatching him .She wa sno tparitcipaitng in hi s e h t : tr o s t n e r e f fi d a f o n o it a il i m u h a g n i c n e ir e p x e s a w e h S . n o it a il i m u h
g n i h t e m o s h tr o w e b t h g i m n a m a h c u s t a h t d e n i g a m i g n i v a h f o n o it a il i m u
h –
a h y d a e rl a s e m it y t n e w t t ’ n d a h e h s h g u o h t s
a d ful lproo fo fhi smediocrtiy .
) 4 7 1 : 3 9 9 1 (
I ti salso shown tha tshe doe snot pay much atteniton to he r ilt lte daughter ,
e t h g u a d r e h f o e r a c d o o g a e k a t o t y t u d s ’ a m m E s i ti , r e h t o m a s A . e h tr e
B rwhoi s
n w o r e h t u o b a s k n i h t y l n o a m m E . r e l d d o t a l li t
s affilciton sand unfuliflleddesrie s
.
4 Deceiftul
t c a a m m E s e m it e m o S . n o s r e p l u ft i e c e d a s i a m m
E s o rbehave sin some
. r e h e v e il e b e l p o e p s e k a m h c i h w y a
w He rhusband ,Chalre salway s rtustsher .He
r e v e
n discovers he rmischie funit lshe dies .He thinks tha thi swfie is pure ,
e h s g n i h t y r e v e n i s e v e il e b e H . t c e f r e p d n a t n e c o n n
i sh a said and gives he r
o s l a e h S . s t n a w e h s g n i h t y r e v
e a cts a s fi there i snothing wrong wtih her .She
e s l e e n o y r e v e o t s w o h s e h s t u b , e fi l r e h s e t a h e h s d n a s e t s o T n i e v il o t s e t a
h tha t
s l e e f e h
s t he oppostie w :a ” ey S h keep saying tha tthey have to be carefu lsince
, d e t n e t n o c y r e v s a w e h s t a h t d d a o t n o t n e w s y a w l a e h s d n a ; h c ir t ’ n e r e w y e h t
y r e
v happy ,tha tshe ilkes Toste svery much ;and she made othe rsurp irsing
r e h p u t u h s t a h t s t n e m e t a t
s mother- ni - wl ” a (1993:61 .)
When shecommti sadutlerywtih Rodolpheand Leon ,she ifnd saway so her
r e h t o m d n a d n a b s u
h - ni -law will no t discove rhe rmischief .She goes to see
d n a b s u h r e h n e h w e h p l o d o
R si tn o around :“She had dared and won ;and from
, n o n e h
t each itmet ha tChalre swen tou tealryshequicklydressedandstoledown
s ri a t s r e v ir e h
t ” (1993:154 .) Emma also thinks o fanothe rway which i ssafer .
n e v e a m m
E thinkso fb irbing hermaid wtihpresent ,bu t tii stoo irsky .Thesafe r
r e h t o n a d n if o t s i y a
w placei nYonvillewherenobodycan es e he rwtihRodolphe
.) 8 5 1 : 3 9 9 1 (
e r o m a s e k a m n e v e e h
S convincing ile when she want sto see Leon .She
e h s t a h t d n a b s u h r e h s w o h
s i svery talented ,bu tshe cannot develop he rpiano
a t s e n o y r e v E . ll i k
s tr toptiyhe rbecauseshehassuchwondefrult alent .Theyt hink
t n e l a t r e h t a h
s t s e g g u s a m m
E takingapianol essoni nPa ir swhichactuallyi sa ile .“Thati show
e h
s obtains he rhusband' spermission to go to the ctiy once a week to mee the r
.r e v o
l Emma use sher t alen tto play piano a san excuse .By the end of t hefris t
s d n if e n o y r e v e h t n o
m tha the rplaying has improved considerably” (1993:247 .)
s e o g e h
S tos eeherl ove ronceinaweeki nt hehote landshealsotakest hel onges t
e e s y d o b o n o s y a
w s :rh e
e h S . y a w t s e tr o h s e h t e k a t t ’ n d i d y ll a u s u e h s , n e e s g n i e b f o r a e f e h t r o F
d n a t o h , e g r e m e d n a , s y e ll a k r a d f o e z a m a o t n i e g n u l p d l u o
w perspiirng,
) 9 4 2 : 3 9 9 1 ( e l a n o it a N e u R e h t f o d n e r e w o l e h t t a n i a t n u o f e h t o t e s o l
c .
tr a t s d n a b s u h r e h n e h w y a d e n
O s to discove rhe r ile ,sheuse sanothe r iletocove r
.
ti S heplies ileupon ile ,usingt hema svelist oconcea lherl ove( 1993:256) .
