• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pacific saury fishing forecasting by using random

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "Pacific saury fishing forecasting by using random "

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272437053

Pacific saury fishing forecasting by using

random forest

Article

in

NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI · February 2015

DOI: 10.2331/suisan.81.2

CITATIONS

0

READS

46

2 authors

, including:

Takashi Matsuishi

Hokkaido University, Hakodate

82PUBLICATIONS

580CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by

Takashi Matsuishi

on 31 August 2015.

(2)

Tel81138405505.Emailca1201@ˆsh.hokudai.ac.jp

ン ム

を用い サンマ来遊量 予測

馬 場 真 哉,

1

松 石

2

点2014年2月21日受付,2014年8月5日受理為

1北海道大学大学院水産科学院,2北海道大学大学院水産科学研究院

Paciˆc saury ˆshing forecasting by using random forest

SHINYABABA1 AND TAKASHIMATSUISHI2

1Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Hokkaido 0418611,2Faculty of

Fish-eries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Hokkaido 0418611, Japan

(3)

3 hro.or.jpもexpもcentralもkanriもSigenHyokaもindex.asp, 北海道立総合研究機構水産研究本部,2012年7月7日

kentropy arg max

k

tion Centerhttp:ももwww.cpc.ncep.noaa.govも,NOAA,

2012年7月12日 公開さ い ,広域 海洋,

木法(Classiˆcation and Regression Trees: CART法

を基礎 持 ンサン 学習器 一種 あ 。 ンサ

ン 学習器 ,多く 基本学習器 結果を統合し 予

測を出力す 。本論文 CART法を概説し うえ

(4)

Table 1 List of data sets used for the random forest

No. Name Period n Note

1 PDO: Paciˆc Decadal Oscillation点annual

av-erage為 Previous year 1

2 SOI: Southern Oscillation Index点monthly

av-erage為 Previous year and until June in this year 18

3 Sea temperature of subtropical mode water in

the north Paciˆc点annual average為 Previous year 1

4 Cross-sectional area of tropical water in the

north Paciˆc点seasonal average為 Summer and Winter in previous year and Win-ter in this year 3 5 NPI: North Paciˆc Index点annual average為 Previous year 1 6 SST in the north Paciˆc点monthly average為 Previous year and until June in this year 18 7 SST in the Kushiro area点seasonal average為 Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn in

previ-ous year and Winter and Spring in this year 6 8 SST in the Sanriku area点seasonal average為 Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn in

previ-ous year and Winter and Spring in this year 6 9 SST in the eastern Kanto area点seasonal

aver-age為 Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn in previ-ous year and Winter and Spring in this year 6 10 SST in the southern Kanto area点seasonal

av-erage為 Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn in previ-ous year and Winter and Spring in this year 6

11 Kuroshio path点monthly average為 Previous year and until June in this year 18 interpolated 12 Flow of Kuroshio点seasonal average為 Summer and Winter in previous year and

Win-ter in this year 3 13 Area of Oyashio点annual average為 Previous year 1

14 Southern limit of Oyashio点annual average為 Previous year 1 interpolated点data in 1971 was used for interpolation為

15 TNH: Tropical North Hemisphere 点monthly

average為 January, February and December in previousyear and January and February in this year 5 16 AO: Arctic Oscillation点monthly average為 Previous year and until June in this year 18 17 PNA: Paciˆc-North American pattern点

month-ly average為 Previous year and until June in this year 18 18 WP: West Paciˆc点monthly average為 Previous year and until June in this year 18 19 EP-NP: East Paciˆc-North Paciˆc 点monthly

average為 Previous year and until June in this year点without December為 17

20 PT: Paciˆc Transition点monthly average為 Previous year点only August and September為 2 21 PE: PolarもEurasia点monthly average為 Previous year and until June in this year 18

Note: The data from lines 1 to 14 were from the Japan Meteorological Agency点http:ももwww.jma.go.jpもjmaも, 10 July 2012為. The data from lines 15 to 21

were from the Climate Prediction Centre点http:ももwww.cpc.ncep.noaa.govも, 26 July 2012為.nis the number of kinds of each data.

(5)

5

Fig. 1 Result of interpolation. The broken line is

(6)

Table 2 Separated ˆsh abundance index Year Abundance Year Abundance 1972 Medium 1992 Medium 1973 Large 1993 Large 1974 Medium 1994 Large 1975 Large 1995 Medium 1976 Small 1996 No data 1977 Medium 1997 Large 1978 Large 1998 Small 1979 Small 1999 Small 1980 Small 2000 Small 1981 Small 2001 Medium 1982 Small 2002 Small 1983 Small 2003 Medium 1984 Small 2004 Medium 1985 Small 2005 Large 1986 Medium 2006 Medium 1987 Small 2007 Large 1988 Large 2008 Large 1989 Small 2009 Medium 1990 Small 2010 Large 1991 Medium 2011 Large

Table 3 Result of variable selection

Variable name Importance index PNA.Nov 34.5 Kuroshio.path.Nov 30.3 North.Paciˆc.Sep 21.6 SOI.Jan 14.9

Note: Importance index was calculated by random forest.PNA.Nov means PNA index in November of the previous year. Kuroshio.path. Nov means interpolated Kuroshio path in November of the previous year. North.Paciˆc.Sep means SST in the north Paciˆc in Septem-ber of the previous year. SOI.Jan means SOI in January of the previ-ous year. The deˆnition of each index follows those of the Japan

Meteorological Agency点http:ももwww.jma.go.jpもjmaも, 10 July 2012為

and Climate Prediction Centre点http:ももwww.cpc.ncep.noaa.govも, 26

July 2012為. Development Core Team, Wien, Austria を使用し 。

ン ム モ 作成 , ッ ー

(7)

7

Fig. 2 Partial dependency plot. Partial dependency was calculated by Eq.点9為, and expresses the relative frequency of each ˆsh

abundance level. PNA. Nov means PNA index in November of the previous year. Kuroshio. path. Nov means interpolated Kuroshio path in November of the previous year. North. Paciˆc. Sep means SST in the north Paciˆc in September of the previ-ous year. SOI. Jan means SOI in January of the previprevi-ous year. The deˆnition of each index follows those of the Japan Meteoro-logical Agency点http:ももwww.jma.go.jpもjmaも, 10 July 2012為and Climate Prediction Centre点http:ももwww.cpc.ncep.noaa.govも, 26 July 2012為.

Table 4 Result of forecast evaluation by Monte Carlo

resampling

Actual ˆshing level

Sum Large Medium Small

Forecast

Large 436 98 143 677 Medium 55 251 115 421 Small 138 212 552 902 Sum 629 561 810 2000

(8)
(9)

9

2為 Watanabe K, Tanaka E, Yamada S, Kitakado T. Spatial and temporal migration modeling for stock of Paciˆc sau-ryCololabis saira点Brevoort為, incorporating eŠect of sea surface temperature.Fish. Sci. 2006;72: 11531165. 3為 Rupp DE, Wainwright TC, Lawson PW, Peterson WT.

Marine environment-based forecasting of coho salmon

点Oncorhynchus kisutch為adult recruitment.Fish. Oceanogr. 2012;21: 119.

11為 Dáƒaz-Uriarte R, De Andres SA. Gene selection and

clas-siˆcation of microarray data using random forest. BMC

Bioinformatics2006;7: 3.

12為 第60, 61回サンマ等 型浮魚資源研究会議報告.東北区

水産研究所資源海洋部.2012, 2013.

13為 Baba S, Matsuishi T. Evaluation of the predictability of ˆshing forecasts using information theory.Fish. Sci. 2014;

80: 427434.

14為 Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication.

Bell. Syst. Tech. J. 1984;27: 379423, 623656.

17為 Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classiˆ-cation and regression trees. Wadsworth & Brooks, Mon-terey. 1984.

18為 Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach. learn. 1996; 24: 123140.

19為 Lee YW, Megrey BA, Macklin SA. Evaluating the perfor-mance of Gulf of Alaska walleye pollock点Theragra chal-cogramma為recruitment forecasting models using a Monte Carlo resampling strategy.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009;

66: 367381.

20為 Diaz-Uriarte R. GeneSrF and varSelRF: a web-based tool and R package for gene selection and classiˆcation using random forest.BMC Bioinformatics2007;8: 328. 21為 Hanawa K, Watanabe T, Iwasaka N, Suga T, Toba Y.

Gambar

Table 1List of data sets used for the random forest
Fig. 1Result of interpolation. The broken line is interpo-lated data. The deˆnition of each index followed thatof the Japan Meteorological Agency 点http:ももwww.jma.go.jpもjmaも, 10 July 2012為.
Table 3Result of variable selection
Fig. 2Partial dependency plot. Partial dependency was calculated by Eq. 点9為, and expresses the relative frequency of each ˆshabundance level

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Pada hari ini Jumat tanggal Dua bulan September Tahun Dua Ribu Enam Belas, kami yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini Pokja Pokja Dinas Dinas Kelautan, Perikanan dan Peternakan

[r]

 Diskusi dan informasi untuk: merumuskan masalah dari temuan gejala alam biotik di lingkungan sekitar sebagai isyu yang perlu dibahas selanjutnya; melengkapi informasi,

Quantum Learning. Berdasarkan hasil refleksi siklus I agar semua anggota kelompok aktif dan tidak ada anggota yang mendominasi kelompok maka pada siklus

besar pada penderita sirosis hati. Dengan demikian, AIAG Score merupakan metode non-invasive yang. mudah dan murah untuk menetapkan ukuran besar varises esofagus

Penggunaan jangka bisa di setel atau di atur apabila akan membuat gambar suatu bentuk lingkaran dengan jari-jari besar, dan apabila kaki jangka tersebut kurang panjang, maka salah

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan tingkat akurasi, sensitivitas serta spesifisitas antara Siriraj stroke score, Allen stroke score, Besson stroke score serta

Secara umum data yang telah diperoleh dari penelitian dapat digunakan untuk memahami, memecahkan dan mengantisipasi masalah. Memahami berarti memperjelas suatu