.
5 Reilgious
a m m
E i salso a reilgiou sperson .I ti sstated since the beginning o fthe
n e h W :r e t p a h
c Emmawast hitreen ,hisf athert ookhert ot hectiyt oente rhe ra sa
. ) 3 3 : 3 9 9 1 ( s n u n e h t f o y n a p m o c e h t d e y o j n e e h s ; t n e v n o c e h t n i r e d r a o
b tIi sclea r
s i e h s t a h
t raised in an envrionmen twhich ha ssrtong reilgion in lfuence even
s w o r g e h s h g u o h
t resitveundert hediscipilne ,which i sanitpatheitc t o t he nature
. ) 7 3 : 3 9 9 1 (
. ) 1 0 1 : 3 9 9 1 ( y lr a l u g e r h c r u h c e h t o t s e o g o s l a e h s d n a d o G n i s e v e il e b a m m E
h g i m n o i g il e r o t n o it o v e d r e
H tbe he rrunaway o funfuliflled desries and he r
f o n o it c a f s it a s s i
U . s e ir r o w d n a n i a p r e h y a w a e s a e d n a r e h r a e
h nfo trunately, t hep ires tdoe sno t
e v a e l d n a r e h t u o b a e r a c y ll a e
r befores hecant el lhers to ires( 1993:106-107 .)
Shereile sonar eilgion r tiualt ohea lhe rsickness .“Oneday att heheigh to f
n o i n u m m o c r o f d e k s a d a h e h s , g n i y d s a w e h s t h g u o h t e h s n e h w , s s e n k c i s r e
h ”
) 0 0 2 : 3 9 9 1
( .She beileve stha ta communion can ease away he rwor ire sand he r
. s s e n k c i
s Thi sshow she rbeile fto he rreilgion and she also think stha tthe
. e h p l o d o R o t e v o l g n i y d n u r e h f o d ir t e g o t r e h s p l e h n o i n u m m o
c ”I tseemedt ohe r
i h t n i n o it a li h i n n a d n if o t t u o b a s a w , d o G o t g n i d n e c s a , ti ri p s r e h t a h
t s l ove , ilke
i n r u
b ngi ncensedissolvingi ns moke”( 1993:201) .
Emma si sure tha tthe communion can ifnally hea lhe robsession to the
y r u b r e h s e k a m t I . y r e tl u d
a the image o fRodolphe in he runconsciou smind .
s a h e h s n e h
W an appointmen twtih Leon i n theCathedral ,she force shersel fto
n a c e h s o s l li w f o h t g n e rt s e h t r e h d n e s l li w n e v a e h t a h t s e v e il e b e h S . d o G o t y a r p
: g n i h t y r e v e h g u o r h t t e g
n e v a e h t a h t e p o h e h t n i , y a r p o t fl e s r e h g n i c r o f r e h t a r r o , g n i y a r p s a w a m m E
h t g n e rt s r e h d n e s y l s u o l u c a ri m t h g i
m o fwill ;andt odrawdowndivineaidshe e c n a r g a r f e h t d e h t a e r b e h s , e l c a n r e b a t e h t f o s r o d n e l p s e h t h ti w s e y e r e h d e ll if
y lt n e t n i d e n e t s il e h s d n a , s e s a v l l a t ri e h t n i h s u l d n a e ti h w , s t e k c o r t e e w s e h t f o
d e s a e r c n i y l n o h c i h w , h c r u h c e h t f o e c n e li s e h t o
t et h tumul to fhe rhear t
.
B The W ay Emma’ s Characterisitc sLead sHer to Adutlery in The
e e r h T n a i d u e r F f o e v it c e p s r e
P -Par tMode lo fPersonaltiy
n o it c e s s i h
T si divided into three patr swhich consis to fthe explanaiton o f
m m
E a’ sId ,Ego and Superego and ti srelait on to Emma’ scharacteirsitc sas
t s il a e r n
u ic ,demanding,s elifsh ,deceiftulandr eilgiou swoman .
.
1 TheI nterrela itonBetweenEmma’ sCharactersiitcandHerAdutlery
sA themainprotagonist fo MadameBovary, EmmaBovaryi sacharacte r t s o m e k il n U . r e t c a r a h c d n u o r d n a c it s il a e r a s a d e r e d i s n o c s i h c i h w
s t s i n o g a t o r
p in mid 19t hltierature, Emma ha slot so fcorrupted rtatis .She i s
.l u ft i e c e d o s l a d n a h s if l e s , g n i d n a m e d , c it s il a e r n
u However ,Emma i salso a
g il e
r iou swoman who beileve sin God and regulalry goe sto church .Thi s
n o it c e
s explains theinterrelaitonbetweenEmma’ scharacteirsitca sunreailsitc ,
r e h o t n o it a l e r s ti d n a n a m o w s u o i g il e r d n a l u ft i e c e d , h s if l e s , g n i d n a m e d
n i d e t c e lf e r s a y r e tl u d
a MadameBovary .
Emma’ scharacteirsitc sa sunreailsitc ,demanding ,deceiftul and selifsh
h c i h w g n i h t e m o s s t n a w s y a w l a a m m E . y r e tl u d a r e h n i e l o r g i b a y a l p n a m o w
. s m a e r d r e h s t n e s e r p e
r Shedreamso fhaving awonderfu lmariragebutt hing s
c e p x e e h s s a n r u t t o n o
d ts .Beforehe rmarirageshehad t houghtt ha tshehad
t c e p x e d a h e h s h c i h w s s e n i p p a h e h t e c n i s t u b ; p s a r g r e h n i h ti w e v o
l ed thi s
t o n d a h r e h g n ir b o t e v o
l come ,shesupposed she mus thave been mistaken .
2 3 : 3 9 9 1
A san unreailsitc woman ,Emma i salso very demanding. She ha san
.r e v o l l a e d i r e h f o d n a m e d c it s il a e r n
u Shedemandst ha tamanshould beable
w o n k o
t everything , talented and iniitates he r to intensiite s and passion
s d n if e h s , n e h T . ) 9 3 : 3 9 9 1
( ou ttha the rhusband ,Cha lre sdoe snotfulifll he r
t u o b a s k n i h t y l n o a m m E . t n e m t n i o p p a s i d o t r e h s d a e l t i d n a s t n e m e ri u q e r
) 9 6 2 : 3 9 9 1 ( e fi l r e h f o n r e c n o c e l o s e h t s a n o i s s a p r e h d n a f l e s r e
h .When she
H . e v o l r e h s s e r p e r o t s e ir t e h s , n o e L s t e e
m e rawarenes soft hemora lvaluei n
b r e h s d l o h y t e i c o s r e
h ack agains the rdesries .He rdesrie sturn ou tto be
, n e h T . d e s s e r p e
r she conitnues he rlfie a sa good wfie and she also goe sto
. ) 1 0 1 : 3 9 9 1 ( y lr a l u g e r h c r u h c
Unfo trunately ,Rodolpheweakenshe rdefense.Rodolphei saman who
; s d n a m e d r e h l l a s ll if l u
f hei shandsome , irch and also asmooth t alker .He i s
a m m E . n o i s s a p d n a s e ri s e d r e h n e k a w a o t e l b
a ’ sunreailsitcnaturethinkstha t
e h s i e h p l o d o
R r rtue love and the love she has wtih Rodolphe i ssomething
w l a e h s t a h
t ay sdreams of .She canno tsee tha tRodolphe only use she rto
h S . t s u l s i h y f s it a
s ethinkstha tRodolphe rtulyl ove she ra smucha sshel ove s
. m i h
Emma’ s demanding nature also b irng she rinto disappointmen twhen
r e e r a c s ’ d n a b s u h r e
h i son the edge .Chalre sseem sto he rso repulsive ,so
k c i h
t - ifngered ,so heavy-witted ,so common (1993:176) .When she reailzes
s a t o n s i d n a b s u h r e h t a h
t good as she expected, she run sto Rodolphe and
s k n i h
t ofr unningaway wtih him .A saplayboy ,Rodolphepreferst oend t hei r
e
Emma become s more reilgiou s du irng he r depression . She tak se
e h s h c i h w s n o i n u m m o
c thinkscaneaseawayherf eeilngsf o rRodolphe .When
e h
s thinks tha tshe sh a arleady recovered ,Leon comesback t o her l fie .Leon
d n a e v i s s e r g g a e r o m s e m o c e
b planst or evea lhislovet oEmma .Atf ris tEmma
s
i defensive and reject shim ,bu tshe i sno table to repres she rlove to him
. e r o m y n
a S hethinkso fLeona samanshe sh a alway sdreamedof . She iles to
e
h rhusband and makes excuse sso she can seehim oncea week i n t hectiy .
r e h o t f e i h c s i m r e h e d i h o t r e h s p l e h n a m o w l u ft i e c e d a s a c it s ir e t c a r a h c r e H
. w a l n i r e h t o m d n a d n a b s u
h Shegive she rallt oLeon andalso becomes om re
t o n s e o d e h S . m i h o t g n i d n a m e
d mind to pay large amoun to fmoney to
s r e v o c s i d o h w x u e r u e h
L he rin ifdeltiy .She doe sno tcare even though he r
s n u r y li m a
f ou to fmoney .Later ,shefeelst ha tLeon ha sfalied t o fuflli lhe r
n I .s n o it a t c e p x
e theendoft hes toryEmmakillshersel fbyd irnkingarsenic .
mE ma’ sunreailsitc nature turns he rinto a woman who alway swant s
i h t e m o
s ng which i simpossible to reach .She ignore severything and doe s
o t g n i h t y n
a fuflli lhe rdesries .She si alway sso demanding and she wli ldo
e s r e h t u o b a y l n o s k n i h t e h S . s d n a m e d r e h l li fl u f o t g n i h t y r e v
e fl .Shedoe snot
s e v o l y l u rt e h h g u o h t n e v e d n a b s u h r e h d n a y li m a f n w o r e h t u o b a e r a c y ll a e r
r e t c a r a h c e s o h T . r e h t u o b a s e r a c d n
a isitcs l ead hert o adutlery. She can hide
l n o e h T . e r u t a n l u ft i e c e d r e h h g u o r h t g n i h t y r e v
e y t hing which hold she rback
s n i a g
a the rdesries t o commti adutlery i sher i nternailzed norm sand reilgion
. r e v o
l Unfo trunately ,Emma chooses t o fuflli lhe rdesries t han followi ng he r
. m r o n d e z il a n r e t n i
e h T .
2 Rela iton between Emma’ sCharacterisitcand HerAdutlery i n
y ti l a n o s r e P f o l e d o M t r a P e e r h T n a i d u e r F f o e v it c e p s r e P e h t
n o it c e s s i h
T explains more abou t the relaiton between Emma’ s
f o l e d o M t r a P e e r h T n a i d u e r F f o e v it c e p s r e p e h t n i y r e tl u d a r e h d n a c it s ir e t c a r a h c
n o it a l e r e h t t u o b a d e n i a l p x e y d a e rl a s a h n o it c e s s u o i v e r p e h T . y ti l a n o s r e P
t n o d e s a B . y r e tl u d a r e h d n a c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ a m m E n e e w t e
b hepreviou sanalysis ,
s u o i g il e r d n a l u ft i e c e d , h s if l e s , g n i d n a m e d , c it s il a e r n u s a y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ a m m
E are
. y r e tl u d a r e h o t d e t a l e
r In t hi sseciton ,Freudianpsychoanalyitct heory i sused t o
. y ti l a n o s r e p f o l e d o M t r a P e e r h T s ’ a m m E o t s ti a rt e s o h t e t a l e
r T hetheoryhelpst o
e h c y s p r e h h g u o r h t a m m E e z y l a n
a and revea lhe rpsychologica lconfilc tin the
l e v o
n .He rcharacteirsitcs a sunreailsitc ,demanding ,deceiftul and sel ifsh are
o g e r e p u s e h t d e t n e s e r p e r n a m o w s u o i g il e r s a c it s ir e t c a r a h c r e h , d I e h t d e t n e s e r p e r
. o g e r e h s t n e s e r p e r n a m o w l u ft i e c e d s a c it s ir e t c a r a h c r e h d n a
A. Emma’ sThreePar tMode lo fPersonaltiy
.
1 Emma’ sI d
d I s ’ a m m
E si srtongly related to he r characteirsitc s a s unreailsitc ,
g n i d n a m e
d ,deceiftul and sel ifsh woman .She l oves t o read romanitcnovel sand
o t n e t s
il roman itcsongs .Thosecharacteirsitc splay abigrolei n he radutleryand
a e m o c e
b m ainfacto ro fhe radutlery. Accordingt oPettjiohn,t heI dcontainst wo
r o j a
